
Builderforce Memory
io.github.SeanHoggPublished by GitHub account SeanHoggv2026.10.80Updated Nov 11, 2026
Token-saving persistent memory for AI agents: recall durable facts instead of re-reading files.
The publisher's own server: Memory.fit
Overview
Persistent memory for AI agents: stores durable facts and recalls a ranked few on demand, so assistants stop re-reading files to remember things.
- What you can do
- Recall, fetch and tag-search stored facts, with results ranked and truncated to keep context small
- Write new memories and forget existing ones, or run read-only with only recall exposed
- Compact absorbed facts into one-line pointer stubs, with an archive and a restore path for the original text
- Optionally record experience: save and list episodes, compile and schedule skills, and log runs with their audit trail
- Install the server into Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code, Cline, Gemini CLI or Codex CLI, sharing one store
- When to use it
- Use it when an assistant repeatedly re-reads files or re-derives the same facts, and you want durable preferences, corrections and project knowledge recalled at the decision point. It suits coding agents and multi-host setups where several tools should share one memory store.
- Requirements
- Runs locally over stdio via npx, so Node.js is needed. Optional BUILDERFORCE_API_KEY enables cost tools; BUILDERFORCE_MEMORY_FILE sets the JSON snapshot path (defaults to a shared file under the home directory); BUILDERFORCE_MEMORY_READONLY=1 exposes recall only. Semantic ranking needs an Evermind model and tokenizer configured; otherwise recall is lexical.
Installation
In SourceWeft
- Open Builderforce Memory in the dashboard and add it to a workspace.
- Enable the server for the chats that should use its tools.
Desktop only via STDIO. STDIO servers start a local process, so they need the SourceWeft desktop host.
Other MCP clients
Follow the launch instructions in the repository.
README
@seanhogg/builderforce-memory-mcp
Expose @seanhogg/builderforce-memory to any MCP client. One token-saving
tool core over a pluggable MemoryBackend, three transports:
Technical report & peer review. This transport is reviewed in the Evermind technical report's adversarial
PEER-REVIEW.md. Note before exposing the HTTP handler publicly: theauthTokencheck is a non-constant-time string compare (timing channel) and the handler shares onebackendwith no per-tenant isolation — a single token reads every tenant's facts. Despite the "multi-tenant" note above, real isolation (token→namespace mapping, constant-time compare, rate limiting) is not yet implemented. Tracked asEVM-3in the Builderforce.ai Consolidated Gap Register. Resolved in v2026.6.34: the HTTP handler now uses a constant-time token compare and per-tenant namespace isolation (see the resolution addendum inPEER-REVIEW.md).
Why this saves tokens
The point of an external memory store is fetch-on-demand instead of pinning
your whole memory file into every prompt. That only pays off if recall is
selective, so the caps are enforced server-side in tools.ts:
memory_recallreturns a ranked top-K (default 5, hard-capped), never the store.- Each entry's content is truncated (default 500 chars) before it hits context.
- There is no "return everything" tool — a dump-all is more expensive than inlining.
memory_compactshrinks a fact the local Evermind has already ABSORBED down to a one-line pointer stub, so it stops filling context. It is lossless: a recall probe must pass first, and the original is archived (recall still returns it) — see below. It writes through the live store, which keeps memory and the on-disk snapshot in agreement.- Recall ranks by hybrid fusion (BM25 ⊕ optional CPU SSM embedding, RRF, MMR) and then
weights by importance (×(0.5+importance)) and a 90-day half-life recency decay —
createLocalMemoryStoreBackend({ ranking: false })turns the signals off.
Tool descriptions are prescriptive ("call this before answering when…") because recent Claude models reach for tools more conservatively; the trigger condition in the description is what drives should-call rate. Pair this with prompt caching (keep the tool set identical across tenants so the cached prefix survives) and context editing (prune stale recalled facts) for the full win.
The seam
Everything is written against MemoryBackend:
Ship the local MemoryStoreBackend (IndexedDB via @seanhogg/builderforce-memory) today;
drop in a networked builderforce.ai adapter later with zero changes to tools
or transports.
