
RCLL
ai.rcll由 rcll.ai 发布v0.1.0更新于 Nov 3, 2026
Self-hosted shared memory for a team of AI agents. Rooms, L0-L3 depth, no LLM on the read path.
发布方自己的服务:Memory.fit
概览
面向 AI 智能体团队的自托管共享记忆服务,通过 stdio 提供保存、召回、反思、压缩与桥接工具,连接你自己的后端。
- 可以做什么
- 保存记忆,并自动归类到房间与大厅
- 按房间、大厅和层级范围进行语义检索
- 通过智能体式推理循环综合事实并给出带引用的回答
- 把累积的事实压缩成带来源指针的摘要
- 在记忆库之间建立隧道,让一个智能体的记忆被另一个看到
- 适用场景
- 当多个智能体或会话需要共享同一个自托管持久记忆库,并希望按主题限定召回、且召回不消耗模型 token 时使用。适合已经运行 RCLL 后端、希望助手读写该记忆库的场景。
- 运行要求
- 需要运行中的自托管 RCLL 后端;MCP 服务器是本地 Node.js 进程,在 mcp-server 目录执行 npm install 后用 node 启动。环境变量 FLEET_URL(后端地址,默认 FLEET_BANK(默认记忆库);旧变量 HINDSIGHT_URL 与旧库名变量仍作为回退读取。仅支持桌面客户端。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 RCLL,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。
其他 MCP 客户端
参照 仓库 中的启动说明。
README
RCLL
Self-hosted shared memory for a team of AI agents. Storage + structure in one system.
RCLL — team memory for agent fleets. Built on Hindsight (github.com/vectorize-io/hindsight, MIT).
[!IMPORTANT] You are looking at a read-only mirror. The canonical repository is
godcrm.ai/git/holetron-lab/fleet-memory— self-hosted, public, clonable anonymously with no account anywhere in the chain. Everything here is pushed out from there, so a merge performed on GitHub is overwritten by the next sync, usually within the hour. Issues and stars belong here and are read. A pull request is welcome here as well — it gets merged on the canonical side and arrives back here on the next sync.
RCLL is a fork of vectorize-io/hindsight (MIT). It keeps Hindsight's storage engine and adds rooms — topic scoping over one shared store, which is selectivity rather than isolation — plus a hierarchical depth model (L0–L3). The room/hall/layer taxonomy is prior art in the hierarchical-memory space; the implementation here is our own.
RCLL is recall with the vowels dropped — the one operation every agent in the fleet performs before it does anything else. The tool is literally called memory_recall; the product is named after the call.
Its one structural property worth remembering: the read path never invokes a language model. A recall costs CPU and zero model tokens — see architecture.
Status
The source is public and MIT. There is no packaged release yet: fleet-memory-mcp is not published on npm and no container image is pushed. Running RCLL today means building from this tree, which the quick start below does. Don't quote an install command as working until rcll.ai shows one.
How it works
Rooms — topic isolation. Auth, pipeline, infrastructure, schema — each topic in its own room. An agent searching for auth facts won't wade through 500 deploy memories.
Halls — knowledge typing within a room. Fact, event, decision, procedure, warning. The system knows what it's looking at before reading — like Content-Type for memory.
Layers L0–L3 — four priority tiers. L0 (core) is always loaded. L3 (archive) is deep-search only. Same idea as CPU cache hierarchy: L1 is fast and small, RAM is slow but holds everything.
Closets — AI-compressed summaries with source pointers. Deduplication at the knowledge level: 10 related facts → 1 paragraph + references.
Tunnels — cross-bank bridges between agents. Agent A discovers an insight — Agent B sees it through a tunnel without data duplication.
What this fork adds
This is a list of our additions relative to our branch point (d054b884, April 2026) — not a claim about what upstream Hindsight does today. Upstream has shipped roughly 1,700 commits and four minor releases since we branched; assume anything below has an upstream answer we have not evaluated, and read FORK.md before treating this as a comparison.
Everything is additive: the upstream /retain and /recall contracts as of our branch point still work unchanged, and every new parameter is optional.
Measured
Retrieval quality, our own models on the public LoCoMo dataset, using a third-party harness rather than one we wrote. Full method, the arms that lost, and the caveats: rcll.ai/docs/benchmarks/.
This is retrieval quality, not answer accuracy. It is not comparable to figures of the form "77% on LoCoMo", which measure a reader and a judge on top of a store. We publish no accuracy number because we have not run a reader and a judge.
Two results that go against us are on the benchmarks page rather than left out: on multi-hop questions our default fusion is worse than vector-plus-reranker, and on single-hop BM25 alone beats dense retrieval.
Latency on CPU with no GPU: ~0.29 s for search, ~3.0 s including the cross-encoder reranker. The reranker is 85% of the time and the single largest quality gain we can measure.
Quick start
This builds the image from this tree — there is no published image to pull, so the first run compiles and is not fast. The API then listens on http://localhost:5100.
Clients written against upstream Hindsight's API as of our branch point keep working — the added parameters are optional. It is not a drop-in for current upstream Hindsight, which is several releases ahead of this fork.
Embeddings
Ships with BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5 (384-dim) — fast, CPU-friendly, baked into the image so first run needs no network download. It's English-optimized; recall quality on other languages degrades.
For multilingual memory (e.g. RU, multi-script), point it at a multilingual model:
Dimension is detected automatically. ⚠️ Switching models changes the vector dimension — do it on an empty memory store, or wipe + re-embed, since existing vectors can't be mixed across dimensions.
Running without an LLM key
