Ci Sentinel

io.github.Baneado98由 GitHub 账号 Baneado98 发布v0.1.0更新于 Oct 24, 2026

Multi-CI security scanner with a live threat-intel feed of compromised CI components

已验证Streamable HTTP可网页运行开发者工具安全与监控

概览

AI 生成的概览

一个托管式 CI 安全扫描器，让助手审查 GitHub Actions、GitLab CI 等七种流水线配置中的注入与供应链缺陷。

可以做什么
审计 CI 流水线配置文件：传入工作流文件名到 YAML 的映射，或单个工作流源码，免费层返回 CRITICAL/VULNERABLE/RISKY/HARDENED 结论及各类问题数量。文件会自动分派给 GitHub Actions、GitLab CI/CD、Jenkins、CircleCI、Azure Pipelines、Bitbucket Pipelines 和 Travis CI 的分析器。付费深度审计返回每条发现的文件与行号、完整注入污点路径、传递性 action 供应链图、含修正片段与统一 diff 的具体修复、A–F 合规评分卡以及 SARIF 报告。检查项包括表达式与变量注入、pwn request 检出、令牌权限、未固定版本的 action/orb/pipe、OIDC 云信任配置、制品与缓存投毒，以及对照实时威胁情报源识别已知被入侵组件和标签重写。
适用场景
适合在审查或加固 CI/CD 流水线定义时使用，让助手发现普通 YAML 检查工具看不到的注入、密钥泄露和供应链风险，包括已知被入侵的 action 与标签重写。
运行要求
远程 MCP 端点，未声明身份验证。README 另提供用 npx 启动的 npm 客户端，它是瘦客户端，会把分析发送到托管服务器。付费深度审计需要 CI_SENTINEL_KEY 环境变量中的预付密钥，或按次 USDC 支付。
安装前请注意
流水线 YAML 会被发送到第三方托管服务器分析。深度审计需付费：CI_SENTINEL_KEY 中的 Stripe 预付密钥或按次 USDC 支付。README 说明 npm 包不在本地运行分析，引擎只留在服务器端。发现基于启发式静态分析，应自行核实；它看不到仓库级令牌默认权限、分支保护或组织策略。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Ci Sentinel，将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Web executable，通过 Streamable HTTP。 远程服务在工作区中配置后即可从网页运行时运行。

交给智能体安装

把这段提示词粘贴到 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 等智能体，或 SourceWeft 对话中。智能体会读取该服务器的安装指南，先向你展示发布者、端点和登录方式，经你同意后再把它添加到你的客户端。密钥不会写进任何命令。

阅读 https://sourceweft.com/mcp/io.github.Baneado98%2Fci-sentinel/install.md，并按其中说明把这个 MCP 服务器接入我的客户端。修改任何配置之前，先告诉我它的发布者、端点和登录方式，等我确认。不要把 API 密钥写进命令或我会提交的文件；问我密钥应从哪里获取。

查看智能体所依据的安装指南

其他 MCP 客户端

把它添加到你客户端的 mcpServers 配置中。

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ci-sentinel": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://ci-sentinel.vercel.app/mcp"
    }
  }
}

README

ci-sentinel 🛡️

Security auditor for SEVEN CI ecosystems — GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD, Jenkins, CircleCI, Azure Pipelines, Bitbucket Pipelines and Travis CI — finds the supply-chain and injection flaws a YAML linter can't see, before an attacker's pull/merge request runs code with your repository secrets.

Available as an MCP server (for Claude / Cursor / any agent) and a pay-per-call HTTP API (x402 USDC or a prepaid card key).

Give it your .github/workflows/*.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, Jenkinsfile, .circleci/config.yml, azure-pipelines.yml, bitbucket-pipelines.yml and/or .travis.yml (each file is auto-routed to the right analyzer) and get a CRITICAL / VULNERABLE / RISKY / HARDENED verdict with the exact flaws.

