
distil
io.github.munhqPublished by GitHub account munhqv0.3.4Updated Oct 28, 2026
Context optimization for LLM agents: tool registry, result masking, budgeting, compaction.
Overview
Local MCP server that optimizes LLM agent context: tool registry, result masking, budgeting and compaction layers, plus measurement of token and cache costs.
- What you can do
- Optimize agent context through a pipeline of layers: cache alignment, scratchpad, masking, summarization, compaction and budgeting.
- Register and route tools through a registry layer and a code-mode layer.
- Report tokens before and after per layer, with a detail line for each.
- Measure context cost on local Claude Code transcripts, including break-even tables for clearing tool results.
- Export sessions and run retention probes against a local model.
- When to use it
- Worth adding when you want to measure or reduce context and prompt-cache cost in long agent sessions, or to experiment with context layers and tool registries. The README itself says most history-rewriting layers cost more than they save and recommends provider-native features first, so it suits evaluation and overflow handling rather than routine use.
- Requirements
- Runs as a local stdio process, typically launched with npx from the npm package, so Node.js is needed; prebuilt binaries and a bash install script exist for those without Node. No account, API key or configuration is required. Windows needs Git Bash, MSYS2 or WSL for the scripts. Optional benchmark and probe features need a local transcript corpus and, for probes, a model endpoint.
Installation
In SourceWeft
- Open distil in the dashboard and add it to a workspace.
- Enable the server for the chats that should use its tools.
Desktop only via STDIO. STDIO servers start a local process, so they need the SourceWeft desktop host.
Other MCP clients
Follow the launch instructions in the repository.
README
[npm] [MCP Registry] [Smithery] [license]
[Install in Cursor] [Install in VS Code]
No account, no API key, nothing to configure. The package is a small wrapper that
fetches the binary for your platform and verifies it against the published
checksums; install.sh and a prebuilt binary remain for anyone without Node.
Cache writes are 2% of your tokens and 28% of your bill
That is not a claim, it is a measurement: 13,814 real agent sessions, 410,742 assistant turns, re-run on 2026-08-29. Every unique token in them was billed 550 times, because a request resends the whole history.
Which means the obvious move — compress the history — is usually the wrong one. Editing history invalidates the cached prefix from the edit onwards and converts reads at 0.1x into writes at 1.25x or 2.0x. You cannot compress your way out of context cost. You can only decline to admit tokens.
[Where an agent session's tokens go: tool results 59.9%, tool calls 17.9%, user text 14.0%, assistant text 7.2%, thinking 1.0%] [How much a rewrite must delete just to break even: 8% with one turn left, 46% with ten, 90% with a hundred]Every tool in this space publishes a savings percentage measured on its own
fixtures. What none publishes is the denominator: what share of a real session
it is allowed to touch, and what that share costs once prompt-cache pricing is
applied. distil measures both on transcripts an agent actually wrote.
What is prior art, and what is not. The cache arithmetic below is not a
discovery. Anthropic's context editing
docs
state that clearing tool results invalidates the cached prefix, and ship
clear_at_least so a clear only fires when it is large enough to pay for that.
The break-even rule is published too: on a 5-minute cache, cleared tokens times
requests-before-the-next-clear must exceed 11.5 times the tokens you keep. The
table in this README reproduces that rule exactly — it was derived
independently, which is a check on the arithmetic, not a contribution.
The gap is empirical. Every source says to calibrate against your own workload,
and none ships a way to do it or publishes what the values turn out to be. That
is what this crate is for: measuring the numbers you need in order to choose
clear_at_least, or to decide not to clear at all.
The full measurement
Measured 2026-08-29 over 13,814 local Claude Code transcripts — 410,742
assistant turns, 212.7M tokens of unique text. Reproduce it on your own corpus
with distil-bench ~/.claude/projects; a corpus grows, so the date matters
more than the decimals.
Those 212.7M unique tokens were billed as 116.9 billion input tokens — every token paid for 550 times, because a request resends the whole history.
