
Vantage
dev.vantagemcp由 vantagemcp.dev 发布官方发布者v1.11.1更新于 Nov 3, 2026
Checks whether ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity cite your site, and who they cite instead.
概览
Vantage 检查 ChatGPT、Gemini 和 Perplexity 在特定问题下是否引用你的网站,显示被引用的替代者,并给出页面修改建议。
- 可以做什么
- 按关键词检查引用覆盖情况,支持 ChatGPT、Gemini 或 Perplexity,可多次采样并匹配品牌名
- 查找已经引用某域名的提问,并查看某话题下引用领先的域名
- 查看某域名以往的覆盖结果和逐月引用趋势
- 分析某话题下获胜答案的结构,可单个或批量覆盖话题簇
- 对比你的页面与被引用答案的结构差异,返回按顺序排列的改写建议
- 查询支持的引擎、市场与调用上限,以及本月剩余额度
- 适用场景
- 适合从事 AI 搜索可见性或 SEO 工作的人,在编码代理中直接确认 AI 助手是否引用自己的网站、引用了谁,以及页面该改什么。也适合长期跟踪可见性变化。
- 运行要求
- 通过 streamable HTTP 连接 vantagemcp.dev 的远程 MCP 端点;使用邮箱账号(免费版)进行 OAuth 登录,或以 Bearer Authorization 头传入 API 密钥。只能启动本地命令的客户端可用 npm 包并设置 VANTAGE_API_KEY 环境变量。调用会消耗每月额度单位。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 Vantage,将其添加到工作区。
- 连接 所需的 凭据。它们会被私密存储,绝不会在公开页面上展示。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Web executable,通过 Streamable HTTP。 远程服务在工作区中配置后即可从网页运行时运行。
交给智能体安装
把这段提示词粘贴到 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 等智能体,或 SourceWeft 对话中。智能体会读取该服务器的安装指南,先向你展示发布者、端点和登录方式,经你同意后再把它添加到你的客户端。密钥不会写进任何命令。
阅读 https://sourceweft.com/mcp/dev.vantagemcp%2Fvantage/install.md,并按其中说明把这个 MCP 服务器接入我的客户端。修改任何配置之前,先告诉我它的发布者、端点和登录方式,等我确认。不要把 API 密钥写进命令或我会提交的文件;问我密钥应从哪里获取。其他 MCP 客户端
把它添加到你客户端的 mcpServers 配置中。 客户端会在首次连接时完成 OAuth 登录。
{
"mcpServers": {
"vantage": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://vantagemcp.dev/mcp"
}
}
}README
Vantage: the AI visibility MCP server
[Official MCP Registry] [npm] [License: MIT] [vantage-mcp MCP server] [MCP status]
Find out whether ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity cite your site, and what to change if they don't.
Vantage is an MCP server. Your coding agent (Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, or any MCP client) asks it which questions already cite your domain, who is cited instead, how the winning answer is built, and how your page differs. No dashboard to read: the answer comes back where you are working.
Add to Cursor · Add to VS Code · Try one check with no account
Claude Code:
Free tier: 30 units a month, no card. Sign in with your email the first time a tool runs.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/38df5876-16ac-403d-b39f-170a2458cfb1
A real check on vantagemcp.dev, 50 seconds, not sped up. Answers vary run to run: this keyword was cited in 0 of 3 answers earlier today (see the output below) and in 1 of 3 here, which is why Vantage reports cited_runs.
What a real check looks like
We ran Vantage on its own domain on 19 October 2026: five questions people ask when they look for a tool like this, three ChatGPT answers per question. Output trimmed to fit; the values are as returned.
Not cited for any of the five, and that is the point of checking. Each result is remembered for 180 days, so
the next run reports change and newly_cited instead of starting from nothing. From there the agent can call
analyze_citation_gap on a page and get an ordered fix brief.
Tools
Ten tools. Units are what a call costs against your monthly quota (Free: 30, Pro: 500, Scale: 1,500).
Install
Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code: use the buttons or the command at the top. All three sign in to Vantage in your browser on first use.
Any client that supports MCP sign-in (OAuth): add https://vantagemcp.dev/mcp with no key and sign in with
an email (a free account) or an existing key.
Any other client: add to its MCP config:
A client that only starts local commands: use the npm package
vantage-ai-visibility-mcp, which connects to the
same hosted server:
Get a free API key at vantagemcp.dev. To try before installing, vantagemcp.dev/check runs a real check with no account, no email and no card: give it a keyword and it returns the measured shape of the answer ChatGPT cites for it.
Published on the Official MCP Registry under the
domain-verified namespace dev.vantagemcp/vantage.
