Reashield

REAShield

[npm version] [license] [CI] [python-ci]

[REAShield demo — REA recovers 6 protected tokens, 0 after hardening]

REA reverse-engineers any app. REAShield makes it come back empty.

REA — the #1 trending repo on GitHub — lets an AI agent reverse-engineer your shipped app in one command, no source code needed. REAShield is the defensive counter: drop it into your build and it hardens what you ship (JavaScript / Electron / Python) so automated reverse engineering comes back empty.

Measured against the real attacker — not claimed

• REA (rea-agents) recovered 6 protected tokens → 0 after hardening.
• webcrack fully deobfuscated the hardened client (1103 changes, string array decoded) and still recovered 0 — because the secrets were relocated/sealed, not just obfuscated.

npm i -D reashieldnpx reashield build        # hardened client + generated server skeletonnpx reashield test --rea   # run the REAL REA on before/after; score what it recovers

Python front-end: pip install reashield (see python/).

Honest promise & limits — read this

Offline code can never be made unbreakable. If a machine must run it, the machine has it, so it can always be extracted given effort — obfuscation, WASM and bytecode only raise the cost. REAShield's job is to defeat the automated attack (the one REA just handed everyone) and raise a human analyst's cost from minutes to days. The only truly unrecoverable code is code you don't ship — run it server-side (mode: "relocate"). Defensive-only, behavior-preserving, transparent (no phone-home). It hardens code you own and ship; it won't help bypass anyone else's DRM, license checks, or anti-cheat.

Use it from an AI agent (MCP server)

REA is an MCP server that hands an agent reverse-engineering tools. REAShield ships the defensive mirror — an MCP server that hands an agent hardening tools, so Claude Code / Cursor can inspect, harden, and measure a project from chat.

Tools: reashield_doctor (what's exposed), reashield_harden (harden it), reashield_measure (run the real REA and report the recovery score).

# Claude Codeclaude mcp add reashield -- npx -y reashield-mcp
# Cursor / other MCP clients — add to your MCP config:# { "mcpServers": { "reashield": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "reashield-mcp"] } } }

Two front-ends, one architecture

REAShield is a monorepo. The same durable idea — move secrets off-device, turn static facts into runtime facts, and measure the result — is implemented for two ecosystems:

Both share the pillar ordering below. The Python package mirrors relocation, sealing (AES-GCM), string indirection, name mangling, polymorphism, decoys, and a measurement harness — with a safety analyzer that refuses rather than miscompiles. See python/README.md.

Interpreted / source-shipped languages are the natural fit; compiled-to-native (Go, Rust, C/C++) ship no source and are a different reverse-engineering game.

Why this works (the threat model)

REA's JavaScript/Electron path is static — it never runs your app. It reads your bundle, rebuilds a graph of modules, imports, routes, IPC channels and strings, then hands a coding agent a compact summary to reason over. It honestly leaves anything computed at runtime unresolved and drops relationships when a graph gets too big.

So the durable defenses either move secrets off-device or turn static facts into runtime facts REA can't resolve. Plain obfuscation — the thing LLM-assisted deobfuscation erodes fastest — is the replaceable outer skin, not the foundation.

Defense pillars (ordered by durability)

Install

npm install --save-dev reashield

Quick start

npx reashield init          # scaffold shield.config.cjsnpx reashield build         # emit hardened client + server skeletonnpx reashield doctor        # show config, layers, costs, depsnpx reashield test          # measure before vs after (static; add --rea for real REA)

Config (shield.config.cjs)

module.exports = {  input: "src/index.js",  output: "dist-shielded",  preset: "balanced",            // low | balanced | max  protect: [    { name: "licenseCheck", mode: "relocate" },  // strongest: off-device    { name: "sealedCalc",   mode: "seal" },        // ciphertext + remote key (max)    { name: "pricingLogic", mode: "wasm" },        // off the JS graph (fast-follow)    { name: "featureGate",  mode: "obfuscate" },   // harden in place  ],  server: {    enabled: true, out: "server-shielded", adapter: "express",    endpoint: "/__s", keyEndpoint: "/__s/k", decoyCalls: false,  },  polymorphic: { enabled: true, seed: "auto" },     // "auto" rotates every build  layers: {    stripSourceMaps: true, flattenBundle: true, obfuscate: true,    stringIndirection: true, dynamicChannels: true, dynamicGraph: false,    decoys: { enabled: true, count: 5 }, integrity: false,  },};

protect: ["a", "b"] (a plain string array) is also accepted; each defaults to mode: "obfuscate". You can also put the config under a reashield key in package.json.

Presets

• low — strip maps, flatten, mangle. Fast, minimal size.
• balanced (default) — + string indirection, name homogenization, computed channels, opaque relocation boundary, structural polymorphism, 5 decoys. Low cost.
• max — + dynamic dispatch, encrypted sealing, decoy calls, control-flow flattening, dead-code injection, self-defending, ~15 decoys. Adds latency / CPU / size — doctor flags it.

Bundler plugins (run hardening inside your existing build)

Instead of the CLI, harden as part of an esbuild / Rollup / Vite build. The plugin runs the source-level pillars per module, then finalizes each output chunk (decoys + obfuscation + source-map stripping + client-runtime injection) and writes the server skeleton. flattenBundle is a no-op here — your bundler already bundles; the plugin hardens its output. Configure the relocated/sealed transport once via the global the plugin installs: globalThis.__configureShield({ transport, keyTransport }) (or let the default fetch transport call your endpoints).

