Stack Guardian

io.github.LuminariSoftwares由 GitHub 账号 LuminariSoftwares 发布v0.4.0更新于 Oct 24, 2026

Health doctor for a home AI stack: Ollama nodes, GPUs and tailnet, with graded confidence.

概览

AI 生成的概览

只读 MCP 服务器,用于诊断家庭 AI 栈(Ollama 或 OpenAI 兼容节点、NVIDIA GPU、tailnet 节点),给出带置信度分级和证据的检查结果。

可以做什么
  • 即时评估整个栈的健康状况:节点、模型、GPU 与 tailnet,并列出发现项和置信度等级
  • 获取未经分级的原始快照:端点、模型 ID、显存数据和 tailnet 状态
  • 解释某个发现代码:含义、可尝试的处理办法以及需要什么证据才能确认
  • 以上能力均可限定到单个指定节点
适用场景
当助手需要回答本地多机模型栈为何变慢或无法连接,并希望得到有分级、有证据的诊断而非猜测时适用。面向在家中运行 Ollama 或 OpenAI 兼容服务(LM Studio、llama.cpp、vLLM、LiteLLM)的用户,也可跨 tailnet 使用。
运行要求
作为本地 stdio 进程运行(PyPI 包 stack-guardian,可用 uvx 启动),需要 Python 3.11+,无运行时依赖。需要一份 nodes JSON 文件,通过 STACK_GUARDIAN_NODES 环境变量或命令行参数指定,描述要探测的端点。节点可选的 api_key_env 指定存放 bearer 令牌的环境变量名。GPU 检查需要本机有 nvidia-smi,tailnet 检查需要 PATH 中有 tailscale。仅支持桌面端。
安装前请注意
MCP 工具为只读,且不会记录运行历史,因此单独使用时最多只能给出 LIKELY 等级,除非 CLI 已在同一状态文件中积累历史。快照包含节点名、模型名、显存数据、GPU 进程名和 tailnet 状态,并会交给 MCP 客户端。请求只发往 nodes 文件中列出的基础 URL;由 api_key_env 指定的 bearer 令牌只会发送到该节点的 OpenAI 端点。另附的 HTTP 端点没有身份验证。自定义规则目录会以你的权限在进程内运行。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Stack Guardian,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。

其他 MCP 客户端

参照 仓库 中的启动说明。

README

stack-guardian

[ci] [privacy] [XERJ Corpus Hub contributor] [stack-guardian MCP server – quality and maintenance score on Glama] [PyPI]

Status: active development -- changelog

mcp-name: io.github.LuminariSoftwares/stack-guardian

14 health checks, one command: the example stack exits 2 with 4 FAIL findings, on purpose.

A health doctor for a home AI stack -- Ollama or OpenAI-compatible nodes, NVIDIA GPUs, tailnet peers -- with graded, evidence-backed findings.

Quick start (60 seconds)

macOS / Linux (offline example run, Python 3.11+):

pip install stack-guardiancurl -LO https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LuminariSoftwares/stack-guardian/main/examples/snapshot.jsoncurl -LO https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LuminariSoftwares/stack-guardian/main/examples/ctx.jsonstack-guardian doctor --snapshot snapshot.json --ctx ctx.json

Windows (PowerShell), or anywhere you would rather not touch the system Python

pipx install stack-guardiancurl.exe -LO https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LuminariSoftwares/stack-guardian/main/examples/snapshot.jsoncurl.exe -LO https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LuminariSoftwares/stack-guardian/main/examples/ctx.jsonstack-guardian doctor --snapshot snapshot.json --ctx ctx.json

pipx puts it in its own virtualenv and on your PATH (pip install pipx if you do not have it). uvx stack-guardian doctor --snapshot snapshot.json runs it without installing anything at all.

The example snapshot makes every shipped rule fire once, so you see each finding type without touching a real stack. The command exits 2 because the example contains FAIL findings; that is the expected result. Each line ends with the confidence grade - one run is at most (LIKELY), the same finding on a second run is (VERIFIED).

