
Vantage
dev.vantagemcpPublished by vantagemcp.devOfficial publisherv1.11.1Updated Nov 3, 2026
Checks whether ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity cite your site, and who they cite instead.
Overview
Vantage checks whether ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity cite a domain for given questions, shows who is cited instead, and returns a fix brief for the page.
- What you can do
- Check citation coverage for up to 10 keywords across ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity, with optional samples and brand matching
- Find questions that already cite a domain, and see which domains lead citations for a topic
- Review past coverage results for a domain and month-by-month citation trends
- Inspect how the winning answer for a topic is structured, singly or across a topic cluster
- Diff a page against the cited answer and get an ordered rewrite brief
- Read supported engines, markets and limits, and remaining monthly quota
- When to use it
- Useful when you work on AI search visibility or SEO and want to know, from inside your coding agent, whether AI assistants cite your site, who they cite instead, and what to change on a page. Also handy for tracking whether visibility changes over time.
- Requirements
- Remote MCP endpoint at vantagemcp.dev over streamable HTTP; OAuth sign-in with an email account (free tier) or an API key sent as a Bearer Authorization header. A client that only starts local commands can use the npm package with a VANTAGE_API_KEY environment variable. Calls draw on a monthly unit quota.
Installation
In SourceWeft
- Open Vantage in the dashboard and add it to a workspace.
- Connect the required credentials. They are stored privately and never shown on public pages.
- Enable the server for the chats that should use its tools.
Web executable via Streamable HTTP. Remote servers run from the web runtime once configured in a workspace.
Use with an agent
Paste this prompt into Claude Code, Codex, Cursor or another agent — or into SourceWeft chat. The agent reads this server's install guide, shows you its publisher, endpoint and sign-in, and adds it to your client once you agree. Keys never go into a command.
Read https://sourceweft.com/mcp/dev.vantagemcp%2Fvantage/install.md and connect the MCP server it describes to my client. Before changing any config, show me its publisher, endpoint and sign-in method and wait for my OK. Never put an API key in a command or in a file I would commit; ask me where it should come from.Other MCP clients
Add this to your client's mcpServers config. The client completes OAuth sign-in on first connect.
{
"mcpServers": {
"vantage": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://vantagemcp.dev/mcp"
}
}
}README
Vantage: the AI visibility MCP server
[Official MCP Registry] [npm] [License: MIT] [vantage-mcp MCP server] [MCP status]
Find out whether ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity cite your site, and what to change if they don't.
Vantage is an MCP server. Your coding agent (Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, or any MCP client) asks it which questions already cite your domain, who is cited instead, how the winning answer is built, and how your page differs. No dashboard to read: the answer comes back where you are working.
Add to Cursor · Add to VS Code · Try one check with no account
Claude Code:
Free tier: 30 units a month, no card. Sign in with your email the first time a tool runs.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/38df5876-16ac-403d-b39f-170a2458cfb1
A real check on vantagemcp.dev, 50 seconds, not sped up. Answers vary run to run: this keyword was cited in 0 of 3 answers earlier today (see the output below) and in 1 of 3 here, which is why Vantage reports cited_runs.
What a real check looks like
We ran Vantage on its own domain on 19 October 2026: five questions people ask when they look for a tool like this, three ChatGPT answers per question. Output trimmed to fit; the values are as returned.
Not cited for any of the five, and that is the point of checking. Each result is remembered for 180 days, so
the next run reports change and newly_cited instead of starting from nothing. From there the agent can call
analyze_citation_gap on a page and get an ordered fix brief.
Tools
Ten tools. Units are what a call costs against your monthly quota (Free: 30, Pro: 500, Scale: 1,500).
Install
Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code: use the buttons or the command at the top. All three sign in to Vantage in your browser on first use.
Any client that supports MCP sign-in (OAuth): add https://vantagemcp.dev/mcp with no key and sign in with
an email (a free account) or an existing key.
Any other client: add to its MCP config:
A client that only starts local commands: use the npm package
vantage-ai-visibility-mcp, which connects to the
same hosted server:
Get a free API key at vantagemcp.dev. To try before installing, vantagemcp.dev/check runs a real check with no account, no email and no card: give it a keyword and it returns the measured shape of the answer ChatGPT cites for it.
Published on the Official MCP Registry under the
domain-verified namespace dev.vantagemcp/vantage.
Tools in detail
get_supported_options
Which engines, platforms and markets each tool accepts, and the per-call limits. Costs 0 units; a fixed list.
"Which markets can I check?"
get_usage
How much of this billing period's quota is left, before spending any of it. Costs 0 units: reads Vantage's own record, never calls the paid data provider.
"How many checks do I have left?"
find_cited_questions
Starts from your domain instead of a keyword: the questions where AI answers already cite it, most asked first. 10 units.
