Contribpath

io.github.CloudCorpRecords由 GitHub 账号 CloudCorpRecords 发布v0.1.0更新于 Nov 3, 2026

对照仓库实际的贡献门槛检查CONTRIBUTING文档,并报告差距。

AI 翻译由 AI 模型根据下方的原文描述翻译,可能有误。

原文描述

Check a CONTRIBUTING document against the repo's actual contribution gates; report gaps.

已验证STDIO仅桌面

概览

Contribpath 的本地 MCP 服务;无需登录;STDIO。

暂无 AI 概览:以下信息来自注册中心条目和服务本身。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Contribpath,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。

其他 MCP 客户端

参照 仓库 中的启动说明。

README

contribpath

A CONTRIBUTING guide can read beautifully and still leave a new contributor stranded, because the document and the repository's real requirements drift apart: the guide never mentions the DCO sign-off the CI enforces, or the changeset the release bot demands. contribpath measures that drift. You supply the document text and the gates the repository actually has — each with an id, the label as it would appear in the document, and any alternative phrases that also count — and it reports which gates are documented, which are missing, how much coverage that adds up to, and a verdict.

Matching is deliberately simple and auditable. Everything is lowercased, and a gate counts as documented when the document contains its label or at least one of its non-empty keywords as a substring. Empty keywords are ignored on purpose: an empty string is a substring of every document, so counting it would mark every gate as covered and hide exactly the gaps this tool exists to find. Either signal is enough on its own — a gate whose label never appears can still be covered by a keyword, and a gate with no keywords at all is covered by its label alone.

Coverage is Math.round(100 * documented / gate_count), so two of three gates is 67, not 66. A coverage of 100 reads as complete, 60 and up as partial, and anything below 60 as sparse. The documented and missing lists carry gate ids in the order the gates were supplied, so the report lines up with the caller's own gate list.

If the caller also extracted topics from the document, they can be passed as documented_topics to find the ones that correspond to no gate at all. A topic matches a gate when it is exactly that gate's id, or when it equals the gate's label ignoring case; topics matching nothing come back verbatim, in input order, as extra_topics. When no topics are supplied, extra_topics is empty.

Duplicate gate ids are an error naming the id — a gate set with two entries for the same gate would make the coverage number meaningless. Malformed input — a missing or non-string document, a missing or empty gates array, a gate with a missing, empty, or non-string id or label, a keywords value that is not an array of strings, or a documented_topics entry that is not a non-empty string — is a validation error naming the offending path, with no partial result. Unknown extra fields are ignored, including inside gate items. The computation is pure and local: no network, no configuration, and no repository is read or touched. contribpath compares what you give it; extracting the gates from a repository in the first place is a separate job.

CLI

bash
npx @reneturcios/contribpath check --input args.jsonnpx @reneturcios/contribpath --version

args.json contains the full arguments object:

json
{  "document": "Please sign off your commits (DCO) and add a changeset.",  "gates": [    { "id": "dco", "label": "Developer Certificate of Origin", "keywords": ["dco", "sign off"] },    { "id": "changeset", "label": "Changeset" },    { "id": "cla", "label": "Contributor License Agreement", "keywords": ["cla"] }  ],  "documented_topics": ["dco", "Changeset", "Code of Conduct"]}

The result is printed as JSON:

json
{  "documented": ["dco", "changeset"],  "missing": ["cla"],  "extra_topics": ["Code of Conduct"],  "coverage_percent": 67,  "verdict": "partial",  "gate_count": 3}

An empty document string is valid input: every gate is missing and the verdict is sparse. Exit codes: 0 on success, 1 on a runtime error (including an unreadable or invalid input file, or invalid input), 2 on a usage error.

MCP server

bash
npx -y @reneturcios/contribpath mcp

MCP client config:

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "contribpath": {      "command": "npx",      "args": ["-y", "@reneturcios/contribpath", "mcp"]    }  }}

Tools

  • check_contributing_coverage — Check a CONTRIBUTING document against the repository's actual contribution gates.

    • document (string, required, may be empty) — the contributing document text to check
    • gates (array, required, at least 1 item) — the repository's actual contribution gates; each item is an object with:
      • id (string, required, non-empty) — gate identifier
      • label (string, required, non-empty) — gate label as it would appear in the document
      • keywords (array of strings, optional) — alternative phrases that also count as documenting the gate
    • documented_topics (array of strings, optional) — topics the caller extracted from the document, checked against the gate set

    Returns {documented, missing, extra_topics, coverage_percent, verdict, gate_count}.

Docker

bash
docker run -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/contribpathdocker run --rm -v "$PWD:/w" ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/contribpath check --input /w/args.json

Development

bash
npm installnpm run build   # tsc -> dist/npm test        # tsx --test test/*.test.ts (pure local, no network)npm run dev     # run the CLI from source

License

MIT — Copyright (c) 2026 Rene Turcios

来源:README.md,提交 f87e206

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中启动过该软件包,因此其工具未知。

版本历史

1
  1. v0.1.0最新Nov 3, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 50%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通25 分

    请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。

  • 已声明认证方式10 分

    请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分