
App Store & Google Play
io.github.JohnBilousov由 GitHub 账号 JohnBilousov 发布v0.1.2更新于 Oct 24, 2026
Read-only access to App Store Connect and Google Play: apps, releases, and reviews.
概览
只读 MCP 服务器,让助手通过一套统一工具查看 App Store Connect 与 Google Play 的应用、发布版本和评论。
- 可以做什么
- 检查已配置哪些商店以及凭据是否可用
- 列出两个商店中所有可访问的应用,或按 App Store id、Play 包名、bundle id 查询单个应用
- 读取单个应用或整个产品组合的发布状态,统一归一为已上线、审核中、分阶段发布、已暂停、被拒等状态
- 获取两个商店的近期评论并合并排序,可按最高评分筛选以便处理差评
- 适用场景
- 适合同时上架两个商店的独立开发者,一次提问即可了解哪些版本已上线、哪些在审核、用户在抱怨什么,无需分别查看两个后台。提供带示例数据的演示模式,无需任何凭据即可试用。
- 运行要求
- 通过 npx 在本地运行(需要 Node.js)。App Store Connect 需要 ASC_KEY_ID、ASC_ISSUER_ID 以及指向已下载 .p8 密钥的 ASC_KEY_PATH;Google Play 需要指向具备 Android Publisher 权限的服务账号 JSON 的 PLAY_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_PATH,以及 PLAY_PACKAGES,因为 Play API 无法列出应用。可只配置其中一个商店,或都不配置而使用示例数据。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 App Store & Google Play,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。
其他 MCP 客户端
参照 仓库 中的启动说明。
README
appstore-play-mcp
A read-only MCP server for App Store Connect and Google Play. One set of tools over both stores, so you can ask "what's live, what's in review, and what are people complaining about?" once instead of twice.
Built for indie developers who ship to both stores and are tired of two consoles, two auth schemes, and two vocabularies for the same thing.
Nothing here writes. No metadata edits, no submissions, no review replies. Every
tool is annotated readOnlyHint, and the test suite fails if that ever stops being true.
Try it in 30 seconds
No Apple key, no Google service account:
Demo mode serves fixtures for a fictional two-app developer — including a version stuck in review and a staged rollout at 20%, because those are the states worth looking at.
Tools
appId is optional on get_releases and get_reviews. Leave it out and the tool
sweeps every app you have — that's the portfolio view.
One vocabulary for two stores
The App Store has appStoreVersions with an appVersionState; Play has tracks holding
releases with a status and a rollout fraction. Both are normalised:
Each store's own wording is preserved in rawState, so nothing is lost in translation.
Reviews get the same treatment, with one honest exception: the stores do not report the same thing about where a review came from, so they do not share a field.
Collapsing a language into a country field would have made the unified shape look tidier and report something false, so each store fills only what it actually knows.
Setup
Listed in the MCP Registry as io.github.JohnBilousov/appstore-play-mcp, so clients that read the registry can find it on
their own.
Either store works on its own — configure one, both, or neither (fixtures).
App Store Connect
In App Store Connect → Users and Access → Integrations → App Store Connect API,
create a key and download the .p8 (Apple lets you download it once).
The server signs its own ES256 JWT — no fastlane, no extra dependency. ASC_PRIVATE_KEY
takes the key inline instead, for CI.
Google Play
Create a service account in Google Cloud, enable the Android Publisher API for its project, then grant it access in Play Console → Users and permissions.
PLAY_PACKAGES is not optional: the Play API has no endpoint that lists a developer's
apps, so the packages have to be declared. PLAY_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_JSON takes the JSON
inline instead, for CI.
MCP client config
Claude Code:
Platform limits worth knowing
These are the stores' constraints, not the server's:
- Play cannot list your apps. Hence
PLAY_PACKAGES. - Play reviews go back about a week, and only exist for apps that have reviews.
- Play track data is only readable inside an "edit." Every read here opens a
transient edit and deletes it in a
finallyblock. Nothing is ever committed, so your app is not modified — but that is why a read-only server makes a POST. - App Store reviews are per-territory and can lag the store page by a few hours.
Design notes
Two credentials, one interface. AppStoreClient and PlayClient both implement
StoreClient; a DemoStoreClient implements it a third time on fixtures. Tools never
branch on which store they are talking to.
One store failing doesn't sink the call. Reads fan out across stores and across apps, and
a failure on either axis is collected rather than thrown. If Play is down, App Store reviews
still come back — with the Play failure named in the text and listed in unavailable, so the
model can tell the user the answer is partial. An empty list and a broken credential must never
look the same; a test asserts they don't.
Errors carry the fix. A 403 from Play says the service account may lack access or
the Android Publisher API may be disabled for its project. A 404 says to call
list_apps. The model can usually recover without the user intervening.
Tokens are cached and refreshed early. ES256 for Apple (20 min), RS256 → OAuth2 for
Google (1 hour), both refreshed a minute before expiry so no call races the boundary. The Play
side also memoizes the in-flight exchange: listApps() opens an edit per package concurrently,
and without that, each concurrent caller would see no cached token yet and mint its own.
Development
CI runs typecheck, lint, format:check, test, and build on every push and pull request.
Releasing
Publishing uses npm's trusted publishing (OIDC) —
no NPM_TOKEN secret, nothing that can leak or expire. One-time setup on npmjs.com, under the
package's Settings → Trusted publishing → GitHub Actions: organization JohnBilousov, this
repository, workflow filename publish.yml.
To cut a release: bump the version in package.json, server.json, and VERSION in
src/server.ts together (a test asserts they can't drift), commit, push, then publish a GitHub
Release with a matching vX.Y.Z tag. That triggers
.github/workflows/publish.yml, which runs the test suite and
publishes to npm with provenance — the
package page shows a verified link back to this exact commit and workflow run, not just a name on
the registry.
Roadmap
- Sales and download reports from App Store Connect (needs a vendor number)
- Crash and ANR vitals from the Play Developer Reporting API
- TestFlight builds and tester groups
- Streamable HTTP transport alongside stdio
Contributions welcome — especially from anyone who ships to both stores and has hit a limit worth documenting here.
License
MIT © Ivan Bilousov
来源:README.md,提交 3f6fa1e
工具
0版本历史
1- v0.1.2最新Sep 16, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 50%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通25 分
请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。
- 已声明认证方式10 分
请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分