
Stylespeak
io.github.Patrizzos由 GitHub 账号 Patrizzos 发布v1.2.0更新于 Oct 24, 2026
MCP server and CLI that makes CSS legible to AI agents — explains what applies and why.
概览
本地 MCP 服务器兼 CLI,让 AI 代理读懂 CSS:解析层叠、追踪属性、预测改动影响,并说明哪些样式生效及原因。
- 可以做什么
- 解析指定选择器在给定文件中实际生效的 CSS 属性,给出胜出规则、被覆盖规则及置信度,并解析 var() 链、回退值和媒体上下文取值。追踪某个属性在何处被设置,归并相互竞争的规则并展示完整层叠链。预览修改选择器或属性值的影响范围,包括被更高优先级屏蔽的选择器、变量链与继承带来的下游影响。生成项目级压缩样式清单,汇总选择器、属性、变量、竞争组和风险热点。通过 CDP 查询运行中的 Chromium 浏览器,返回精确的计算样式与匹配规则。支持普通 CSS、SCSS、CSS Modules,以及从 styled-components 和 Emotion 源码静态提取样式。
- 适用场景
- 适合 AI 编码代理在修改样式前需要理解层叠关系的场景,也适合查询某条规则为何胜出、某属性在何处设置、某次改动会影响什么。还可在会话开始时一次性加载项目级 CSS 概览。
- 运行要求
- 以本地 stdio 进程运行;npm 包 @patrizzos/stylespeak 需要 Node.js 21+。live_resolve 工具还需以 9222 端口开启远程调试的 Chromium 浏览器。未声明任何账号、API 密钥或环境变量。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 Stylespeak,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。
其他 MCP 客户端
参照 仓库 中的启动说明。
README
StyleSpeak - MCP and CLI
A companion MCP server and CLI to stylesafe that makes CSS legible to AI agents — resolving cascade, tracing properties, predicting change impact, and explaining what applies and why before an agent touches a single line of styles.
The problem
AI coding agents write CSS without being able to see its effect. They modify a rule, assume it worked, and move on — unaware that a higher-specificity rule elsewhere already overrides it, a combinator rule in another file is silently winning, or a CSS variable resolves to something entirely different than expected. stylespeak gives agents a structured knowledge layer to consult before making changes.
What it does
resolve_styles — answers "what CSS actually applies to this selector?"
Given a selector and a set of files, returns every CSS property the selector would receive, which rule wins for each, and which rules were overridden — with confidence levels since no real DOM is available. CSS custom properties (var()) are resolved to their actual values, including chained variables, fallbacks, and media-context overrides.
trace_property — answers "everywhere this property is set, who wins?"
Given a property name and a set of files, returns every rule that sets it, groups competing rules that target overlapping selectors, and shows the full cascade chain for each group — with resolved variable values included.
impact_preview — answers "if I change this, what else breaks?"
Given a selector, property, and optional new value, predicts the full blast radius of the change before it's made — showing which selectors will see a different value, which are shielded by higher specificity, which cascade relationships are uncertain, and which downstream rules are affected through CSS variable chains or property inheritance. Works without a browser.
style_manifest — answers "what does this entire project's CSS look like at a glance?"
Builds a compressed, structured summary of a project's entire CSS knowledge — selectors, properties, variables, competition groups, and risk hotspots — that an agent can load once at the start of a session and keep in context instead of repeatedly querying individual files.
live_resolve — answers "what does the browser actually compute for this selector?"
Queries a running Chromium browser via CDP and returns exact computed styles and matched rules. No heuristics, no confidence levels — the browser resolved it. Requires Chrome running with --remote-debugging-port=9222.
Works on more than plain CSS. The four static tools above analyze .css, .scss, CSS Modules, and — as of v1.3 — styled-components and Emotion source files (.js / .jsx / .ts / .tsx), all through the same cascade engine.
