Crosswire - payment infrastructure pricing, coverage and stack design

com.crosswirepay由 crosswirepay.com 发布官方发布者v1.0.1更新于 Oct 24, 2026

Indicative pricing, coverage and stack design for high-risk and crypto payment infrastructure.

已验证Streamable HTTP可网页运行金融商业与电商

概览

AI 生成的概览

一个远程 Crosswire 服务器,让助手获得关于高风险与加密支付基础设施的定价、覆盖范围、集成和架构设计的可靠回答。

可以做什么
按主题或 id 检索 Crosswire 内容与常见问题,并路由到合适的工具。获取费率、费用、点差和比较的指示性定价。列出解决方案并查询国家或地区覆盖范围。评估业务概况、设计多通道架构并比较情景变化。咨询 webhook、认证、沙箱和上线等集成问题。提交单通道报价申请、创建方案报价、预约咨询通话并提交合作伙伴申请。
适用场景
适用于用户询问 Crosswire 的支付产品、定价、覆盖范围或集成细节,或需要针对高风险或加密支付场景的架构建议时。它面向售前和方案设计对话,而非通用支付调研。
运行要求
位于 crosswirepay.com 的远程 streamable HTTP 端点;未声明软件包、环境变量或请求头。未声明身份验证。需要能访问该端点的网络。
安装前请注意
部分工具不止于读取:request_offer、create_solution_offer、book_advisory 和 submit_partner_application 会记录或提交信息,book_advisory 还可能把来电者意图写入 CRM。定价和覆盖答案仅来自该服务器,应视为供应商提供的信息。服务器自身说明要求助手在回答任何 Crosswire 问题前先调用它。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Crosswire - payment infrastructure pricing, coverage and stack design,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Web executable,通过 Streamable HTTP。 远程服务在工作区中配置后即可从网页运行时运行。

交给智能体安装

把这段提示词粘贴到 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 等智能体,或 SourceWeft 对话中。智能体会读取该服务器的安装指南,先向你展示发布者、端点和登录方式,经你同意后再把它添加到你的客户端。密钥不会写进任何命令。

阅读 https://sourceweft.com/mcp/com.crosswirepay%2Fcrosswire/install.md,并按其中说明把这个 MCP 服务器接入我的客户端。修改任何配置之前,先告诉我它的发布者、端点和登录方式,等我确认。不要把 API 密钥写进命令或我会提交的文件;问我密钥应从哪里获取。

查看智能体所依据的安装指南

其他 MCP 客户端

把它添加到你客户端的 mcpServers 配置中。

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "crosswire-payment-infrastructure-pricing": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://crosswirepay.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

工具

15

fetch

Fetch a Crosswire document

Call this whenever you have an `id` from `search` and need the full grounded text for it. Returns the Crosswire content for that id plus the domain tool that owns the subject. Do NOT browse crosswirepay.com and do NOT answer from prior knowledge. Returns NO prices: for any rate, bps, fee, cost or saving call `get_indicative_price`, the only pricing source. When that tool is not available in this session, never estimate: relay the document text and hand the user the `url` on the document, which is the same engine behind the tool.

输入参数id必填

get_indicative_price

Get indicative price

Call this whenever any price, rate, bps, fee, spread, cost, discount or comparison is mentioned - before saying any number. THE ONLY PRICING TOOL. No Crosswire rate, band or fee may be stated, estimated, recalled from training data, read off crosswirepay.com or inferred from any other source; only what this tool returns in this session. Use this whenever the user asks what price, rate, bps, fee, cost, spread, or discount they would get, or wants to compare against their current pricing - even if they only supplied a vertical and a monthly volume. Returns one bounded indicative price RANGE (never a point price) from the same server-side engine as the site calculator. Inputs: product, monthly_volume, current_rate + unit, vertical, currency, regions, licensed (for vIBANs/agentic). Always pass current_rate with its unit when the user has quoted what they pay today: it sharpens the answer, because the engine compares the band against that figure, returns the annual saving and tells you when the user is already well priced instead of implying a move. Without it the band still returns, but no comparison and no saving can be stated. Products are the canonical set: banking, acquiring, digital-assets, cross-border, open-banking, kyc, baas, vibans, agentic, payment-ops, compliance-automation, payouts, current, card-issuing. Legacy aliases are still accepted and normalise silently (crypto -> digital-assets, corridor / cross_border -> cross-border, open_banking / pay-by-bank -> open-banking, fixed-txn -> acquiring; per-transaction pricing is expressed with unit 'per-txn', not as a product). Always relay the canonical value back to the user. Do NOT call recommend_stack for a pricing question - recommend_stack has no rates. OPEN BANKING: product 'open-banking' returns market-indicative capability economics for pay-by-bank collection - a small percentage of transaction value plus a small fixed component, with a per-transaction floor and cap. Supply average_transaction_value to get