Point it at your own machines next:

stack-guardian init                       # writes nodes.json for this machine; never overwrites onestack-guardian doctor --nodes nodes.json

init probes http://127.0.0.1:11434 to see whether Ollama is answering, and lists your tailnet peers (if tailscale is on PATH) as commented-out candidates you can move up into the file. Edit it by hand from there; the shape is in examples/nodes.json and under What it does.

From a clone instead (for writing rules or running the tests):

git clone https://github.com/LuminariSoftwares/stack-guardian.gitcd stack-guardianpython -m venv .venv.venv\Scripts\activate          # Windows;  macOS/Linux: source .venv/bin/activatepip install -e ".[test]"         # drop [test] if you only want to run it, not test itstack-guardian doctor --snapshot examples/snapshot.json --ctx examples/ctx.jsonpython -m pytest -q

Proof

stack-guardian doctor --snapshot snapshot.json --ctx ctx.json

Run 2026-11-05 on stack-guardian 0.4.0 (): the command exits 2, prints worst: FAIL, and ends with:

stack-guardian: 8 finding(s) are LIKELY on one run: run again to confirm them as VERIFIED

14 findings on the example snapshot: 4 FAIL, 4 WARN, 6 INFO. The 14 checks that ship are counted from the installed package: stack-guardian 0.4.0 checks loaded from installed package: 14

Tests, 2026-11-05 (): 171 passed in 61.00s (0:01:00)

Standard library only, Python 3.11+, no runtime dependencies. GPUs: NVIDIA only, and only on the machine running stack-guardian.

A health doctor for a home AI stack. It collects a snapshot of your nodes (Ollama or OpenAI-compatible endpoints, loaded models, NVIDIA GPUs, tailnet peers), runs small Python rules against it, remembers the last runs, and reports findings with a confidence grade: one sample is at most LIKELY, the same finding twice in a row is VERIFIED. It exists because "the model is slow" on a multi-machine local stack has a dozen possible causes, and an agent or a person should get a graded, evidence-backed answer instead of a guess. A finding can carry a typed fix that you run on purpose, never automatically. It ships as a CLI, an MCP server for coding agents, a tiny HTTP endpoint with Prometheus metrics, and a DeepSeek Harness (DSH) plugin.

Two runs against examples/nodes.json with one state file:

# run 1FAIL ollama.unreachable [gpu-box-2]: 1 Ollama endpoint(s) do not answer: http://100.64.0.2:11434 (LIKELY)FAIL ollama.unreachable [home-server]: 1 Ollama endpoint(s) do not answer: http://100.64.0.3:11434 (LIKELY)FAIL tailnet.peer_offline [home-server]: tailnet peer offline: home-server (LIKELY)WARN model.expiring [gpu-box]: 1 loaded model(s) unload within 60s: qwen3:8b (LIKELY)OK   ollama.answering [gpu-box]: 1 endpoint(s) answer: http://127.0.0.1:11434worst: FAIL# run 2 (same state file)FAIL ollama.unreachable [gpu-box-2]: 1 Ollama endpoint(s) do not answer: http://100.64.0.2:11434 (VERIFIED)FAIL ollama.unreachable [home-server]: 1 Ollama endpoint(s) do not answer: http://100.64.0.3:11434 (VERIFIED)FAIL tailnet.peer_offline [home-server]: tailnet peer offline: home-server (VERIFIED)WARN model.expiring [gpu-box]: 1 loaded model(s) unload within 60s: qwen3:8b (VERIFIED)OK   ollama.answering [gpu-box]: 1 endpoint(s) answer: http://127.0.0.1:11434worst: FAIL

That is the real output of python examples/demo_report.py: the shipped collector and rules, with a stub Ollama on 127.0.0.1 answering for gpu-box, the two placeholder tailnet addresses never contacted, and sample nvidia-smi and tailscale output so it prints the same on any machine. The shipped rules only report problems; the OK line comes from a small rule inside the script. A test fails if this block and the script disagree.

Why the grade. One run can make a finding at most LIKELY; the same finding on two runs in a row makes it VERIFIED; passing checks are not graded. On a home network a sleeping laptop, a Wi-Fi drop or a model being reloaded looks broken for a few seconds, so one bad sample is reported as a likely problem and only what persists is reported as fact.

Standard library only, Python 3.11+, no runtime dependencies.

