
Agent Reliability
dev.agentreliability由 agentreliability.dev 发布官方发布者v0.6.14更新于 Oct 27, 2026
Testing, benchmarking and auditing autonomous AI agents — methods, harnesses, evidence
概览
一个托管、只读的 MCP 服务器,基于精选知识图谱回答自主 AI 智能体的测试、基准评测与审计问题,并附带引用来源。
- 可以做什么
- 先获取语料库概览,了解内容范围、类型计数、标签与新鲜度
- 对知识图谱做全文检索,或直接提问并获得带来源与置信度的论断
- 按 id 获取单个知识对象,或按主题标签列出相关对象
- 查看对象的图谱邻居及其关系类型
- 查阅整个来源登记表或某个对象引用的来源,并列出最近验证的对象
- 适用场景
- 适合需要可引用、有出处的智能体评测背景知识时使用,例如评测与基准、LLM 作为评判者的失效模式、基准污染、故障注入、审批关卡与事实依据。语料规模固定且较小,更适合查阅式问答而非广泛调研。
- 运行要求
- 远程 streamable-HTTP 端点,无需安装。不需要账号、API 密钥或认证。端点仅接受 POST 请求,并限制每客户端每分钟 120 次请求。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 Agent Reliability,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Web executable,通过 Streamable HTTP。 远程服务在工作区中配置后即可从网页运行时运行。
交给智能体安装
把这段提示词粘贴到 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 等智能体,或 SourceWeft 对话中。智能体会读取该服务器的安装指南,先向你展示发布者、端点和登录方式,经你同意后再把它添加到你的客户端。密钥不会写进任何命令。
阅读 https://sourceweft.com/mcp/dev.agentreliability%2Fagent-reliability/install.md,并按其中说明把这个 MCP 服务器接入我的客户端。修改任何配置之前,先告诉我它的发布者、端点和登录方式,等我确认。不要把 API 密钥写进命令或我会提交的文件;问我密钥应从哪里获取。其他 MCP 客户端
把它添加到你客户端的 mcpServers 配置中。
{
"mcpServers": {
"agent-reliability": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://agentreliability.dev/mcp?via=manifest"
}
}
}README
Agent Reliability — MCP server
Testing, benchmarking and auditing autonomous AI agents — methods, harnesses, evidence
A remote MCP server over a curated knowledge graph. Every claim it returns is bound to a registered source: the tools hand back claims with their citations and a confidence value, so an agent can show its work instead of asserting.
Nothing to install. It is a hosted streamable-HTTP endpoint:
Also listed on Smithery.
Add it to a client
Claude Code
Claude Desktop / any client reading mcpServers
No API key, no account, no auth. Read-only.
Check it answers, without any client at all:
Tools
Eight, each with an outputSchema, each returning structuredContent.
The intended path is get_overview → search or answer → get_entity
→ get_related. get_overview exists because an agent that has just
arrived needs to know whether this corpus can help before it spends a
call guessing.
What is in the corpus
Subject matter: evals and benchmarks (GAIA, AgentBench, Inspect), LLM-as-judge and its failure modes, Goodhart and benchmark contamination, fault injection and chaos testing, approval gates and autonomy levels, grounding and faithfulness.
Questions it is built to answer
- How do I tell a real eval from a benchmark my agent has memorised?
- What does calibration mean for an LLM judge, and how is it measured?
- Which failure modes does fault injection actually catch?
What an answer actually looks like
A real call against the live endpoint — answer with
"how do I tell a real eval from benchmark contamination" — returns this structuredContent, trimmed:
Note what travels with the answer: the evidence tier, a confidence, the date it was last verified, and the source behind the claim — not as prose an agent has to parse, but as fields it can act on. An agent can decline to use a weak claim, or cite the primary source directly.
When the corpus cannot answer, answered is false. It does not
improvise, and the miss is recorded so the gap can be filled.
Machine-readable surfaces
The MCP endpoint is one of several. The same corpus is served as plain files an agent can read directly:
Each knowledge object has a human page and a machine twin at the same id, with a canonical URL that agrees across all of them.
Behaviour worth knowing before you integrate
POSTonly. Every other method answers405with anAllow: POST, OPTIONSheader.- Rate limit: 120 requests per minute per client, counted in a shared
store, published on every response as
RateLimit-Limit,RateLimit-RemainingandRateLimit-Reset(all three exposed via CORS). It fails open: if the store is unreachable the request is served. - Malformed input gets a spec-correct JSON-RPC error —
-32700for unparseable bodies,-32602for an unknown tool — never an HTML error page. - Request bodies are capped and validated before transport.
Privacy
No accounts, no cookies, no ads. Usage is measured in aggregate with daily-rotating hashed identifiers and a 200-day retention; raw IPs are never stored. Full policy: PRIVACY.md.
Provenance and licence
Knowledge content is CC-BY-4.0: use it, cite it. The source registry is
public precisely so a claim can be checked rather than trusted —
get_sources returns what any given claim rests on.
Claims carry an evidence tier and a last_verified date. Where the
evidence is weaker, the object says so rather than rounding up.
How it is built
Compiled and served by Citarium, a source-available framework for turning a knowledge graph into a website, an API, an MCP server and agent-readable files from a single source, under external evaluation.
The framework's code is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 and
its repository is not public. What is public — and what actually matters for
trusting an answer — is this server, the corpus it serves, and the registered
source behind every claim: get_sources returns what any given claim rests
on, so it can be checked rather than trusted.
This repository is the server's public face: its manifest and its documentation. The corpus itself lives at agentreliability.dev.
Running it yourself
The endpoint above is the server. If you want to run a copy locally — or
if a directory needs to start one in order to inspect it — the recipe is
in CONTAINER.md: fetch-corpus.mjs downloads this
instance's published corpus and @citarium/mcp serves it. Both files are
GENERATED by citarium mirror; edit the instance, not them.
The container serves a snapshot taken when its image was built. This endpoint is the thing itself.
来源:README.md,提交 04a2084
工具
0版本历史
1- v0.6.14最新Sep 16, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 85%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通必需25 分
- 已声明认证方式必需10 分
- 已列出工具必需15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分