
semhood
io.github.AhmeedGamil由 GitHub 账号 AhmeedGamil 发布v0.1.0更新于 Oct 24, 2026
AST-based semantic code search; results ship with their call graph (calls + callers).
概览
semhood 是一个本地 MCP 服务器,提供基于 AST 的语义代码搜索,让助手按意图查找代码,并在结果中附带调用关系图。
- 可以做什么
- 对已索引的代码库进行语义搜索,一次调用可执行多个查询,并按精确名称查找符号,结果按查询或符号类型分组并附带文件位置。获取某个代码块的完整源码及其调用的函数和被谁调用,让调用方与被调用方在同一响应中返回。查看索引状态以确认项目已被索引。支持由助手驱动的增强流程:列出待生成 LLM 摘要的代码块、保存助手撰写的摘要、查看增强进度。
- 适用场景
- 适合助手在代码库中工作时,通过描述行为来定位相关函数,而不必用 grep 搜索并阅读大量文件,从而节省 token。尤其适用于已建立索引、且需要调用关系上下文的项目,例如追踪某个函数在何处被使用或某条规则在何处执行。
- 运行要求
- 作为本地进程在用户机器上运行,通过 semhood-mcp 命令启动;软件包发布在 PyPI,可用 uvx 运行。需要 Python 3.11 或更高版本,并先用 semhood index 命令为项目建立索引。首次索引会下载约 420 MB 的嵌入模型。后台守护进程持有索引并只加载一次模型。本地嵌入无需 API 密钥;可选的增强功能需要 LLM 服务商密钥,例如 ANTHROPIC_API_KEY 或 OPENROUTER_API_KEY,或改用助手自身的模型。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 semhood,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。
其他 MCP 客户端
参照 仓库 中的启动说明。
README
semhood
Stop grepping. Find the exact code your AI agent needs by intent, not keywords. semhood is an AST-aware semantic code search engine that retrieves code by what it does, complete with call-graph context and optional LLM enrichment.
Runs fully offline with zero API keys — or plug in cloud embeddings — Voyage's code-specialized models, or OpenAI's strong general-purpose (natural-language) embeddings — for higher-quality retrieval. Optional LLM enrichment adds a logic summary and developer queries to each chunk that you commit once and share — and every result ships with its call graph (what it calls + what calls it).
[License: MIT] [Build Status] [MCP] [Tree-sitter]
Why semhood · Install · Quickstart · MCP Setup · Architecture · Config · Troubleshooting
semhood indexes your codebase the way a developer thinks about it: every function, method, and class becomes a chunk, with its call graph, docstring, and signature attached. You search by intent ("how do we retry transient payment failures?") and get back the few chunks that actually answer the question.
Two stages: structural (always, free, ~seconds) and enrichment (optional, LLM or code agent, drains a pending queue). The index is queryable after stage 1; stage 2 just makes natural-language matches sharper.
The package ships an MCP server so Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, Continue, Kiro, Zed, and any other MCP-aware client can call semhood as a tool — your AI agent gets search, find_symbol, and get_chunk_context next to its built-in read_file and grep.
What makes semhood different
Most code search embeds your raw source and hopes a natural-language query lands near it. semhood adds two things plain vector search and grep can't:
🧠 Enrichment that thinks like a developer
An LLM reads each function and class and writes two artifacts, each stored as its own search vector:
- A logic summary — what the code actually does, in plain language. Not its name, not its signature — its behavior.
- Predicted developer questions — the real questions an engineer would ask to find this code: "how do we retry a failed payment?", "where are customer emails validated?"
This is the part that makes retrieval click. When you search with a question, you're matching against questions the code was pre-labeled to answer — so the right chunk wins even when it shares zero keywords with your query. You generate the enrichment once, commit it to git, and your whole team — and every AI agent — retrieves better for free. → Portable enrichment
Why enrichment matters: some code has no words to search. Plain semantic search only works when the source contains language close to your question. Plenty of important code doesn't — terse names, raw math, business rules. Consider a function like:
Ask "how do we calculate compound interest?" and plain vector search comes up empty — there's no "interest", no "compound", nothing in the source that means anything close to the question. Enrichment reads the code and generates:
Now your question matches a pre-written question that means the same thing, and _calc ranks first — despite sharing zero words with your query. The cryptic-but-critical functions are exactly the ones plain semantic search misses and enrichment rescues.
