
Agent Readiness Auditor
io.github.asish-singhPublished by GitHub account asish-singhv0.5.0Updated Oct 24, 2026
Audits any website for AI agent readiness and safety, scoring prompt injection risk and llms.txt.
Overview
A local MCP server that audits a website for AI agent readiness and safety, scoring prompt-injection risk, llms.txt, robots.txt and structured data.
- What you can do
- Audit a site: fetch a URL and return a 0-100 score, letter grade and per-check findings with suggested fixes, matching the command-line report.
- When to use it
- Use it when you want an assistant to check whether a site is safe and readable for AI agents, or to review your own site's llms.txt, robots.txt, structured data and hidden prompt-injection risk before publishing.
- Requirements
- Runs locally over stdio via npx, so Node.js 18 or newer is needed. No accounts, API keys or environment variables are declared. It needs network access to fetch the target site's pages, robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap and AI Catalog.
Installation
In SourceWeft
- Open Agent Readiness Auditor in the dashboard and add it to a workspace.
- Enable the server for the chats that should use its tools.
Desktop only via STDIO. STDIO servers start a local process, so they need the SourceWeft desktop host.
Other MCP clients
Follow the launch instructions in the repository.
README
Agent Readiness Auditor
A command-line tool that scans a website and scores how well it works with, and how well it defends against, automated AI agents.
What problem this solves
AI assistants increasingly visit websites on a person's behalf: reading pages, following instructions found on them, and taking actions. This creates two practical issues for site owners:
- Safety. A page can contain text that is hidden from human visitors but still read by an AI agent. That hidden text can carry instructions designed to hijack the agent. This is known as indirect prompt injection.
- Readability for machines. Sites are usually built for human eyes. Agents do better when a site also publishes machine-readable signals about its content and its rules.
Standard SEO tools measure how well a site works for search engines. This tool measures something different: how well a site works for AI agents, and whether it is safe for them to read.
Research built with this tool
The State of the Agentic Web, 2026 audits 84 prominent sites across seven categories with this tool, and its second edition reruns the study with the deeper nine check audit. Among the findings, no audited site carries hidden prompt injection content even under attribute level and multi page scanning, only 13% publish the FAQ structured data AI answers quote, no site advertises an MCP endpoint, and nearly one in five prominent sites refuses automated visitors entirely, including several AI companies. The data and method are published for anyone to reproduce.
What it checks
The tool fetches the landing page, robots.txt, llms.txt, the sitemap, and the AI Catalog, then crawls a few key pages and runs nine checks, producing a score from 0 to 100 and a letter grade from A to F. Safety is weighted highest on purpose, because a readable site that can hijack an agent is worse than one that is simply hard to read.
Example output
Each line shows the check result, its score, and (when a check does not fully pass) a suggested fix.
Quick start
If you have Node.js 18 or newer installed, you can run the tool in one line without installing anything:
Use a bare domain (example.com) or a full URL (https://example.com). The --json flag prints machine-readable output for use in scripts.
Auditing many sites at once
Batch mode reads a text file with one URL per line (lines starting with # are ignored) and audits them a few at a time.
The CSV has a column for each check, which makes it easy to open in a spreadsheet or feed into an analysis.
Using it in GitHub Actions
The repo doubles as a GitHub Action, so any project can audit its own site on every push or on a schedule and fail the build if a hard safety problem appears.
An unreachable site produces a warning, not a failure, since bot protection on CI runners is an infrastructure issue rather than a safety one. This repo uses the action on itself every Monday in audit-site.yml.
Using it from an AI assistant (MCP)
The auditor ships with a server for the Model Context Protocol, the standard that lets AI assistants use external tools, and is listed on the official MCP registry. One of this tool's own findings is that zero of 69 prominent sites advertise an agent endpoint, so the auditor holds itself to the standard it measures. Once connected, you can simply ask your assistant to audit a site for you.
For Claude Code, one command connects it.
For Claude Desktop, add this to the mcpServers section of the configuration file.
The server exposes one tool, audit_site, which takes a URL and returns the same scores and findings as the command line.
Running from source
To work on the code or run it from a local copy:
The -- in the command passes the URL to the tool rather than to npm.
To install a global agent-audit command from your local copy:
You can then run agent-audit example.com from any folder. To remove it later, run npm unlink -g agent-readiness-auditor.
Installing from GitHub Packages
The package is also published to GitHub Packages as a scoped mirror, @asish-singh/agent-readiness-auditor. For most people the npm install above is simpler. Use GitHub Packages only if your organization standardizes on it, since it requires authentication even for public packages.
To install from it, create a GitHub personal access token with the read:packages scope, then point the scope at the GitHub registry:
Exit codes
The tool sets its exit code so it can be used in automated pipelines:
0: the audit ran and found no hard safety failure.2: a hard safety failure was found (for example, hidden prompt-injection text). Use this to fail a build.1: the tool could not complete the audit (for example, the site was unreachable).
How the code is organized
Each check lives in its own file under src/checks/ and returns a structured result. All checks are registered in a single list in src/audit.ts, and the total score is derived from that list, so adding a new check does not require changing the scoring logic. Architecture decisions are recorded in docs/adr/, product decisions in docs/decisions/, planned work in ROADMAP.md, and the go-to-market plan in LAUNCH.md.
Background
This tool grew out of the Agentic Web Governance Pack, a set of guidelines for how websites should behave toward AI agents. This project turns several of those guidelines into checks that can be run and measured.
License
MIT. See LICENSE.
Source: README.md at commit 6e7ce22
Tools
0Version history
2- v0.5.0LatestOct 11, 2026
- v0.4.7Sep 16, 2026
Score
50% of the applicable checks met
How complete this listing is, computed from the registry entry, the endpoint and public sources. Not a rating of the server and not a statement that it is safe or working today: reachability is a dated check, and no installs or reviews go into the score.
- Reached in the last 30 days25 pts
Keep the endpoint answering the MCP handshake; SourceWeft probes it every 30 days.
- Auth declared10 pts
Declare the credential headers in the registry entry, or keep the endpoint answering the probe so its auth can be classified.
- Tools listed15 pts
Answer tools/list without a credential, or ship a package that starts in a sandbox without one.
- DescriptionRequired15 pts
- Logo10 pts
- Documentation15 pts
- License10 pts