
Wallcheck
io.github.CloudCorpRecordsPublished by GitHub account CloudCorpRecordsv0.5.0Updated Oct 25, 2026
Probe a URL and name the bot wall: vendor, verdict, and evidence. CLI plus stdio MCP server.
Overview
A local MCP server that probes a URL once and reports which bot wall stopped it, naming the vendor and the evidence.
- What you can do
- Probe a live URL and get a verdict (open, challenged, walled, login-gated, rate-limited, unreachable) with vendor and evidence signals, plus an optional exposure scan of key-like material the page serves, reported as fingerprints only. Classify a response you captured yourself offline, with no network access. Audit a domain you own for agent-access posture: robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap, feed, API and signed-agent readiness, each graded with fixes.
- When to use it
- Useful when an agent's fetch or browser session fails and you need to know whether a bot wall, login gate or rate limit is the cause and whose wall it is. Also for site owners checking how their own domain treats automated agents before filing or fixing anything.
- Requirements
- Runs as a local stdio process. The npm launcher needs Node 20+ and Python 3.11+ on PATH; it can also run from the repo with Python 3.11+ (standard library only) or from the GHCR Docker image. Network access is needed for the live probe, exposure scan and audit tools; the offline classify tool needs none. No accounts, keys or environment variables are declared.
Installation
In SourceWeft
- Open Wallcheck in the dashboard and add it to a workspace.
- Enable the server for the chats that should use its tools.
Desktop only via STDIO. STDIO servers start a local process, so they need the SourceWeft desktop host.
Other MCP clients
Follow the launch instructions in the repository.
README
wallcheck
Point an agent at a URL. Find out what actually stops it: with receipts.
0.5.0: stamped final at the ship-readiness pass (release candidate at Wave 9). Not yet published; the launch hold stands. What is proven, what is not, and what the ship decision still needs: campaign/LAUNCH-READINESS.md.
Agents die silently on bot walls. A fetch returns 403, a browser session
churns through environment after environment, an upload never starts :
and nothing can say what stopped it, whose wall it was, or show the
evidence. wallcheck probes a URL once, honestly, and classifies what an
agent really hits: OPEN, CHALLENGED, WALLED, LOGIN_GATED,
RATE_LIMITED, or UNREACHABLE: naming the vendor (Cloudflare,
PerimeterX, DataDome, Akamai, Imperva, AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure WAF,
Kasada, AWS CloudFront) and the exact signals
that prove it.
No LLM anywhere in the verdict: the classifier is a deterministic pure
function of (status, headers, body). Same response in, same verdict
out: which is what makes the results safe to put in CI, in an incident
report, or in the public Bot Wall Index.
New in v0.2: signed agent identity. wallcheck keygen mints an
RFC 9421 signing key and wallcheck probe <url> --sign key.json
attaches a real HTTP Message Signature (hmac-sha256,
tag="web-bot-auth") to the probe: an agent with a name, not an
anonymous bot. wallcheck verify-server --key key.json runs a tiny
server that honors only correctly signed requests, so site owners can
test their side. The hmac-sha256 variant covers
bilateral agent↔owner setups; Ed25519 (v0.4) covers the public
directory case: see
validation/wave2/SIGNING.md.
New in 0.5.0: the owner-side audit joins the MCP server as
the audit tool (up to 10 honest GETs per call, same bounded-fetch
discipline as probe_url), the docs pass in Wave 9 corrected every
stale count against measured reality, and the suite stood at 120
tests at the Wave 9 stamp. Waves 10-17 took it to 428 tests (the
Wave 17 audit's 423 predates the W17-007 live fix's 5 fixtures :
see validation/wave17/STABILITY-12.md);
Wave 18's battery v10 plus the W18-007 live fix took it to 481.
Wave 19's battery v11 took it to 532; Wave 20's battery v12 took
it to 571; Wave 21's battery v13 took it to 608; Wave 22's
battery v14 took it to 638; Wave 23's battery v15 took it to
674; Wave 24's battery v16 took it to 710; Wave 25's battery
v17 took it to 747; Wave 26's battery v18 took it to 788;
Wave 27's battery v19 took it to 831.
New in v0.5: the classifier learned the territory the Wave 5 expansion measured: Microsoft Azure WAF, Kasada, and AWS CloudFront detection; the Akamai reference-token deny page; a verdict rule for status 444 (a dropped request is a refusal, never an OPEN); and the end of the false-challenge species where a served page merely embeds a reCAPTCHA/hCaptcha loader for its own forms. All five Wave 5 defects are fixed test-first from live captures (PROBLEMS.md). The index now covers 500 sites (Waves 6-7 expansion, Wave 18 row 500), and Wave 5 ran the first signed-vs-unsigned experiment with the shipped signer (SIGNED-EXPERIMENT.md): an unregistered key changed no verdict anywhere: the measured baseline the campaign's identity front has to move. For owners, the Fix Kit turns audit findings into vendor-verified remediation steps.
New in v0.4: Ed25519 signed identity. The signer now implements
Ed25519 per RFC 8032 in pure Python stdlib (verified against the
official RFC 8032 §7.1 test vectors), so wallcheck keygen --alg ed25519 mints a directory-compatible Web Bot Auth key: the public
half publishes in a /.well-known/http-message-signatures-directory
document, and probe --sign auto-detects the key's algorithm.
Wave 4 also took the index's third data point and ran the first
signed-agent-directory census of all 154 index domains
(DIRECTORY.md).
