PageLens AI

io.github.PageLens-AI由 GitHub 账号 PageLens-AI 发布v1.0.0更新于 Oct 24, 2026

AI website audit: security, SEO, performance, UX and accessibility checks with actionable fixes.

已验证Streamable HTTP可网页运行网页搜索与抓取开发者工具安全与监控

概览

AI 生成的概览

远程 MCP 服务器,让助手读取 PageLens AI 网站审计报告(评分、问题项、快速改进项与 QA 旅程结果),并记录负责人决策。

可以做什么
  • 列出并读取扫描与域名:近期扫描的评分、等级、严重度统计与发布结论,以及已验证域名
  • 查看单次扫描:执行摘要、最高优先级问题、各角色视角评审与 QA 旅程详情
  • 分页浏览问题项,可按严重度、类别、角色、页面或规则筛选,含证据与修复建议
  • 按影响与工作量排序快速改进项,可切换转化等预设视角
  • 记录或清除负责人决策,并提交误报、严重度错误等问题反馈
  • 以资源形式获取扫描的 Markdown 报告或精简 JSON 摘要
适用场景
适合让编码助手直接基于已有的 PageLens 审计结果工作:把问题转成补丁计划、分诊严重问题、修复后对比扫描结果,或审阅 QA 旅程审计。若只想看网页报告并复制修复提示词,则无需安装。
运行要求
远程 streamable HTTP 端点,无需本地安装。需用 PageLens 账号通过 OAuth 2.0 授权,首次连接时在浏览器中完成。授权范围包括 read:scans、read:findings 与 write:feedback。MCP 访问需付费报告;创建新扫描需另用 CLI、API、GitHub Action 或部署钩子,且需 Pro+ 方案。
安装前请注意
write:feedback 权限允许助手提交问题反馈并添加或清除报告上的负责人决策,会影响当前及未来报告显示的内容。MCP 访问与付费报告和方案绑定,会产生费用。扫描数据通过远程服务从你的 PageLens 账号读取。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 PageLens AI,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 连接 所需的 凭据。它们会被私密存储,绝不会在公开页面上展示。
  3. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Web executable,通过 Streamable HTTP。 远程服务在工作区中配置后即可从网页运行时运行。

交给智能体安装

把这段提示词粘贴到 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 等智能体,或 SourceWeft 对话中。智能体会读取该服务器的安装指南,先向你展示发布者、端点和登录方式,经你同意后再把它添加到你的客户端。密钥不会写进任何命令。

阅读 https://sourceweft.com/mcp/io.github.PageLens-AI%2Fpagelensai-mcp-server/install.md,并按其中说明把这个 MCP 服务器接入我的客户端。修改任何配置之前,先告诉我它的发布者、端点和登录方式,等我确认。不要把 API 密钥写进命令或我会提交的文件;问我密钥应从哪里获取。

查看智能体所依据的安装指南

其他 MCP 客户端

把它添加到你客户端的 mcpServers 配置中。 客户端会在首次连接时完成 OAuth 登录。

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pagelens-ai": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://www.pagelensai.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

README

PageLens AI - MCP Server

Connect PageLens AI reports to Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, and other MCP clients so your AI assistant can understand what failed, why it matters, and what to fix next.

An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that gives AI agents direct access to PageLens AI - the independent launch reviewer for AI-built websites. PageLens AI turns launch risk across UX, SEO, Performance, Accessibility, Security, Conversion, and QA journey audits into plain-English priorities and agent-ready fix context.

Plug it into Cursor, Claude Desktop, Codex, or any MCP-compatible client and your agent can read scan results, drill into findings, surface quick wins, record owner decisions, and help close the fix loop without leaving the IDE.


MCP Endpoint

https://www.pagelensai.com/api/mcp

This is a remote MCP server — no local install required.


Which PageLens Path Is This?

  • Launch Pack is for founders, marketers, and AI builders who want a one-off repair loop: owner-first verdict, fix prompts for their AI builder, Markdown export, desktop + mobile review, and a re-scan.
  • CLI/API/deploy hooks are for Pro+ users who want PageLens AI to create scans from CI, release scripts, and client workflows.
  • MCP is for AI assistants that need to read a PageLens report, understand the owner launch verdict, inspect the evidence, and help you patch or triage findings.

If you do not want to read technical detail, start in the PageLens web report and copy the fix prompt into Lovable, Bolt, Replit, Cursor, Codex, Claude Code, Copilot, or Windsurf. If you do want your coding agent to work directly with the report data, connect this MCP server.


Quick Start

Cursor

Add to your ~/.cursor/mcp.json (or workspace .cursor/mcp.json):

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "pagelens": {      "url": "https://www.pagelensai.com/api/mcp"    }  }}

Claude Desktop

Add to claude_desktop_config.json:

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "pagelens": {      "type": "http",      "url": "https://www.pagelensai.com/api/mcp"    }  }}

Codex CLI

Add to ~/.codex/config.toml:

toml
[mcp_servers.pagelens]url = "https://www.pagelensai.com/api/mcp"

Generic / other clients

Use the streamable HTTP endpoint:

text
https://www.pagelensai.com/api/mcp

Authentication

This server uses OAuth 2.0. Your MCP client will open a browser window to authorize with your PageLens account on first connect. No API keys to manage.