// rollup.config.mjsimport { reashieldRollup } from "reashield/plugins";export default {  input: "src/index.js",  output: { dir: "dist", format: "esm" },  plugins: [reashieldRollup({ configPath: "shield.config.cjs" })],};

// vite.config.mjs  (Vite consumes the Rollup plugin interface)import { reashieldVite } from "reashield/plugins";export default { plugins: [reashieldVite({ configPath: "shield.config.cjs" })] };

// esbuild build scriptimport { build } from "esbuild";import { reashieldEsbuild } from "reashield/plugins";await build({  entryPoints: ["src/index.js"],  bundle: true,  outdir: "dist",  plugins: [reashieldEsbuild({ configPath: "shield.config.cjs" })],});

Each plugin accepts { config | configPath, cwd, seed }. Note: the plugin hardens every emitted JS chunk, so obfuscation cost applies to the whole output — scope your build accordingly.

The generated server skeleton

relocate and seal emit a server-shielded/ directory holding the real logic and keys. Never ship it to users. You run it behind your own auth + TLS. REAShield scaffolds the Express/Fastify wiring and an in-process handler for tests; securing the endpoint is your responsibility (it does not add auth for you).

Auth seam (you supply it). Until you call setAuthVerifier, the endpoint is open — secure it before shipping. The client attaches a token from a source you configure; the server verifies it:

// serverimport { setAuthVerifier } from "./server-shielded/handlers.js";setAuthVerifier(async (token, ctx) => (await myAuth.verify(token)) === true);
// client (wire once at startup)__configureShield({ authToken: () => myAuth.currentToken() }); // (or globalThis.__configureShield in plugin builds)

Adapters. adapter: "express" | "fastify" | "web" | "generic". The skeleton always exports a cross-runtime webHandler(request: Request): Promise<Response> that drops into Hono, Cloudflare Workers, Deno, Bun, or a Next.js route handler:

import { webHandler } from "./server-shielded/handlers.js";export const POST = (req) => webHandler(req); // Next.js app route, Workers fetch, ...

Relocated/sealed functions become async (they do a round-trip). Make sure your call sites await them. They must be self-contained (no closure over client-only module state).

Behavior preservation

Hardening must never change what your program does. The bundled example (examples/sample-package) proves identical outputs before and after hardening — including relocated and sealed code, exercised through an in-process server — and asserts decoys never execute. Run it with npm run example:test.

Electron hardening

For Electron apps, REAShield adds an Electron-specific path (pair it with the JS pillars above):

• Dynamic IPC channel rewriting — turns literal ipcMain/ipcRenderer/ webContents channel strings into runtime-computed ones. REA leaves dynamically-computed IPC names unresolved by design, so this directly starves its graph. Value-preserving: both sides compute the identical string. Enable with layers.ipcChannels: true, or run standalone:
  bash

  npx reashield electron ipc src/main.js --out dist/main.js

• V8 bytecode (bytenode) — ship .jsc so the asar holds no readable JS:
  bash

  npx reashield electron bytecode dist/main.js --out dist/main.jsc

  Caveat: V8 bytecode is tied to the exact V8 version — compile with your target Electron's Node/V8, or the .jsc will not load. Raises cost against automated static JS analysis; it is not unbreakable.
• Defensive fuses (@electron/fuses) — flip the packaged binary to the hardened defaults (disable RunAsNode, Node CLI inspect args and NODE_OPTIONS; enable embedded ASAR integrity validation and OnlyLoadAppFromAsar). Run after packaging, in your afterPack:
  bash

  npx reashield electron fuses path/to/YourApp   # --dry to preview

bytenode and @electron/fuses are optional dependencies, loaded only when you use these commands. Programmatic API: import { rewriteIpcChannels, compileToBytecode, recommendedFuses, applyFuses } from "reashield/electron".

WASM backend (numeric crown jewels)

Mark a function mode: "wasm" and REAShield compiles it to a real WebAssembly module (emitted as binary — no external toolchain) that is instantiated synchronously, so behavior is unchanged. The arithmetic then lives in wasm bytes, off REA's JS module-graph path. Supported today: numeric params, const locals, a return, + - * /, unary -, ternaries with comparison/&&/||/! conditions, and Math.(max|min|abs|floor|ceil|round|sqrt|trunc). Anything outside that subset falls back to in-place obfuscation, reported (never silent). Honest limit: wasm is a harder, different analysis league — not unbreakable.

Durability: measure, don't trust

REA ships often. reashield test compares your own before/after artifact and writes a baseline; the committed GitHub Action (.github/workflows/reashield-regression.yml) re-measures across a matrix of rea-agents versions and fails when a newer REA recovers more than the baseline allows. That regression gate — not any single obfuscation trick — is what keeps the shield strong over time.

rea-agents is an optional dev dependency. Without it, reashield test falls back to static proxy metrics (source maps, import edges, string leakage, protected-name leakage, secret-string removal).

Roadmap

✅ Bundler plugins (esbuild/Rollup/Vite) · ✅ Electron path (bytenode, defensive fuses, dynamic IPC rewriting) · ✅ WASM backend (numeric-subset → real wasm).

Next: broader WASM subset (control flow, strings) · broader server adapters + auth helpers · summary-view-tuned decoys · ASAR packaging integration helpers.

License

MIT. Use it to protect code you own and ship. Nothing here is a weapon against anyone else's software.