What it catches that a linter can't

ClassWhat ci-sentinel does
💉 Expression injection (inter-step / inter-job taint)Taints untrusted ${{ github.event.* }} (issue/PR title, body, comment, review, branch name, commit message, label name, fork repo identity, edited-from values) to a run: shell or actions/github-script sink — and follows it across steps.<id>.outputs.*, needs.<job>.outputs.*, env: vars, matrix values and reusable-workflow inputs.*. An attacker who hides the untrusted value behind an intermediate output is still caught; a per-file grep is not.
🎭 Pwn requestspull_request_target / workflow_run that check out untrusted fork code in the privileged, secret-bearing context = arbitrary code execution with your secrets.
🔑 Token permissionsExcessive GITHUB_TOKEN scopes (write-all, contents:write, id-token:write), missing permissions: blocks, and secrets exposed to untrusted triggers.
🔁 Reusable workflowsworkflow_call callers passing untrusted data across the boundary as inputs.*, and secrets: inherit handing the full secret set to a reusable workflow on an untrusted trigger.
📌 Action pinningThird-party actions (and reusable-workflow uses:) on mutable tags/branches instead of a commit SHA (the tj-actions/changed-files-style hijack), resolved through the transitive action graph.
🖥️ Self-hosted RCESelf-hosted runners reachable from public-repo PRs (RCE on your own infra), and OIDC id-token trust misuse.

…and the same depth for GitLab CI/CD (.gitlab-ci.yml)

ClassWhat ci-sentinel does
💉 CI-variable injectionTaints untrusted GitLab variables (CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME/BRANCH/TAG, CI_MERGE_REQUEST_TITLE/DESCRIPTION/SOURCE_BRANCH_NAME, commit message/author, triggering-user fields) interpolated into script: — following the taint through variables: and extends: templates. Knows the SAFE vars (CI_COMMIT_SHA, CI_MERGE_REQUEST_IID, CI_PROJECT_ID, …) so it doesn't flag every $CI_.
🎭 Fork merge-request pwnJobs reachable from fork MR pipelines (merge_request_event, only: merge_requests) that carry secrets / a broad CI_JOB_TOKEN / id_tokens (OIDC), or that run privileged work (deploy/publish/kubectl/terraform) with no when: manual gate.
📦 include: supply-chaininclude: from a remote URL or another project/component on a moving (non-SHA) ref — foreign pipeline code merged into yours.
☣️ Artifact / cache poisoningAn untrusted job writes an artifact/cache that a privileged downstream job consumes and executes (needs:/dependencies: or a shared cache path) — a cross-job and cross-pipeline escalation.

…and five more CI systems, same taint model

EcosystemWhat ci-sentinel catches
🔧 Jenkins (Jenkinsfile)Command injection from params.* / env.CHANGE_* / ghprb* / SCM data into sh/bat/powershell (through environment{} bindings); credential-leak (credentials()/withCredentials printed or baked into a GString); Groovy evaluate()/load RCE; missing input() approval gate; unsafe agent any.
⭕ CircleCI (.circleci/config.yml)Shell injection from << pipeline.git.branch/tag >> / pipeline parameters into run:; unpinned orbs (@volatile / bare major); fork-PR context secret exposure with no type: approval gate; privileged deploy with no approval.
🟦 Azure Pipelines (azure-pipelines.yml)Macro injection from $(Build.SourceBranch) / $(System.PullRequest.SourceBranch) / commit message into script:/bash:/pwsh:; untrusted templates from a foreign repo resource; fork variable-group secret exposure; unpinned repository resources.
🪣 Bitbucket Pipelines (bitbucket-pipelines.yml)Shell injection from $BITBUCKET_BRANCH / $BITBUCKET_TAG / $BITBUCKET_PR_DESTINATION_BRANCH / commit message expanded unquoted into script:; secured/deployment-variable exposure on externally-triggerable PR pipelines; unpinned pipes (:latest); deployments with no trigger: manual gate.
🚦 Travis CI (.travis.yml)Shell injection from $TRAVIS_BRANCH / $TRAVIS_PULL_REQUEST_BRANCH / $TRAVIS_COMMIT_MESSAGE expanded unquoted into a lifecycle hook; secure-env PR/fork secret exposure; deploy: stages with no on: branch/condition gate.

…plus two deep cross-domain detectors a one-shot agent can't replicate

DetectorWhat ci-sentinel catches
☁️ OIDC cloud-trust misconfiguration (Terraform / CloudFormation / GCP workload-identity / Azure federated-credential)Models the cloud half of CI OIDC: the trust policy of the IAM role / WIF pool / federated app. Flags a sub condition with a broad wildcard (repo:org/*, repo:*), no sub condition at all (any workflow on the issuer assumes the role), a repo pinned but ref/environment unpinned (any branch assumes), the bare pull_request subject (fork-reachable), or an unpinned aud. Then correlates the IaC trust with the CI side (a workflow that mints id-token reachable from an untrusted trigger) and escalates to critical when the chain is reachable end-to-end. No single-file linter catches this — it spans the CI claim and the cloud trust policy.
🔧 Jenkins shared libraries (@Library → vars/*.groovy)Taints an untrusted pipeline value (PR title / branch / build parameter) passed to a shared-library global-var step through the library's call() interior to an internal sh/bat sink — the Jenkins parity of orb/template/composite-action cross-file taint, invisible when reading only the Jenkinsfile. Also flags @Library imports on a mutable ref (a branch / default version) as supply-chain risk.

