
Rebaseplan
io.github.CloudCorpRecordsPublished by GitHub account CloudCorpRecordsv0.1.0Updated Nov 3, 2026
Plan a safe rebase: squash history and force-push risk flagged before you start.
Overview
Rebaseplan's local MCP server; no sign-in required; STDIO.
No AI overview yet: these facts come from the registry entry and the server itself.
Installation
In SourceWeft
- Open Rebaseplan in the dashboard and add it to a workspace.
- Enable the server for the chats that should use its tools.
Desktop only via STDIO. STDIO servers start a local process, so they need the SourceWeft desktop host.
Other MCP clients
Follow the launch instructions in the repository.
README
rebaseplan
Rebasing a branch is easy to start and hard to undo, especially once other people have the old history. The risky parts are rarely visible in the branch name: merge commits that a plain rebase will flatten, squash-merge markers whose original commits may also live upstream, an upstream that has moved far ahead, and a published history that a rewrite will orphan. rebaseplan reads that shape before you start and returns a plan instead of a surprise.
You hand it the branch's own commits, oldest first, each with a hash, a subject, and optionally a flag saying it is a merge commit. You may also hand it the commits upstream has that this branch does not, and say whether the branch has been pushed or shared. Nothing is fetched, rebased, or pushed — the tool only counts and advises.
A commit counts as a squash marker in exactly two ways: its
subject starts with Squashed commit, or it ends with a
GitHub squash-merge suffix such as (#123) — the pinned test
is the regular expression /\(#\d+\)$/. Upstream commits are
never counted as markers, however their subjects read.
Force-push risk follows a fixed table. An unpublished branch
is low. A published branch with no merge commits and no
squash markers is medium. A published branch with either is
high.
The recommended strategy is chosen by first match: any merge
commits means rebase_with_merge_preservation; otherwise any
squash markers means interactive_squash_cleanup; otherwise
linear_rebase. Merge history therefore beats squash
markers when both are present.
The plan's steps always start with fetching upstream and end
with running the test suite on the rebased head and a push
instruction: --force-with-lease, never plain --force, for
a published branch, with a backup branch created first; or a
normal push when the branch was never published. Warnings, in
order, flag merge commits, squash markers, an upstream ten or
more commits ahead (the warning text is fixed regardless of
the exact count), and the published-history rewrite.
Malformed input — a missing, empty, or non-array commits,
an entry with a missing, empty, or non-string hash or
subject or a non-boolean merge, a badly typed
upstream_commits entry, or a non-boolean published — is a
validation error naming the offending path, with no partial
result. Unknown extra fields are ignored.
CLI
args.json contains the full arguments object:
upstream_commits defaults to [], published defaults to
false, and each commit's merge defaults to false. The
result is printed as JSON:
Exit codes: 0 on success, 1 on a runtime error (including
an unreadable or invalid input file, or invalid input), 2
on a usage error.
MCP server
MCP client config:
Tools
-
plan_rebase— Plan a safe rebase before you start.commits(array, required, non-empty) — the branch's own commits, oldest first:{hash, subject, merge}upstream_commits(array, optional, default[]) — commits the upstream branch has that this branch does not:{hash, subject}published(boolean, optional, defaultfalse) — whether the branch has been pushed or shared
Returns
{commit_count, merge_commits, squash_markers, upstream_new_commits, published, force_push_risk, recommended_strategy, steps, warnings}.
Docker
Development
License
MIT — Copyright (c) 2026 Rene Turcios
Source: README.md at commit d6afa22
Tools
0Version history
1- v0.1.0LatestNov 3, 2026
Score
50% of the applicable checks met
How complete this listing is, computed from the registry entry, the endpoint and public sources. Not a rating of the server and not a statement that it is safe or working today: reachability is a dated check, and no installs or reviews go into the score.
- Reached in the last 30 days25 pts
Keep the endpoint answering the MCP handshake; SourceWeft probes it every 30 days.
- Auth declared10 pts
Declare the credential headers in the registry entry, or keep the endpoint answering the probe so its auth can be classified.
- Tools listed15 pts
Answer tools/list without a credential, or ship a package that starts in a sandbox without one.
- DescriptionRequired15 pts
- Logo10 pts
- Documentation15 pts
- License10 pts