One of four small, independent tools for people running local models: see The guardian family.

Not affiliated with StackGuardian, the infrastructure-automation company. Same word, unrelated projects.

Architecture

mermaid
flowchart LR    nodes["nodes.json"] --> collect    subgraph collect["collect: one snapshot, all nodes in parallel"]        direction TB        ol["Ollama /api/tags, /api/ps<br/>OpenAI-compatible /v1/models"]        gpu["nvidia-smi<br/>(local node only)"]        ts["tailscale status --json"]    end    collect --> snap[("snapshot dict")]    snap --> rules["checks.d/*.py rules<br/>run concurrently;<br/>a crash becomes check.crashed"]    rules --> grade["state.grade<br/>LIKELY until seen twice, then VERIFIED"]    hist[("state.json<br/>last 5 runs per node")] <--> grade    grade --> cli["CLI: doctor<br/>exit 0 / 1 / 2"]    grade --> mcp["MCP stdio server<br/>read-only, never records"]    grade --> http["serve: /snapshot, /metrics"]    grade -.->|"finding.fix"| fix["doctor --fix ID<br/>dry run unless --apply;<br/>snapshot + audit line"]
modulejob
collect.py, multinode.py, parsers.pyprobe every node in parallel under one deadline; parse Ollama, OpenAI-compatible, nvidia-smi and tailscale output into one snapshot dict. A dead endpoint is data, never an exception.
core.py, finding.py, checks.d/load rule files, run them concurrently, and build findings with a fixed shape (code, severity, level, node, summary, evidence, try, confidence, fix).
state.pykeep the last runs per node and grade confidence from streaks.
fixes.pythe three typed fix actions, their dry-run plan, snapshot and audit line.
cli.py, mcp_server.py, serve.pythe three front ends over the same doctor.

Design decisions

Each is written up with its alternatives in docs/adr/.

  • Standard library only (ADR 0001). pip install pulls nothing else, so it installs on any machine with Python 3.11. Trade-off: the HTTP client, JSON-RPC loop and Prometheus renderer are hand-written and have to be tested here.
  • Rules are plain Python files in a folder (ADR 0002). A rule is a function (snapshot, ctx) -> finding | list | None; a rule that raises becomes a check.crashed WARN, so a buggy rule never reports a broken stack. Trade-off: rules run in-process with your privileges; only load rule folders you trust.
  • Confidence from history, not from one sample (ADR 0003). One run is at most LIKELY; two bad runs in a row are VERIFIED. Trade-off: a real outage needs a second run before it is VERIFIED, and the history is a local file.
  • Typed fixes, dry run by default (ADR 0004). Exactly three actions, never a shell string from a rule; nothing changes without --apply, and every applied fix leaves a snapshot and an audit line. Trade-off: anything outside the three actions has to be done by hand.
  • Agent-facing surfaces are read-only (ADR 0005). The MCP server and the HTTP endpoint never fix, never write the run history, and serve binds to loopback unless told otherwise. Trade-off: an agent can diagnose but must hand the fix back to a person.

For coding agents

  • MCP server (any MCP client): stack-guardian-mcp speaks MCP over stdio with three read-only tools, stack_health, stack_snapshot and stack_explain. See MCP server for client configs and the tool reference.
  • DSH plugin (npm install dsh-stack-guardian, source in dsh/, Node 20+): adds one line at the start of a DeepSeek Harness session when the doctor reports WARN or FAIL, and nothing otherwise. It runs stack-guardian doctor --json --quiet, so set STACK_GUARDIAN_NODES to your nodes file in the harness environment.
  • Watching and scraping: stack-guardian doctor --watch 30 --json prints one JSON object per finding that changes state (new, resolved, severity change), so an agent can tail it; stack-guardian-serve --nodes FILE also answers GET /metrics in Prometheus text format.

MCP server

stack-guardian-mcp (also stack-guardian mcp) speaks MCP over stdio (JSON-RPC 2.0, protocol 2024-11-05). It needs a nodes file (examples/nodes.json); give its path with --nodes FILE or the STACK_GUARDIAN_NODES environment variable. Optional: --ctx FILE (rule settings), --state FILE (run history to grade against), --ttl SECONDS (how long one snapshot is reused, default 10).

