
Mcp As A Judge
io.github.OtherVibesPublished by GitHub account OtherVibesv0.3.20Updated Nov 10, 2026
MCP as a Judge: a behavioral MCP that strengthens AI coding assistants via explicit LLM evaluations
Overview
A local behavioral MCP server that adds LLM-judged approval gates to an AI coding assistant's plan, code diff, test and completion steps.
- What you can do
- Create and retrieve coding task metadata, including task size and next-step guidance
- Review plans and designs for research depth, library reuse, requirements fit and risk
- Review unified Git diffs for correctness, reuse, security and code quality
- Validate tests against real runner output and optional coverage, then gate final task completion
- Raise missing requirements or obstacles to get user decisions through elicitation
- When to use it
- Use it when you want an AI coding assistant to stop and justify its work at each stage instead of moving straight to code, especially on larger or security-sensitive changes. It suits teams that already use IDE rules or agents but want enforceable approval gates on plans, diffs and tests.
- Requirements
- Runs locally via Docker or Python 3.13+ (PyPI package, uv). Needs a client with MCP sampling and elicitation, such as GitHub Copilot in VS Code; other clients such as Cursor, Claude Code, Augment and Qodo require the LLM_API_KEY environment variable, with optional LLM_MODEL_NAME. Large-context models are recommended.
Installation
In SourceWeft
- Open Mcp As A Judge in the dashboard and add it to a workspace.
- Enable the server for the chats that should use its tools.
Desktop only via STDIO. STDIO servers start a local process, so they need the SourceWeft desktop host.
Other MCP clients
Follow the launch instructions in the repository.
README
MCP as a Judge ⚖️
mcp-name: io.github.OtherVibes/mcp-as-a-judge
MCP as a Judge acts as a validation layer between AI coding assistants and LLMs, helping ensure safer and higher-quality code.
[License: MIT] [Python 3.13+] [MCP Compatible]
MCP as a Judge is a behavioral MCP that strengthens AI coding assistants by requiring explicit LLM evaluations for:
- Research, system design, and planning
- Code changes, testing, and task-completion verification
It enforces evidence-based research, reuse over reinvention, and human-in-the-loop decisions.
If your IDE has rules/agents (Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code), keep using them—this Judge adds enforceable approval gates on plan, code diffs, and tests.
Key problems with AI coding assistants and LLMs
- Treat LLM output as ground truth; skip research and use outdated information
- Reinvent the wheel instead of reusing libraries and existing code
- Cut corners: code below engineering standards and weak tests
- Make unilateral decisions when requirements are ambiguous or plans change
- Security blind spots: missing input validation, injection risks/attack vectors, least‑privilege violations, and weak defensive programming
Vibe coding doesn’t have to be frustrating
What it enforces
- Evidence‑based research and reuse (best practices, libraries, existing code)
- Plan‑first delivery aligned to user requirements
- Human‑in‑the‑loop decisions for ambiguity and blockers
- Quality gates on code and tests (security, performance, maintainability)
Key capabilities
- Intelligent code evaluation via MCP sampling; enforces software‑engineering standards and flags security/performance/maintainability risks
- Comprehensive plan/design review: validates architecture, research depth, requirements fit, and implementation approach
- User‑driven decisions via MCP elicitation: clarifies requirements, resolves obstacles, and keeps choices transparent
- Security validation in system design and code changes
Tools and how they help
🚀 Quick Start
Requirements & Recommendations
MCP Client Prerequisites
MCP as a Judge is heavily dependent on MCP Sampling and MCP Elicitation features for its core functionality:
- MCP Sampling - Required for AI-powered code evaluation and judgment
- MCP Elicitation - Required for interactive user decision prompts
System Prerequisites
- Docker Desktop / Python 3.13+ - Required for running the MCP server
Supported AI Assistants
✅ Recommended setup: GitHub Copilot + VS Code — full MCP sampling; no API key needed.
⚠️ Critical: For assistants without full MCP sampling (Cursor, Claude Code, Augment, Qodo), you MUST set LLM_API_KEY. Without it, the server cannot evaluate plans or code. See LLM API Configuration.
💡 Tip: Prefer large context models (≥ 1M tokens) for better analysis and judgments.
If the MCP server isn’t auto‑used
For troubleshooting, visit the FAQs section.
🔧 MCP Configuration
Configure MCP as a Judge in your MCP-enabled client:
Method 1: Using Docker (Recommended)
One‑click install for VS Code (MCP)
Notes:
- VS Code controls the sampling model; select it via “MCP: List Servers → mcp-as-a-judge → Configure Model Access”.
-
Configure MCP Settings:
Add this to your MCP client configuration file:
📝 Configuration Options (All Optional):
- LLM_API_KEY: Optional for GitHub Copilot + VS Code (has built-in MCP sampling)
- LLM_MODEL_NAME: Optional custom model (see Supported LLM Providers for defaults)
- The
--pull=alwaysflag ensures you always get the latest version automatically
Then manually update when needed:
Method 2: Using uv
-
Install the package:
-
Configure MCP Settings:
The MCP server may be automatically detected by your MCP‑enabled client.
📝 Notes:
- No additional configuration needed for GitHub Copilot + VS Code (has built-in MCP sampling)
- LLM_API_KEY is optional and can be set via environment variable if needed
-
To update to the latest version:
Select a sampling model in VS Code
- Open Command Palette (Cmd/Ctrl+Shift+P) → “MCP: List Servers”
- Select the configured server “mcp-as-a-judge”
- Choose “Configure Model Access”
- Check your preferred model(s) to enable sampling
🔑 LLM API Configuration (Optional)
For AI assistants without full MCP sampling support you can configure an LLM API key as a fallback. This ensures MCP as a Judge works even when the client doesn't support MCP sampling.