Scopes granted on authorization:

ScopeWhat it unlocks
read:scansList and read your scan results
read:findingsRead findings and quick wins
write:feedbackSubmit finding feedback and owner decisions

Available Tools

whoami

Confirm which PageLens account this MCP session is operating on, plus granted OAuth scopes.

json
{}

list_domains

List the domains you've verified ownership of, along with badge tier and the scan currently anchored to the public badge.

json
{  "include_unverified": false}

list_scans

List your most recent PageLens scans. Filter by status, domain, or date. Returns a slim summary per scan (id, URL, score, grade, severity counts, and launchVerdict). Scans may include launchContext with builderPlatform and launchMoment so agents can frame fixes for the owner's workflow without changing evidence or severity. QA Audit scans include a compact qaAudit summary with confidence, journey-step count, pages reviewed versus page budget, blocked/needs-review step counts, auth-profile status, and the reason fewer than the page budget were captured when the safe same-origin link graph is exhausted.

json
{  "limit": 20,  "status": "COMPLETE",  "domain": "example.com",  "since": "2026-01-01T00:00:00Z"}

Status values: PENDING · RUNNING · COMPLETE · FAILED · CANCELLED


get_scan

Read the full summary for a single scan: score, grade, owner-first launchVerdict, severity counts, launch context, executive summary, top-5 highest-priority findings, and per-persona reviews. For QA Audit scans, get_scan also returns a qaAudit block containing the product-flow synthesis, journey replay, safe blocked actions, confidence, authenticated-route context, and page-budget coverage.

json
{  "scan_id": "clxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"}

Available Resources

pagelensai://scan/{id}/markdown

Fetch the same agent-flavoured Markdown report available from the PageLens UI. Standard reports include launch-context and verdict front matter such as ai_builder, launch_moment, launch_verdict_status, and launch_verdict when captured, followed by an Owner launch verdict section and an AI-builder priority prompt pack your agent can act on before it reaches the detailed evidence. For QA Audit scans, this includes front matter such as qa_journey_event_count, qa_confidence, and qa_needs_review_step_count, followed by the application interpretation, journey replay, blocked/risky paths, safe actions, and next QA tests.

Use this when an agent needs rich context to reason about a QA Audit:

text
pagelensai://scan/clxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/markdown

pagelensai://scan/{id}/summary.json

Fetch compact JSON for a scan. Standard scans include the same launchVerdict object returned by list_scans and get_scan: status, label, headline, summary, and next step. For QA Audit scans, the qaAudit object includes journey metadata, synthesis, page-budget coverage, and any queue_exhausted reason explaining why fewer than the purchased page count were discoverable.

text
pagelensai://scan/clxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/summary.json

list_findings

Page through all findings for a scan. Filter by severity, category, persona, page URL, or rule ID. Use format: "full" to include descriptions, suggestions, and evidence.

json
{  "scan_id": "clxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",  "severity": "HIGH",  "category": "SECURITY",  "format": "full",  "limit": 50}

Severity levels: CRITICAL · HIGH · MEDIUM · LOW · INFO

Categories: UX · SEO · PERFORMANCE · ACCESSIBILITY · SECURITY · CONTENT · HEADERS · DESIGN · ERROR

Personas: MARKETER · CRO · UX · ACCESSIBILITY · BRAND · EXECUTIVE · PERFORMANCE · SEO


get_quick_wins

Return the top N quick-win findings — high impact, low-to-moderate effort — ranked by the same Impact × Effort scorer used in the PageLens dashboard. Optionally override the scan's preset to re-rank under a different lens.

json
{  "scan_id": "clxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",  "limit": 5,  "preset_override": "CONVERSION"}

Presets: PRE_SALES · PRE_LAUNCH · CONVERSION · INVESTOR · BRAND_POLISH


report_finding_feedback

Flag a finding as a false positive, wrong severity, wrong category, or not actionable. Requires a paragraph of reasoning and a concrete evidence snippet.

json
{  "finding_id": "clxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",  "kind": "FALSE_POSITIVE",  "reason": "The selector .pointer-events-auto matches 100+ utility classes, not a single offending element.",  "evidence": "<div class=\"pointer-events-auto ...\"> — Tailwind utility, not an event-handler.",  "proposed_severity": "LOW"}

Feedback kinds: FALSE_POSITIVE · INCORRECT_SEVERITY · INCORRECT_CATEGORY · NOT_ACTIONABLE · OTHER


acknowledge_finding_decision

Attach owner-controlled context to a finding when the issue is real, but reflects an intentional architecture, security, or product tradeoff.