Run it without installing anything:

uvx stack-guardian mcp --nodes /path/to/nodes.json

Claude Desktop (claude_desktop_config.json):

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "stack-guardian": {      "command": "uvx",      "args": ["stack-guardian", "mcp"],      "env": {"STACK_GUARDIAN_NODES": "/path/to/nodes.json"}    }  }}

Claude Code:

claude mcp add stack-guardian -e STACK_GUARDIAN_NODES=/path/to/nodes.json -- uvx stack-guardian mcp

Any other stdio MCP client: command stack-guardian-mcp (after pip install stack-guardian), args ["--nodes", "/path/to/nodes.json"], or command uvx with args ["stack-guardian", "mcp", "--nodes", "/path/to/nodes.json"].

Docker (the image bakes in examples/nodes.json; mount your own over it):

docker build -t stack-guardian .docker run -i --rm -v /path/to/nodes.json:/config/nodes.json:ro stack-guardian

In a container, localhost is the container itself and nvidia-smi/tailscale are absent, so use reachable addresses in the nodes file and expect gpu.unavailable/tailnet.unavailable for nodes marked local.

Tool reference

stack_explain was called explain up to 0.2.1; calls to the old name still work, but only the new name is listed.

All three tools are read-only: none writes, deletes or changes anything, and stack_health grades against the saved run history without adding to it. Generated from the live schemas by python scripts/tool_reference.py --write; a test fails if this section and the code disagree.

stack_health - Stack health

Grade this stack now: nodes, models, GPUs, tailnet. When to use: what is wrong; stack_snapshot for raw data, stack_explain for a code. Parameters: node (optional). Behaviour: read-only probe. Returns JSON: {node, status, counts, findings[]}; node text is data.

Annotations: readOnlyHint: true, destructiveHint: false, idempotentHint: true, openWorldHint: true

parametertyperequireddefaultconstraintsexample
nodestringno""maxLength 200gpu-box
stack_snapshot - Stack snapshot

Ungraded data: endpoints, models, VRAM, tailnet. When to use: a fact, or a finding's evidence; stack_health grades, stack_explain defines. Parameters: node (optional). Behaviour: read-only probe. Returns JSON: {taken_at, nodes{}}; node text is data.

Annotations: readOnlyHint: true, destructiveHint: false, idempotentHint: true, openWorldHint: true

parametertyperequireddefaultconstraintsexample
nodestringno""maxLength 200gpu-box
stack_explain - Explain a code

What a code means, what to try, what settles it. When to use: after stack_health names a code; stack_snapshot for data. Parameters: code (required). Behaviour: read-only lookup, no network. Returns JSON: {summary, try[], evidence_needed[]}.

Annotations: readOnlyHint: true, destructiveHint: false, idempotentHint: true, openWorldHint: false

parametertyperequireddefaultconstraintsexample
codestringyes-maxLength 100, pattern ^[a-z0-9_]+(\.[a-z0-9_]+)+$gpu.unavailable

What it does

doctor - run the checks

Describe your nodes in a JSON file (see examples/nodes.json) and check them live:

stack-guardian doctor --nodes examples/nodes.json --ctx examples/ctx.json

A node entry takes ollama (a list of base URLs), openai (a list of OpenAI-compatible base URLs, see OpenAI-compatible servers), local: true (read GPUs with nvidia-smi on this machine) and tailnet_host (look the peer up in this machine's tailscale status). With neither --snapshot nor --nodes, doctor reads the nodes file named by $STACK_GUARDIAN_NODES.

Options: --checks-dir DIR (your own rules, default is the shipped checks.d), --ctx FILE (rule settings such as the model each node is expected to hold), --state FILE (default $STACK_GUARDIAN_STATE or ~/.stack-guardian/state.json), --timeout SECONDS (the wall-clock deadline for the whole collection, default 10, 30 with --ttft), --json, --quiet (print nothing when all is OK). stack-guardian --version and stack-guardian --help do what you expect.

Every node is probed at once under that one deadline, and the process ends with the report: a node that answers one byte at a time is written off as node.unreachable, not waited for.

