
PJQ — Public Judgment Quotient
life.pjqPublished by pjq.lifeOfficial publisherv1.0.0Updated Oct 24, 2026
Observatory of public media reception: classify YouTube comments for mood, support and controversy.
Overview
PJQ analyzes YouTube comments and returns a reception verdict — a mood score plus a stance breakdown — so an assistant can gauge how an audience received a…
- What you can do
- Run an analysis on a piece of content by its URL, sampling the comments beneath it.
- Read verdicts: a numeric mood score plus counts of substantive support, pushback and neutral opinion.
- See how much of the discussion is noise — off-topic, thin praise, bots or self-promoters — reported separately from opinion metrics.
- Read-only lookups are described as free of credits; a full analysis consumes one credit.
- When to use it
- Useful when you want an assistant to judge audience reception of a video or other media rather than just its view counts, for example to compare how different audiences reacted or to separate genuine opinion from bot and promotional noise.
- Requirements
- Remote MCP endpoint at pjq.life over streamable HTTP. A bearer API key is required in the Authorization header; a free key is created in the Cabinet on the site. Network access to the hosted service is needed; the analysis engine itself is closed and hosted.
Installation
In SourceWeft
- Open PJQ — Public Judgment Quotient in the dashboard and add it to a workspace.
- Connect Authorization token credentials. They are stored privately and never shown on public pages.
- Enable the server for the chats that should use its tools.
Web executable via Streamable HTTP. Remote servers run from the web runtime once configured in a workspace.
Use with an agent
Paste this prompt into Claude Code, Codex, Cursor or another agent — or into SourceWeft chat. The agent reads this server's install guide, shows you its publisher, endpoint and sign-in, and adds it to your client once you agree. Keys never go into a command.
Read https://sourceweft.com/mcp/life.pjq%2Fpjq/install.md and connect the MCP server it describes to my client. Before changing any config, show me its publisher, endpoint and sign-in method and wait for my OK. Never put an API key in a command or in a file I would commit; ask me where it should come from.Other MCP clients
Add this to your client's mcpServers config.
{
"mcpServers": {
"pjq-public-judgment-quotient": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://pjq.life/mcp/",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"
}
}
}
}README
PJQ — Public Judgment Quotient
A seismograph for public opinion. PJQ measures how an audience actually received a piece of media — separating genuine opinion from fan noise, bots, and self-promoters.
Live: pjq.life · License: Apache-2.0
What this is
PJQ takes the URL of a piece of content (YouTube today; Reddit, Telegram, and
News next), samples the comments under it, and classifies every comment against
a 7-category stance rubric. The output is a verdict: a numeric reception
score (mood) plus a structured breakdown — how many people substantively
agreed, how many pushed back, how many stayed neutral, and how much noise is
drowning the signal.
Think of it as an observatory of media reception, exposed over two transports on one core:
- a REST API (
/api/v1/*) for analytics automation, and - an MCP server (
/mcp/) so AI agents (Claude Desktop and friends) can run analyses and read verdicts directly inside a chat.
What's in this repository
This repo is the open client + specification of PJQ. The hosted analysis engine (sampling, classification, QA, the ONNX stance model and the prompt internals) stays closed — it is the product's moat. What's open here is everything you need to use, integrate with, and understand PJQ:
The 7-category rubric (in one breath)
Every comment gets exactly one of: SUP (substantive support), AGA (substantive against), NEU (neutral), OFF (off-topic), THIN (thin positive — praise without an argument), SUS (inorganic — bot / paid / coordinated), AGN (own agenda — the comment is a vehicle for the author's external goal).
Reporting rule: opinion metrics (mood, support) are computed strictly
from SUP / AGA / NEU. THIN / OFF / SUS / AGN are counted separately and never
inflate support percentages. See spec/RUBRIC.md.
Running the web client
The client is a standard Vite SPA. By default it talks to the hosted backend at
pjq.life (same-origin in production).
To point the client at a different backend, copy web/.env.example and set
VITE_API_BASE.
Integrating
- REST API — get an API key from the Cabinet on pjq.life,
then see
docs/api-reference.md. Read-only tools cost no credits; a full analysis costs one credit. - MCP — point an MCP-capable client at
https://pjq.life/mcp/and seedocs/mcp-reference.mdfor the exported tools.
Comment raw texts are never returned over the API — only aggregates, percentages, and a small set of representative exemplars, per PJQ's privacy policy.
Status
PJQ is live and in active development. The roadmap is public at pjq.life/flightlog. This repository tracks the client and the spec; engine changes ship to the hosted service.
License
Copyright 2026 PJQ (github.com/Makaric). Licensed under the Apache License,
Version 2.0 — see LICENSE.
Русская версия: README_RU.md.
Source: README.md at commit cf65787
Tools
0Version history
1- v1.0.0LatestSep 16, 2026
Score
60% of the applicable checks met
How complete this listing is, computed from the registry entry, the endpoint and public sources. Not a rating of the server and not a statement that it is safe or working today: reachability is a dated check, and no installs or reviews go into the score.
- Reached in the last 30 daysRequired25 pts
Keep the endpoint answering the MCP handshake; SourceWeft probes it every 30 days.
- Auth declaredRequired10 pts
- Tools listed15 pts
Answer tools/list without a credential, or ship a package that starts in a sandbox without one.
- DescriptionRequired15 pts
- Logo10 pts
- Documentation15 pts
- License10 pts