XF Model Source

dev.xpansion由 xpansion.dev 发布官方发布者v0.5.3更新于 Oct 25, 2026

Find the right AI model for your job. Free discovery and ranking; tests on your own key.

已验证Streamable HTTP可网页运行数据与分析AI 与机器学习

概览

AI 生成的概览

一个托管服务,帮助助手梳理任务真实需求并给出候选模型清单,再用你自己的任务实测模型并选出最合适的一个。

可以做什么
通过引导式提问梳理任务的真实需求,给出带证据和接近落选者的候选清单,或给出单一最佳已验证模型及备选与理由。用你的样例任务对候选模型或指定模型进行实时并排测试,运行前先显示费用估算。查询同类任务的实际结果:通过率、胜出模型、典型单任务成本和常见失败。保存已完成的任务,供可选的每周复测和更优模型出现时的邮件提醒。
适用场景
当你需要为具体且重复出现的任务挑选 AI 模型,并希望依据在你自己的样例上的测试而非厂商宣传或排行榜来做决定时使用。适合比较模型在成本、格式遵循或硬性约束方面表现的人。
运行要求
通过 Streamable HTTP 访问的远程 MCP 端点,无需安装。需要邮箱登录,部分客户端需使用个人连接链接作为服务器地址。实时 compare 和 benchmark 需要在 X-OpenRouter-Key 请求头中提供 OpenRouter API 密钥,并需要访问 OpenRouter 的网络连接。
安装前请注意
X-OpenRouter-Key 请求头携带你自己的 OpenRouter 密钥;实时测试会消耗你的 OpenRouter 额度,运行前请查看估算并确认。可选的 Model Watch 订阅为付费服务。watch_job 会保存任务及其示例任务,保存前应先征得同意。一行任务描述和匿名 ID 会被记录,个人连接链接应像密码一样保管。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 XF Model Source,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Web executable,通过 Streamable HTTP。 远程服务在工作区中配置后即可从网页运行时运行。

交给智能体安装

把这段提示词粘贴到 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 等智能体,或 SourceWeft 对话中。智能体会读取该服务器的安装指南,先向你展示发布者、端点和登录方式,经你同意后再把它添加到你的客户端。密钥不会写进任何命令。

阅读 https://sourceweft.com/mcp/dev.xpansion%2Fxfms/install.md,并按其中说明把这个 MCP 服务器接入我的客户端。修改任何配置之前,先告诉我它的发布者、端点和登录方式,等我确认。不要把 API 密钥写进命令或我会提交的文件;问我密钥应从哪里获取。

查看智能体所依据的安装指南

其他 MCP 客户端

把它添加到你客户端的 mcpServers 配置中。

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "xf-model-source": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://xfms.xpansion.dev/mcp"
    }
  }
}

README

XF Model Source (XFMS)

[License: MIT] [smithery badge] [Part of the Xpansion Framework]

Find the AI model your job really needs, and prove it on your own tasks.

AI is specialized. There are 450+ models on OpenRouter, and the one every vendor calls "the best" was not measured on your job. XF Model Source works inside the assistant you already use (Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Continue, any MCP client) and does three things:

  1. Finds what your job needs. It asks a few plain questions and turns your answers into the job's real requirements: what goes in, what must come back, the format, the cost ceiling, what must never happen.
  2. Narrows the field. It checks every model against those requirements using independent test scores, each model's published capabilities and price, and the results of our own comparisons, then produces a shortlist.
  3. Proves it on your tasks. A screening round runs about 12 likely models on one of your sample tasks. Any model that breaks a must-have is ruled out, and the best six run all your tasks. You get the winner, the reasons, and every answer so you can check it yourself.

Scores and claims can't tell you whether a model will follow your exact format or avoid inventing a detail. So the test, not the leaderboard, makes the final call, and each shortlisted model shows how it has really done in our own comparisons.


Connect

The server is hosted. There is nothing to install. The address is:

https://xfms.xpansion.dev/mcp

  • Claude (claude.ai or the desktop app): Settings, Connectors, Add custom connector, paste the address. Sign in with your email when it opens.
  • Claude Code: run claude mcp add model-source --transport http https://xfms.xpansion.dev/mcp, then /mcp inside Claude Code to sign in.
  • Codex (in the ChatGPT desktop app): Settings, MCP servers, Add server. Name it model-source, choose Streamable HTTP, paste the address, save, then select Restart. When it shows Authenticate, select it and sign in with your email.
  • Codex (in a terminal): run codex mcp add model-source --url https://xfms.xpansion.dev/mcp, then codex mcp login model-source.
  • Cursor, Windsurf and other assistants: add an HTTP MCP server at the address (Cursor: ~/.cursor/mcp.json):
json
{  "mcpServers": {    "model-source": { "url": "https://xfms.xpansion.dev/mcp" }  }}
  • An assistant that can't open a sign-in page: sign in at https://xfms.xpansion.dev/signin and use the personal connection link from your account page as the server address. Treat it like a password.