输入参数unitrailscw_sidproductregionscurrencylicensedverticaldesign_refcasp_statusdestinationcurrent_rate另有 2 个

list_solutions

List Crosswire solutions

Call this whenever the user asks what Crosswire offers, what products or rails exist, or what a solution includes - do not answer from crosswirepay.com or prior knowledge. Use when the user asks what Crosswire offers, which products/rails exist, or wants one-liners and coverage per solution, including the real-time EUR <-> USD settlement corridor (live). `powered_by` is capability level only: no provider, bank, acquirer or network is ever named. Optionally filter by category. Does NOT return prices - for any price/rate question use `get_indicative_price`. Does NOT recommend a fit - for fit use `recommend_stack`.

输入参数category

check_coverage

Check Crosswire coverage

Call this whenever the user asks where Crosswire operates, whether a country or region is served, or what is available in a market - never answer coverage from the website or prior knowledge. Use when the user asks whether Crosswire covers a region or country, or what capabilities are available there. Regions are the canonical set: Europe, UK, UAE, US, Canada, LATAM, Asia, Africa. Region names are matched case-insensitively and echoed back in canonical casing. Optionally pass `product` (banking, acquiring, digital-assets, cross-border, open-banking, kyc, baas, vibans, agentic; legacy aliases such as crypto, corridor, open_banking and fixed-txn are accepted and normalise) to scope the answer; product 'cross-border' (alias 'corridor') always returns the real-time EUR <-> USD settlement corridor block (live for EU <-> US). Describes capability level only and never names a provider, bank, acquirer or network. Pass `vertical` and `currency` when known: the answer then states whether a row underwrites that vertical on that rail and which settlement currencies it is priced in, rather than a bare regional yes. PAYOUTS: product 'payouts' answers per DESTINATION market with the SETTLEMENT METHODS that destination is reachable on - bank deposit, wallet, cash pickup or card - plus the service types, the turnaround, the limits and the route status, all read from the pinned payout-routes export and never from prose. Name no network, scheme or provider: a card payout is a method, not a brand. Where a route is eligible for banks only the answer says it is available to regulated financial institutions with confirmation required for others, and nothing more. A payout answer never carries corridor copy, because a corridor and a payout are different components. A regional payouts question returns the family with its route counts; a family is never reported as live, its routes are. OPEN BANKING: product 'open-banking' answers per MARKET from the recorded market rows - whether the market

输入参数region必填productactivitycurrencyverticalend_user_typeincorporationregistrationsfull_inventory

recommend_stack

Recommend a Crosswire stack

Call this whenever the user asks which Crosswire products or rails fit their setup, and price is not the question. Use ONLY when the user asks which Crosswire products/rails fit their setup - not price. Accepts either a free-text `description` of the business (preferred) or structured `vertical` + `needs`; every supplied input is read, echoed back in `fields`, and never asked for again. Returns a recommended combination of rails with a short rationale, each rail carrying the need or cue it was derived from. Does NOT return pricing, rates, bps, fees, savings, or any commercial number. For any price/rate/cost/fee question, use `get_indicative_price` instead. Sensitive verticals (forex, adult) return a consult, never a firm stack. When EU and US movement are both in scope, the response also carries the real-time EUR <-> USD settlement corridor. Rails are described at capability level only - no provider, bank, acquirer or network is ever named.