This does not hide the finding, edit the report, or change the PageLens score. It records the rationale so the report can show that the owner has acknowledged the tradeoff, and future scans can recognise the same finding as previously acknowledged.

json
{  "finding_id": "clxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",  "decision": "INTENTIONAL_TRADEOFF",  "reason": "Next.js Cache Components and PPR currently prevent us from using per-request CSP nonces safely.",  "evidence": "proxy.ts documents the CSP tradeoff: script-src uses 'unsafe-inline' because cached HTML shells cannot vary nonces per request.",  "expires_at": "2026-10-01T00:00:00Z"}

Decision kinds: ACKNOWLEDGED · ACCEPTED_RISK · INTENTIONAL_TRADEOFF · WONT_FIX_NOW


clear_finding_decision

Clear a previously acknowledged decision so it stops appearing on current and future reports. The audit history is preserved.

json
{  "decision_id": "clxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",  "reason": "We have migrated to a nonce-compatible rendering path."}

You can also clear by finding_id when you do not have the decision_id.


What PageLens Checks

Each scan runs a deterministic rule engine + AI reviewer pipeline across every page:

AreaExamples
SEOTitle/meta length, canonical URL, Open Graph, heading hierarchy
PerformanceCore Web Vitals (LCP, CLS, INP), page weight, render-blocking resources, DOM size, third-party load
SecurityHTTP→HTTPS redirect, exposed .env/.git files, SSL expiry, XSS surfaces, source maps, exposed secrets in page source
AccessibilityFocus-visible CSS, reduced-motion support, ARIA patterns
UXHero hierarchy, mobile menu patterns, CTA structure
ContentPlaceholder text, stale copyright year, mixed-content references
QA AuditJourney replay, safe form/input exploration, blocked risky actions, app-flow synthesis, page-budget coverage

Findings include severity, effort estimate, copy-pasteable evidence, and a one-line fix suggestion.

QA Audit scans are different from standard technical scans: the primary artifact is the agentic journey report. PageLens will attempt to review the purchased page budget (for example, up to 10 pages on QA Audit) and should only return fewer pages when the safe same-origin link graph is exhausted. It can use validated auth profiles for scoped post-login routes, while still avoiding SSO, CAPTCHA, MFA, signup, payment, destructive changes, and other committing actions.


Example Agent Workflows

Fix with my AI builder:

"Read the latest PageLens Launch Pack report for example.com, list the top 3 owner-risk fixes, and turn each one into a patch plan I can apply in this repo."

Respect launch context:

"Open the latest PageLens report. If it was built with Codex or Cursor and the launch moment is Product Hunt, prioritise the fixes that make it safe to post publicly, then give me exact patches."

Pre-launch audit in Cursor:

"Use the latest PageLens scan for my staging site, list all CRITICAL and HIGH findings, and create GitHub issues for the top 5."

CRO review:

"Fetch the latest scan for example.com, get the CONVERSION quick wins, and summarise what to fix before the campaign launch."

Security sweep:

"List all SECURITY findings with severity HIGH or above from my last scan and show me the evidence for each."

Accepted architecture decision:

"For the CSP unsafe-inline finding, acknowledge this as an intentional Next.js/PPR tradeoff with the rationale from our security docs. Do not mark it as a false positive."

Post-fix validation:

"I re-ran PageLens from the CLI/API after fixing the findings. Compare the latest scan to the previous one and tell me what improved, regressed, or still needs work."

MCP reads and works with report data through OAuth. To create a new scan from automation, use the PageLens CLI, API, GitHub Action, or deploy hooks with a Pro+ plan; then ask your MCP-connected assistant to inspect the completed report.

QA Audit review:

"Fetch the latest QA Audit for example.com, read the markdown resource, and tell me which user journeys were verified, which actions were blocked safely, and whether PageLens reviewed the full page budget."


Pricing

PageLens AI supports one-off launch reviews and ongoing plan automation.

ProductPriceBest for
Free Launch CheckFreeOwner verdict, one issue preview, one AI-builder prompt
Fix Pack$9One-page full fix loop with a verification re-scan
QA Audit$10Agentic public-app journey review across up to 10 pages
Launch Pack$29Serious AI builders who want desktop + mobile, up to 15 pages, AI-builder fix prompts, Markdown export, and one re-scan
Data-Safe Launch Pack$79Launches collecting emails, payments, uploads, accounts, bookings, private data or client trust

MCP access is included with paid reports so an agent can work from the same evidence the owner sees. Continuous Health Watch monitoring, API keys, CLI scans, GitHub Actions, deploy hooks, competitors, alerts, and team/client seats are plan features:

PlanPriceWhy upgrade
Watch$9/mo1 live app, weekly Health Watch, email alerts and badge freshness
Builder$39/mo3 sites, weekly monitoring, manual scans and deeper audits
Pro$99/moMore sites, Slack/webhook alerts, competitors, API/CLI/deploy automation and team workflow scale
Agency$299/moMany client sites, higher quotas, more seats, client workflows and priority support

There is no separate new-user Monitor product in the current pricing model. Health Watch is included with paid account plans; legacy monitor rows may still exist for existing customers.

See full pricing ->


Links


License

MIT © PageLens AI

来源:README.md,提交 97266f4

工具

0
该服务器需要登录,因此 SourceWeft 无法在没有账号的情况下读取其工具,也未收录。已连接账号所能看到的内容可能因账号及其权限而异。

版本历史

1
  1. v1.0.0最新Sep 16, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 85%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通必需25 分
  • 已声明认证方式必需10 分
  • 已列出工具15 分

    请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分