Sign-in is free and needs only your email. Then ask your assistant: "Help me pick an AI model for pulling the invoice number, date, total and vendor out of invoices as JSON, about 2,000 a month. The cheapest one that gets every field right."

What it costs

  • Discovery and the shortlist are free. Sign-in is free and needs only your email.
  • Comparisons run on your own OpenRouter key, usually a few cents. You see the most a comparison can cost before anything runs, and nothing runs until you say go. Add the key as an X-OpenRouter-Key header. It is used for that run and never stored.
  • XF Model Watch (optional, from $19 a month) re-tests your saved jobs every week and emails you only when a cheaper or better model passes every one of your checks, plus a warning before your model is retired. Solo $19 (3 jobs), Team $49 (10), Agency $149 (40). 14-day money-back. Details: https://xfms.xpansion.dev/watch

Tools

discover (finds the job's real requirements), rank (the full shortlist with the evidence behind it), pick (the single best proven model), compare (the screening round and test on your tasks), benchmark, field_results (what has worked for jobs of the same kind), and watch_job (XF Model Watch).

What we keep

No conversations are kept. We log the one-line description you start with and an anonymous ID to count use. Our own daily comparisons are published at https://xfms.xpansion.dev, every answer and every verdict, so the method can be checked.

How the shortlist is built

  1. No vendor claims as proof. A model saying it supports JSON or a long context is a claim. We record how often each model actually kept its claims in our own comparisons.
  2. Missing evidence is shown as missing, never as good.
  3. Your requirements decide. Must-haves filter; priorities order what is left.
  4. The test decides the winner. Methodology in docs/methodology.md.

Honest limits

A comparison uses a handful of your sample tasks, and a model grades part of the answers. Read a result as strong evidence for your decision, not a guarantee. We can only report on models we have tested, and the ranking before the test is a shortlist, not a verdict.


Part of the Xpansion Framework

XFMS doesn't stand alone — it's the model-selection layer of the Xpansion Framework.

The Xpansion thesis

Humans communicate with intent compressed by contextual experience. AI simply predicts patterns in language. Xpansion is the execution layer that bridges them.

Every sentence a human types carries lifetimes of context that the speaker assumes the other side will decompress — what counts as "good enough," which constraints are non-negotiable, what failures last month taught them, what their house style demands. AI doesn't share that context. It predicts patterns in language, filling in the gaps with whatever's plausible to its training data. The result reads as plausible but isn't intent-honoring: sessions lose context, security holes ship silently, contracts break without warning, and there's no way to verify that what was built actually matches what was asked for. They don't know what they don't know, and neither does AI.

Xpansion closes the gap. It decompresses finite intent upfront, enforces it through code-driven AI behavior, and delivers binary-verified results against the intent across persistent memory that survives every session boundary.

Model Source — the model-selection enforcement

When you say "the best model for this task", you're compressing a lot: what counts as best depends on whether you care about factual reasoning or coherent prose, whether cost matters more than latency, whether you actually need vision or just text, whether the call has to stream, whether a particular benchmark dominates your real workload. AI on its own predicts the pattern — what model do most people pick for queries that look like this? — and gives you a plausible-sounding answer that's often wrong for you.

XFMS does the decompression. It takes your stated purpose, infers which benchmarks actually map to it, honors your stated primary preferences without silently overriding them, surfaces the latent requirements you didn't know to ask about (streaming for real-time chat, vision for OCR), and probes the top picks against your real query to verify the recommendation — not predict it. Then it tells you, in plain English, why it picked what it picked.