🕸️ Every result ships with its call graph
Each chunk knows what it calls and what calls it. So a result isn't just "here's the function" — it's the function plus its neighborhood. One get_chunk_context call returns the body, calls, and called_by together, so your AI agent gets the caller/callee context in the same response instead of opening files and tracing references by hand.
Features
- Retrieval-boosting enrichment — an LLM gives each chunk a plain-language logic summary + predicted developer questions, indexed as their own vectors so question-style queries hit the right code even with zero shared keywords. Written once, committed to git, shared with the team.
- Call graph included — each result knows what it calls and what calls it, so your agent gets the neighborhood, not just the function
- AST-aware chunking via Tree-sitter — every function, method, and class becomes a first-class searchable unit
- Hybrid retrieval — dense vectors (
code,description,developer_queries) + BM25 sparse, all in one query - Token-efficient for AI agents — replaces dozens of
read_file+grepcalls with onesearch - MCP server out of the box — works with Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, Continue, Kiro, Zed
- 10 languages — Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Java, Go, PHP, C#, Ruby, Rust, C++
- Free tier works — local embeddings + structural pipeline need zero API keys
- Incremental indexing —
--changedre-indexes only whatgit difftouched
Install
Prefer an isolated CLI install? pipx keeps semhood and its deps out of your global environment — recommended for a command-line tool:
Just want to try it without installing? With uv, run it straight from PyPI:
Requires Python 3.11+. First index downloads the embedding model (~420 MB for the default
all-mpnet-base-v2) and caches it.
60-second quickstart
No config files, no API keys, no setup. semhood works offline with a local
embedder by default. Just cd into any project and index it:
The first command auto-starts a background daemon that loads the embedding
model once and keeps it warm — so every later search (from any terminal or
your editor) is instant. Each project gets its own index automatically under
~/.semhood/indexes/, keyed by repo root. One global config lives at
~/.semhood/config.yaml (created on first run); there is no per-project
config file to manage.
CLI commands
All commands act on the current project (nearest git root of your cwd). Override with
--root /path/to/repo. They're thin clients to the daemon — no model loading, noconfig.yamlflag.
MCP — wire it into your AI editor
The package ships an MCP server (semhood-mcp) that exposes eight tools — five for search, three for agent-driven enrichment:
Register it once, globally — it then works in every project you open, with no per-project setup. This is the entire config — drop it into your editor's user-level MCP file:
Where that file lives, per editor (click to expand)
A few clients use a slightly different shape — e.g. VS Code's native MCP uses a top-level
"servers"key instead of"mcpServers". If yours differs, keep thecommand: "semhood-mcp"part and match the client's MCP docs for the wrapper.
That's the whole config — no config.yaml path, no per-project entry. The
server is a thin proxy: it forwards each call to the warm daemon, tagged with
the project the editor currently has open (its nearest git root). Most editors
launch the server with the workspace as the working directory, so this Just
Works; if yours doesn't, pass the root explicitly:
After restarting the editor, the agent sees semhood.search,
semhood.find_symbol, etc. The daemon loads the model once for the whole
machine — so no matter how many editors and terminals you have open, there's
one model in memory and every call is ~80 ms.
Teach the agent when to use it (optional)
The MCP server gives the agent the tools; a short skill teaches it to reach for semantic search before grep/read. Install it once, user-level, into every AI editor you use:
Supported: Claude Code (skill), Cursor & Windsurf (rules), Kiro (steering),
Codex (AGENTS.md). It writes to each editor's own convention at the user
level — so, like everything else here, it's set up once and applies to every
project. Re-run any time to update in place.
Why this matters for token usage
Without semantic search, an AI agent asked "where do we validate emails?" runs grep -r email, gets 200 hits, and reads dozens of files. With semhood it calls search("validate email"), gets 3 ranked chunks back as JSON (~500 tokens), and reads only what it needs.
Worked example — "How does the OrderService validate orders?"
I indexed sample_project/, then asked exactly that. The agent calls two MCP tools and is done — no read_file, no grep.
