
Lightpaper Mcp
org.lightpaperPublished by lightpaper.orgv0.1.1Updated Oct 27, 2026
API-first publishing platform. Publish markdown as permanent web pages with quality scoring.
Overview
MCP server for lightpaper.org, an API-first publishing platform, letting an assistant publish markdown as permanent, shareable web pages with quality scores.
- What you can do
- Publish markdown documents to lightpaper.org and get back a permanent URL, a short URL and a quality score with a breakdown.
- Search published documents and browse by tags, authors and feeds.
- Set up and verify an author account, including API key generation and identity verification steps.
- Export content, including print-ready PDF output and license selection at publish time.
- When to use it
- Useful when you want research reports, analyses or design documents produced in a chat to end up as permanent, linkable web pages instead of staying in a chat window or a local markdown file. Also relevant if you want published output that is readable by browsers, search engines and other agents.
- Requirements
- Runs as a local Python package (lightpaper-mcp) over stdio on a desktop machine. Needs a lightpaper.org account and an API key supplied as LIGHTPAPER_API_KEY; the server can also create an account interactively. LIGHTPAPER_BASE_URL optionally points at a different API base and defaults to the hosted service. Network access to the platform is required.
Installation
In SourceWeft
- Open Lightpaper Mcp in the dashboard and add it to a workspace.
- Enable the server for the chats that should use its tools.
Desktop only via STDIO. STDIO servers start a local process, so they need the SourceWeft desktop host.
Other MCP clients
Follow the launch instructions in the repository.
README
lightpaper.org
Permanent knowledge. Beautifully shared. Discoverable by everyone.
An API-first publishing platform where AI agents publish with one HTTP call and humans get beautiful, permanent links — readable by browsers, search engines, agents, and LLMs alike.
The Idea
There is no frontend. No editor. No WYSIWYG. Just an API.
Response:
That URL loads a beautifully typeset page. Perfect OG preview on LinkedIn, X, Slack, email. The URL works forever. Request the same URL with Accept: application/json and you get structured data back. An LLM can read llms.txt at the root to understand the entire platform.
Why
AI agents produce content at unprecedented volume and quality — research reports, technical analyses, design documents. Today, that content dies in chat windows or markdown files. lightpaper.org gives it a permanent, beautiful, discoverable home.
Documentation
The Gap — Five Critical Dimensions
No platform today addresses all five:
1. Agent Discovery
How will agents find the API? MCP server (8,600+ servers ecosystem, Linux Foundation standard), OpenAPI spec at /v1/openapi.json, content negotiation on every URL, and a Google A2A Agent Card for agent-to-agent discovery. llms.txt is served at the root as a low-cost courtesy signal — 844K sites deploy it, though no major AI platform currently reads it. /.well-known/ai-plugin.json (OpenAI plugins) is not implemented — OpenAI plugins were deprecated and the Assistants API sunsets Aug 2026; it is a dead protocol. Agents that have never heard of lightpaper.org can discover and use it through MCP, OpenAPI, and A2A.
2. Content Ownership
API keys are fragile. lightpaper.org has real accounts, revocable keys, full content export, GDPR hard-delete, and clear TOS: authors own copyright, platform has display license only. Authors choose their license at publish time (all-rights-reserved, cc-by-4.0, cc-by-sa-4.0, cc-by-nc-4.0, cc-by-nc-sa-4.0, cc0). Print-ready PDF export generates 6"×9" trade paperback interiors, full wrap covers at 300 DPI, and Certificates of Publication with SHA-256 content hashes — ready for Amazon KDP or IngramSpark.
3. Content Discovery
Not just publishing — finding. Search API from day one (GET /v1/search?q=&tags=), auto-generated sitemap.xml, JSON-LD on every page, tag browsing, author pages, RSS feeds. robots.txt welcomes all crawlers.
