Idea to Product Sequencer

com.modernmustardseed由 modernmustardseed.com 发布官方发布者v1.0.0更新于 Oct 24, 2026

Rule-based product method: scores an idea, finds its riskiest assumption, sequences the build.

发布方自己的服务:AI Search Kit

已验证Streamable HTTP可网页运行效率与工作流数据与分析

概览

AI 生成的概览

基于规则的产品方法服务器:为助手给想法打分、找出最大风险假设、挑选验证测试、裁剪 MVP 并排出开发顺序。

可以做什么
把想法归类为产品类型和买家类型,并对十项假设做风险评分,附上匹配到的词,不使用 AI 模型。从一组具名测试中,挑选在可用天数内最能证伪某一假设的最便宜验证测试。按显式标签规则把功能清单分为必须、应该和暂不做。把功能及其依赖转成带日期的开发计划,计算关键路径和浮动时间,并按给定人数排期。根据指标和证据,对最多十二个产品做出推进、迭代、搁置或终止的判断。对单个想法运行完整方法,以 Markdown 返回范围与顺序计划并附 JSON 摘要,还可查询方法自带的参考表。
适用场景
适合需要对产品或商业想法获得结构化、确定性第二意见的场合:哪些假设风险最高、本周该做哪个测试、MVP 应包含什么、开发如何排期。也适合需要在多个产品间做出一致终止或继续判断的组合评审。
运行要求
远程 streamable HTTP 端点;未声明任何软件包、环境变量或请求头。清单未声明身份验证。
安装前请注意
输出是基于规则的建议,而非真实市场证据,评分和决策应作为判断的起点。完整方法工具会返回文档和摘要,可能被写入你的笔记或计划。不要求凭据,但你提交的想法和功能细节会发送到第三方服务器。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Idea to Product Sequencer,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Web executable,通过 Streamable HTTP。 远程服务在工作区中配置后即可从网页运行时运行。

交给智能体安装

把这段提示词粘贴到 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 等智能体,或 SourceWeft 对话中。智能体会读取该服务器的安装指南,先向你展示发布者、端点和登录方式,经你同意后再把它添加到你的客户端。密钥不会写进任何命令。

阅读 https://sourceweft.com/mcp/com.modernmustardseed%2Fidea-sequencer/install.md,并按其中说明把这个 MCP 服务器接入我的客户端。修改任何配置之前,先告诉我它的发布者、端点和登录方式,等我确认。不要把 API 密钥写进命令或我会提交的文件;问我密钥应从哪里获取。

查看智能体所依据的安装指南

其他 MCP 客户端

把它添加到你客户端的 mcpServers 配置中。

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "idea-to-product-sequencer": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.modernmustardseed.com/idea-sequencer"
    }
  }
}

工具

7

classify_idea

Classify an idea

Classify a product or business idea with fixed rules (no AI model): one of 10 product types and 9 buyer types with the words that matched, a 0 to 100 risk score on each of 10 assumptions (problem, buyer access, willingness to pay, solution fit, feasibility, retention, supply, regulatory, unit economics, operator capacity) with every rule that moved each score, the riskiest assumption written as a sentence a test can prove wrong, red flags, the stage of the Idea to Product method it is in, the build rules for its type, and the cheapest validation test for this week with pass and kill lines. Evidence already gathered (interviews, signups, deposits, payments) lowers risk along a fixed evidence ladder. The same input always gives the same answer.

输入参数idea必填billingevidencewho_payswho_usesprice_usdbuyer_typestart_datehas_audienceproduct_typeaudience_sizehas_prototype另有 6 个

validation_plan

Plan a validation test

Pick the cheapest test that can prove one assumption about an idea wrong within the days available, from a library of 18 named tests (for example Five Past-Behavior Interviews, Pay Link Pre-sale, Smoke Test Landing Page, Letter of Intent Round, Concierge MVP, Wizard of Oz, Feasibility Spike, Hand-Seeded Supply, Unit Cost Teardown, Regulatory Read and One Call). Tests are filtered by the buyer type, the price, the audience, reachable buyers, budget and whether someone can build, then ranked by strength of evidence against cost and days. Returns the sample, steps, a pass line, a kill line and an inconclusive rule set before the test runs, the decision date, a backup test, and every ruled-out test with the reason. Defaults to the riskiest assumption; pass assumption to choose another.