Step 1 — search narrows the question to a few candidates
The _validate method ranks #1. The class and place_order rank just below — useful context, not the answer.
Step 2 — get_chunk_context pulls the body, calls, and called_by without opening the file
That's the entire answer: three checks (non-empty, minimum total, email contains @), called once from place_order. Total cost: ~1.4 KB of JSON, two MCP calls, sub-second.
Compared to the grep-then-read alternative — open orders.py (3.5 KB), scan for validate, then trace into place_order to confirm the call — the MCP path uses roughly 40% of the tokens and skips file I/O entirely.
Two ways to enrich
Stage 2 (description / developer_queries vectors) needs an LLM. You pick how:
Option A — direct API
semhood calls Claude / GPT / OpenRouter / Ollama itself.
Best for CI, batch jobs, or users without an AI editor. Set llm.provider + llm.<provider>.api_key in config.yaml.
Option B — your AI agent does it
Skip the API key. The agent in your editor (Claude in Cursor, Kiro, Cline, Continue, etc.) loops over pending chunks via the MCP tools and writes summaries itself. No semhood-side LLM cost. Just say:
"enrich the codebase index"
The agent uses list_pending_enrichments → writes summary → save_enrichment → repeats until enrichment_progress reports zero pending. Uses the model + subscription you already pay for.
Portable enrichment — pay once, share, survive model changes
Enrichment (the LLM-written summaries + developer queries) is the only part of semhood that costs tokens. semhood persists that text to .semhood/enrichment.jsonl in your repo, keyed by each chunk's content hash — separate from the vector index (which lives in ~/.semhood/indexes/ and is disposable).
Commit .semhood/enrichment.jsonl to git. Doing so gives you:
- Share across a team — a teammate clones, runs
semhood index, and the enrichment is restored from the file and re-embedded locally. They pay zero LLM tokens for code that's already enriched. - Survive embedding-model changes — switch from a local model to Voyage/OpenAI, run
semhood index --reset, and your enrichment is re-embedded into the new vector space with no re-enrichment. (Without this, changing models meant re-paying for everything.) - Survive branch switches / reverts — old records are kept as a content-addressed cache, so checking out an older revision reuses its enrichment instantly.
It's content-addressed, so it's always safe: if a chunk's code changed, its hash misses and that chunk is simply re-enriched — stale summaries can never attach to changed code. Run semhood compact to prune records no longer referenced by any code. The file holds only text and contains no secrets.
OpenRouter — one key, every model
If you don't want to manage Anthropic + OpenAI + Google accounts separately, point semhood at OpenRouter:
Use any supported model slug. Same semhood enrich and semhood query commands as before.
Architecture
Three named dense vectors per chunk: code (always), description (post-enrichment), developer_queries (post-enrichment), plus a bm25 sparse vector. Pre-enrichment, search still works on code + BM25 alone.
Stage 1 (semhood index) parses files with Tree-sitter, builds the call graph, computes a source hash, embeds the raw source into the code vector, and upserts to Qdrant. No LLM calls. Every chunk lands in state pending.
Stage 2 (semhood enrich) drains the pending queue through an LLM, generating a logic_summary + 5–10 developer_queries per chunk, embedding them into the description and developer_queries vectors and mirroring the text to the portable .semhood/enrichment.jsonl store. State flips to fresh. Trivial chunks get a free template; tests get pattern-skipped.
Configuration
semhood uses one global config at ~/.semhood/config.yaml (created with
working defaults on first run) — the daemon loads it for every project. You can
still point at an explicit file with $SEMHOOD_CONFIG. Environment-variable
refs (${VAR}) resolve from ~/.semhood/.env, a local .env.semhood/.env,
or the real environment. Indexes are stored centrally under
~/.semhood/indexes/<id>/, one per project root — you don't set a path.
Supported languages
Troubleshooting
Status
Tune enrichment.llm_concurrency, or use the agent-driven enrichment flow if you hit rate limits.
Contributing
Issues and PRs welcome.
See open issues for things to pick up.
Developed and designed by Ahmed Gamil
MIT licensed — see LICENSE.
来源:README.md,提交 f2f72f5
工具
0版本历史
1- v0.1.0最新Sep 16, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 50%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通25 分
请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。
- 已声明认证方式10 分
请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分