New in v0.3: the owner-side audit. wallcheck audit <domain>
grades a site's agent-access posture across six checks: robots.txt
AI-agent directives, llms.txt sanity (an HTML soft-404 fails),
sitemap, feed discovery, API discovery, and Web Bot Auth
signed-agent readiness: each PASS/WARN/FAIL with evidence and a
concrete fix, rolled into an A-F grade. First live audits
(validation/wave3/AUDITS.md): our own
properties grade D/F: the audit found real work on our own sites
before anyone else's. v0.3 also adds AWS WAF detection to the
classifier and merges the census into the
Bot Wall Index working table (499 sites after the
Waves 6-7 expansion).
Non-goals
wallcheck will never solve CAPTCHAs, spoof fingerprints or user
agents, or bypass/evade a wall, rate limit, or access control. The probe
identifies itself (wallcheck/<version> user agent). The combat is
detection + evidence + standards: a wall an agent can name is a bug
report; signed agent identity (Web Bot Auth, RFC 9421: prototype
shipped in v0.2, see SPEC.md) is how agents stop being
anonymous in the first place.
Usage
CLI
Example output (a real run: see DOGFOOD.md for the full set):
Exit codes: 0 for OPEN, 1 for any other verdict, 2 for usage
errors: CI-ready. --json prints one stable object:
{url, final_url, status, verdict, vendor, evidence[], elapsed_ms, redirect_chain[]}.
Signed probes and owner-side verification:
Owner-side audit of your own site's agent-access posture:
Seven checks (robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap, feed, API, signed-agent
readiness, security contact) → per-check PASS/WARN/FAIL + evidence +
a fix list, and a grade (out of 14 since the security-contact check
was added; earlier grades were out of 12). Exit 0 for grade A/B,
1 otherwise.
Exposure scan of the page a site serves (opt-in, same single fetch):
Classifies the key-like material the page itself hands an anonymous
visitor — CANDIDATE_EXPOSURE (server-secret classes that should
never be public), PUBLIC_BY_DESIGN (frontend keys, app IDs),
VISITOR_TOKEN (short-lived JWTs). Findings are fingerprint-only:
pattern, class, length and a SHA-256 prefix, never the value. The
method and its disclosure rules live in
campaign/EXPOSURE-LAYER.md.
Verdicts
MCP server
From npm (no install, needs Node 20+ and Python 3.11+ on PATH; the package is a thin launcher over the same Python stdlib code):
Or from this repo:
Tools:
probe_url(url, timeout?): live fetch → classification object.classify(status, headers, body): offline classification of a response you captured yourself. No network.scan_exposure(url, timeout?): live fetch → classification object plus an exposure section (key-like material the page serves, classified, fingerprint-only). One honest GET, same discipline asprobe_url; covers the probe's 64 KB body sample.audit(domain, timeout?): owner-side agent-access audit: grade plus per-check PASS/WARN/FAIL. Up to 11 honest GETs to the one domain, same bounded-fetch discipline asprobe_url.
Add to an MCP client config as a stdio server running either command,
or via Docker with the GHCR image
ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/wallcheck:0.5.0 (see Dockerfile).
Tests
Fully offline: recorded fixtures exercise the pure classifier:
Contributing evidence
Captured responses under validation/ are evidence, and evidence
is scrubbed before it is published: run
python3 scripts/scrub_captures.py on any new capture wave first.
Served pages embed other sites' key material; the scrubber's
redaction table is the exposure scanner's own pattern table, so
anything the scanner can find, the scrubber removes. Private
disclosure material (validation/monster-finding/) and unreleased
candidate findings (validation/exposure-wave*/) are never
published — both paths are gitignored on purpose.
Family
By Rene Turcios: sibling of greenlight (know before you claim an issue: GO/NO-GO with evidence) and mcpaudit (audit any MCP server, scored). Same house rules: deterministic core, named issues, evidence over vibes, dogfood on real targets before claiming anything.
Full product spec, roadmap (Web Bot Auth signing shipped as the
v0.2 prototype; the owner-side audit shipped in v0.3), and the Bot
Wall Index plan: SPEC.md. Validation waves live in
validation/: Wave 2 added depth probing of 77 platform paths
(PATHS.md) and the signing prototype
(SIGNING.md); Wave 3 added the
stability re-probe, the 154-site index, and the audit's first live
runs (AUDITS.md). Wave 4 added the
third stability data point (STABILITY-2.md),
the signed-agent directory census
(DIRECTORY.md), and Ed25519. Wave 5
added the territory growth, the signed-vs-unsigned experiment, and
the owner fix kit; Wave 6 hardened the classifier against 25
adversarial shapes; Wave 7 took the index to 499 sites, ran the
second directory census (4 adopters) and an audit sweep; Wave 8
probed paths on 46 more platforms and took the front-doors file to
65 platforms. Wave 9 stamped 0.5.0-rc and added the audit MCP tool;
Waves 10-28 ran nineteen more stability rounds (rounds 6-24)
and adversarial batteries v2-v20, took the suite to 885 tests,
and kept the launch hold.
License
MIT: see LICENSE.
Source: README.md at commit 6fdd06a
Tools
0Version history
1- v0.5.0LatestOct 25, 2026
Score
50% of the applicable checks met
How complete this listing is, computed from the registry entry, the endpoint and public sources. Not a rating of the server and not a statement that it is safe or working today: reachability is a dated check, and no installs or reviews go into the score.
- Reached in the last 30 days25 pts
Keep the endpoint answering the MCP handshake; SourceWeft probes it every 30 days.
- Auth declared10 pts
Declare the credential headers in the registry entry, or keep the endpoint answering the probe so its auth can be classified.
- Tools listed15 pts
Answer tools/list without a credential, or ship a package that starts in a sandbox without one.
- DescriptionRequired15 pts
- Logo10 pts
- Documentation15 pts
- License10 pts