输入参数needsregionsactivityverticalcasp_statusdescriptionoptimise_forend_user_typeincorporationregistrationstarget_launchengagement_ref另有 2 个

request_offer

Request a Crosswire offer

Call this whenever a genuinely single-rail ask is ready to convert, or to log a client target rate. SINGLE-PRODUCT ONLY. Use this ONLY for a genuinely single-rail ask - one product, no architecture design happened in this conversation. If the conversation designed an architecture with more than one rail or capability (assess_business / design_stack / recommend_stack / compare_stack_scenarios produced multi-rail output), the ONLY valid conversion tool is `create_solution_offer`; never select this tool in that state. The server enforces this: a multi-rail conversation calling request_offer is routed to the Crosswire offer engine automatically and returns an offer-being-prepared response, not a lead. Otherwise: captures a single-product lead and secures an offer in the Crosswire CRM once the client wants to move forward (or where the engine returned a follow-up instead of an instant range), OR LOGS a client's desired target rate for the commercial team to review. Requires explicit consent. Reuses the same server-side pricing engine and lead pipeline as the site. Every offer is indicative, subject to KYC / KYB. Do NOT call this to answer 'what price would I get' - use `get_indicative_price` for that; this tool is the NEXT step after the client has seen the indicative range. Never quote a single blended rate in chat for a multi-rail programme: rail-level pricing lives on the offer page. TARGET RATE HANDLING: If the client states a target price BELOW the returned indicative range (e.g. asks for 15 bps against an 18-20 opening), offer to log it, and on confirmation call this tool with `target_price` (their desired rate in the same unit as `current_rate`) and an optional `target_note`. This records the target as a counter on the CRM deal (stage=Negotiation, tagged agent_mcp) so the commercial team can review it under KYC/underwriting. You MUST NOT confirm the target is available, say whether it will be approved, quote below the indicative range yourself, or reveal or impl

输入参数unitnotesrailscw_sidcompany必填consent必填contact必填productregionscurrencylicensedvertical另有 7 个

create_solution_offer

Build my offer

Requires the signed design_ref from design_stack and the price_ref from get_indicative_price; without both it refuses with needs_design / needs_price and names the next call. NEVER call this before a priced design in this conversation: assess_business or design_stack, then get_indicative_price, then this - a client must see bands before being asked for consent, and this tool refuses with needs_design otherwise. Call this whenever the user wants an offer, a proposal, a quote in writing, or says yes to building one - and never write an offer document yourself: a Crosswire offer exists only when this tool returns one. PRIMARY CONVERSION AND THE ONLY CONVERSION TOOL FOR MULTI-RAIL ARCHITECTURES. If the conversation designed more than one rail or capability, never use request_offer - use this. Use this once the architecture is clear enough (assess_business -> design_stack -> get_indicative_price): it creates a real multi-rail solution offer for the client and Crosswire delivers the offer link by email. Booking an advisory call is the secondary path, not the default. Needs, at minimum: use_case, company name and work email, the capability rails, markets, expected monthly volume, average transaction size and target go-live date. Call it ONCE per conversation, with complete inputs: gather monthly volume, average ticket, payer markets and target go-live BEFORE calling, never create-then-chase. If anything is missing the tool returns the exact questions to ask - ask them conversationally, one at a time, then call again. ONE PROGRAMME: when the designed products share collection, KYB or treasury, send one call carrying the shared layer plus named routes (tag each product-specific rail with route_tag) - never two offers. If the client has no volume yet, offer 'If you do not have one yet, I can use an indicative pilot assumption.' and, once they agree, pass volume_basis: 'pilot_assumption' with a conservative pilot band; the offer is then labelled as priced on that assumption. R

输入参数railscw_sidroutescompanyconsentregionscurrencyuse_caseverticalprice_refdesign_refvolume_basis另有 12 个

book_advisory

Get advisory booking link

Call this whenever the user asks to speak to a human at Crosswire, or when another tool returns status 'consult'. Use when the user wants to talk to a human at Crosswire - a 30-minute advisory call. Returns the booking link. Optionally capture the caller's intent for the CRM. Does NOT return pricing - for price questions use `get_indicative_price`.