输入参数idea必填billingevidencewho_payswho_usesprice_usdassumptionbuyer_typestart_datehas_audienceproduct_typeaudience_size另有 7 个

cut_mvp

Cut an MVP

Sort a feature list into must, should and not now using 15 explicit rules on each feature's tags (core_job, revenue, compliance, trust_safety, onboarding, measurement, retention, integration, automation, admin, growth, analytics, customization, platform, scale, delight), whether it could be done by hand at first, and how many buyers asked for it. Dependencies of a must become must. Should-haves fill the build window by value per effort point in dependency order. Returns each feature with its tier, the rule and the reason, effort totals against capacity, and when the must-haves do not fit, the specific cuts that would make them fit. Rejects duplicate ids, unknown dependencies and cycles with the chain named.

输入参数buildersfeatures必填build_weekspoints_per_weekcharge_at_launch

sequence_build

Sequence the build

Turn a feature list with dependencies into a dated build plan: applies the MVP cut, orders tasks by dependency, schedules them across the given number of builders on working days (weekends skipped), computes the critical path and each task's slack, adds the method's own tasks (record the success metric, take payment, launch kit, Hand Off) where missing, and dates the milestones: first core job end to end, MVP in real users' hands, launch, success metric review, and Hand Off. Every plan carries a success metric and a review date; a default per product type is used and flagged when none is given.

输入参数scopebuildersfeatures必填start_datebuild_weeksproduct_typesuccess_metricpoints_per_weekcharge_at_launchvalidate_first_daysinclude_method_tasks

kill_or_continue

Kill or continue

Make a push, iterate, park or kill call on 1 to 12 products from their metrics (target, actual, kill line, must-hit), evidence, stage, review date, last activity, and monthly revenue and cost, using 10 named decision rules: a must-hit metric past its kill line on the review date kills; a weighted score under 30 on the review date kills; more than 45 days idle parks; revenue under cost and falling kills or forces a price or cost change; 80 or more with the stage gate evidence pushes. Returns each call with its score, rule, reason, next action, next review date and what would flip it, then portfolio notes. Money and time already spent are recorded and deliberately ignored.

输入参数as_ofbuildersproducts必填

build_scope_and_sequence

Write a Scope and Sequence

Run the full Idea to Product method on one idea and its feature list and return a Scope and Sequence plan as a Markdown document, followed by a short JSON summary. The document covers the problem and buyer, the riskiest assumption with its risk table, this week's validation test with pass and kill lines, red flags, the MVP cut (must, should, not now, with reasons), the build sequence with builders and dates, milestones through Hand Off, the launch plan and success metric, kill criteria written before the work, build rules for the product type, and a Hand Off checklist. When there is no commitment-level evidence yet, the build is scheduled to start after the test's decision date.

输入参数idea必填scopetitlebillingbuildersevidencefeatures必填who_payswho_usesprice_usdbuyer_typestart_date另有 14 个

explain_method

Explain the method

Return one of the method's reference tables: the four stages and their exit gates, the 10 assumptions, the evidence ladder, the 18 validation tests, the MVP cut rules, the feature tags, the 10 product types with their risk priors and build rules, the 9 buyer types, the decision rules, or the risk scoring rules. Static reference, no computation on user data.

输入参数topic必填

版本历史

1
  1. v1.0.0最新Oct 11, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 83%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通必需25 分
  • 已声明认证方式必需10 分
  • 已列出工具必需15 分
  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分

    请声明包含 README 的 GitHub 仓库,或在 OAuth 受保护资源元数据中提供 resource_documentation。

  • 许可证不适用

    托管服务按其提供方的条款使用,因此这里不要求许可证。此检查项不计入百分比。

其他 Modernmustardseed 集成