Each analyzer knows the SAFE variables (SHAs, numeric ids, trusted slugs — BITBUCKET_COMMIT, TRAVIS_PULL_REQUEST, pipeline.git.revision, …) and the SAFE OIDC trusts (sub pinned to repo:org/repo:ref:refs/heads/main / :environment:prod with aud set) so it doesn't flag every $VAR or every trust. Zero false positives on hardened configs.

It is a real static analyzer: a line-aware workflow YAML parser → a model of triggers/jobs/steps/permissions/actions/outputs/needs → an inter-step/inter-job taint resolver + permission + supply-chain detectors → a scored verdict with per-finding file:line, the full taint path, concrete remediation, and a SARIF 2.1.0 report (with codeFlows) you can upload to GitHub code scanning.

…and it doesn't just flag — it FIXES, and it GRADES

PremiumWhat you get
🔧 Auto-remediation (the exact fix)For each finding ci-sentinel produces the concrete change: the corrected YAML/Groovy snippet and a unified diff you can apply — pin the action/orb/pipe to an immutable SHA/version, env-bind + quote the injected expression, drop write-all to least privilege, insert the manual/approval gate, pin the OIDC sub/aud, move the hardcoded secret to the store (and rotate it). Not "you have a bug" but "change THIS to THIS", with a confidence label (exact / template / guided) so you know what's drop-in vs. what needs a value filled. Findings carry a stable fingerprint for de-duplication, and the SARIF results carry inline fixes.
📋 Compliance scorecard (A–F)A CIS-like CI security benchmark scored A–F with a PASS / FAIL / WARN / N/A breakdown per control (least privilege, component pinning, no secrets to forks, no self-hosted on public PRs, OIDC pinned, no hardcoded secrets, no pwn checkout, gated deploys, no injection, no cross-job poisoning). Each control lists the finding ids that drove its verdict — defensible to a security team. A directly-exploitable critical flaw caps the grade (one open RCE/secret-exfil path dominates the posture).
🛰️ Live threat-intelligence feed (the data moat)Every uses: / orb / pipe in your config is checked against a live, server-side feed of KNOWN-compromised CI components, ingested on a cron from public sources — OSV.dev and the GitHub Security Advisory database (ecosystem=actions) — and merged onto a curated seed of the flagship incidents (tj-actions/changed-files CVE-2025-30066, reviewdog/action-setup CVE-2025-30154 and its transitive dependents, the aquasecurity/trivy-action tag force-push, Ultralytics). It knows that tj-actions/changed-files@v45 is poison and that the same action SHA-pinned to a clean commit or upgraded to @v46 is safe — a distinction a static YAML scan or a local linter cannot make, because it has no feed. The feed lives only on the hosted server (the thin client never carries it); GET /feed/status surfaces its freshness. A live reputation signal (stars / last-commit / archived / does-the-repo-still-resolve) additionally flags archived/abandoned components and dangling references that are takeover-bait. This is the access-moat that justifies the hosted, paid model: the value is the live DATA, not the compute.
🪤 Tag-rewrite & imposter detection (live ref→commit)Give ci-sentinel the commit SHA you expected a mutable ref to be (from your lockfile/SBOM) and it resolves what the tag currently points at upstream — flagging a tag-rewrite / force-push (@v2 now runs a different commit than you reviewed — the exact tj-actions attack), a deleted/dangling ref, or a suspiciously recent move. It also pairs typosquat detection with the live reputation signal to confirm impersonation — actons/checkout (a near-miss of actions) whose repo is a freshly-stood-up, low-star or dangling imposter — vs. a legitimately-named small fork (no false positive). And because the feed is keyed by component identity, a compromised action is caught no matter which CI system references it (cross-CI) — the piece a mono-CI scanner structurally can't have.