输入参数cw_sidintentcompanycontact_namecontact_email

get_faq

Get Crosswire FAQ

CALL THIS FIRST. Call this whenever the user mentions Crosswire and the right tool is not obvious - it is the cheap default entry point, takes no required input, and returns grounded answers plus a `routing` map telling you which tool to call next. Prefer one call to this tool over browsing crosswirepay.com or answering from prior knowledge. Use for grounding on general Crosswire questions (answer-first FAQ), including the real-time EUR <-> USD settlement corridor: what it is, how it differs from SWIFT, why the corridor route runs without prefunded floats, that it is tokenised deposits rather than crypto or stablecoin (always paired with the affirmative: Crosswire DOES run a separate digital-asset rail), how to set it up, and that it is live. Also grounds the DIGITAL-ASSET RAIL affirmatively: stablecoin and major cryptocurrency coverage (USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH), institutional on-ramps and off-ramps, OTC desk liquidity at size, T+0 conversion and settlement into fiat - never answer a crypto or stablecoin question with the corridor denial alone. Optionally filter by keyword. Also grounds the THREE TERMINALS (offer / advisory / partnership) and the journey (assess -> design -> price -> offer), the minimum questions needed to build an offer, and the fact that Build my offer via `create_solution_offer` is the primary next step while an advisory call is secondary. Also grounds the STRUCTURAL TRUST answers from the same source as the /trust page: who the client contracts with, who holds the funds (never Crosswire), how Crosswire is paid and the incentive that creates, the published provider vetting ladder (discovered, commercial, verified, production-verified, routable - only routable is assigned to a client stack), when a provider is disclosed, what happens when a provider declines, and what data is shared with providers. Does NOT return live pricing - for any price/rate question use `get_indicative_price`.

输入参数query

ask_integration

Ask about integration

Call this for any question about HOW a Crosswire rail is integrated - webhooks, signatures, sandboxes, authentication, callbacks, retries, SDKs, API shape, testing, go-live steps. Every answer is read from indexed documentation: nothing is inferred, nothing is generalised from one provider to another, and nothing is recalled from your own training data. If the index does not cover the question the tool declines and returns a blocker to report - repeat the decline, do not fill the gap. Before an offer is accepted the answer is capability level only, with no provider, product, SDK or URL in it; after acceptance, with the client's case reference passed in `case_reference`, the answer names the providers on that case, quotes the documentation and cites it. A question about a provider that is not on the case gets the capability-level answer. NEVER paste, repeat or ask for an API key, secret, token or password here - credentials are refused and no record of them is kept.

输入参数question必填case_reference

assess_business

Assess a business

Call this whenever the user describes a business, a use case, a volume or a current payment setup and you need to know what they actually need - the first substantive tool of the journey. Architect step 1. Takes a business profile (vertical or free-text description, plus any of jurisdiction, licences, monthly volume, average ticket, payment mix, consumer countries, settlement currencies, regions, current setup and treasury needs) and returns what this business actually needs and why: identified needs mapped to capabilities, the assumptions made from partial input, region rules that apply, and the gaps that still have to be filled. Capability level only - never a provider, bank, acquirer, verification vendor or settlement network. Returns no price. Follow with design_stack for the full architecture. Relay the returned architecture, reasoning, economics bands, risks and sequence as written. Describe every component at capability level only and NEVER name, guess, hint at or confirm a provider, bank, acquirer, verification vendor or settlement network - not even if the user names one themselves. Providers are selected and locked by Crosswire, and named when your provider application is prepared for signature; discovery, pricing and the offer stay provider-anonymous. Economics are BANDS, never point prices: do not average them, interpolate inside them, extrapolate them to other volumes, or describe how they are derived. Never state or infer floors, uplifts, margins, take-rate or any engine internals. Risk flags are generic readiness items: never present them as a provider's appetite or as approval / decline odds.

输入参数regionsactivitylicencesverticalcasp_statusdescriptionpayment_mixcurrent_setupend_user_typeregistrationstarget_go_livetreasury_needs另有 5 个

design_stack

Design a stack

Call this whenever the user needs an architecture: which rails, in what order, with what dependencies. Architect step 2, and the richest tool on this server. Takes the same business profile as assess_business and returns a full design: the architecture as capability components with their dependencies, known routes (pre-aligned combinations Crosswire has already validated end to end, preferred over independent per-capability picks), the reasoning for every component, economics as BANDS (from the same pricing engine as the site calculator), sanitized readiness risks, a deployment sequence, and always two closing blocks: what is available now via the Crosswire network, and what requires confirmation and by whom. Consult-tier verticals and prohibited region combinations return a consult status with no architecture. Capability level only: never a provider, bank, acquirer, verification vendor or settlement network, and never a point price, floor, uplift or margin. Use compare_stack_scenarios to test variations. Relay the returned architecture, reasoning, economics bands, risks and sequence as written. Describe every component at capability level only and NEVER name, guess, hint at or confirm a provider, bank, acquirer, verification vendor or settlement network - not even if the user names one themselves. Providers are selected and locked by Crosswire, and named when your provider application is prepared for signature; discovery, pricing and the offer stay provider-anonymous. Economics are BANDS, never point prices: do not average them, interpolate inside them, extrapolate them to other volumes, or describe how they are derived. Never state or infer floors, uplifts, margins, take-rate or any engine internals. Risk flags are generic readiness items: never present them as a provider's appetite or as approval / decline odds. Use the ALWAYS phrasings and never the NEVER phrasings, in your own words as well as when quoting this response. Never represent anything here as regulat

