Verified Rec

verified-rec

Hash-chained audit ledger for AI agent work. Append-only records anyone can verify and replay — did the agent really do what it says it did?

An MCP server. Zero npm dependencies. Records land in a plain text file you own.

You:   "ship the release."Agent: *does the work, records each step into the ledger*You:   "verify the ledger."Agent: "chain intact — 14 entries, head 9f3c…, nothing edited."

Tools

Install

One line, any MCP host:

// ~/.codebuddy/.mcp.json  (WorkBuddy / CodeBuddy)   — user scope// ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json  (Claude Desktop){  "mcpServers": {    "verified-rec": {      "type": "stdio",      "command": "npx",      "args": ["-y", "verified-rec"]    }  }}

Local checkout works the same way ("command": "node", "args": ["/path/to/verified-rec/src/server.js"]). Node ≥ 18. No build step, no native modules, no network.

Usage

After installing, just talk to your agent — the tools are named in plain language and it will pick them up:

• "Open a ledger for today's release work." → ledger_start creates release.vrec with a genesis entry and returns the first chain head.
• "Record what you just did." (as the agent works) → ledger_append adds one step (action, optional actor / note) and returns the new head.
• "Verify the ledger." → ledger_verify recomputes the chain and reports ok + entry count + head — or the first broken line number if anything was edited.
• "Show me the ledger." → ledger_replay lists entries in order.

Verifying a game recording (see Origin):

• "Check this recording: /path/to/play.rec, head 9f3c…" → game_verify_rec replays it and answers one of three ways: reproduced (some registered kernel recomputes the head — authentic), not-reproduced (none does — tampered or from an unregistered game version), premise-broken (the recording's facts match no kernel at all). Without an expected head it just proves the recording is replayable and reports its head.

Tip: after any important ledger_append, publish the chain head (commit message, release note, chat). That is what turns "I didn't edit it" into "nobody edited it" — the published head pins the chain retroactively.

How verification works

Each entry links to the previous one by hash:

entry.hash = sha256([seq, ts, actor, action, note, prev].canonical)entry.prev = previous entry.hash          (genesis prev = 64 zeros)

ledger_verify recomputes the whole chain. Edit one field in one line, swap two lines, delete one — the first broken line is reported by number.

Threat model, honestly stated: this catches accidental edits and casual tampering. It cannot catch an attacker who rewrites the entire chain and its head. The fix is the oldest trick in accounting: publish the head — commit it, tweet it, put it in a release note. A retroactive edit then breaks against the published head, anywhere.

Origin

This ledger is an extraction. It came from a game — 《它在维护一场对话》(It Is Maintaining a Conversation), a free narrative game about a mind that maintains memories for someone, and loses them. Every in-game state is hash-chained; every playthrough can be recorded as a .rec file and replayed byte-for-byte. The design discipline behind that ("decisions are hashed, prose is not; same inputs, same chain head") is what this tool generalizes.

The lineage is one step older: the game evolved from dbx-sql-guard, a hash-chain guard for SQL — the same instinct, three forms: a database guard, a game, a work ledger.

game_verify_rec keeps that story executable. It replays a .rec recording through the same deterministic narrative kernel (versioned compiled artifacts, see LICENSE-content.md and PROVENANCE.md) and reports the chain head — the head of the game's own hash chain, where head = H(prev ‖ frame ‖ canonical state) per frame. Give it an expectedHead and it becomes an integrity check with three outcomes: reproduced (some registered kernel version recomputes the head — authentic), not-reproduced (no registered kernel does — tampered, or from an unregistered game version), premise-broken (the recording's facts digest matches no kernel at all). Kernel upgrades add a new registered version; old recordings keep verifying against old kernels — an upgrade never falsifies an honest recording.

The kernel is a compiled artifact, and that is a fair thing to be suspicious of in an audit tool. PROVENANCE.md answers it: every kernel version ships with its source wasm and SHA-256, is byte-reproducible from it via a pinned wasm2js command (./gen-kernel.sh), and is anchored to the game's publicly registered golden chain heads — verify it yourself in minutes, no trust in the author required.

Files

• *.vrec — ledger files, newline-delimited JSON. Plain text; diffable, greppable.
• .rec — game recordings (crossgame-slice-recording line format: seed=, facts=, variants=, then f=<frame> <tokens> per frame). Produced by the game's own export panel.

License

Code: Apache-2.0. The narrative content compiled into kernel/ (sim-<ver>.wasm / kernel-asm-<ver>.js): All Rights Reserved (see LICENSE-content.md). The two halves are explained in both files — engine is engineering, story is authorship.

中文

给 AI Agent 工作用的哈希链账本。 追加式记录，任何人都能校验和重放—— Agent 说它做过的事，链上做没做过，一验便知。

MCP server，零 npm 依赖，账本是你自己机器上的纯文本文件。

安装：上面那段 JSON 照抄进 MCP 配置（WorkBuddy/CodeBuddy 是 ~/.codebuddy/.mcp.json），一行 npx -y verified-rec。Node ≥ 18， 无构建、无原生模块、不碰网络。

使用：装完直接跟 Agent 说话就行，工具会被自动挑中：

• "开一本账记今天的发版工作" → ledger_start 建 .vrec，创世环 + 首个链头
• "把刚才做的事记上"（干活途中随时）→ ledger_append 记一环，返回新链头
• "验一下这本账" → ledger_verify 全量重算：完好报 ok + 条数 + 链头， 被改过就报第一个断链行号
• "把账读一遍" → ledger_replay 按序列出

验游戏录像（见出处段）：

• "验这份录像 /path/to/play.rec，链头 9f3c…" → game_verify_rec 三态回答： reproduced（某登记内核复现链头 ⇒ 真实）/ not-reproduced（都复现不出 ⇒ 篡改或未登记版本）/ premise-broken（facts 对不上任何内核）。不给链头 则只证明可重放并报出链头。

用法要点：重要操作 ledger_append 之后，把链头登记出去（提交信息 / 发布记录 / 聊天里贴一下）——这一步才把"我没改过"升级成"谁都没法改"。

防篡改的诚实边界：抓得住手改和误改；抓不住「重算整条链并伪造链头」的 攻击者。解法是会计行最古老的一招——把链头登记出去（git 提交 / 公开贴文）， 事后改账就与公开链头对不上。

内核的出生证明：kernel/ 里的编译产物不是黑箱——每个版本带源 wasm 与 SHA-256，可用 PROVENANCE.md 里钉死的 wasm2js 命令 （./gen-kernel.sh）逐字节重建，并用游戏公开登记的黄金链头锚定内容。 game_verify_rec 的三态判定：reproduced（某登记版本内核复现链头 ⇒ 真实）/ not-reproduced（所有登记版本都算不出 ⇒ 篡改或录自未登记版本）/ premise-broken（facts 对不上任何内核）。内核升级是追加新版本，老录像 永远用老内核验，升级不会冤枉诚实的录像。

出处：这套账本是从游戏里提出来的。《它在维护一场对话》 ——一个关于记忆衰减的免费叙事游戏，它把每一帧状态都串成哈希链，每一局都能 录成 .rec 逐帧重放。本工具就是那套纪律的通用化。谱系再往前一步：游戏本身 演化自 dbx-sql-guard—— 同一个本能的三种形态：数据库守卫、游戏、工作账本。