
Phases Agents
io.github.Cherridsaid由 GitHub 账号 Cherridsaid 发布v0.5.0更新于 Oct 24, 2026
Deterministic skill selection: local discovery, strict validation, every skill classified.
概览
本地 MCP 服务器,用于发现、校验并确定性地选择技能包,为项目返回可复现的计划,而非临场发挥。
- 可以做什么
- 分析目标项目并列出检测到的特征
- 列出、查看并刷新本地技能包的已校验目录
- 生成确定性计划,把每个已安装技能归入已选中、不适用或已阻止,并报告能力缺口
- 按需重建已校验的注册表
- 适用场景
- 适合需要对本地项目做可重复、可审计的技能选择的场景,例如审计或合规工作,要求同一目标、同一目录、同一参数每次得到相同结论。它不用于语义匹配,也不从远程来源获取技能。
- 运行要求
- 以本地 stdio 进程在用户机器上运行(Python 3.11 及以上,仅用标准库;可通过 uvx 或 pip 安装)。需要一个 skills-roots.json 配置文件指向技能包根目录,并通过 --skills-config 参数传入。无需令牌、环境变量或请求头,也不进行网络访问。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 Phases Agents,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。
其他 MCP 客户端
参照 仓库 中的启动说明。
README
phases-agents
English · Français
[phases-agents: select, block, prove]
A local MCP server that discovers, validates and selects skills deterministically. Python standard library only, no runtime dependencies.
One server. Five tools. Nothing executed behind your back.
Why
AI agents improvise. Ask the same question twice and you get two different plans. That is fine for brainstorming, and unacceptable for audit and compliance work.
phases-agents removes the improvisation. It profiles a local project, validates a catalogue of skills against a strict contract, and returns a plan that can be replayed. Same target, same catalogue, same parameters, same decision.
Principle
The server selects and exposes. The calling model reads the selected skills and decides what to do with them, using its own tools. The server never executes a skill.
Architecture
The modules live in src/phases_agents/.
The normative contract lives in src/phases_agents/core/SKILLS_CONTRACT.md
(French).
Quick start
An example package ships in examples/skills/. Three steps produce a real
plan.
Create skills-roots.json pointing at the example root:
pip install -e . installs the phases-agents command. Without installing,
the same server starts with PYTHONPATH=src python -m phases_agents.server.
The server reads JSON-RPC line by line on standard input. A
phases_agents_plan call against a Python project then selects
hello-python:
Two plan formats coexist. "B3" names the versioned format, not a server
version; its official schema is
src/phases_agents/core/PLAN_B3_SCHEMA.json. Use it for new
work. Without plan_version, the legacy format returns a flat list of steps;
it is kept so existing callers do not break, and will be deprecated before
removal. client_capabilities is only accepted in B3, since declaring what
the client can do only makes sense in that format.
Connecting an MCP client
Claude Code (.mcp.json at the root of your project):
Codex uses the same command/arguments pair in its own configuration file. No token and no environment variable is required.
MCP tools
today is injected rather than read from a clock, so every call is
replayable. get_skill takes an identifier, never a path, and its content
comes from the validated snapshot. Absolute paths and detected secrets are
masked in public output. Any encoded JSON-RPC response stays under 1 MiB.
The first call builds the validated registry. Warm calls verify metadata
without re-reading contents. refresh_skills forces a rebuild.
Writing a skill package
Each package is a direct child of a root and contains at least:
The fastest way to start is to copy examples/skills/hello-python/ and rename
the identifier.
SKILL.md frontmatter
Five keys are allowed. All optional, all checked when present.
The fourteen required sections
Each is a Markdown heading (##), in any order. Section titles are French,
because they belong to the contract; the body is yours to write in any
language.
Loi centrale · Ce que ce skill fait · Ce que ce skill ne fait pas ·
Conditions d'activation · Conditions d'exclusion ·
Capacites necessaires · Interdictions · Methode d'audit ·
Contrat de preuve · Format de sortie · Conditions de blocage ·
Limites connues · Exemples d'entree · Exemple de sortie attendue
phases.json fields
All required: schema_version, id, version, title, description,
domain, project_types, platforms, activation, exclusions,
requires_capabilities, optional_capabilities, forbidden_capabilities,
execution_mode, human_approval, output_schema, rules_path,
references_path, scripts_path, tests_path, files.
output_schema uses the symbolic form core:SCHEMA_NAME.json.