The nodes file is validated when it is read. A node needs something to probe (ollama, openai, endpoints with the older "kind": "openai" form, local: true, or tailnet_host), and URLs need a scheme; anything else is a usage error (exit 3) naming the node, rather than a confident wrong answer. A single URL string where a list belongs is accepted, with one note on stderr. Keys starting with _ are ignored, so a file can carry comments and candidate nodes; "_options": {"timeout_s": 20} sets the deadline for that file.

Human output ends each line with the finding's confidence - (LIKELY) on one run, (VERIFIED) once the same finding has been seen twice - and worst: X stays the last line. --json prints {"schema": 1, "findings": [...], "worst": "..."}.

Exit codes: 0 all OK/INFO, 1 a WARN, 2 a FAIL, 3 usage, 4 the doctor itself crashed.

Shipped rules: node.unreachable, ollama.unreachable, openai.unreachable, openai.no_models, openai.slow, model.not_loaded, model.expiring, model.slow_ttft, vram.unattributed, gpu.unavailable, gpu.parse_degraded, tailnet.unavailable, tailnet.peer_offline, tailnet.relayed. Each raises one finding per affected node. A rule that raises becomes a check.crashed WARN - a buggy rule never reports a broken stack.

Servers that speak the OpenAI API (LM Studio, llama.cpp, vLLM, LiteLLM) are covered by OpenAI-compatible servers below.

model.expiring (WARN): a loaded Ollama model whose /api/ps expires_at is within 60 s of the snapshot time; INFO when /api/ps is unavailable. Change the window with "model_expiring_s": 120 in --ctx.

--watch N re-runs the doctor every N seconds and prints only the findings that changed state, each with a timestamp. Ctrl+C exits 0 with a one-line summary. With --json, each change is one JSON object on stdout.

stack-guardian doctor --nodes examples/nodes.json --watch 30

--ttft sends a 1-token generation to every loaded model on each Ollama endpoint and records ttft_ms on the model in the snapshot. It costs a generation, so it never runs unless you pass it, and it needs --nodes. The probe keeps each model's unload time as it was. model.slow_ttft (INFO) fires above 2000 ms; change it with "ttft_slow_ms": 1500 in --ctx.

stack-guardian doctor --nodes examples/nodes.json --ttft

OpenAI-compatible servers

LM Studio, llama.cpp's llama-server, vLLM and LiteLLM serve models over the OpenAI API. Give a node an openai list of base URLs - the part before /models, usually ending in /v1 - beside or instead of ollama:

{  "gpu-box": {"ollama": ["http://127.0.0.1:11434"], "local": true},  "studio":  {"openai": ["http://127.0.0.1:1234/v1", "http://192.0.2.7:8000/v1"]},  "proxy":   {"openai": ["http://100.64.0.1:4000/v1"], "api_key_env": "PROXY_API_KEY"}}

Each endpoint is probed with GET <base>/models, under the same single deadline as everything else. The snapshot records, per endpoint, whether it answered, how long that took and the model ids it lists (node.openai[]; at most 200 ids, with models_total when there were more). api_key_env names an environment variable that holds the bearer token for the node's openai endpoints; the token itself is not in the nodes file, the snapshot, the state folder or any output, and is not forwarded if the server redirects to another host. If the variable is not set, the endpoint is reported as failing with the variable's name and nothing is sent.

findinglevelwhen
openai.unreachableFAILan endpoint refused, timed out, answered with an error, or did not answer with a model list
openai.no_modelsWARNan endpoint answered and lists no models
openai.slowINFOGET /models took longer than 2000 ms; change it with "openai_slow_ms": 3000 in --ctx

Confidence grading is the same as for Ollama. model.not_loaded counts a model an endpoint lists as present, because the OpenAI API cannot say what is resident. Loaded-model state is Ollama-only: model.expiring and model.slow_ttft (and --ttft) read only ollama endpoints, since /v1/models carries no unload time and a time-to-first-token probe would cost a generation on a server this tool did not start. stack_health and stack_snapshot over MCP include these nodes with no change to the tools.