MCP server (free)

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "ci-sentinel": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "ci-sentinel-mcp"] }  }}

Tool: audit_ci_security. Pass files (a map of workflow filename → YAML) or source (one workflow). The free tier returns the verdict and how many issues of each kind were found.

Deep audit (deep: true) — two ways to pay

The deep audit returns every finding with file:line, the full inter-step/ inter-job injection taint path, the transitive action supply-chain graph, a concrete fix (corrected snippet + unified diff) per finding, an A–F compliance scorecard with a per-control breakdown, and a SARIF 2.1.0 document with inline fixes (uploadable to GitHub code scanning via github/codeql-action/upload-sarif).

  • 💳 Card (Stripe) — buy a prepaid key at https://ci-sentinel.vercel.app/pro/checkout, then set "env": { "CI_SENTINEL_KEY": "<key>" } in your MCP config.
  • 🪙 x402 (USDC) — AI agents pay per call automatically (USDC on Base), no signup.

HTTP API

POST /audit          # free, rate-limited — verdict + per-severity countsPOST /pro/audit      # deep — pay-per-call (x402) or Authorization: Bearer <key>POST /mcp            # MCP-over-HTTP (free)GET  /presence       # live active sessions (last 5 min)GET  /                # this landing page
bash
curl -X POST https://ci-sentinel.vercel.app/audit \  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \  -d '{"files":{".github/workflows/ci.yml":"name: CI\non: pull_request_target\n..."}}'

Why hosted? (the moat)

The npm package is a thin client: it runs no analysis locally. The parser, taint engine, action-graph resolver and detector knowledge base run server-side only, behind the paywall — so the premium material (findings, evidence, taint paths, remediation) never lands on the caller's machine. A npm pack ships only dist/mcp.js, dist/mcpServer.js and dist/types.js; the engine is never in the tarball (verified automatically by npm run test:moat).

How the live feed stays live (the update pipeline)

The threat-intelligence feed is ingested, not hard-coded. A periodic job runs server-side:

  1. Fetch advisories from two public sources (no paid keys):
    • GitHub Security Advisory DB — GET /advisories?ecosystem=actions (public; GITHUB_TOKEN only raises the rate limit, it is not required).
    • OSV.dev — the GitHub Actions ecosystem, queried for the components we already track plus everything GHSA just surfaced (so OSV enriches them).
  2. Normalize each advisory into a ThreatRecord — owner/name split, incident class inferred from the advisory text (tag-rewrite / maintainer-compromise / malicious / CVE…), severity bucketed, the affected version range parsed into a selector, the fixed version captured (so an upgraded pin does not fire).
  3. Merge the rows onto the curated seed (ingestFeed: union refs, keep the worst severity, widen the affected range, de-dup by identity).
  4. Store the snapshot in Cloudflare KV. Every /pro/audit reads it back via kvFeedProvider, falling back to the compiled seed if KV is cold — so the detector is never blocked and never worse than the static baseline.
bash
# run the refresh once (live: hits the real public APIs)node scripts/refreshFeed.mjs# dry run with no network (produces the seed-only snapshot)CI_SENTINEL_NO_NET=1 node scripts/refreshFeed.mjs

Schedule it with Vercel Cron ({ "path": "/internal/refresh-feed", "schedule": "0 */6 * * *" }, guarded by FEED_REFRESH_TOKEN) or a scheduled GitHub Action that runs node scripts/refreshFeed.mjs. GET /feed/status reports the live snapshot's version, generatedAt and record count — the public freshness proof. None of this ships in the npm client.

Development

bash
npm installnpm run build          # tscnpm test               # engine + parser + taint + SARIF + autofix + compliance + corpus tests (851 checks)npm run test:moat      # lock-proof: tarball ships no engine, deep degrades w/o paynpm run dev:http       # local HTTP server (FORCE_LISTEN)

Heuristic static analysis of the workflow YAML you provide — it cannot see repo-level default token permissions, branch protections or org policy, and does not execute the pipeline. Treat findings as leads to verify.

Source & docs: https://github.com/Baneado98/ci-sentinel · MIT

来源：README.md，提交 0e3f188

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未读取此服务器的工具。

版本历史

1
  1. v0.1.0最新Sep 16, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 85%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度，依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价，也不表示服务器安全或当前可用：可连通性是带日期的检查结果，评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通必需25 分
  • 已声明认证方式必需10 分
  • 已列出工具必需15 分

    请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list，或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分