"What does ChatGPT already cite us for?"
analyze_citation_coverage
Which of several prompts actually cite a specific domain, and which don't, up to 10 keywords in one call. ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity (engine), 1 unit per keyword per sample. Pass samples=3 to get "cited in 2 of 3 answers" instead of one yes or no. Each result is remembered for 180 days, so the next check reports what changed (previous, change, newly_cited).
Cited and named are reported separately. An answer can name your brand without linking you (mentioned_not_cited: the model already knows you, it just isn't citing you) or link a page it never names. Pass brand (e.g. "Notion") so the name check looks for your real brand instead of a guess from the domain.
"Out of everything we care about, where do we already show up?"
get_check_history
Your earlier analyze_citation_coverage results for a domain, newest first. 0 units.
"Did our changes last week move anything?"
find_citation_leaders
Who dominates AI-answer citations for a topic, and whether a domain is among them.
"Who's winning AI search for this?"
analyze_citation_trend
Month-by-month mention counts for a domain, so you can see whether visibility is growing or fading.
"Is our AI visibility improving?"
analyze_citation_structure
How the winning AI answer for a topic is actually shaped: list-led, sources cited, opening length.
"What does a winning answer look like?"
analyze_citation_structure_batch
Same as analyze_citation_structure, across up to 10 related topics in one call, for content planning across a cluster.
"What do winning answers look like across this whole topic cluster?"
analyze_citation_gap
Diffs your own page's structure against the winning AI-cited answer for the same keyword and returns a fix_brief: ordered rewrite instructions your agent can carry out on the page (opening, sections, the answer's points your page does not cover, table, sources), ending with one step beyond the page: which community sites or other websites the answer relies on. The brief never contains the cited answer's text.
"What should I actually change on this page to get cited?"
Source mix
Every tool that returns cited domains also returns source_mix: how much of them are community sites (Reddit, YouTube, X, Quora and similar) and which. A high share means the topic is won by what people say about a brand elsewhere, not by any one site's pages.
Country and language
Every tool except get_usage takes optional country (e.g. "Italy") and language (e.g. "it"), default United States / en. Tools that read a live ChatGPT answer work in any supported market; find_citation_leaders and analyze_citation_trend only have ChatGPT data for the United States in English, so use platform: "google" for other countries.
What it can and cannot tell you
- Answers change from run to run. One answer is a sample, not a verdict. Use
samples=3before telling anyone they are or are not cited. - Cited is not the same as named. Vantage reports a link to your domain and a mention of your brand separately, and never merges them.
- It reads what a person would see. ChatGPT and Gemini results are the answers a person sees in those apps,
fetched through DataForSEO; Perplexity results come from its search API. It cannot see private conversations,
and a result is the answer at the time of the check (
modelandchecked_atare on every result). - A fix brief is a hypothesis. It shows how your page differs structurally from the answer that is cited. Page shape gets a page into the running; being cited is decided mostly by what other sites say about the brand, which is why every brief ends with an off-site step.
Agent skill
vantage-citation-audit teaches your agent the whole loop:
measure which keywords cite you, diagnose one page, apply the fix brief, re-check. It only describes the workflow;
every check is a Vantage tool call.
Monthly research
Every month Vantage asks ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity the same everyday questions and publishes which sites they cite, by engine and topic, with the raw data: vantagemcp.dev/research. Free to quote.
Running your own instance
This repo is the MCP server itself: API-key auth, usage metering, one tool per read (see Tools above). Billing and account provisioning are a separate internal service, not included here.
Requires a DataForSEO account for the underlying SERP/AI-answer data.
Not to be confused with: vantage.sh, a cloud cost-management company with its own, unrelated MCP server also named Vantage. Different product, same name.
Star it
Useful? A star on GitHub helps others find it. Already starred? Tell us what brought you here: [email protected].
License
MIT
Source: README.md at commit fbf6d49
Tools
0Version history
7- v1.11.1LatestOct 19, 2026
- v1.11.0Oct 16, 2026
- v1.9.1Oct 14, 2026
- v1.9.0Sep 29, 2026
- v1.8.1Sep 23, 2026
- v1.6.0Sep 21, 2026
- v1.5.7Sep 16, 2026
Score
85% of the applicable checks met
How complete this listing is, computed from the registry entry, the endpoint and public sources. Not a rating of the server and not a statement that it is safe or working today: reachability is a dated check, and no installs or reviews go into the score.
- Reached in the last 30 daysRequired25 pts
- Auth declaredRequired10 pts
- Tools listed15 pts
Answer tools/list without a credential, or ship a package that starts in a sandbox without one.
- DescriptionRequired15 pts
- Logo10 pts
- Documentation15 pts
- License10 pts