Tested against: a stdlib stub server on 127.0.0.1 that answers GET /v1/models in the shape those servers document (tests/test_openai_nodes.py). Also run once by hand, not in CI: a real LiteLLM proxy 1.106.2 on 127.0.0.1 (no master key; it listed its two configured models, and answers on /v1/models and /models alike). LM Studio, llama.cpp llama-server and vLLM: expected to work, not yet tested. The bearer token was exercised against the stub only; a LiteLLM proxy with a master key needs its database, which was not set up.

The older form {"kind": "openai", "endpoints": ["http://127.0.0.1:1234"]} (the base URL without /v1) still works exactly as before, including its ollama.unreachable finding; use openai for new nodes.

doctor --fix ID - run a finding's typed fix

A rule may attach fix={"action": ..., "args": {...}} to a finding. There are exactly three actions and never a raw shell string:

actionwhat it doesneeds
unload_modelPOST keep_alive: 0 to an Ollama /api/generatenode, url, model
restart_laneruns the argv list you declared for that lanelane declared in --config
set_envwrites NAME=value to <state folder>/env and sets it for the processname, value
stack-guardian doctor --checks-dir examples/checks.d --snapshot examples/snapshot.json --fix ollama.stuck --config examples/lanes.json

That is a dry run: it prints the plan and changes nothing. Add --apply to perform it. An applied fix first saves the snapshot under <state folder>/snapshots/, then runs, then appends one JSON line to <state folder>/fixes.jsonl (--audit FILE to move it). A set_env value is never written to the audit, only its length. ID is the finding code, or code@node when several nodes raise the same code. With --fix, the exit code is the fix's: 0 plan or success, 1 refused or failed, 3 usage.

Other commands

  • stack-guardian init [--out nodes.json] [--ollama URL] writes a starter nodes file for this machine: it probes the local Ollama, lists tailnet peers as commented-out candidates, and refuses (exit 3) rather than overwrite a file that is already there.

  • stack-guardian snapshot --nodes FILE [--ttft] [--timeout SECONDS] prints the raw snapshot the rules read.

  • stack-guardian-serve --nodes FILE [--ctx FILE] [--port 8788] [--cache SECONDS] serves a fresh snapshot at GET /snapshot and Prometheus metrics at GET /metrics (read-only, loopback unless you pass --host H --allow-remote). It is a scrape target, not a cluster protocol: no other part of stack-guardian reads it. Every request collects a new snapshot; --cache SECONDS (default 0, off) reuses one for that long if a scrape interval is faster than your nodes answer. It has no auth: bind to localhost or a tailnet IP only.

  • The same server answers GET /metrics in Prometheus text format, running the shipped rules on a fresh snapshot: stack_guardian_finding{code,severity,node} (1 while raised, 0 once resolved), stack_guardian_worst_severity (0 OK, 1 INFO, 2 WARN, 3 FAIL) and stack_guardian_last_run_timestamp.

    curl http://127.0.0.1:8788/metrics
  • stack-guardian-mcp --nodes FILE [--ctx FILE] [--state FILE] [--ttl SECONDS]: see MCP server.

Writing a rule

python
from stack_guardian import finding as F
def ollama_up(snapshot, ctx):    if not snapshot["nodes"]["gpu-box"].get("reachable"):        return F.make_finding("ollama.unreachable", "missing", "FAIL", "gpu-box", "Ollama does not answer")    return None
CHECKS = [("ollama.up", ollama_up)]

Drop the file in a folder and point --checks-dir at it. A full example with a fix is in examples/checks.d/20_ollama_fix.py. A rule may also return a list of findings, one per node.

Examples

filewhat it is
examples/nodes.jsonthree nodes: a local one with GPUs, two remote ones over the tailnet
examples/ctx.jsonrule settings: which model gpu-box-2 should hold
examples/snapshot.jsonan offline snapshot on which every shipped rule fires once, for trying doctor and --fix
examples/lanes.jsonthe lanes restart_lane is allowed to run
examples/checks.d/20_ollama_fix.pya custom rule whose finding carries a fix
examples/demo_report.pyprints the two-run report at the top of this README: a stub Ollama on 127.0.0.1, no other network

