
Contribpath
io.github.CloudCorpRecordsPublished by GitHub account CloudCorpRecordsv0.1.0Updated Nov 3, 2026
Check a CONTRIBUTING document against the repo's actual contribution gates; report gaps.
Overview
Contribpath's local MCP server; no sign-in required; STDIO.
No AI overview yet: these facts come from the registry entry and the server itself.
Installation
In SourceWeft
- Open Contribpath in the dashboard and add it to a workspace.
- Enable the server for the chats that should use its tools.
Desktop only via STDIO. STDIO servers start a local process, so they need the SourceWeft desktop host.
Other MCP clients
Follow the launch instructions in the repository.
README
contribpath
A CONTRIBUTING guide can read beautifully and still leave a new contributor stranded, because the document and the repository's real requirements drift apart: the guide never mentions the DCO sign-off the CI enforces, or the changeset the release bot demands. contribpath measures that drift. You supply the document text and the gates the repository actually has — each with an id, the label as it would appear in the document, and any alternative phrases that also count — and it reports which gates are documented, which are missing, how much coverage that adds up to, and a verdict.
Matching is deliberately simple and auditable. Everything is lowercased, and a gate counts as documented when the document contains its label or at least one of its non-empty keywords as a substring. Empty keywords are ignored on purpose: an empty string is a substring of every document, so counting it would mark every gate as covered and hide exactly the gaps this tool exists to find. Either signal is enough on its own — a gate whose label never appears can still be covered by a keyword, and a gate with no keywords at all is covered by its label alone.
Coverage is Math.round(100 * documented / gate_count),
so two of three gates is 67, not 66. A coverage of 100
reads as complete, 60 and up as partial, and anything
below 60 as sparse. The documented and missing lists
carry gate ids in the order the gates were supplied, so
the report lines up with the caller's own gate list.
If the caller also extracted topics from the document,
they can be passed as documented_topics to find the
ones that correspond to no gate at all. A topic matches a
gate when it is exactly that gate's id, or when it equals
the gate's label ignoring case; topics matching nothing
come back verbatim, in input order, as extra_topics.
When no topics are supplied, extra_topics is empty.
Duplicate gate ids are an error naming the id — a gate
set with two entries for the same gate would make the
coverage number meaningless. Malformed input — a missing
or non-string document, a missing or empty gates
array, a gate with a missing, empty, or non-string id
or label, a keywords value that is not an array of
strings, or a documented_topics entry that is not a
non-empty string — is a validation error naming the
offending path, with no partial result. Unknown extra
fields are ignored, including inside gate items. The
computation is pure and local: no network, no
configuration, and no repository is read or touched.
contribpath compares what you give it; extracting the
gates from a repository in the first place is a separate
job.
CLI
args.json contains the full arguments object:
The result is printed as JSON:
An empty document string is valid input: every gate is
missing and the verdict is sparse. Exit codes: 0 on
success, 1 on a runtime error (including an unreadable
or invalid input file, or invalid input), 2 on a usage
error.
MCP server
MCP client config:
Tools
-
check_contributing_coverage— Check a CONTRIBUTING document against the repository's actual contribution gates.document(string, required, may be empty) — the contributing document text to checkgates(array, required, at least 1 item) — the repository's actual contribution gates; each item is an object with:id(string, required, non-empty) — gate identifierlabel(string, required, non-empty) — gate label as it would appear in the documentkeywords(array of strings, optional) — alternative phrases that also count as documenting the gate
documented_topics(array of strings, optional) — topics the caller extracted from the document, checked against the gate set
Returns
{documented, missing, extra_topics, coverage_percent, verdict, gate_count}.
Docker
Development
License
MIT — Copyright (c) 2026 Rene Turcios
Source: README.md at commit f87e206
Tools
0Version history
1- v0.1.0LatestNov 3, 2026
Score
50% of the applicable checks met
How complete this listing is, computed from the registry entry, the endpoint and public sources. Not a rating of the server and not a statement that it is safe or working today: reachability is a dated check, and no installs or reviews go into the score.
- Reached in the last 30 days25 pts
Keep the endpoint answering the MCP handshake; SourceWeft probes it every 30 days.
- Auth declared10 pts
Declare the credential headers in the registry entry, or keep the endpoint answering the probe so its auth can be classified.
- Tools listed15 pts
Answer tools/list without a credential, or ship a package that starts in a sandbox without one.
- DescriptionRequired15 pts
- Logo10 pts
- Documentation15 pts
- License10 pts