Quick start
As a CLI tool
As an MCP server
Add to your MCP client config (Cursor: .cursor/mcp.json, VS Code: .vscode/mcp.json):
Once connected, agents can call:
resolve_styles({ selector, files, projectRoot, componentFiles? })trace_property({ property, files, projectRoot })impact_preview({ selector, property, newValue?, files, projectRoot })style_manifest({ files?, projectRoot?, maxSelectors? })live_resolve({ selector, port?, tabUrl? })
Example output
impact_preview
resolve_styles
Confidence levels
CSS custom property resolution
As of v0.2, stylespeak fully resolves CSS custom properties (var()) in all output:
value— the raw value as written (var(--color-primary))resolvedValue— the actual resolved value (#2563eb)variableChain— the full resolution path, including chained variablesconditionalValues— media-context overrides where the variable resolves differently
Supported: simple, fallback, nested fallback, chained, scoped, media-context, circular reference protection.
CSS-in-JS support (styled-components & Emotion)
As of v1.3, stylespeak statically extracts styles from .js, .jsx, .ts, .tsx, .mjs and .cjs files that import styled-components, @emotion/styled, @emotion/react or @emotion/css, and runs them through the same cascade engine as plain CSS. resolve_styles, trace_property, impact_preview and style_manifest all work on them, and CSS-in-JS and regular CSS can be analyzed together.
Pass JS/TS files in files, or point projectRoot at a directory — files that import one of these libraries are discovered automatically and all other JS/TS files are ignored.
Addressing components
Generated class names are hashed at runtime, so each styled component is addressed by its variable name as a class selector:
Rules are tagged cssInJs, library and component, and are treated as locally scoped (like CSS Modules): two components named Wrapper in different files are independent, never reported as conflicting, and never counted as a "declared in N locations" risk. Querying such a name is flagged as ambiguous, because results will mix both files.
What is extracted
What is flagged, never guessed
Values that depend on props or theme can't be known statically. stylespeak keeps the original expression, marks it, and tells the agent:
dynamic: trueon a declaration, winner and property means the value depends on runtime props/theme — the winner may differ depending on props.- Conditional blocks and mixin calls (
${p => p.active && css…}) can't be evaluated. They are dropped and counted indynamicInterpolations, andagentNotewarns that additional styles may apply at runtime. - Style blocks that can't be attached to a selector are listed in
cssInJs.skippedinstyle_manifestoutput instead of being silently ignored. styled(Base)recordsextends;agentNotetells the agent to also resolve the base component.
Limitations
This is static analysis, so there are boundaries:
styled(Base)does not merge the base component's styles into the child — resolve the base selector separately.- Constants and theme objects imported from other files are not resolved (same-file only).
ThemeProviderthemes are not resolved. - Emotion's
cssprop on JSX elements and style blocks not assigned to a named variable are anonymous — there is no selector to target, so they are reported as skipped. keyframesare not modeled, and.attrs({ className })is not considered.- Cross-file injection order is approximated by the order files are provided.
- For ground truth on a running app, use
live_resolveagainst the real element.
How it pairs with stylesafe
stylesafe catches problems in your CSS — conflicts, dead rules, Tailwind clashes — before they ship.
stylespeak explains your CSS — resolving cascade, tracing properties, predicting impact, resolving variables — so agents understand before they act.
Use stylesafe as a post-edit check. Use stylespeak as a pre-edit consultation. Together they give AI coding agents a complete feedback loop on styles.
Live browser inspection
live_resolve requires a Chromium browser running with remote debugging enabled:
Security note: Never run
--remote-debugging-porton a machine exposed to untrusted networks or in production. This flag opens a local API that any process on the machine can connect to.
File format support
Architecture
Zero external dependencies. Requires Node.js 21+.
Roadmap
- v0.2 ✅ — CSS custom property resolution
- v0.3 ✅ — SCSS nesting, CSS Modules scope awareness, AST component graph
- v1.0 ✅ — Chrome DevTools Protocol live resolution
- v1.1 ✅ — impact_preview: blast radius prediction before making a change
- v1.2 ✅ — style_manifest: compressed project-wide CSS knowledge for agent context
- v1.3 ✅ — CSS-in-JS: static extraction for styled-components and Emotion (template and object syntax)
Next (not yet scheduled)
Known gaps in CSS-in-JS support, in no particular order: merging styled(Base) styles into the child, resolving constants and theme objects imported from other files, and modeling keyframes and the Emotion css prop.
来源:README.md,提交 9bcac5a
工具
0版本历史
1- v1.2.0最新Sep 16, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 50%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通25 分
请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。
- 已声明认证方式10 分
请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分