
Navigator
ai.mentuPublished by mentu.aiv1.0.2Updated Oct 24, 2026
Read-only repo navigation and progressive disclosure; BM25 locator with registered evidence.
Overview
Read-only repository navigator that returns ranked file-and-line ranges, with reasons, so an assistant can find the document answering a question without ingurg
- What you can do
- Locate and read documentation: BM25-ranked file/line ranges with retriever attribution and reasons, then heading-bounded slices with frontmatter kept separate, plus demotion files that lower but never remove a document's rank. Map a repository: files, languages, contracts, manifests, typed docs and Git state. Query and route: an exact-search pipeline and frontmatter handles that point to documents and typed relationships, flagged as requiring hydration. Inspect code structure: symbol context (definitions, references, tests, docs, config) and change impact (Git range, tickets, contracts, tests, risk signals).
- When to use it
- Useful for documentation-heavy repositories where an assistant must find the runbook, ADR or specification that answers a question without loading the whole corpus into context, and for people reviewing what the agent read. The README says the ranking was measured on markdown documentation, not source code, and recommends native or code-aware search for finding code from an issue description.
- Requirements
- Local process; Node.js 20 or newer. Installed globally from the npm package mentu-navigator, or run through npx with the -p flag because the package and command names differ. The MCP server binary is mentu-navigator-mcp. No authentication, environment variables or headers are declared.
Installation
In SourceWeft
- Open Navigator in the dashboard and add it to a workspace.
- Enable the server for the chats that should use its tools.
Desktop only via STDIO. STDIO servers start a local process, so they need the SourceWeft desktop host.
Other MCP clients
Follow the launch instructions in the repository.
README
mentu-navigator
Read-only, provenance-first repository navigation for humans and AI agents.
Point it at a repository and ask a question. It returns ranked file-and-line ranges to read, each carrying the reason it ranked, and it never writes to the repository it reads. It is built for agents that must find the document that answers a question in a documentation-heavy repository, without pulling the whole thing into context, and for the people reviewing what those agents did.
Scope. The ranking default is measured on documentation: markdown corpora,
in pre-registered studies (see Evidence). It has not been measured on source
code, where published comparisons favour other locators (see Scope of the
evidence). The code-structure commands (map, symbol, impact) work on any
repository; their usefulness has not been measured.
mentu-navigator is the product name. mentu-nav is its short CLI.
Install
Requires Node.js 20 or newer.
To run it without installing:
The package name and the command name differ, so npx mentu-navigator on its
own cannot resolve a binary. Pass -p as above.
License: Apache-2.0. Telemetry is local-only JSONL under ~/.mentu/pd1/
(spec: docs/TELEMETRY-SPEC.md); disable with
MENTU_NAV_TELEMETRY=off. Nothing ever leaves the machine.
Where it sits in Mentu
mentu-navigator is the retrieval surface.
mentu-pdv validates the frontmatter
schema this tool consumes and emits the demotion sets locate applies. The two
are designed as a pair, and the schema is published as a spec
(SPEC-frontmatter.md).
Why it exists
Search tools find matching text. A repository navigator also preserves the question's intent and returns the nearby contracts, tests, docs, Git lineage, and risk surfaces needed to act safely.
The first release is intentionally deterministic:
- no embeddings;
- no background index;
- no writes to target repositories;
- on-demand, bounded frontmatter handles that route to documents but never replace reading them;
- bounded snippets with file-and-line provenance;
- known secret-bearing paths excluded before content reads.
One-command start
Interactive terminals receive a concise human view. Pipes receive compact JSON;
--json requests the full envelope.
Agents should use --agent for a compact, token-efficient JSON contract:
The front door auto-routes to map, query, handles, symbol, or impact. Their
explicit commands remain available for scripts and advanced use.
For a docs-as-code network:
This returns metadata pointers, typed relationships, and diagnostics. Every
pointer carries requiresHydration: true. query keeps these pointers separate
from source-body evidence so a summary cannot silently become an answer.
Capabilities
Progressive disclosure: locate and read-range
locate is the agent surface. Its default arm is ranked lexical retrieval
(BM25). That default was set by a pre-registered study, not by taste (see
Evidence below). Two legs exist:
- a ranked lexical leg: in-memory Okapi BM25 over the same file set the
walker already produces, with vendored Snowball stemmers for Spanish and
English, routed by each document's
langfrontmatter tag (detected as a fallback, and the detection is logged, never written); - an exact leg: the deterministic
querypipeline, unchanged in semantics.