- Set
LLM_API_KEY(unified key). Vendor is auto-detected; optionally setLLM_MODEL_NAMEto override the default.
Supported LLM Providers
Client-Specific Setup
Cursor
-
Open Cursor Settings:
- Go to
File→Preferences→Cursor Settings - Navigate to the
MCPtab - Click
+ Addto add a new MCP server
- Go to
-
Add MCP Server Configuration:
📝 Configuration Options:
- LLM_API_KEY: Required for Cursor (limited MCP sampling)
- LLM_MODEL_NAME: Optional custom model (see Supported LLM Providers for defaults)
Claude Code
-
Add MCP Server via CLI:
-
Alternative: Manual Configuration:
- Create or edit
~/.config/claude-code/mcp_servers.json
📝 Configuration Options:
- LLM_API_KEY: Required for Claude Code (limited MCP sampling)
- LLM_MODEL_NAME: Optional custom model (see Supported LLM Providers for defaults)
- Create or edit
Other MCP Clients
For other MCP-compatible clients, use the standard MCP server configuration:
📝 Configuration Options:
- LLM_API_KEY: Required for most MCP clients (except GitHub Copilot + VS Code)
- LLM_MODEL_NAME: Optional custom model (see Supported LLM Providers for defaults)
🔒 Privacy & Flexible AI Integration
🔑 MCP Sampling (Preferred) + LLM API Key Fallback
Primary Mode: MCP Sampling
- All judgments are performed using MCP Sampling capability
- No need to configure or pay for external LLM API services
- Works directly with your MCP-compatible client's existing AI model
- Currently supported by: GitHub Copilot + VS Code
Fallback Mode: LLM API Key
- When MCP sampling is not available, the server can use LLM API keys
- Supports multiple providers via LiteLLM: OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Azure, Groq, Mistral, xAI
- Automatic vendor detection from API key patterns
- Default model selection per vendor when no model is specified
🛡️ Your Privacy Matters
- The server runs locally on your machine
- No data collection - your code and conversations stay private
- No external API calls when using MCP Sampling. If you set
LLM_API_KEYfor fallback, the server will call your chosen LLM provider only to perform judgments (plan/code/test) with the evaluation content you provide. - Complete control over your development workflow and sensitive information
🤝 Contributing
We welcome contributions! Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for guidelines.
Development Setup
© Concepts and Methodology
© 2025 OtherVibes and Zvi Fried. The "MCP as a Judge" concept, the "behavioral MCP" approach, the staged workflow (plan → code → test → completion), tool taxonomy/descriptions, and prompt templates are original work developed in this repository.
Prior Art and Attribution
While “LLM‑as‑a‑judge” is a broadly known idea, this repository defines the original “MCP as a Judge” behavioral MCP pattern by OtherVibes and Zvi Fried. It combines task‑centric workflow enforcement (plan → code → test → completion), explicit LLM‑based validations, and human‑in‑the‑loop elicitation, along with the prompt templates and tool taxonomy provided here. Please attribute as: “OtherVibes – MCP as a Judge (Zvi Fried)”.
❓ FAQ
How is “MCP as a Judge” different from rules/subagents in IDE assistants (GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code)?
How does the Judge workflow relate to the tasklist? Why do we need both?
- Tasklist = planning/organization: tracks tasks, priorities, and status. It doesn’t guarantee engineering quality or readiness.
- Judge workflow = quality gates: enforces approvals for plan/design, code diffs, tests, and final completion. It demands real evidence (e.g., unified Git diffs and raw test output) and returns structured approvals and required improvements.
- Together: Use the tasklist to organize work; use the Judge to decide when each stage is actually ready to proceed. The server also emits next_tool guidance to keep progress moving through the gates.
If the Judge isn’t used automatically, how do I force it?
- In your prompt: "use mcp-as-a-judge" or "Evaluate plan/code/test using the MCP server mcp-as-a-judge".
- VS Code: Command Palette → "MCP: List Servers" → ensure "mcp-as-a-judge" is listed and enabled.
- Ensure the MCP server is running and, in your client, the judge tools are enabled/approved.
How do I select models for sampling in VS Code?
- Open Command Palette (Cmd/Ctrl+Shift+P) → "MCP: List Servers"
- Select "mcp-as-a-judge" → "Configure Model Access"
- Check your preferred model(s) to enable sampling
📄 License
This project is licensed under the MIT License (see LICENSE).
🙏 Acknowledgments
- Model Context Protocol by Anthropic
- LiteLLM for unified LLM API integration
Source: README.md at commit 896d48a
Tools
0Version history
1- v0.3.20LatestSep 16, 2026
Score
50% of the applicable checks met
How complete this listing is, computed from the registry entry, the endpoint and public sources. Not a rating of the server and not a statement that it is safe or working today: reachability is a dated check, and no installs or reviews go into the score.
- Reached in the last 30 days25 pts
Keep the endpoint answering the MCP handshake; SourceWeft probes it every 30 days.
- Auth declared10 pts
Declare the credential headers in the registry entry, or keep the endpoint answering the probe so its auth can be classified.
- Tools listed15 pts
Answer tools/list without a credential, or ship a package that starts in a sandbox without one.
- DescriptionRequired15 pts
- Logo10 pts
- Documentation15 pts
- License10 pts