A remote MCP server that reviews Python code, returning a structured report on security, bugs, performance and style, plus a 0-10 quality score.
What you can do
Review pasted Python code and get a structured report covering security vulnerabilities, bug detection, performance optimization suggestions, code standards and refactoring advice, at quick, standard or deep depth. Request only a code quality score with a brief rating, without the full report.
When to use it
Useful when you want a second opinion on a Python snippet or file before committing or shipping it, or a quick quality score to triage code. It suits ad hoc review rather than repository-wide analysis.
Requirements
A remote endpoint reached over streamable HTTP; no package, account, API key or environment variable is declared. The code to review is supplied as a tool argument.
Before you install
Code you submit is sent to a third-party server at a duckdns.org address with no declared authentication, so avoid pasting secrets, credentials or proprietary code. The review is advisory and may miss issues; verify findings before acting on them.
Enable the server for the chats that should use its tools.
Web executable via Streamable HTTP. Remote servers run from the web runtime once configured in a workspace.
Use with an agent
Paste this prompt into Claude Code, Codex, Cursor or another agent — or into SourceWeft chat. The agent reads this server's install guide, shows you its publisher, endpoint and sign-in, and adds it to your client once you agree. Keys never go into a command.
Read https://sourceweft.com/mcp/org.duckdns.43-134-36-21%2Fpython-code-reviewer/install.md and connect the MCP server it describes to my client. Before changing any config, show me its publisher, endpoint and sign-in method and wait for my OK. Never put an API key in a command or in a file I would commit; ask me where it should come from.
Review Python code and output a structured report: security vulnerabilities, bug detection, performance optimization suggestions, code standards, and refactoring advice.
Args:
code: The Python code to review
depth: Review depth (quick/standard/deep)
Parameterscoderequireddepth
python_quality_score
Return only the code quality score and brief rating, without a full report.
Args:
code: The Python code to score
Parameterscoderequired
Version history
1
v1.27.1LatestSep 16, 2026
Score
72%
72% of the applicable checks met
How complete this listing is, computed from the registry entry, the endpoint and public sources. Not a rating of the server and not a statement that it is safe or working today: reachability is a dated check, and no installs or reviews go into the score.
Reached in the last 30 daysRequired25 pts
Auth declaredRequired10 pts
Tools listedRequired15 pts
DescriptionRequired15 pts
Logo10 pts
Publish an icon in the registry entry.
Documentation15 pts
Declare a GitHub repository with a README, or serve resource_documentation in the OAuth protected-resource metadata.
LicenseNot applicable
A hosted service is used under its provider's terms, so no license is expected here. This check is left out of the percentage.