Omitly Mcp

io.github.omitlyPublished by GitHub account omitlyv5.3.0Updated Nov 4, 2026

Omitly's local, verifiable PDF redaction for AI agents — your documents never leave your device.

Overview

Omitly's local MCP server; no sign-in required; STDIO; 13 tools.

No AI overview yet: these facts come from the registry entry and the server itself.

Installation

In SourceWeft

  1. Open Omitly Mcp in the dashboard and add it to a workspace.
  2. Enable the server for the chats that should use its tools.

Desktop only via STDIO. STDIO servers start a local process, so they need the SourceWeft desktop host.

Other MCP clients

Follow the launch instructions in the repository.

README

omitly-mcp

A Model Context Protocol server that exposes Omitly's local, verifiable PDF redaction to AI agents (Claude Code, Claude Desktop, and any other MCP client).

Repository scope and licence — please read before opening a PR.

This repository is source-available, not open source. See LICENSE: the code is published so you can read exactly what runs on your machine before you let it touch a confidential document. It is not licensed for reuse in other projects.

It contains the MCP server and the compiled wasm detection bundle. The Omitly redaction engine, the tamper-evidence seal and the licensing implementation are not in this repository and are developed privately; this code calls the engine, it does not contain it.

Development happens in a private repository and is mirrored here on release, so pull requests cannot be merged. Issues and security reports are very welcome — see SECURITY.md.

The point of difference: an agent can redact a document without uploading it anywhere. Redaction runs on-device through the Omitly engine and returns a signed audit log recording what was removed; the seal shows the delivered file is unchanged since it was sealed. It does not show that nothing else sensitive remains in the document — the opposite of pasting a confidential file into a chat model.

Five of the eleven tools (find_sensitive_regions, locate_text, check_redaction, verify_redaction, extract_pdf_text) work out of the box — npm install, no Rust toolchain, no native binary, no desktop app. They run on a wasm-bindgen build of the same detector that powers the web leak-checker at omitly.app, bundled directly in this package. create_pdf, the two write tools (redact_pdf, redact_by_entity), and the two seal-verification tools (verify_seal, verify_document) still need a configured native engine — see "Native engine" below. Neither seal tool has a wasm fallback yet: there is no wasm seal-verification path (tracked in issue #113), so both always require the native engine, even though checking a seal needs no licence.

Install

Add the server to your MCP client with npx — nothing to clone, build or compile. Published releases ship the wasm detector bundled, so a registry install never needs Rust.

Claude Code:

bash
claude mcp add omitly --env OMITLY_ALLOWED_DIR=/path/agents/may/touch -- npx -y omitly-mcp

Claude Desktop (claude_desktop_config.json), Cursor (~/.cursor/mcp.json) and Windsurf (~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.json) take the same entry:

jsonc
{  "mcpServers": {    "omitly": {      "command": "npx",      "args": ["-y", "omitly-mcp"],      "env": { "OMITLY_ALLOWED_DIR": "/path/agents/may/touch" }    }  }}

Set OMITLY_ALLOWED_DIR to the folder holding the documents you want checked; without it the server uses the directory it was launched from (see "Access control"). Claude Desktop users can instead install the one-click .mcpb bundle (see "One-click install for Claude Desktop" below).

Five tools work out of the box. find_sensitive_regions and check_redaction are free but EVALUATION-marked and limited to 10 attempts a month, shared across the two, without a native engine (OMITLY_FREE_CAP changes the number); locate_text, verify_redaction and extract_pdf_text are free with no cap. Redaction (redact_pdf, redact_by_entity), create_pdf and seal verification need the native engine, which is not currently distributed outside the source repo (omitly#1405).

Skill (Claude Code)

The package ships a Claude skill at skill/SKILL.md: plain instructions that tell Claude when to reach for these tools and how to report results — masked values only, and what the free check does and does not prove.

Install it for Claude Code (user scope):

bash
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/omitly-redactioncurl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/omitly/omitly-mcp/main/skill/SKILL.md \  -o ~/.claude/skills/omitly-redaction/SKILL.md

A project can instead keep the skill under .claude/skills/omitly-redaction/. The skill is instructions only; limits and the free cap are enforced by the server, not by the skill.

