Repoready

io.github.CloudCorpRecords由 GitHub 账号 CloudCorpRecords 发布v0.1.0更新于 Nov 3, 2026

评估首次贡献者就绪度:README、安装与测试文档、许可证、CI、锁文件。

AI 翻译由 AI 模型根据下方的原文描述翻译,可能有误。

原文描述

Score first-contributor readiness: README, install and test docs, license, CI, lockfile.

已验证STDIO仅桌面

概览

Repoready 的本地 MCP 服务;无需登录;STDIO。

暂无 AI 概览:以下信息来自注册中心条目和服务本身。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Repoready,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。

其他 MCP 客户端

参照 仓库 中的启动说明。

README

repoready

A repository can be technically excellent and still lose its first contributor in the first ten minutes: no README to orient them, no install steps to follow, no test command to prove the setup worked. repoready scores that first experience — from the facts you supply, running nothing.

You hand it the repo's file list (with the README's content when you have it) and, optionally, the package.json scripts. It hands back eight checks in a fixed order, each with a pass or fail and an exact detail string:

  • readme — a README exists
  • install_docs — the README documents installation
  • test_script — a test script is defined
  • test_command_docs — the README documents a test command
  • license — a license file is present
  • contributing — a contributing guide is present
  • ci — CI workflows are present under .github/workflows/
  • lockfile — a known lockfile is present

The first four checks are essential. Alongside the checks, the result counts how many passed (out of 8), lists the essential checks that failed in check order, and sets ready to true exactly when no essential check failed. A repo can therefore score well on the supporting checks — license, contributing guide, CI, lockfile — and still be honestly marked not ready because a newcomer cannot install it or cannot run a test.

The README is the first file in input order whose basename, lowercased, is readme.md or starts with readme.. When its content was not supplied, the two documentation checks say so plainly (README content not supplied) rather than guessing from its name. Basename matching is case-insensitive throughout, CI requires the exact .github/workflows/ path prefix, and the lockfile check recognises package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, Cargo.lock, poetry.lock, Pipfile.lock, and go.sum.

Malformed input — a missing or empty file list, a missing, empty, or duplicated file path, a non-string content, or a package_scripts value that is not a string — is a validation error naming the offending path, and no partial assessment is produced. The computation is pure and local: no network, no configuration, and nothing is executed.

CLI

bash
npx @reneturcios/repoready assess --input args.jsonnpx @reneturcios/repoready --version

args.json contains the full arguments object:

json
{  "files": [    { "path": "README.md", "content": "# Demo\n\n## Install\n\nnpm install\n\nRun npm test to verify.\n" },    { "path": "LICENSE" },    { "path": "CONTRIBUTING.md" },    { "path": ".github/workflows/ci.yml" },    { "path": "package-lock.json" }  ],  "package_scripts": { "test": "node --test", "build": "tsc" }}

The assessment is printed as JSON:

json
{  "checks": [    { "id": "readme", "status": "pass", "detail": "README found at README.md" },    { "id": "install_docs", "status": "pass", "detail": "README documents installation" },    { "id": "test_script", "status": "pass", "detail": "a test script is defined" },    { "id": "test_command_docs", "status": "pass", "detail": "README documents a test command" },    { "id": "license", "status": "pass", "detail": "license file found at LICENSE" },    { "id": "contributing", "status": "pass", "detail": "contributing guide found at CONTRIBUTING.md" },    { "id": "ci", "status": "pass", "detail": "CI workflows found" },    { "id": "lockfile", "status": "pass", "detail": "lockfile found at package-lock.json" }  ],  "passed": 8,  "total": 8,  "essential_failures": [],  "ready": true}

Exit codes: 0 on success, 1 on a runtime error (including an unreadable or invalid input file, or invalid input), 2 on a usage error.

MCP server

bash
npx -y @reneturcios/repoready mcp

MCP client config:

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "repoready": {      "command": "npx",      "args": ["-y", "@reneturcios/repoready", "mcp"]    }  }}

Tools

  • assess_readiness — Assess first-contributor readiness from repo files and package scripts.

    • files (array, required, at least one) — files as {path, content?} objects; path is unique across the set and content is used for the README checks
    • package_scripts (object, optional) — package.json scripts as a string-to-string map

    Returns {checks, passed, total, essential_failures, ready}.

Docker

bash
docker run -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/reporeadydocker run --rm -v "$PWD:/w" ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/repoready assess --input /w/args.json

Development

bash
npm installnpm run build   # tsc -> dist/npm test        # tsx --test test/*.test.ts (pure local, no network)npm run dev     # run the CLI from source

License

MIT — Copyright (c) 2026 Rene Turcios

来源:README.md,提交 ce249f8

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中启动过该软件包,因此其工具未知。

版本历史

1
  1. v0.1.0最新Nov 3, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 50%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通25 分

    请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。

  • 已声明认证方式10 分

    请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分