Rebaseplan

io.github.CloudCorpRecordsPublished by GitHub account CloudCorpRecordsv0.1.0Updated Nov 3, 2026

Plan a safe rebase: squash history and force-push risk flagged before you start.

VerifiedSTDIODesktop only

Overview

Rebaseplan's local MCP server; no sign-in required; STDIO.

No AI overview yet: these facts come from the registry entry and the server itself.

Installation

In SourceWeft

  1. Open Rebaseplan in the dashboard and add it to a workspace.
  2. Enable the server for the chats that should use its tools.

Desktop only via STDIO. STDIO servers start a local process, so they need the SourceWeft desktop host.

Other MCP clients

Follow the launch instructions in the repository.

README

rebaseplan

Rebasing a branch is easy to start and hard to undo, especially once other people have the old history. The risky parts are rarely visible in the branch name: merge commits that a plain rebase will flatten, squash-merge markers whose original commits may also live upstream, an upstream that has moved far ahead, and a published history that a rewrite will orphan. rebaseplan reads that shape before you start and returns a plan instead of a surprise.

You hand it the branch's own commits, oldest first, each with a hash, a subject, and optionally a flag saying it is a merge commit. You may also hand it the commits upstream has that this branch does not, and say whether the branch has been pushed or shared. Nothing is fetched, rebased, or pushed — the tool only counts and advises.

A commit counts as a squash marker in exactly two ways: its subject starts with Squashed commit, or it ends with a GitHub squash-merge suffix such as (#123) — the pinned test is the regular expression /\(#\d+\)$/. Upstream commits are never counted as markers, however their subjects read.

Force-push risk follows a fixed table. An unpublished branch is low. A published branch with no merge commits and no squash markers is medium. A published branch with either is high.

The recommended strategy is chosen by first match: any merge commits means rebase_with_merge_preservation; otherwise any squash markers means interactive_squash_cleanup; otherwise linear_rebase. Merge history therefore beats squash markers when both are present.

The plan's steps always start with fetching upstream and end with running the test suite on the rebased head and a push instruction: --force-with-lease, never plain --force, for a published branch, with a backup branch created first; or a normal push when the branch was never published. Warnings, in order, flag merge commits, squash markers, an upstream ten or more commits ahead (the warning text is fixed regardless of the exact count), and the published-history rewrite.

Malformed input — a missing, empty, or non-array commits, an entry with a missing, empty, or non-string hash or subject or a non-boolean merge, a badly typed upstream_commits entry, or a non-boolean published — is a validation error naming the offending path, with no partial result. Unknown extra fields are ignored.

CLI

bash
npx @reneturcios/rebaseplan plan --input args.jsonnpx @reneturcios/rebaseplan --version

args.json contains the full arguments object:

json
{  "commits": [    { "hash": "a1b2c3", "subject": "Add login form" },    { "hash": "d4e5f6", "subject": "Merge branch 'main'", "merge": true }  ],  "upstream_commits": [    { "hash": "f7a8b9", "subject": "Bump dependencies" }  ],  "published": true}

upstream_commits defaults to [], published defaults to false, and each commit's merge defaults to false. The result is printed as JSON:

json
{  "commit_count": 2,  "merge_commits": 1,  "squash_markers": 0,  "upstream_new_commits": 1,  "published": true,  "force_push_risk": "high",  "recommended_strategy": "rebase_with_merge_preservation",  "steps": [    "fetch upstream before planning the final rebase",    "create a backup branch pointing at the current head",    "rebase onto upstream preserving merge commits",    "run the test suite on the rebased head",    "push with --force-with-lease, never plain --force"  ],  "warnings": [    "history contains merge commits; a plain rebase will flatten them",    "branch is published; rewriting it rewrites history others may have based work on"  ]}

Exit codes: 0 on success, 1 on a runtime error (including an unreadable or invalid input file, or invalid input), 2 on a usage error.

MCP server

bash
npx -y @reneturcios/rebaseplan mcp

MCP client config:

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "rebaseplan": {      "command": "npx",      "args": ["-y", "@reneturcios/rebaseplan", "mcp"]    }  }}

Tools

  • plan_rebase — Plan a safe rebase before you start.

    • commits (array, required, non-empty) — the branch's own commits, oldest first: {hash, subject, merge}
    • upstream_commits (array, optional, default []) — commits the upstream branch has that this branch does not: {hash, subject}
    • published (boolean, optional, default false) — whether the branch has been pushed or shared

    Returns {commit_count, merge_commits, squash_markers, upstream_new_commits, published, force_push_risk, recommended_strategy, steps, warnings}.

Docker

bash
docker run -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/rebaseplandocker run --rm -v "$PWD:/w" ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/rebaseplan plan --input /w/args.json

Development

bash
npm installnpm run build   # tsc -> dist/npm test        # tsx --test test/*.test.ts (pure local, no network)npm run dev     # run the CLI from source

License

MIT — Copyright (c) 2026 Rene Turcios

Source: README.md at commit d6afa22

Tools

0
SourceWeft has not started this package in its sandbox yet, so its tools are not known.

Version history

1
  1. v0.1.0LatestNov 3, 2026

Score

50% of the applicable checks met

How complete this listing is, computed from the registry entry, the endpoint and public sources. Not a rating of the server and not a statement that it is safe or working today: reachability is a dated check, and no installs or reviews go into the score.

  • Reached in the last 30 days25 pts

    Keep the endpoint answering the MCP handshake; SourceWeft probes it every 30 days.

  • Auth declared10 pts

    Declare the credential headers in the registry entry, or keep the endpoint answering the probe so its auth can be classified.

  • Tools listed15 pts

    Answer tools/list without a credential, or ship a package that starts in a sandbox without one.

  • DescriptionRequired15 pts
  • Logo10 pts
  • Documentation15 pts
  • License10 pts