Troubleshooting

By finding code - the same text stack_explain gives an agent:

you seeit meansfirst thing to try
node.unreachablethe node did not answer within the deadline, or the collector raisedcheck the machine is on; if it is only slow, --timeout 30 or "_options": {"timeout_s": 30}
ollama.unreachablethe endpoint itself refused or timed outcurl http://HOST:11434/api/version from this machine; check the port and that Ollama listens on more than loopback (OLLAMA_HOST)
openai.unreachablean OpenAI-compatible endpoint refused, timed out, errored or did not list modelscurl http://HOST:PORT/v1/models from this machine; the base URL should end in /v1; if the server needs a key, check the variable named by api_key_env is set where stack-guardian runs
openai.no_modelsthe endpoint is up and lists no modelsload a model in the server (LiteLLM: check the proxy config lists model_name entries)
openai.slowGET /models took over 2000 mscheck nothing else is loading a model or generating on that node; "openai_slow_ms" in --ctx moves the line
model.not_loaded--ctx expects a model that is not residentload it with one short generate, or drop the expectation from --ctx
model.expiringa loaded model unloads within 60 s (INFO: /api/ps is missing, so it cannot be told)send a request with a longer keep_alive, or set OLLAMA_KEEP_ALIVE on that node
model.slow_ttfta --ttft probe took over 2000 ms to the first tokencheck the model fits in VRAM, and that nothing else is generating on that GPU
vram.unattributedVRAM is in use that no listed process explainsnvidia-smi and look at the compute apps; on Windows some processes report [N/A] and cannot be attributed
gpu.unavailablenvidia-smi is missing, or ran and failed - the finding says whichNVIDIA only; if it is installed, run nvidia-smi by hand and fix the driver
gpu.parse_degradednvidia-smi printed a GPU line with [N/A] fields, so that card is missing from the reportrun the query by hand (the evidence quotes the line); update the driver
tailnet.unavailabletailscale is not on PATH, or tailscale status failednot on a tailnet? drop tailnet_host from that node; otherwise start tailscaled or log in
tailnet.peer_offlinethe tailnet says the peer is offlinecheck the machine is up and tailscale status on it
tailnet.relayedthe peer is reachable only through a DERP relaycheck UDP 41641 and your firewall; tailscale netcheck on both ends
check.crashedone of your rule files raisedthe evidence carries the exception; fix or remove that file

And by symptom:

you seewhy
stack-guardian: usage: ... nothing to probea node in the nodes file has no endpoints, no local: true and no tailnet_host. It used to report worst: OK.
stack-guardian: usage: ... "kind": "openai"the node lists endpoints but is not marked as an OpenAI-compatible node; for a new node use "openai": [".../v1"] instead
stack-guardian: usage: ... "api_key_env"it takes the NAME of an environment variable ("PROXY_API_KEY"), not the key, and only on a node with an openai list
every finding says (LIKELY)confidence comes from history: run it twice against the same --state file
the MCP server never says VERIFIEDby design, it grades against the saved history without adding to it; let the CLI or --watch build the history
doctor exits 2 on the example snapshotthat is the point of the example: it fires every rule once

What leaves the machine, and what is written

  • Out: HTTP(S) requests to exactly the base URLs in your nodes file (/api/version, /api/tags, /api/ps, or GET <base>/models for each openai URL, /v1/models for the older kind form), and with --ttft one 1-token generation per loaded Ollama model. No credentials are sent unless a node sets api_key_env, in which case that variable's value goes as a bearer token to that node's openai URLs only (and is dropped if a redirect leaves the host); redirects are followed, and nothing is sent anywhere else: no telemetry, no update check, no analytics. nvidia-smi and tailscale status --json run locally.
  • In: nothing is downloaded or installed at run time. The package has no runtime dependencies.
  • Written: the state folder, $STACK_GUARDIAN_STATE or ~/.stack-guardian/, created 0700. It holds state.json (the last 5 runs per node: codes and levels, no measurements) and, only after --fix ... --apply, fixes.jsonl (one audit line per applied fix) and snapshots/ (the snapshot taken just before it). set_env also writes env. Those files are created 0600; a set_env value is never written to the audit, only its length. doctor --json, snapshot and the MCP server write nothing but their own output.
  • Shown: a snapshot contains your node names, model names, VRAM figures, GPU process names and tailnet state. That is what stack-guardian-serve serves and what an MCP client receives, so treat it as you would nvidia-smi output.