4. Quality Control
The name "lightpaper" implies clarity — illuminating ideas, not burying them. Every document gets a quality score (0-100) at publish time: structure, substance, tone, attribution. Score affects visibility (noindex < 40, featured > 70) but content is never refused. Transparent feedback helps authors improve.
5. Author Gravity
Every document requires a human account. The platform takes no position on whether AI assisted the writing — what matters is that a human had the idea, decided it was worth sharing, and put their name to it. That accountability is the strongest spam filter that exists.
Gravity is the platform's measure of how thoroughly an author has verified their identity: email (Level 0) → domain DNS (Level 1) → LinkedIn OAuth (Level 2) → ORCID (Level 3). Gravity affects search ranking (1.0×–1.4× multiplier) and featured eligibility threshold. Badges appear on every document and in every OG image — visible on LinkedIn before anyone clicks.
An onboarding agent (setup_author_identity MCP tool) walks new users through verification in under 2 minutes, handling detection, key generation, and polling automatically. The only things that cannot be automated are the trust signals themselves — the OAuth clicks and DNS records that prove you are who you say you are.
Quick Start
Local Development
Running Tests
Project Structure
Environment Variables
Deployment
Deployed on Google Cloud Run with Cloud SQL PostgreSQL:
See CONTRIBUTING.md for development setup and SECURITY.md for vulnerability reporting.
Learn More
- What is lightpaper.org?
- Publishing your first document via the API
- Using the MCP server
- How quality scoring works
- Author gravity: a trust system for the agentic web
- The case for permanent URLs in an age of disappearing content
Quick Numbers
- Infrastructure: Google Cloud (Cloud Run + Cloud SQL + Firebase Auth), ~$50-100/month at launch
- Revenue target: ~$5K/month by month 12 (freemium at $12/mo Pro)
- Growth mechanic: Every shared link = product demo (the Loom/Figma playbook)
- Four audiences: Every page serves humans, search engines, agents, and LLM training crawlers equally
Research Methodology
This design was developed through three rounds of deep research, then subjected to three critical review passes:
-
Competitive landscape — Analyzed 12 publishing platforms for API capabilities, reading experience, social previews, content ownership, quality control, author credibility, and agent discovery.
-
Viral mechanics — Researched Open Graph optimization, LinkedIn algorithm behavior, agent discovery protocols, LLM training data as distribution, author reputation, and the growth flywheels of Loom ($975M), Figma, Notion.
-
Technical architecture — Designed for Google Cloud (Cloud Run, Cloud SQL, Cloud CDN, Firebase Auth, Cloud Storage). Evaluated rendering pipeline, content negotiation, discovery infrastructure, quality scoring, and the monochrome "lightpaper" design language.
-
Critical review — Three passes identified five gaps (agent discovery, content ownership, content discovery, quality control, author identity) and replaced all external infrastructure (Fly.io, Cloudflare, Upstash) with Google Cloud equivalents.
-
Deep market research — Investigated the agent publishing ecosystem (clawXiv, aiXiv, AgentRxiv, Moltbook), agent identity standards (NIST, ERC-8004, C2PA), current state of discovery protocols (ai-plugin.json dead, llms.txt inert, MCP thriving), Google's Feb 2026 core update, and copyright law for autonomous agent content.
Source: README.md at commit 35202b6
Tools
0Version history
1- v0.1.1LatestSep 16, 2026
Score
50% of the applicable checks met
How complete this listing is, computed from the registry entry, the endpoint and public sources. Not a rating of the server and not a statement that it is safe or working today: reachability is a dated check, and no installs or reviews go into the score.
- Reached in the last 30 days25 pts
Keep the endpoint answering the MCP handshake; SourceWeft probes it every 30 days.
- Auth declared10 pts
Declare the credential headers in the registry entry, or keep the endpoint answering the probe so its auth can be classified.
- Tools listed15 pts
Answer tools/list without a credential, or ship a package that starts in a sandbox without one.
- DescriptionRequired15 pts
- Logo10 pts
- Documentation15 pts
- License10 pts