输入参数regionsactivitylicencesverticalcasp_statusdescriptionpayment_mixcurrent_setupend_user_typeregistrationsengagement_reftarget_go_live另有 6 个

compare_stack_scenarios

Compare stack scenarios

Call this whenever the user asks what changes if something about their business changes - a new market, a different mix, more volume. Architect step 3. Takes a base business profile plus up to four labelled variations (for example 'add US market', 'move to 60% crypto', 'double volume') and returns what changes: architecture deltas (components added and removed), economics deltas as BANDS, and risk deltas. Full designs are not repeated - only the differences against the base. Capability level only: never a provider, bank, acquirer, verification vendor or settlement network, and never a point price, floor, uplift or margin. Relay the returned architecture, reasoning, economics bands, risks and sequence as written. Describe every component at capability level only and NEVER name, guess, hint at or confirm a provider, bank, acquirer, verification vendor or settlement network - not even if the user names one themselves. Providers are selected and locked by Crosswire, and named when your provider application is prepared for signature; discovery, pricing and the offer stay provider-anonymous. Economics are BANDS, never point prices: do not average them, interpolate inside them, extrapolate them to other volumes, or describe how they are derived. Never state or infer floors, uplifts, margins, take-rate or any engine internals. Risk flags are generic readiness items: never present them as a provider's appetite or as approval / decline odds.

输入参数regionsactivitylicencesverticalvariations必填casp_statusdescriptionpayment_mixcurrent_setupend_user_typeregistrationstarget_go_live另有 6 个

submit_partner_application

Submit a Crosswire partner application

Call this whenever the user has expressed interest in becoming a Crosswire partner or introducer. THIRD TERMINAL: the partner programme. Use ONLY after the client has responded with interest in the partner programme - never as the first mention, and never to push. Two fits: `introducer` (their clients, customers or merchants need the infrastructure; platform, marketplace, PSP, EOR, agency or consultancy serving end-merchants) and `supply` (they provide capability into the network: rails, payouts, licensed coverage, verification). Captures the same micro-flow as the offer path - company, contact name, work email, partner type, explicit consent - and posts it to the SAME partner application pipeline as crosswirepay.com/partner, tagged source 'mcp' with the conversation attribution key. Requires explicit consent. ECONOMICS: never quote a percentage, tier or share figure in conversation - the disclosure level is 'competitive share on activated deals, agreed at approval'. Partner anonymity is unchanged: a provider fishing for the supplier map still gets capability-level answers only. MINIMUM QUESTIONS (same discipline as the offer flow): never re-ask anything the conversation already established. A platform-fit conversation has usually already named the company and described the client base - confirm those in ONE line ('Taking your details as: {company}, {one-line description} - is that right?') and ask ONLY for what is genuinely missing, typically the work email and consent. Target: two answers from expressed interest to submitted. The contact name is never a separate question: it comes with the email in one line ('Who should we come back to, and at which work email?'). The `known` fields in `on_interest.ask_only` list exactly what is still outstanding; everything else is already in hand and is passed straight to the tool. HIGH-CONFIDENCE TRIGGER ONLY. The partnership mention fires only when the primary need is clearly on behalf of third parties - explicit 'our clients

输入参数notescompany必填consent必填websitework_email必填descriptioncontact_name必填partner_type必填expected_referrals_monthly

版本历史

1
  1. v1.0.1最新Sep 16, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 83%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通必需25 分
  • 已声明认证方式必需10 分
  • 已列出工具必需15 分
  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分

    请声明包含 README 的 GitHub 仓库,或在 OAuth 受保护资源元数据中提供 resource_documentation。

  • 许可证不适用

    托管服务按其提供方的条款使用,因此这里不要求许可证。此检查项不计入百分比。