
Ai Context Kit
io.github.ofershapPublished by GitHub account ofershapv0.1.2Updated Oct 24, 2026
Lint, measure, and sync AI context files across Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot.
Overview
A local toolkit that lets an assistant load, measure, lint, select and sync AI context rule files across Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot and similar tools.
- What you can do
- Load and auto-detect context rule files from Cursor, Claude Code, AGENTS.md, Copilot, Windsurf and Cline formats, including frontmatter parsing and token estimates per file with budget checks and percentage breakdowns. Lint rules for conflicts, duplicates, oversized files, directory listings and vague instructions, producing a 0-100 score. Select only the rules relevant to a given task within a token budget, prioritizing alwaysApply rules, then task and tag matches. Sync a single source of rules into other target files, with a dry-run preview option. Scaffold starter rule templates in a chosen format.
- When to use it
- Useful when a project has accumulated several overlapping or contradictory context files and you want to know their token cost, find conflicts and duplicates, or inject only task-relevant rules. Also suited to CI pipelines that should fail on rule errors.
- Requirements
- Runs as a local stdio process; the npm package ai-context-kit is installed and invoked via npx or imported as a library. No authentication, environment variables or headers are declared. Works on project directories containing supported context files.
Installation
In SourceWeft
- Open Ai Context Kit in the dashboard and add it to a workspace.
- Enable the server for the chats that should use its tools.
Desktop only via STDIO. STDIO servers start a local process, so they need the SourceWeft desktop host.
Other MCP clients
Follow the launch instructions in the repository.
README
ai-context-kit
How do you measure the token cost of your context?
You spent hours writing the perfect .md context file, just to find out that your agent got worse.
That's not a bug. That's what happens when nobody measures the cost of context.
[Try It Now] [Install] [See Example Output] [Vote on Next Features]
[GitHub stars] [npm version] [npm downloads] [CI] [TypeScript] [License: MIT] [PRs Welcome]
You write a CLAUDE.md. Then someone adds .cursor/rules/. Then a teammate drops in an AGENTS.md. Then someone copies in a .cursorrules file from a blog post. Nobody removes the old ones.
Six months later your project has four context files that overlap, contradict each other, and dump 8,000 tokens of directory listings and "follow best practices" into every conversation. Your agent follows all of it. It gets slower. It gets confused. You blame the model.
An ETH Zurich study (February 2026) measured what actually happens when you give agents context files:
- Auto-generated context files reduced task success compared to providing nothing
- Human-written ones only improved accuracy by 4%
- Inference costs jumped 20%+ from wasted tokens
- Performance dropped on some models because agents got too obedient - following unnecessary instructions instead of solving the actual problem
I kept hitting this in my own projects, so I built ai-context-kit - a toolkit to treat context like a budget. Measure it, trim it, inject only what the current task needs.
Quick Start
Run the CLI on any project to see what you're actually injecting:
Then lint it:
That's the difference between guessing and knowing.
What's Different
What This Answers
- How much context am I injecting? Token count per file, percentage breakdown, budget check
- Are my rules fighting each other? Conflict detection across all files and formats
- What's wasting tokens? Directory listings, duplicate content, vague advice
- Which rules matter for this task? Task-relevant selection with token budget
How It Works
ai-context-kit reads every context file format in the ecosystem, parses frontmatter, estimates token cost, and gives you tools to analyze and manage them.
API
loadRules(rootDir?)
Returns RuleFile[] with parsed frontmatter, body, format, path, and token count.
measure(rules, budget?)
lint(rules)
What the linter catches:
select(rules, options)
The core insight from the research: don't inject everything. Pick what matters.
Scoring: alwaysApply: true in frontmatter gets highest priority. Then task words matched against file paths and content. Then tag matches. Budget is respected - highest-scored rules are included first until the budget runs out.
sync(options)
Write rules once, sync everywhere.
Supports dryRun: true to preview changes without writing.
init(options?)
CLI
All commands support --path <dir> to point at a different project root. lint exits with code 1 on errors (warnings pass).
Use with Vercel AI SDK / LangChain / Custom Agents
This isn't just for Cursor. If you're building agents with Vercel AI SDK, LangChain, or your own framework, ai-context-kit solves the same problem: how much context are you stuffing into the system prompt, and is it helping or hurting?
Any framework that takes a system prompt string. Any rules stored as markdown files.
Supported Formats
ai-context-kit detects the format from the file path. No configuration needed.
Why not just write better rules?
The ETH Zurich study tested both human-written and LLM-generated context files. Human-written ones were better, but only by 4%. The real problem isn't quality - it's volume. More context means more tokens consumed by instructions the agent doesn't need for the current task. The winning strategy is fewer, task-relevant rules, not better prose.
How accurate is the token estimation?
ai-context-kit uses a 4-character-per-token approximation. This is intentionally simple and fast. It's accurate enough for budgeting and comparison (GPT-4 averages ~4 chars/token for English text). If you need exact counts, pipe the output through tiktoken or your model's tokenizer.
Does this work in CI?
Yes. npx ai-context-kit lint returns exit code 1 on errors, 0 on pass. Add it to your CI pipeline the same way you'd add eslint. The --json flag gives machine-readable output for custom reporting.
Tech Stack
Contributing
PRs welcome. Whether it's a new lint rule, a format detector, or a bug fix - check out the contributing guide.
Author
README built with README Builder
License
Star this repo · Fork it · Report a bug · Join the discussion
Source: README.md at commit 8b1d7a5
Tools
0Version history
1- v0.1.2LatestSep 16, 2026
Score
50% of the applicable checks met
How complete this listing is, computed from the registry entry, the endpoint and public sources. Not a rating of the server and not a statement that it is safe or working today: reachability is a dated check, and no installs or reviews go into the score.
- Reached in the last 30 days25 pts
Keep the endpoint answering the MCP handshake; SourceWeft probes it every 30 days.
- Auth declared10 pts
Declare the credential headers in the registry entry, or keep the endpoint answering the probe so its auth can be classified.
- Tools listed15 pts
Answer tools/list without a credential, or ship a package that starts in a sandbox without one.
- DescriptionRequired15 pts
- Logo10 pts
- Documentation15 pts
- License10 pts
