com.ailawframeworkPublished by ailawframework.comOfficial publisherv1.1.0Updated Oct 27, 2026
Decide whether AI may be used for a legal task, who drafts and who checks. Australian law.
A remote MCP server that walks an assistant through a five-step framework for deciding whether and how AI may be used on an Australian legal task.
Web executable via Streamable HTTP. Remote servers run from the web runtime once configured in a workspace.
Paste this prompt into Claude Code, Codex, Cursor or another agent — or into SourceWeft chat. The agent reads this server's install guide, shows you its publisher, endpoint and sign-in, and adds it to your client once you agree. Keys never go into a command.
Read https://sourceweft.com/mcp/com.ailawframework%2Fai-law-framework/install.md and connect the MCP server it describes to my client. Before changing any config, show me its publisher, endpoint and sign-in method and wait for my OK. Never put an API key in a command or in a file I would commit; ask me where it should come from.Add this to your client's mcpServers config.
{
"mcpServers": {
"ai-law-framework": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://ailawframework.com/mcp"
}
}
}Start a task under the framework
Opens a work record for one legal task and returns the clarifying questions the framework needs answered (step 1, define the task), less any already answered in `answers`. The first two are the country and, in Australia, the state or territory: ask them first. Read the skill ailf://skills/ai-law-framework before the first call.
agentanswersrequestrequiredRecord the user’s answers
Adds the user’s answers to the clarifying questions to the work record. Returns the questions still open, or, once all are answered, the research the task requires.
recordrequiredanswersrequiredRecord research findings
Adds research findings, each with its source, quote and confirmation status, to the work record. Returns the required research still missing, or the scoring anchors and the governance ceiling the evidence sets.
recordrequiredfindingsrequiredAssess and decide
Scores the AI option on adoption, efficiency and governance (step 2), caps governance by the recorded evidence, scores the manual route, and returns the decision, its reasons and the order of preference.
recordrequiredadoptionrequiredconditionsefficiencyrequiredgovernancerequiredoption_namerequiredoutstandingefficiency_confidencePlan the human work
Sets the level of each of the seven stages of the task (step 3) from the recorded answers, research and decision, and returns what the lawyer and the AI may and may not do at each stage.
recordrequiredProduce the work record
Returns the work record as markdown (steps 4 and 5): the task, the evidence, the decision, the plan, what the AI did, and the checks, approval and release left for the lawyer.
notesoutputrequiredrecordrequiredagent_didcheck_pointslawyer_checkpointsSearch the practice library
Searches the framework’s published practice areas, tasks, jurisdiction versions, jurisdictions, firm-wide obligations and software profiles. Returns titles, ids and ailawframework.com links.
kindlimitqueryrequiredGet a task’s guidance
Returns one task from the practice library: how AI may be used, its level, what the lawyer must review, its checkpoints, restrictions and sources, and its jurisdiction versions.
task_idrequiredjurisdictionGet a jurisdiction’s guidance
Returns the framework’s notes for one jurisdiction, and which stored AI instruments apply to a task in a court or tribunal. Name the forum, or court "no" when no court is involved. A gap means no instrument is stored for that forum.
taskcourtforumaudiencejurisdictionrequireddocument_typepersonal_informationGet a software profile
Returns the framework’s research on one AI product and plan: its facts, the governance considerations found, and the cited sources with their review dates. Accepts a profile id or a product name.
productrequiredcontrolsSearch the precedent library
Searches the published precedent library (letters, agreements, clauses, checklists, forms, policies and more for every practice area) by title, summary and when to use it. Returns ids, titles, kinds, practice area ids, jurisdictions and the date each states the law as at. The full text is available through the signed-in firm connector.
arealimitqueryrequiredGet a precedent’s details
Returns one published precedent’s details: summary, when to use it, authorities, the AI-use guidance (level, what AI may and must not do, what the lawyer checks), licence, the date it states the law as at and how the library maintains it. The text itself is available through the signed-in firm connector.
precedent_idrequiredGet started with the framework
For a new user, or when asked what this is: what the AI Law Framework decides, the first questions it asks (country, then state or territory), the five steps, the skills and starting prompts, and a fictional sample matter the user can run to see a finished work record.
Takes no parameters.
Read the framework
Returns the AI Law Framework’s rules: the five steps, the three pillars and their anchors, the decision rule, the four levels, the seven stages and their matrix, and the rules that admit no exception.
part72% of the applicable checks met
How complete this listing is, computed from the registry entry, the endpoint and public sources. Not a rating of the server and not a statement that it is safe or working today: reachability is a dated check, and no installs or reviews go into the score.
Publish an icon in the registry entry.
Declare a GitHub repository with a README, or serve resource_documentation in the OAuth protected-resource metadata.
A hosted service is used under its provider's terms, so no license is expected here. This check is left out of the percentage.