LLM_PROVIDER=none is a supported configuration, and it is a smaller product rather than the same one for free: retain drops to chunk mode — chunks stored and embedded whole, with no fact extraction, no entity resolution, no causal links, and consolidation and reflection off. You get a hybrid vector-and-lexical chunk store. Reading is unaffected, because reading never calls a model anyway. Choose this deliberately, or point extraction at a local model — don't arrive here by leaving a field blank.
MCP Server
The mcp-server/ directory contains a standalone MCP server over stdio.
What is actually verified, as of 2026-08-24, against a live backend: protocol version
2025-06-18; initialize, tools/list and tools/call all round-trip; memory_recall
returns real results. That is a protocol-level check run directly over stdio — not a
client-by-client compatibility matrix.
Any client that speaks MCP over stdio should therefore work, but we have not sat in front of each one. Listed below is the config we run ourselves (Claude Code) and no others. If you get it working with a different client, a PR to this section is the useful kind.
Tools
memory_recall is the only one of the five that never calls a model. memory_reflect is an agentic loop with repeated LLM calls — if you expose this server to anything untrusted, expose memory_recall alone.
One thing worth knowing before you budget context: the backend treats limit on recall as
a retrieval hint, not a result cap — it returns everything inside its own token budget,
around 110 facts. The MCP layer enforces your limit on the way out, so a limit: 2 recall
costs about 1 KB instead of 43 KB. Recall spends no model call; it does spend context.
Setup
Claude Code config
Add to ~/.claude/mcp.json:
Upgrading from the old package name? HINDSIGHT_URL and the legacy bank variable are still read
as a fallback, so an existing config keeps working — it just prints a deprecation notice on start.
See mcp-server/README.md for full docs and environment variables.
API changes from upstream
The base /retain and /recall endpoints are backward-compatible with upstream as of our branch point. New parameters are optional.
New parameters
New endpoints
Room/Hall taxonomy
Rooms (topics)
auth · pipeline · infrastructure · deployment · schema · api · ui · tax · hr · legal · compliance · monitoring · agent · general
Halls (knowledge types)
warning · decision · procedure · event · preference · discovery · fact
Layers
Auto-classification
RCLL includes a keyword-based classifier (room_hall_classifier.py) that assigns room and hall automatically when not provided. No LLM call — classification is instant and free.
Extensible: add keywords to ROOM_KEYWORDS / HALL_KEYWORDS dictionaries.
Examples
Store a memory
Scoped recall
Cross-bank bridge
Known limits
Honest list, kept here rather than only on the site:
- You cannot export your memory yet. The upstream
exportcommand emits a bank template — config, mental models, directives — and none of your stored content. A full dump that carries rooms, halls, layers and the link graph is the top item on our list, because it is the one thing that should not be missing from a store you self-host. - No accuracy benchmark. Retrieval quality is measured and published; a reader-and-judge run is not.
- Adversarial / unanswerable questions — where the right answer is "I don't know" — are not covered by the retrieval metric we report, and that is the category most likely to embarrass us.
- Switching
MEMORY_MODElater does not migrate what you already stored. Pick before you accumulate.
What we changed
A taxonomy layer over Hindsight's vector store, plus a standalone MCP server.
Key additions:
room_hall_classifier.py— keyword-based taxonomy engine (new)aa1_add_room_hall_to_memory_units.py— DB migration: flat → hierarchical, adds room/hall +layercolumn (new)mcp-server/— standalone MCP server with 5 tools (new)- Storage layer — room/hall/layer metadata on every write
- Retrieval — room-scoped search with hall filtering
- Compression — closet generation with source linking
- Tunnels — cross-bank memory sharing protocol
Full architectural spec: RCLL.md. Commit-by-commit account of the fork: FORK.md.
Upstream
This fork branches from d054b884 and its changes are a readable series on top of that commit, so taking a new upstream release is a rebase rather than an excavation:
Expect real conflicts: the rooms work touches the same engine files upstream has rewritten most. FORK.md lists which ones and why.
Credits
- Hindsight by vectorize-io — the memory storage engine
- Holetron — fork maintainers, MCP server, integration
License
MIT — same as upstream Hindsight. See LICENSE.
来源:README.md,提交 81ef52c
工具
0版本历史
1- v0.1.0最新Sep 16, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 50%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通25 分
请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。
- 已声明认证方式10 分
请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分
其他 Memory 集成

Memory.fit
fit.memory官方发布者
托管式 Memory.fit 服务器,让 AI 读取你的训练、睡眠、恢复与饮食数据,并写回每周计划、每日目标和饮食计划。
pg.ddx.io: the PostgreSQL community's memory
io.ddx.pg官方发布者
pg.ddx.io: the PostgreSQL community's memory 的托管 MCP 服务,由 pg.ddx.io 发布;无需登录;Streamable HTTP;29 个工具。
var.gg Naming Memory
gg.var官方发布者
远程 MCP 服务器,可根据领域概念推荐并检索韩、日、中、越、英多语言的代码标识符名称,并提供 ERD 结构查询。

Counterparts
ai.counterparts
面向 Claude Code 与 Claude Desktop 的本地优先长期记忆:助手自行写下关于你和项目的笔记,并在之后的会话中回忆起来。

LAHZE - Persian AI Memory Platform
由 GitHub 账号 pedramgholizadeh 发布
以波斯语为先的地理记忆平台:发现地点,起草并发布仅限波斯语的记忆。AI 翻译