Quick start — in-process with the Claude Agent SDK
The snapshot is shared — the server watches it
With persistFile set, the store lives in memory and the JSON snapshot is the source of
truth across process lifetimes. Other processes edit that file too (the BuilderForce VS
Code extension rewrites absorbed entries to stubs in place), so before every operation the
backend stats the file and re-hydrates from disk when it changed underneath — otherwise
this server, still holding the pre-edit bodies, would re-snapshot over that work on its next
write. Its own writes are stamped (mtime + size + content hash) the moment they land, so the
steady-state cost is one stat and there is no write-loop.
SSM-embedding recall — including on a headless host (no GPU)
With no model configured the local backend ranks recall lexically (BM25). Point it
at an Evermind checkpoint and the ordering becomes the SSM embedding's cosine ranking
fused with the lexical one (Reciprocal Rank Fusion — dense ⊕ sparse, so exact
tokens like identifiers and error codes are still caught). Every memory_recall
result names the ranker it used, so a degrade to lexical is never silent:
The stdio/HTTP servers do not need a GPU for this. EvermindLM is a pure-CPU
model and EvermindLM.embed() mean-pools + L2-normalises the same hidden state the
GPU HybridMambaModel.embed() does, to the same contract. Configure it with:
Vectors are cached across process lifetimes (stamped with the model's fingerprint, so an adapted checkpoint invalidates them), because a per-session subprocess that re-embedded the whole store on its first recall would cost more than the lexical ranking it replaces.
In-process hosts pass an embedder directly — reuse an already-loaded GPU Evermind runtime rather than standing up a second model:
Either way, recall quality improves automatically as that model is adapted/distilled.
Experience — what Evermind has done (opt-in)
Facts are one kind of learned item; experience is another. An episode is a
recorded demonstration (a program and the UI steps a person took in it), a skill is
what Train Once compiles from one (typed values become parameters, secrets never stored,
irreversible clicks gated for approval), and a run is one execution with its audit
trail. The domain lives in @seanhogg/builderforce-memory-engine; this server keeps it
durable and exposes it.
Set BUILDERFORCE_MEMORY_EXPERIENCE=1 to register the tools (Synapse does). Off by
default, so ordinary coding-agent installs never carry them in their tool list.
Stored beside the memory snapshot as experience.json (shared across processes exactly
like memory.json) plus episodes/. Never served to a token-selected tenant of the
HTTP handler.
One-shot install into any MCP host (not just Claude)
Writes the stdio server entry into each host's own config, idempotently and with
.bak backups. Supported hosts: Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf,
VS Code, Cline, Gemini CLI, Codex CLI. Every agent points at one shared store
(resolveMemoryFile(): ~/.builderforce-memory/memory.json, or the legacy
~/.claude/builderforce-memory/memory.json when that is where the live store is; override
with --memory-file / BUILDERFORCE_MEMORY_FILE; the hook script resolves the same way),
so a fact remembered in one agent is recalled in another. --readonly drops the
write tools; --local=<dist/bin/stdio.js> runs a checkout for development.
The same launch spec is exported for programmatic use:
buildServerSpec() / installMemoryServer() (see src/install/).
Claude Code: the self-driving "memory combo"
Registering the server gives Claude Code the memory tools. For Claude Code the
installer ALSO wires hooks so memory is self-driving instead of advisory (skip
with --no-hooks):
All four point at one generated, dependency-free hook script
(~/.claude/builderforce-memory/bfmem-hook.mjs, four modes) plus a companion
skill. Idempotent + .bak-safe. Source of truth: src/install/claude-hooks.ts
(installClaudeCombo / bfmemHookSource).
Quick start — stdio (any process / language)
Env: BUILDERFORCE_MEMORY_DB (db name), BUILDERFORCE_MEMORY_READONLY=1 (drop write tools).
Quick start — HTTP (multi-tenant)
Or mount createMemoryHttpHandler(backend, { authToken }) on your own Node/Express
server against any backend (including a future remote one).
Custom / remote backend
Implement MemoryBackend and hand it to any transport:
Compaction rules (@seanhogg/builderforce-memory-mcp/compaction)
The stub format that memory_compact writes ([absorbed→Evermind vN] <first line>) is published as a dependency-free subpath. An external compactor imports its rules from it, so its stubs are byte-identical to the server's and neither re-stubs the other.