Tools

ToolWhat it does
find_sensitive_regionsScans a PDF on-device and returns PII candidates — email/SSN/phone/card plus Australian identifiers (TFN, ABN, ACN, Medicare, Centrelink CRN, IHI, BSB; check-digit validated where a published algorithm exists) — with page + exact coordinates, so the agent selects by entity and never guesses geometry. Best-effort pattern matching, not a compliance assessment. Optional regions (generic/us/au) narrows the listed kinds. Free tier (wasm) is EVALUATION-marked and counts toward the shared 10-attempts-a-month cap (see "Licensing"); a configured native engine is not capped.
locate_textResolves literal strings the model supplies (names, addresses — anything regex can't catch) to their page + coordinates. The model does the recognition; the engine does the geometry.
check_redactionAudits an ALREADY-redacted PDF and reports whether sensitive text still survives underneath the redaction marks, in prior incremental-update revisions, metadata, AcroForm fields, or attachments — the "did my black boxes actually remove the data?" check, with a coverage report scoping what was inspected. It also returns verdict — safe_to_send, needs_review (with blocking for a problem found) or cannot_verify — from the same presented-document check the desktop app's "Check any PDF" runs (native omitly-redact check or the bundled wasm check, one Rust function), with the fixed-copy result sections (what was checked, problems, review, what could not be checked). The full audit v2 report behind the verdict is not returned by this tool; it is available from the engine's check command. A verdict is about the check and what it covered (hidden, covered and recoverable content), never a statement that the document is safe. Free tier (wasm) is EVALUATION-marked and counts toward the shared 10-attempts-a-month cap (see "Licensing"); a configured native engine is not capped.
extract_pdf_textExtracts a PDF's full text, page by page, PII-MASKED BY DEFAULT so raw sensitive values never flood the model's context window. Each page's spans report the CHAR offset (not byte offset) and kind of every masked value, so an agent can still reason about position without seeing the raw value. masked: false is a documented, explicit opt-in to raw text. Free, no licence, works out of the box on the bundled wasm engine — a native engine is preferred when available (also enables the regions filter; wasm ignores it and scans every pattern). Never renders pages to images.
redact_by_entityOne-shot: find + filter by kind (email/ssn/phone/card/tfn/abn/acn/medicare/crn/ihi/bsb) and/or regions + redact + verify. The "just scrub the obvious PII" shortcut.
redact_pdfRemoves the underlying data from given regions of a PDF, verifies nothing survives, writes the redacted file, and returns the audit log.
verify_redactionRe-scans an already-redacted PDF and returns the verification verdict — the redaction-completeness check.
verify_sealCryptographically checks a PDF's embedded Omitly audit report and whole-file tamper-evidence seal (seal v1: Ed25519; seal v2, from Omitly 4.0: ML-DSA-87 with ECDSA P-384) — the tamper-evidence check, distinct from verify_redaction. Integrity, not identity: the signing key rides inside the file (per-install from the desktop app, or one-time for a single output from the engine), so a valid seal means "unchanged since sealed by the holder of this key", never "produced by Omitly" — compare sealFingerprint out-of-band for origin. Requires a native engine; no wasm fallback exists.
verify_documentRecipient trust-verification (omitly#113): the same seal/report check as verify_seal — not a survivor re-scan — aimed at someone who received a PDF from someone else and wants to confirm the file is unchanged since it was sealed (integrity, not identity — see verify_seal), without paying or licensing anything. Free, no licence. Currently requires a native engine like verify_seal (no wasm seal-verification path yet).
create_pdfGenerates a clean PDF from Markdown/HTML on-device, rendered through a real browser engine so it looks printed — instead of writing a throwaway reportlab/LaTeX script.
check_licenseReports the current licence or trial state — tier, trial days left, the vendor-signed licensee name, which resolution step supplied the licence, and whether it is bound to this machine. Free, takes no arguments, reads no document, and is re-resolved on every call so buy → save licence → call again works without a restart. Never returns the device fingerprint or the licence file's contents — device binding is a yes/no. Requires a native engine: the wasm free tier has no licence concept.
propose_redactionsomitly#1643, bring your own AI: proposes regions for a PERSON to accept in the Omitly desktop app. Writes nothing. Requires the desktop app to be running on this computer; on acceptance the desktop removes, verifies and seals, and the record shows a person decided (human-desktop).
get_proposal_statusFollows a queued proposal: pending, accepted, rejected, applied (with output path and verdict), failed or expired. Free; reads no document.