Tools in detail
get_supported_options
Which engines, platforms and markets each tool accepts, and the per-call limits. Costs 0 units; a fixed list.
"Which markets can I check?"
get_usage
How much of this billing period's quota is left, before spending any of it. Costs 0 units: reads Vantage's own record, never calls the paid data provider.
"How many checks do I have left?"
find_cited_questions
Starts from your domain instead of a keyword: the questions where AI answers already cite it, most asked first. 10 units.
"What does ChatGPT already cite us for?"
analyze_citation_coverage
Which of several prompts actually cite a specific domain, and which don't, up to 10 keywords in one call. ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity (engine), 1 unit per keyword per sample. Pass samples=3 to get "cited in 2 of 3 answers" instead of one yes or no. Each result is remembered for 180 days, so the next check reports what changed (previous, change, newly_cited).
Cited and named are reported separately. An answer can name your brand without linking you (mentioned_not_cited: the model already knows you, it just isn't citing you) or link a page it never names. Pass brand (e.g. "Notion") so the name check looks for your real brand instead of a guess from the domain.
"Out of everything we care about, where do we already show up?"
get_check_history
Your earlier analyze_citation_coverage results for a domain, newest first. 0 units.
"Did our changes last week move anything?"
find_citation_leaders
Who dominates AI-answer citations for a topic, and whether a domain is among them.
"Who's winning AI search for this?"
analyze_citation_trend
Month-by-month mention counts for a domain, so you can see whether visibility is growing or fading.
"Is our AI visibility improving?"
analyze_citation_structure
How the winning AI answer for a topic is actually shaped: list-led, sources cited, opening length.
"What does a winning answer look like?"
analyze_citation_structure_batch
Same as analyze_citation_structure, across up to 10 related topics in one call, for content planning across a cluster.
"What do winning answers look like across this whole topic cluster?"
analyze_citation_gap
Diffs your own page's structure against the winning AI-cited answer for the same keyword and returns a fix_brief: ordered rewrite instructions your agent can carry out on the page (opening, sections, the answer's points your page does not cover, table, sources), ending with one step beyond the page: which community sites or other websites the answer relies on. The brief never contains the cited answer's text.
"What should I actually change on this page to get cited?"
Source mix
Every tool that returns cited domains also returns source_mix: how much of them are community sites (Reddit, YouTube, X, Quora and similar) and which. A high share means the topic is won by what people say about a brand elsewhere, not by any one site's pages.
Country and language
Every tool except get_usage takes optional country (e.g. "Italy") and language (e.g. "it"), default United States / en. Tools that read a live ChatGPT answer work in any supported market; find_citation_leaders and analyze_citation_trend only have ChatGPT data for the United States in English, so use platform: "google" for other countries.
What it can and cannot tell you
- Answers change from run to run. One answer is a sample, not a verdict. Use
samples=3before telling anyone they are or are not cited. - Cited is not the same as named. Vantage reports a link to your domain and a mention of your brand separately, and never merges them.
- It reads what a person would see. ChatGPT and Gemini results are the answers a person sees in those apps,
fetched through DataForSEO; Perplexity results come from its search API. It cannot see private conversations,
and a result is the answer at the time of the check (
modelandchecked_atare on every result). - A fix brief is a hypothesis. It shows how your page differs structurally from the answer that is cited. Page shape gets a page into the running; being cited is decided mostly by what other sites say about the brand, which is why every brief ends with an off-site step.
Agent skill
vantage-citation-audit teaches your agent the whole loop:
measure which keywords cite you, diagnose one page, apply the fix brief, re-check. It only describes the workflow;
every check is a Vantage tool call.
Monthly research
Every month Vantage asks ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity the same everyday questions and publishes which sites they cite, by engine and topic, with the raw data: vantagemcp.dev/research. Free to quote.
Running your own instance
This repo is the MCP server itself: API-key auth, usage metering, one tool per read (see Tools above). Billing and account provisioning are a separate internal service, not included here.
Requires a DataForSEO account for the underlying SERP/AI-answer data.
Not to be confused with: vantage.sh, a cloud cost-management company with its own, unrelated MCP server also named Vantage. Different product, same name.
Star it
Useful? A star on GitHub helps others find it. Already starred? Tell us what brought you here: [email protected].
License
MIT
来源:README.md,提交 fbf6d49
工具
0版本历史
7- v1.11.1最新Oct 19, 2026
- v1.11.0Oct 16, 2026
- v1.9.1Oct 14, 2026
- v1.9.0Sep 29, 2026
- v1.8.1Sep 23, 2026
- v1.6.0Sep 21, 2026
- v1.5.7Sep 16, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 85%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通必需25 分
- 已声明认证方式必需10 分
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分