A fused arm (reciprocal rank fusion of the two legs) exists as a measurement arm. It was the original default and was retired from the default path by its own pre-registered ablation rule when the registered bake-off found it trailing plain BM25 by 7.8 points of localization (see Evidence). Every hit says which leg (or both) put it there.
locate returns {path, line, range, snippet, score, retriever, why}. That
is a range to read, not an answer. read-range returns the slice; each --widen
step reaches ±20 lines further and stops at the enclosing heading boundary, and
frontmatter comes back in its own field so metadata cannot be mistaken for body
evidence. Handles remain the pointer layer, unchanged: every pointer still
carries requiresHydration: true.
Pinned parameters
These are design parameters, not implementation details. Each is registered as an ablation and measured there; changing one is a dated decision plus a re-measurement.
The legacy query command keeps its own human-facing default of 40 results;
the pins above govern locate.
Demotions
--demotions <path> reads a pdv demotions JSON file (resolved against the
repository root) and multiplies those documents' scores by 0.5. A demoted
document ranks lower and is never removed. An unavailable document is the
more expensive error. An unreadable or malformed demotion set is reported in the
envelope diagnostics rather than silently ignored.
--retriever is for measurement
--retriever=bm25|exact|fused selects an arm (default bm25). It exists so a
registered bake-off's arms are produced by the shipped code path rather than by
a harness fork. That is exactly how the defaults here were decided. The flag
is not a tuning knob.
Evidence
Every performance-relevant default in this tool traces to a registered, mechanically adjudicated study, and every claim below carries its scope: one 141-document bilingual operational documentation corpus, a fresh 115-question blind set, this tool's k=8 contract. The bake-off (doi:10.5281/zenodo.21969901, companion to doi:10.5281/zenodo.21960138):
- BM25 located the gold document on 93.0% of questions vs hardened exact
search's 71.3% (McNemar p < 1e-5). That is why
bm25is the default. - The fused arm trailed BM25-alone by 7.8 pp (p = 0.0225), failing its frozen "fusion never costs localization" prediction; the pre-registered ablation rule retired it from the default path (docs/build/D3-REVISION-2026-08-16.md).
- An off-the-shelf SQLite FTS5 control (89.6%) was not statistically distinguishable from this implementation. BM25 as such carries the gain.
- Downstream answer accuracy moved +5.2 pp under the better locator, almost entirely through localization.
Nothing here claims generality beyond that corpus class; the study, corpus manifest, question set, and adjudicator are public in the DOIs above for re-running.
Scope of the evidence
Every study behind these defaults used markdown documentation; none used source code, and the difference matters. Finding the file to change from an issue description is a lower-overlap task, and published comparisons rank BM25 below embedding retrieval there. On SWE-bench Lite, BM25 placed a correct file among its top five 61.7% of the time, against 84.7% for a code-embedding retriever (Chen et al., LocAgent, Table 4). So:
- for a question answered by a document (a runbook, an ADR, a specification),
use
locate, then read the range it returns; - to find code from an issue or a behaviour description, prefer your harness's native search, or a code-aware locator, until a study on code exists;
- a pre-registered comparison of this tool inside a live agent, against the harness's native tools, is drafted with a code-localization stratum. It has not been run. When it has, this section will report its result either way.
What is additionally asserted by the test suite on every commit: the index writes
nothing to a target repository and lives in memory for the life of the process;
identical corpus and query produce byte-identical hit lists across runs and
index rebuilds; secret-bearing paths are excluded before tokenization, not
after; and a search pattern beginning with - is passed after a literal --
so it can never be parsed as an engine flag.
MCP
mentu-navigator-mcp exposes:
navigator: preferred compact, auto-routing entrypointlocate: BM25-ranked ranges, withretrieveranddemotionsread_range: the disclosure steplocatehands off tonavigator_mapnavigator_querynavigator_handlesnavigator_symbol_contextnavigator_change_impact
An MCP client configuration:
or launch the installed binary mentu-navigator-mcp directly.
Agent setup
Setup links the bundled skill into Codex and Claude without copying its logic. It refuses to replace an existing path. Repository navigation itself remains read-only.
Adoption
The executable remains centralized. Repositories adopt only a short operating contract; they do not copy the implementation. See docs/adoption.md.
Source: README.md at commit 6638cda
Tools
0Version history
1- v1.0.2LatestSep 16, 2026
Score
50% of the applicable checks met
How complete this listing is, computed from the registry entry, the endpoint and public sources. Not a rating of the server and not a statement that it is safe or working today: reachability is a dated check, and no installs or reviews go into the score.
- Reached in the last 30 days25 pts
Keep the endpoint answering the MCP handshake; SourceWeft probes it every 30 days.
- Auth declared10 pts
Declare the credential headers in the registry entry, or keep the endpoint answering the probe so its auth can be classified.
- Tools listed15 pts
Answer tools/list without a credential, or ship a package that starts in a sandbox without one.
- DescriptionRequired15 pts
- Logo10 pts
- Documentation15 pts
- License10 pts