Accept-in-app (omitly#1643)

While the Omitly desktop app is running on the same computer with Settings → Connect your AI → "Accept proposals in Omitly" on (the default), redact_pdf and redact_by_entity do not run: they return { status: "queued", proposalId } and the redaction becomes a proposal a person accepts or rejects in the app. On acceptance the desktop runs its own verified-removal engine, the survivor scan and the seal, and the sealed record says a person decided (human-desktop); this path needs no native engine on the agent's side. propose_redactions is the explicit form of the same thing; get_proposal_status follows the outcome; the person picks the output path in Omitly's own save dialog (outputPath is kept as the client's suggestion). Needs an omitly-mcp release that knows the channel — an older server writes directly. With no desktop running (or the toggle off), the write tools behave exactly as before and the record says mcp-agent (not human-reviewed). The two sides talk through files under the state directory (OMITLY_STATE_DIR, else ~/.omitly: desktop.json, proposals/, clients/) — no socket, no network. The PDF and the engine stay on this computer; text a client asks for (for example extract_pdf_text) goes to wherever that client's model runs.

PDF generation (create_pdf)

create_pdf is served by a separate binary, omitly-pdf, kept apart from the redaction engine because generation is a different trust model from verifiable redaction. It renders Markdown (or raw HTML) through a headless Chromium-family browser (Chrome/Chromium/Edge/Brave; override with OMITLY_BROWSER_BIN) — the same engine family the Omitly app's webview uses, so output looks printed rather than script-generated. It needs the native omitly-pdf binary, which is not currently distributed (omitly#1405) and whose source is not in this repository; point OMITLY_PDF_BIN at a copy to enable this tool.

jsonc
// stdin{ "command": "create", "outputPath": "/abs/out.pdf",  "source": "# Hello\n\nBody **markdown**", "format": "markdown", "title": "Hello" }// stdout{ "ok": true, "output": "/abs/out.pdf" }

Typical agent flows:

  • Quick: redact_by_entity (find + redact + verify in one call).
  • Careful: find_sensitive_regions / locate_text → review → redact_pdf → verify_redaction. Coordinates from find/locate drop straight into redact as its regions argument.

See DEMO.md for a full Claude Code walkthrough.

Status

The MCP surface (eleven tools, schemas, transport), the native engine binary (crates/omitly-cli, built as omitly-redact), and the bundled wasm engine (crates/leakcheck-wasm, covering the five free tools without a native binary) are all implemented and pass end-to-end tests. find_sensitive_regions is a first-pass detector (ASCII patterns, per-show-operator matching): treat its hits as candidates for review, not a completeness guarantee. An LLM can always supply additional regions directly.

Scanned (image-only) pages are desktop-only in Omitly 5.3. The engine CLI (omitly-redact) and this server have no OCR path; only the desktop app can OCR a scanned page. Both fail closed on an image-only page: find reports count 0 with scanComplete: false, and redact comes back needs_review / review_required with a review line saying the page content is an image only, so any text there was not read. check_redaction can still say clean: true for such a page, but always with scanComplete: false and text that leads with "INCOMPLETE SCAN", so it is never reported as a complete scan, and a production of scanned documents can only reach an affirmative verdict in the desktop app. Engine-side OCR is a later release, not scheduled — not in 5.3.

Privacy of findings. This server processes files locally and never uploads them. Every tool result, though, is returned to your MCP client, so it enters that client's model context and goes wherever the client sends it: "nothing is uploaded" describes the file, not the results. The detection tools (find_sensitive_regions, check_redaction, verify_redaction) return a masked preview of each finding (e.g. •••-••-6789) rather than the raw value, and redaction is driven by page + coordinates. extract_pdf_text masks recognised values by default, but masked: false is an explicit opt-in under which raw text appears verbatim in the result and in the model's context. Masking covers only the recognised pattern kinds (email, SSN, phone, card and the Australian identifiers): a name, an address or a clause the detector does not know is returned as ordinary text. locate_text hits also carry a masked preview, but that mask hides all but the last four letters or digits of whatever text matched, so short or distinctive strings stay partly legible.

Engine contract (implemented in crates/omitly-cli)

The server spawns OMITLY_REDACT_BIN, writes a JSON request to stdin, and reads a JSON response from stdout. Any failure returns { "ok": false, "error": "..." } (the process still exits 0, so the caller reads ok rather than the exit code).