Limits

What it does not do, so you are not surprised:

  • GPUs: NVIDIA only, and only on the machine running stack-guardian. GPU data comes from nvidia-smi on a node marked "local": true. Remote nodes report endpoints, models and tailnet state, not VRAM. Nothing in the package reads another machine's /snapshot, so there is no way to pull a remote node's GPUs into this report: run stack-guardian on that machine too, or scrape its stack-guardian-serve /metrics with Prometheus. No AMD, Intel or Apple GPU support.
  • Tailnet state is this machine's view. Peers are read from the local tailscale status --json; a peer can be offline to you and online to another node.
  • VERIFIED needs two runs. The MCP server never records a run, so on its own it reports at most LIKELY unless the CLI (or --watch) has built up history in the same state file.
  • No auth on stack-guardian-serve. It is read-only and loopback by default; it is not meant for the open internet.
  • MCP over stdio only, protocol 2024-11-05: results are JSON text content, without outputSchema or structuredContent.
  • Rules run in-process. A rule folder is code; only point --checks-dir at rules you trust.
  • --ttft costs a real generation per loaded model, which is why it is opt-in.

How it's tested

pip install -e ".[test]"python -m pytest -q
  • Every module carries a counted --selftest (pure functions, injected HTTP and command runners, no network); the suite runs each one.
  • Integration tests drive the real CLI and the MCP server over stdio in a subprocess, including the tool list and its annotations, and run the examples/ exactly as this README shows them.
  • tests/test_tool_definitions.py fails if any MCP tool or parameter loses its description, type, example, default or constraints, if a shipped finding code has no stack_explain entry, or if the tool reference above is stale.
  • tests/test_tools_list_budget.py starts the real MCP server and fails if the whole tools/list payload grows past its token budget, because those definitions are sent on every request.
  • CI runs the suite on Ubuntu, Windows and macOS (Python 3.11) and on Ubuntu with 3.12 and 3.13, builds the wheel and runs it from a clean virtualenv (so a release without its rules fails), builds the Docker image and lists its tools, syntax-checks the DSH plugin, and runs a privacy scan of every tracked file.

Contributing and security

Pull requests are welcome; CONTRIBUTING.md has the setup, the house style and the three rules that matter (a test you watched fail first, no new runtime dependency, the tool-definition token budget).

Found something exploitable? Please report it privately through the repository's Security tab, not a public issue: SECURITY.md explains how, and lists what this tool does by design (rules are code, node URLs are fetched, serve has no auth).

Credits

No code is copied from other projects. The wire formats follow their public specs: the Model Context Protocol (JSON-RPC over stdio, tool annotations) and the Prometheus text exposition format. The data comes from the documented interfaces of Ollama, nvidia-smi and tailscale status --json.

The guardian family

Four small MIT-licensed tools for people running local models. Each does one job, they share no code, and each is useful on its own.

toolwhat it answers
code-guardianBefore you run or merge code you did not write: is it safe, does it work, is anything missing? Three scores from a static scan, Python in depth.
context-guardianKeeps a long local-model session inside its context window: a proxy that compacts history before the window fills, with tools to search what was archived.
tool-guardianRoutes many MCP servers through a few tools, so their definitions stop filling the context window.
stack-guardianIs my home AI stack healthy? Ollama / OpenAI-compatible nodes, NVIDIA GPUs and Tailscale peers, with a confidence grade on every finding.

One of four free, MIT-licensed guardians for people running local models, each answering one question from the outside: tool-guardian (what do my tools cost the window?), context-guardian (will this session hit the limit?), stack-guardian (is my stack healthy?), code-guardian (is this code safe to run?).

License

MIT. See LICENSE.

来源:README.md,提交 99d2f91

工具

0
SourceWeft 曾在隔离沙箱中以无凭据方式启动该软件包一次,以列出其工具,但未能完成:服务器未能启动。

版本历史

3
  1. v0.4.0最新Oct 24, 2026
  2. v0.3.0Oct 22, 2026
  3. v0.2.1Oct 15, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 50%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通25 分

    请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。

  • 已声明认证方式10 分

    请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分