Closed vocabularies
project_types must intersect what the detector can emit: apk, python,
skill_package, solana, web.
activation.any uses profile facts: collects_personal_data, has_api,
has_apk, has_authentication, has_database, has_ecommerce,
has_eu_context, has_file_upload, has_javascript, has_python,
has_rust, has_skill_packages, has_solana, has_source_code,
has_typescript, has_web, uses_ai, uses_payments.
requires_capabilities, optional_capabilities and
forbidden_capabilities use: browser, dependency_installation,
filesystem_read, filesystem_search, filesystem_write, human_question,
shell, target_code_execution, web.
Provided capabilities are an open vocabulary: each catalogue names what
it brings, and only the shape is enforced (^[a-z][a-z0-9_]{0,63}$). Only
client capabilities are closed, because they describe the protocol rather
than your domain.
A domain of legal, juridique, regulatory or compliance triggers an
extra regime: every rule cited must carry an official source, a jurisdiction
and a verification date.
What the schema does and does not say
SKILL_MANIFEST_SCHEMA.json describes the shape of phases.json:
required fields, types, closed vocabularies.
The schema engine is deliberately minimal. It applies enum, minLength and
minItems, and nothing else: no pattern, no if/then, no oneOf. A
schema using those keywords would itself be rejected.
The consequence matters: conditional rules live in validator.py, which
remains the source of truth. The version rule is the example:
provides_capabilities is forbidden in a 1.0 manifest and required in a
1.1 one. That rule is enforced and tested, but it is not expressible in the
schema. Do not read required as the whole contract.
A package with only SKILL.md fails. An invalid package blocks the registry
rather than degrading silently.
Identity
phases.json.id is the identity, and SKILL.md.name must match it. The
directory must carry the same key. Keys are normalised with NFKC then
casefold, so homoglyphs cannot smuggle in a second identity. Any collision
blocks the whole build; no package is elected arbitrarily.
Selection
[Every skill is classified and justified]
Every valid skill in the registry lands in exactly one category, with its reason. Nothing is discarded silently.
The only proven automatic signal is:
Platform, domain and capabilities filter only when the caller supplies those constraints. A forbidden capability rejects the skill. No semantic score is invented, and the plan is sorted by identifier.
An empty plan is explicitly valid: it carries NO_COMPATIBLE_SKILL.
The B3 plan classifies every installed skill across skills_selected,
skills_not_applicable and skills_blocked; each skill appears exactly once.
skills_missing lists capabilities with no executable provider, derived from
confirmed facts only. A gap never proves non-compliance: it says an audit
deemed necessary is not covered.
Limits
- 16 roots maximum
- direct depth only
- 1,000 packages maximum
- 10,000 entries per root
SKILL.mdcapped at 256 KiB- a single reference capped at 256 KiB, 1 MiB in total
- snapshots capped at 16 MiB
- public result capped at 1 MiB
- 100 issues per package
- fingerprint capped at 100,000 nodes
Callers may only lower these limits, never raise them.
Runtime constraints
- Python
>=3.11 - no third-party runtime dependency
- no implicit network
- no runtime shell
- no target code executed
- no implicit clock
- no telemetry
- no skill downloaded
pytest is a development dependency only.
Tests
Expected result, 778 collected, 0 failed on every platform:
The skips are platform capabilities, not failures. Linux skips the Windows-junction tests, which have no POSIX equivalent. Windows skips the two symlink tests only when the local privilege to create symlinks is missing, so a runner that holds it reports no skip at all. Every count above comes from a real run: the two Windows lines are the GitHub Actions runner and a local machine.
Normative texts are checked out with LF endings, enforced by .gitattributes.
A couple of Windows symlink tests are skipped: they need a local Windows
privilege. Windows junctions are genuinely tested.
Level of proof
The validator confirms one thing only:
It does not verify the real target. TARGET_VERIFIED stays forbidden in V1.
Security
The loader refuses reparse points. Reads are bounded and confined. Output is sorted and deterministic.
One design decision deserves your attention: detect and plan take a
target path that is not confined to the configured roots, because the
point is to profile an arbitrary project. Run this server under an account
whose reach you accept, and connect it only to a trusted client. The full
threat model is in SECURITY.md.
Non-guarantees
- no universal semantic relevance
- no external skill approved automatically
- no audit of script contents
- no genuinely mounted target proof
- no total Windows atomicity
- no universal HTML recognition
- no universal secret detection
- no guaranteed legal compliance
- no marketplace, no remote source
Licence
Apache-2.0. See LICENSE and NOTICE.
来源:README.md,提交 492529f
工具
0版本历史
1- v0.5.0最新Sep 16, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 50%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通25 分
请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。
- 已声明认证方式10 分
请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分