jsonc
// stdin{ "command": "find", "pdfPath": "..." }// stdout{ "ok": true, "count": 2, "regions": [  { "page": 0, "x": 250.4, "y": 610.4, "width": 79.2, "height": 14.4, "kind": "ssn", "preview": "•••-••-6789" } ] }// `preview` is masked — the raw value never leaves the process; redaction is driven by coordinates.
jsonc
// stdin — "masked" omitted ⇒ true (the default); pass "masked": false for the// documented raw-text opt-in. "regions" narrows detected kinds (generic// kinds like email/card always apply).{ "command": "extract_text", "pdfPath": "..." }// stdout — "spans" offsets are CHAR (not byte) offsets into "text", valid// against either the masked or the raw text of the same page (masking never// changes a page's character count). A page whose text could not be fully// read reports "contentDecoded": false rather than being silently skipped;// any text that was read is still returned, so treat that page as incomplete.{ "ok": true, "masked": true, "pages": [  { "page": 0, "contentDecoded": true,    "text": "Sensitive sample line: SSN •••-••-6789",    "spans": [ { "kind": "ssn", "start": 24, "end": 35 } ] } ] }
jsonc
// stdin{ "command": "redact", "pdfPath": "...", "outputPath": "...",  "regions": [{ "page": 0, "x": 72, "y": 700, "width": 200, "height": 14, "reason": "PII.SSN" }] }// stdout — also writes "<outputPath>.audit.json" beside the file{ "ok": true, "output": "...", "audit": { "verdict": "pass", "regions": [ ... ], "warnings": [], "metadataScrubbed": true } }
jsonc
// stdin — recovers the redacted regions from "<pdfPath>.audit.json"{ "command": "verify", "pdfPath": "..." }// stdout — hiddenContent re-checks thumbnails / document actions / embedded// files on the delivered bytes (omitly#171); any fail flips the verdict{ "ok": true, "verdict": "pass", "regions": [ ... ], "metadataScrubbed": true,  "hiddenContent": [ { "class": "thumbnails", "verification": { "result": "pass" } }, ... ] }
jsonc
// stdin — checks the embedded audit report + whole-file seal (v1 or v2), not// redaction completeness (that's "verify" above){ "command": "verify_seal", "pdfPath": "..." }// stdout — verdict is one of: no_report | seal_invalid |// seal_unsupported_version | incomplete | verified. seal_unsupported_version// means this verifier is too old to check the seal at all — sealValid is// `null` (checked nothing), never true or false; carriesAuditReport flags// whether the file also carries an Omitly audit report (escalation signal).// sealRemoved (omitly#1591) is true when the file carries a sealed report but// no seal at all (typically re-saved in another app) — a reason beside// seal_invalid or a v2 cannot_verify, never a verdict of its own.{ "ok": true, "verdict": "verified", "sealValid": true, "sealFingerprint": "...",  "allPassed": true, "metadataScrubbed": true, "regionCount": 2, "pageCount": 4,  "warnings": [], "licenseProvenance": null,  "inputSha256": "...", "outputSha256": "...",  "sourceFilename": "...", "outputFilename": "..." }
jsonc
// stdin — omitly#1267: the Safe to Send verdict over the file AS PRESENTED// (the desktop "Check any PDF" check; the bundled wasm `check` returns the// same object). Free, read-only, no qpdf.{ "command": "check", "pdfPath": "..." }// stdout — verdict is one of: safe_to_send | needs_review | cannot_verify;// "blocking" marks a problem found (e.g. text recoverable under a box).// These are verdicts about the CHECK, scoped to what it covered// (result.checked / result.notChecked) — never "the document is safe".// "report" is the presented audit v2 report, present only when it verified;// "reason_code" is set only for input_too_large / check_failed.{ "ok": true, "check": { "verdict": "needs_review", "blocking": true,  "result": { "state": "needs_review", "summary": "...", "problems": [ { "text": "...", "pages": [1] } ], ... },  "report": { "schema": "omitly.audit/v2", "release_check": { "mode": "presented", "overall": "unsafe", ... }, ... },  "reason_code": null } }

The MCP tool verify_document (omitly#113) shells out to the exact same verify_seal engine command above — it is the recipient-facing name/wording for the same seal/report integrity check, not a separate engine command.

Native engine

create_pdf, verify_seal, verify_document and the two write tools (redact_pdf, redact_by_entity) always need a native engine configured; the five free tools use the bundled wasm engine unless one is. The native binaries (omitly-redact, omitly-pdf) are not currently distributed outside the source repo (omitly#1405). Neither seal tool has a wasm fallback, even though checking a seal carries no licence requirement (see "Licensing" below).

One env var covers both binaries: OMITLY_ENGINE_DIR is the directory holding omitly-redact and omitly-pdf. Per-binary overrides (OMITLY_REDACT_BIN, OMITLY_PDF_BIN) win over the directory when set. When OMITLY_ENGINE_DIR (or OMITLY_REDACT_BIN) isn't set, find_sensitive_regions, locate_text, check_redaction, and extract_pdf_text transparently use the bundled wasm engine instead — same detector, no native binary (extract_pdf_text's optional regions filter is native-only; wasm scans every pattern and notes that the filter was ignored). verify_redaction does too, but with a narrower check: without a native engine there's no <path>.audit.json sidecar to verify specific regions against, so it falls back to a general re-scan of the whole file (still useful — a non-empty result still means the file isn't clean — just not the same rigor as the sidecar-based check).

find/redact need qpdf for the redaction pipeline (QPDF_BIN overrides the PATH lookup). find alone (native or wasm) is read-only and works without it.