Lossless contract (what every compactor must do, in order):
planLosslessCompaction(candidates, { probe, version })— the structural rules (planCompaction: skip stubs, never grow an entry) plus a recall probe:probeQuestionFor(key, content)blanks the fact's most identifying token and the local Evermind must supply it (probePasses). No probe, or a wrong answer, leaves the fact uncompacted (no_probe/probe_failed).- Archive every write's
archiverow (mergeArchiveintodefaultArchiveFile(memoryFile)→memory.archive.json) — durably, before any stub is written. The archive sits outside the snapshot, is only merged into and never pruned, so it survives snapshot rewrites,forget, and the 10,000-entry cap. - Write the stubs.
Reads resolve a stub to its archived original (RecallHit.content = full text, RecallHit.stub = the stored stub). A stub with no archive is contentLost: tools and the Claude Code hooks label it CONTENT_LOST_LABEL — "(content lost — re-verify before relying on it)" — and the hooks importance-demote it. memory_restore (file on the stdio bin, inline json everywhere) brings the text back from [{key, content}] or the Evermind coordinator's [{id, text}] mem: dump: matched by key (an id loses its mem: prefix), else uniquely by first line against the stub's pointer; the text is archived beside the stub, so the token saving stays.
Every overwrite of a shared store file (SharedJsonFile: the snapshot, the archive, experience.json) first rotates the previous version into <file>.bak.1 … .bak.3.
Dependencies
@modelcontextprotocol/sdk + zod are hard deps. @anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk
(SDK transport), @seanhogg/builderforce-memory + fake-indexeddb (local backend) are
optional peers, imported indirectly — install only what your transport/backend
needs.
Source: packages/memory-mcp/README.md at commit bec4fb1
Tools
0Version history
22- v2026.10.80LatestNov 11, 2026
- v2026.10.60Nov 8, 2026
- v2026.10.56Nov 8, 2026
- v2026.10.55Nov 8, 2026
- v2026.10.48Nov 7, 2026
- v2026.10.45Nov 7, 2026
- v2026.10.40Nov 5, 2026
- v2026.10.39Nov 4, 2026
- v2026.10.38Nov 3, 2026
- v2026.10.37Nov 1, 2026
- v2026.10.36Oct 31, 2026
- v2026.10.35Oct 29, 2026
- v2026.10.26Oct 25, 2026
- v2026.10.24Oct 25, 2026
- v2026.10.23Oct 23, 2026
- v2026.10.3Oct 21, 2026
- v2026.9.34Oct 17, 2026
- v2026.9.33Sep 30, 2026
- v2026.9.32Sep 29, 2026
- v2026.9.31Sep 29, 2026
- v2026.9.30Sep 28, 2026
- v2026.9.29Sep 27, 2026
Score
40% of the applicable checks met
How complete this listing is, computed from the registry entry, the endpoint and public sources. Not a rating of the server and not a statement that it is safe or working today: reachability is a dated check, and no installs or reviews go into the score.
- Reached in the last 30 days25 pts
Keep the endpoint answering the MCP handshake; SourceWeft probes it every 30 days.
- Auth declared10 pts
Declare the credential headers in the registry entry, or keep the endpoint answering the probe so its auth can be classified.
- Tools listed15 pts
Answer tools/list without a credential, or ship a package that starts in a sandbox without one.
- DescriptionRequired15 pts
- Logo10 pts
- Documentation15 pts
- License10 pts
Declare a license in the repository or the registry entry.
Other Memory integrations

Memory.fit
fit.memoryOfficial publisher
Hosted Memory.fit server that lets an AI read your training, sleep, recovery and nutrition data and write back weekly plans, targets and meal plans.
pg.ddx.io: the PostgreSQL community's memory
io.ddx.pgOfficial publisher
pg.ddx.io: the PostgreSQL community's memory's hosted MCP server, published by pg.ddx.io; no sign-in required; Streamable HTTP; 29 tools.
var.gg Naming Memory
gg.varOfficial publisher
Remote MCP server that suggests and searches code identifier names from domain concepts in Korean, Japanese, Chinese, Vietnamese and English, and exposes ERD…

Memoria — Deterministic AI Memory & Code Intelligence MCP
Published by GitHub account kolivritech
Remote MCP server giving AI coding agents deterministic long-term memory plus code intelligence tools, with no LLM tokens spent on recall.

thron-memory
Published by GitHub account jacobbarglof
Gives every MCP-capable AI app one shared, private memory of plain note pages that assistants can search, read and update.