One module per enforcement

The rest of the Xpansion stack enforces the same decompress- enforce-verify contract for different parts of the work:

  • Dispatch (Dispatch) — runtime task router. Watches what kind of work you're doing and routes it to the right tool.
  • Finite Intent (XFFI) — turns "build me a feature" into a finite spec with binary terminals before any code gets written. Stops scope drift at the source.
  • Boundary Auditor (XFBA) — checks every code edit against contracts. Stops broken function signatures and mismatched types from ever reaching production.
  • Systemic Impact Analysis (XSIA) — maps the blast radius of a proposed change before it lands. Tells you what else might break.
  • Token Conservation (XFTC) — manages how much of the conversation has to stay in the assistant's working memory. Prevents context loss in long sessions.
  • Execution Audit (XFXA) — verifies every promise from the spec was actually met before declaring a task done. The final binary check.
  • Memory Tree (XFMT) — session snapshots that stay searchable across conversations. Your assistant remembers what you decided last week.
  • Security Auditor (XFSA) — static + AI security scanning on every code edit. Catches secrets, injection paths, and unsafe patterns before they ship.

The full picture, with the rest of the modules, lives at xpansion.dev.

Xpansion is in pre-signup right now. Early access and founding licenses are open at xpansion.dev. XFMS is the first piece to ship public + free — the rest follow.


Local development

bash
git clone https://github.com/VisionAIrySE/XFMS.gitcd XFMSpython3 -m venv .venv.venv/bin/pip install -e .[dev].venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/ -v

The tests mock the HTTP layer so they run offline — no API keys needed to develop.


License

This client library is MIT-licensed. The recommender engine, the catalog, and the ingestion pipeline are not open source. See NOTICE for the patent reservation language and the relationship to the broader Xpansion Framework IP.


Contact

来源:README.md,提交 7306117

工具

7

rank

Rank models for a discovered job

The full shortlist for a job worked out with discover: 5 proven models and 1 promising newcomer, each with its standing on every requirement, plus near misses and what would change the order. Pass the discover session.

输入参数session必填

pick

Pick the best model for a discovered job

The single best proven model for a job worked out with discover, with why and the runners-up. Pass the discover session.

输入参数session必填

discover

Work out what the job really needs

Discovery: finds the true requirements of the person's job before any model is chosen. Start with purpose: the reply carries the discovery instructions and the evidence catalogue. YOU ask the person the questions (one thing each, plain words, offering the returned choices); then call again with the sealed session, their answers and your structured updates. Each reply gives progress, rejected updates with reasons, next targets, answer choices from live data and a shortlist. At most 5 rounds. Ends with a confirmation view; call with confirm=true once the person agrees. The person can stop any time (end_now=true). Nothing about the person is stored by XFMS.

输入参数answersconfirmcontextend_nowpurposesessionupdatescorrections

benchmark

Test the shortlist on the person's own work

The live test: the 5 proven models and 1 promising newcomer from discovery do the person's real tasks side by side, every requirement is judged, and the results pick the winner. First call (session + tasks) returns the estimate and an offer — nothing is spent. Show the person the cost; only when they agree, call again with offer and go=true. Runs on the person's OpenRouter key (X-OpenRouter-Key header). Save the returned report as a local file.

输入参数gooffertasksratingssession必填overruledjobs_wantedtest_sessioncurrent_modelruns_per_month

field_results

What has worked for jobs like this

Results from real comparisons on Model Source for one kind of job (call with no job_type for the list): which models passed, how often, which won, typical cost per task and the most common failure. Counted without anyone's job details. A starting point; test on the person's own work before choosing.

输入参数job_type

watch_job

Watch this job (XF Model Watch subscribers)

Saves a finished job for XF Model Watch, which re-tests it as new models arrive and emails the person only when a model passes every must-have and ranks higher on their priorities. Needs a signed-in subscriber. Ask the person first: Model Watch keeps the job and its example tasks (encrypted, deletable any time). Pass consent=true only if they agree. Pass the discover session, and either test_session from a finished comparison or the tasks, plus the model they use now. The first check runs as soon as the job is saved. To re-check a job the person already watches, pass check_now with the job's id or title instead (once a day per job; the result is emailed and shown at /account).

输入参数taskstitleconsentsessioncheck_nowtest_sessioncurrent_modelruns_per_month

compare

Test models the person named on their own work

Same live test as benchmark, but on the models the person names (model_ids). Needs a finished discover session so every requirement is judged. Estimate first, then go=true.

输入参数gooffertasksratingssession必填model_idsoverruledtest_sessioncurrent_modelruns_per_month

版本历史

2
  1. v0.5.3最新Oct 17, 2026
  2. v0.4.0Sep 16, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 100%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通必需25 分
  • 已声明认证方式必需10 分
  • 已列出工具必需15 分
  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分