Access control

Every path in a tool call comes from the model, so the server confines all reads and writes to one allowed directory:

  • OMITLY_ALLOWED_DIR — set it in the MCP config (recommended). Without it, the directory the server was started in is used.
  • Symlinks are resolved before the check, so a link inside the root pointing outside it is refused.
  • Outputs never overwrite an existing file (or its .audit.json sidecar); the agent is asked to pick a fresh name instead.
  • OMITLY_ENGINE_TIMEOUT_MS (default 120000) — a wedged engine process is killed at the deadline instead of hanging the agent's tool call.

These are guardrails against confused-deputy mistakes, not a sandbox against a hostile local user — see docs/THREAT-MODEL.md.

Licensing

redact_pdf/redact_by_entity are the write surface, enforced inside the engine binary (not in this server, and not bypassable by the bundled wasm fallback — wasm never touches these two tools): a Pro or Personal licence (OMITLY_LICENSE_FILE, or the Omitly desktop app's activated licence on the same machine) runs unmarked; otherwise the shared 14-day trial applies and the audit output is permanently marked as evaluation output. The redaction itself is never degraded, and licence checks never touch the network. find_sensitive_regions, locate_text, check_redaction, verify_redaction, verify_seal, verify_document, and extract_pdf_text are free — and locate_text/verify_redaction/verify_seal/verify_document/extract_pdf_text are free forever with no cap and no marking (recipient-side verification and on-device extraction are the point, not a metered funnel). The two free detection tools (find_sensitive_regions, check_redaction) on the wasm tier — i.e. with no native engine configured — are metered (omitly#226): results carry an evaluation: true flag plus an EVALUATION banner, and after 10 attempts a month across the two tools (one shared counter; OMITLY_FREE_CAP changes the number) the tool returns a structured { blocked: true, reason: "free-cap" } refusal until the month rolls over. The count lives in ~/.omitly/usage.json (override the directory with OMITLY_STATE_DIR; written 0600) and is local-only — nothing ever phones home; deleting the file resets the free count, which is accepted (the no-network doctrine makes it unavoidable), and the counter is deliberately never consulted by any paid write path. An attempt is counted before the scan runs, so a failed attempt still counts. Calls served by a configured native engine (licensed or not) are not metered here — that user is in the engine funnel, where the licence rules above apply. verify_seal and verify_document (both native-only) stay free by the same design in crates/omitly-cli (no Pro/Personal licence check on that command path either — both tools shell out to the identical verify_seal engine command).

One-click install for Claude Desktop (MCPB, free tier only)

mcpb/ packages the four free/diagnosis tools (check_redaction, find_sensitive_regions, locate_text, verify_redaction) — never the write tools — as a self-contained MCPB .mcpb extension: no Node/npm/Rust toolchain on the end user's machine, just "Install Extension…" in Claude Desktop. This is a deliberately smaller, separate server (mcpb/server/index.js) from dist/index.js above, so the bundle can never expose redact_pdf/redact_by_entity/create_pdf even by accident.

Download: releases.omitly.app/mcp/omitly-leak-check.mcpb — always the current version (published by publish-npm.yml on every real omitly-mcp release; a versioned copy + checksum also live at mcp/latest.json). Drag the downloaded file into Claude Desktop, or use "Install Extension…".

To build the bundle yourself, see "Building from source".

Not signed (mcpb sign needs a code-signing cert we don't have yet — same gate as desktop app signing). mcpb info on the packed file confirms WARNING: Not signed. Whether Claude Desktop's "Install Extension…" flow blocks or just warns on an unsigned .mcpb has NOT been confirmed against the real Desktop app in this change (no Desktop GUI in this environment) — that check is still open, tracked in omitly#225.

Building from source

Building this repository. A registry install (see "Install") needs none of this.

The server and the free tools (no native engine):

bash
cd omitly-mcpnpm installnpm run build  # plain tsc; the wasm bundle ships prebuilt in wasm/node dist/index.js

This repository ships the compiled wasm bundle in wasm/, alongside wasm/leakcheck_wasm_bg.wasm.sha256 so you can verify the byte-for-byte artifact you received. It is the same bundle published in the npm package. That means npm install && npm run build && npm test works here with no Rust toolchain: npm run build is plain tsc. The wasm is compiled from the Omitly detection engine, whose Rust source is not part of this repository (see "Repository scope" above).