Price that at real cache multipliers (read 0.1x, write 1.25x for the 5-minute TTL and 2.0x for the 1-hour):
Cache writes are 2% of the tokens and 28% of the bill. Editing history invalidates the cached prefix from the edit onwards, converting reads at 0.1x into writes at 1.25x or 2.0x. So a rewrite must shrink what it invalidates below:
That table is the published break-even rule in another form: at every row,
cleared x turns / kept equals 11.5 for the 5-minute tier. Use it to pick a
clear_at_least value, and use distil-bench to find the turn count and tail
size to put into it — those are workload properties, and they are the part
nobody publishes.
Per unit of history, at 10 remaining turns: keeping it costs 1.00, compressing it costs 2.15, and never admitting it costs 0. You cannot compress your way out of context cost. You can only decline to admit tokens.
What that means for using this crate
Layers that do not touch history are on the right side of that arithmetic:
CacheAlignLayer (orders content so the stable prefix stays cacheable) and
ScratchpadLayer (keeps working state outside the window).
Layers that rewrite history — MaskingLayer, SummarizationLayer,
CompactionLayer — cost more than they save in the common case. Reach for them
at one boundary only: context overflow, where the alternative is a failed
request and cache price stops being the comparison. BudgetLayer exists for
exactly that moment.
RegistryLayer and CodeModeLayer predate Anthropic's Tool Search Tool and
Programmatic Tool Calling, which do the same jobs natively and better. Prefer
the native features.
For clearing old tool results, prefer the provider's clear_tool_uses context
editing over MaskingLayer: it runs server-side, it takes clear_at_least, and
it is one API parameter against a dependency. Reach for a layer here only when
you need behaviour the API does not offer.
Measuring
See bench/README.md for the external-tool comparison, the
fairness rules, and the two harness mistakes that produced wrong numbers first.
Retention
A saving is only a saving if the model can still answer what the original context could answer.
The probe taxonomy is Factory.ai's;
their write-up defines it and ships no harness. The judge is a Completer,
never a Summarizer — a summarizer may impose summarization framing, which
rewrites both the probe format and the grading instruction.
Using it as a library
This example is kept compilable as
examples/readme_quickstart.rs — run it with
cargo run --example readme_quickstart.
Every layer implements Layer and reports tokens_before, tokens_after and a
detail line, so each one can be measured on its own.
Features
Install
install.sh installs both binaries, drops the skill into every Claude home it
finds, and registers the MCP server at user scope. When the plugin is already
installed it installs the binary only, since the plugin declares the server and
ships the skill itself.
The plugin launches the server with npx -y @munhq/distil, so it needs Node.
It cannot use a plugin-relative path: Claude Code expands ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}
and nothing else does, so a plugin declaring one hands every other client a
literal path that does not exist. install.sh and the prebuilt binaries remain
for anyone without Node.
Platform support
The release publishes six targets and plugin/test_platform.sh holds both the
installer and the plugin launcher to that matrix, so an asset name and the name
asked for cannot drift apart. install.sh and the launcher are bash scripts, so
on Windows they need a shell — cmd and PowerShell cannot run them. Linux
binaries are static musl builds, so they do not need a matching glibc.
Caveats
The corpus is one developer's machine. The ratios are the finding; the
absolute totals are personal. Counts use cl100k_base, which approximates
Claude's tokenizer within a few percent. The break-even model assumes a single
cache breakpoint, so a rewrite confined to the tail costs less than the table
shows — that refines it, it does not reverse it.
Contributing
Build and test instructions, the rules a benchmark change has to follow, and what
a pull request needs before review: CONTRIBUTING.md.
Report a vulnerability privately — SECURITY.md.
License
MIT. See LICENSE.
Source: README.md at commit 3d3f228
Tools
0Version history
1- v0.3.4LatestSep 16, 2026
Score
50% of the applicable checks met
How complete this listing is, computed from the registry entry, the endpoint and public sources. Not a rating of the server and not a statement that it is safe or working today: reachability is a dated check, and no installs or reviews go into the score.
- Reached in the last 30 days25 pts
Keep the endpoint answering the MCP handshake; SourceWeft probes it every 30 days.
- Auth declared10 pts
Declare the credential headers in the registry entry, or keep the endpoint answering the probe so its auth can be classified.
- Tools listed15 pts
Answer tools/list without a credential, or ship a package that starts in a sandbox without one.
- DescriptionRequired15 pts
- Logo10 pts
- Documentation15 pts
- License10 pts