
Reviewthread
io.github.CloudCorpRecords由 GitHub 账号 CloudCorpRecords 发布v0.1.0更新于 Nov 3, 2026
将PR审查评论分类为可操作或噪音,并附上触发的规则作为依据。
AI 翻译由 AI 模型根据下方的原文描述翻译,可能有误。
原文描述
Classify PR review comments as actionable or noise, with the rule that fired as evidence.
概览
Reviewthread 的本地 MCP 服务;无需登录;STDIO。
暂无 AI 概览:以下信息来自注册中心条目和服务本身。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 Reviewthread,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。
其他 MCP 客户端
参照 仓库 中的启动说明。
README
reviewthread
A pull-request review thread collects everything: a
maintainer pointing at a genuinely broken check, a bot
cheering "LGTM", the same coverage note posted twice, a
comment on code that has since been rewritten. reviewthread
sorts a batch of those comments into the five buckets a
reviewer actually acts on — actionable, noise,
closed, stale, and duplicate — and, for each one,
names the exact rule that put it there, so the verdict can
be checked rather than trusted.
You supply the facts, per comment: an id, the author's
name, whether the author is a bot or a human, the body,
the thread state (open, resolved, or outdated), and
optionally whether the comment is attached to a currently
failing check and the id of another comment it duplicates.
Nothing is fetched; the classification is a pure function
of what you pass in.
The rules run in a fixed order and the first match wins. A
resolved thread is closed and an outdated one is stale,
whatever else is true of the comment. A comment whose
duplicate_of is non-empty after trimming is a
duplicate, and its evidence names the trimmed target id.
A comment attached to a failing check is actionable —
that outranks everything a bot might say. Only then does
authorship matter: a bot whose body is praise-only (after
trimming, lowercasing, collapsing whitespace, and
stripping trailing ! and . characters, the body is
exactly one of a pinned eleven-phrase set such as lgtm,
looks good to me, or ship it) is noise, and any
other bot comment with no failing check is noise too.
What remains — an open human comment — is actionable.
Two judgement calls are pinned. A duplicate_of that is
absent, empty, or whitespace-only counts as no duplicate
at all. And praise is judged against the exact phrase set
only: a bot saying "great job, but the tests fail" is a
generic bot comment, not praise-only, because the whole
normalized body must match a phrase.
Malformed input — a missing or empty comments array, a
comment that is not an object, a missing, empty, or
non-string id or author, an author_kind outside
bot / human, a missing or non-string body, a state
outside open / resolved / outdated, a non-boolean
failing_check, or a non-string duplicate_of — is a
validation error naming the offending path, with no
partial result. Unknown extra fields are ignored,
including inside comment items.
CLI
args.json contains the full arguments object:
The result is printed as JSON:
Exit codes: 0 on success, 1 on a runtime error
(including an unreadable or invalid input file, or invalid
input), 2 on a usage error.
MCP server
MCP client config:
Tools
-
triage_review_comments— Classify pull-request review comments as actionable, noise, closed, stale, or duplicate from caller-supplied comment facts.comments(array, required, at least 1 item) — the review comments to classify. Each item:id(string, required, non-empty) — comment identifierauthor(string, required, non-empty) — comment author nameauthor_kind(string, required,botorhuman) — whether the author is a bot or a humanbody(string, required, may be empty) — comment body textstate(string, required,open,resolved, oroutdated) — thread state of the commentfailing_check(boolean, optional, absent means false) — whether the comment is attached to a currently failing checkduplicate_of(string, optional) — id of another comment this one duplicates
Returns
{comments, counts, total}, wherecommentsis one{id, author, verdict, evidence}per input comment in input order,countsis{actionable, noise, closed, stale, duplicate}in that key order, andtotalis the number of input comments.
Docker
Development
License
MIT — Copyright (c) 2026 Rene Turcios
来源:README.md,提交 2bf64b0
工具
0版本历史
1- v0.1.0最新Nov 3, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 50%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通25 分
请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。
- 已声明认证方式10 分
请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分