The native engine binaries (for create_pdf, the seal tools and the write tools; see "Native engine"):

bash
# Build and start the MCP server (no Rust toolchain needed)npm installnpm run buildnode dist/index.js
# To enable the native-engine tools as well, point at a directory containing# the Omitly engine binaries (omitly-redact, omitly-pdf). They are not currently# distributed (omitly#1405), and their source is not in this repository.OMITLY_ENGINE_DIR=/abs/path/to/engine node dist/index.js

Registering a local build with Claude Code:

bash
claude mcp add omitly -- env \  OMITLY_ENGINE_DIR=/path/to/engine-dir \  OMITLY_ALLOWED_DIR=/path/agents/may/touch \  node /abs/path/to/omitly-mcp/dist/index.js

or in Claude Desktop's claude_desktop_config.json:

jsonc
{  "mcpServers": {    "omitly": {      "command": "node",      "args": ["/abs/path/to/omitly-mcp/dist/index.js"],      "env": {        "OMITLY_ENGINE_DIR": "/path/to/engine-dir",        "OMITLY_ALLOWED_DIR": "/path/agents/may/touch"      }    }  }}

The MCPB bundle:

bash
npm run mcpb:pack   # copy wasm/ into mcpb/wasm + npm install + mcpb pack                     # → dist-mcpb/omitly-leak-check.mcpb

mcpb:pack needs no Rust toolchain — it reuses the prebuilt wasm/ in this repository (builds the shared wasm detector once, then copies it into mcpb/ — see mcpb/scripts/copy-wasm.mjs). The packed .mcpb itself needs nothing but Node, already bundled inside Claude Desktop.

Source: README.md at commit 401b171

Tools

13

find_sensitive_regions

Scan a PDF on-device and return candidate regions that look like PII — emails, US SSNs, phone numbers, card numbers, and Australian identifiers (TFN, ABN, ACN, Medicare, Centrelink CRN, IHI, BSB; kinds 'tfn'/'abn'/'acn'/'medicare'/'crn'/'ihi'/'bsb') — each with the page and exact coordinates (in PDF points) the redaction engine needs. Use this FIRST so you select regions by entity ('redact every TFN') and pass the returned coordinates straight to redact_pdf, instead of guessing geometry from a rendered page. Numeric kinds are check-digit validated where a published algorithm exists (CRN has none — its matches are format-only). Candidates are best-effort pattern matches for review — not a completeness guarantee and not a compliance assessment; the file is never uploaded — detection runs locally. Each candidate carries a MASKED preview (e.g. '•••-••-6789'), never the raw value: the secret stays on the machine. You don't need the plaintext to redact — drive it by page + coordinates. (A human reviewer has the file open locally for full context.) Free tier (no native engine): results are EVALUATION-marked and limited (by default) to 10 attempts a month, shared with check_redaction and counted locally — past the cap this tool returns a structured 'free-cap' refusal. A configured native engine is not capped.

ParameterspdfPathrequiredregions

locate_text

Locate exact text strings in a PDF and return each occurrence's page and coordinates (in PDF points). Use this for what pattern-matching can't catch — names, addresses, account references — by doing the entity recognition YOURSELF and passing the literal strings here; the engine resolves where they sit so you never guess geometry from a rendered page. Feed the returned regions straight to redact_pdf. Case-insensitive; a string the PDF splits across text operators may not match as one run. Each hit returns a masked preview, not the raw text. Nothing is uploaded.

ParameterstextsrequiredpdfPathrequired

redact_by_entity

Find and redact PII in a PDF in ONE on-device step: scan, keep only the requested entity kinds (email/ssn/phone/card plus the Australian tfn/abn/acn/medicare/crn/ihi/bsb — omit `kinds` to redact every kind detected), remove them, verify, and return what was redacted plus the audit log. This is the 'just scrub the obvious PII' shortcut; when you need to review before removing, call find_sensitive_regions first. Same caveat as the detector: matches are best-effort pattern matching, not a completeness guarantee and not a compliance assessment. Nothing is uploaded.

ParameterskindsdrawBoxpdfPathrequiredregionsoutputPathrequired

redact_pdf

Permanently redact regions of a PDF on-device using Omitly. Removes the underlying text and image data (not a black box over it), verifies nothing survives in each region, and returns a signed audit log. The file is never uploaded — redaction happens locally.

ParameterspdfPathrequiredregionsrequiredoutputPathrequired

verify_redaction

Re-scan an already-redacted PDF on-device and confirm nothing recoverable remains. With a configured native engine and this file's own `<path>.audit.json` sidecar (written by redact_pdf/redact_by_entity), this re-checks exactly the regions that were redacted — the strongest form of this check. Without a native engine (or without that sidecar — e.g. the file wasn't redacted by this tool), it falls back to a general on-device re-scan of the whole file and reports whether anything is still detectable — a good-faith re-check, not a claim of the same rigor as the sidecar-based path. This is a self-check for the person who just redacted, typically the one holding the sidecar file — a third-party recipient who only has the delivered PDF should use `verify_document` instead, which checks the embedded audit report and seal rather than re-scanning region bytes.

ParameterspdfPathrequired

check_license

Report Omitly's current licence or trial state on this machine — free, takes no arguments, and reads no document. Use it to answer 'am I licensed?', to see how many trial days are left, or to confirm a licence the user just saved has been picked up. Re-resolved on EVERY call, so buy → save the licence file → call again works without restarting this server. Reports which resolution step supplied the licence (OMITLY_LICENSE_FILE, the activated desktop licence, or the import inbox ~/.omitly/omitly.license), the tier, the vendor-signed licensee name, whether the licence is bound to this one machine, and whether this build can make licensed-provenance claims at all. It deliberately NEVER returns the device fingerprint (a stable machine identifier) or the licence file's contents — 'device-bound' is reported as a yes/no. Requires a configured native engine (OMITLY_ENGINE_DIR/OMITLY_REDACT_BIN): the wasm free tier has no licence concept, so there is nothing to report without one.

Takes no parameters.

verify_seal

Verify a PDF's embedded Omitly audit report and whole-file tamper-evidence seal (v1: Ed25519; v2: ML-DSA-87 with ECDSA P-384) — on-device, nothing uploaded. Distinct from `verify_redaction`: that tool re-checks whether redacted regions are still empty; this tool cryptographically checks whether the delivered bytes have changed since they were sealed. The seal proves INTEGRITY, NOT IDENTITY: the signing key travels with the file (per-install, or one-time for a single output), so a valid seal means 'unchanged since sealed by the holder of this key', never 'produced by Omitly'. Compare `sealFingerprint` out-of-band against the fingerprint the sender published if origin matters. Requires a configured native engine — there is no wasm seal-verification path, so this always needs OMITLY_ENGINE_DIR/OMITLY_REDACT_BIN. A `seal_unsupported_version` verdict means this verifier is too old to check the seal at all — that is neither a pass nor a fail; update the verifier rather than trusting or rejecting the file on that basis.

ParameterspdfPathrequired

verify_document

Recipient trust-verification: for someone who RECEIVED a PDF from someone else and wants to confirm it's an authentic, unaltered Omitly output — free tier, no licence required. Confirms the embedded audit report and whole-file tamper-evidence seal (v1: Ed25519; v2: ML-DSA-87 with ECDSA P-384) are valid and unaltered since sealing, and reports the seal's own attested verdict — this does not independently re-scan the document for residual PII. For that self-check (typically run by the person who just redacted, not a recipient), use `verify_redaction` instead. The seal proves INTEGRITY, NOT IDENTITY: the signing key travels with the file (per-install, or one-time for a single output), so a valid seal means 'unchanged since sealed by the holder of this key', never 'produced by Omitly' — compare `sealFingerprint` out-of-band against the fingerprint the sender published if origin matters. Currently requires a configured native engine (OMITLY_ENGINE_DIR/OMITLY_REDACT_BIN) — there is no wasm seal-verification path yet (tracked in issue #113), so a recipient running only `npx omitly-mcp` with no engine installed cannot use this tool until that lands. A `seal_unsupported_version` verdict means this verifier is too old to check the seal at all — that is neither a pass nor a fail; update the verifier rather than trusting or rejecting the file on that basis.

ParameterspdfPathrequired

create_pdf

Generate a clean PDF from Markdown (or raw HTML) on-device, rendered through a real browser engine so it looks printed — not like a script's best guess. Give it Markdown inline via `source` (or a file via `sourcePath`) and an `outputPath`; it writes the PDF and returns the path. Use this instead of writing a one-off reportlab/LaTeX/pandoc script. Nothing is uploaded.

ParameterscsstitleformatsourceoutputPathrequiredsourcePath

check_redaction

Audit an ALREADY-redacted PDF and report whether sensitive text still survives underneath the redaction — the 'did my black boxes actually remove the data?' check. Most tools redact by drawing a rectangle over text while leaving the characters in the file, where they stay selectable and extractable. This re-extracts the text on-device and flags any emails, SSNs, phone or card numbers that are still present, each with a MASKED preview — the raw value never leaves the machine. It checks the page text layer, text surviving UNDER redaction marks, incremental-update prior revisions (the classic 'redacted then saved, original still in the file' failure), document metadata, AcroForm field values and embedded attachments, and returns a coverage report so a clean result is scoped to what was inspected. A non-empty result means the redaction leaked. Nothing is uploaded. (Pattern-based: names/addresses, image-only text, and the surfaces listed as not-inspected aren't covered; absence of hits isn't proof of completeness.) Free tier (no native engine): reports are EVALUATION-marked — for evaluation, not production reliance — and limited (by default) to 10 attempts a month, shared with find_sensitive_regions and counted locally; past the cap this tool returns a structured 'free-cap' refusal. A configured native engine is not capped. `scanComplete` is false when some page or stream could not be read; then `clean` only means nothing was found in what WAS read (possibly nothing) and the text leads with an INCOMPLETE SCAN warning — never report such a result as clean. The result also carries `verdict`: the same presented-document check the Omitly desktop app's 'Check any PDF' runs, as one of three verdicts about THE CHECK — 'safe_to_send' (every check that applies to this file passed, within what the check covers; `verdict.result.notChecked` lists what it did not), 'needs_review' (something needs a person to look before sending; `blocking` true means a problem such as recoverable tex

ParameterspdfPathrequired

extract_pdf_text

Extract a PDF's text, page by page, for reading or summarizing — PII-MASKED BY DEFAULT, so detected emails, SSNs, phone/card numbers and Australian identifiers (TFN/ABN/ACN/Medicare/CRN/IHI/BSB) never flood your context window as raw values. Each page returns its (masked, unless you opt out) text plus 'spans': the CHAR offset (not byte offset — matters for any non-ASCII text) of every detected PII value with its kind, so you can still reason about WHERE something was found even though the value itself reads as a masked preview (e.g. '•••-••-6789'). Pass 'masked: false' ONLY when you deliberately need the raw text for genuine content review and understand the raw PII values will then appear verbatim in this response and in your context — that is the explicit, documented opt-in this tool requires; the default is always masked. A page whose text could not be fully read (a corrupt or size-capped content stream, or characters whose meaning the font does not define) reports 'contentDecoded: false' rather than being silently skipped or counted as blank; any text that was read is still returned, so treat that page as incomplete, not as the whole page. Does NOT render pages to images — text only. Free tier, no licence required; works zero-install via the bundled wasm engine, same as find_sensitive_regions/locate_text/check_redaction/verify_redaction — a configured native engine (OMITLY_ENGINE_DIR) is preferred when available (also enables the 'regions' filter, wasm-only ignores it and scans every pattern) but not required. The file is never uploaded: extraction runs entirely on-device.

ParametersmaskedpdfPathrequiredregions

propose_redactions

Propose regions to redact for a PERSON to accept in the Omitly desktop app (omitly#1643, bring your own AI). The explicit, preferred form for agents working alongside a lawyer: nothing is written by this call. The desktop app shows the proposal, the person accepts or rejects, and on acceptance Omitly removes the content, verifies nothing survives and seals the output with a record that a person decided. Requires the Omitly desktop app to be running on this computer; use get_proposal_status to follow the outcome. Same inputs as redact_pdf. Nothing is uploaded.

ParameterspdfPathrequiredregionsrequiredoutputPathrequired

get_proposal_status

Report what happened to a proposal queued by propose_redactions (or by redact_pdf / redact_by_entity while accept-in-app was on): pending, accepted, rejected, applied (removed, verified and sealed by the desktop app, with the output path and verdict), failed, or expired. Free; reads no document.

ParametersproposalIdrequired

Version history

8
  1. v5.3.0LatestNov 3, 2026
  2. v5.2.0Oct 29, 2026
  3. v4.3.0Oct 26, 2026
  4. v0.3.10Oct 25, 2026
  5. v0.3.9Oct 24, 2026
  6. v0.3.8Oct 23, 2026
  7. v0.3.7Oct 20, 2026
  8. v0.1.16Sep 16, 2026

Score

80% of the applicable checks met

How complete this listing is, computed from the registry entry, the endpoint and public sources. Not a rating of the server and not a statement that it is safe or working today: reachability is a dated check, and no installs or reviews go into the score.

  • Reached in the last 30 days25 pts
  • Auth declared10 pts

    Declare the credential headers in the registry entry, or keep the endpoint answering the probe so its auth can be classified.

  • Tools listedRequired15 pts
  • DescriptionRequired15 pts
  • Logo10 pts
  • Documentation15 pts
  • License10 pts

    Declare a license in the repository or the registry entry.