
Render Mcp
io.github.RodRomer由 GitHub 账号 RodRomer 发布v0.7.4更新于 Oct 28, 2026
Hosted browser for AI agents: screenshots, post-JS DOM, console, WCAG. No install, no API key.
概览
面向 AI 助手的托管无头浏览器:截图、执行 JavaScript 后的 DOM、页面诊断、元素检查与 PDF 导出,无需安装或 API 密钥。
- 可以做什么
- 对网址截图,可整页或指定视口尺寸,返回 PNG
- 获取 JavaScript 执行后的 DOM,可等待指定 CSS 选择器
- 加载页面并报告控制台错误、失败的请求以及 4xx/5xx 响应
- 检查某个 CSS 选择器:盒模型、计算样式、是否在视口内、被哪个元素遮挡、是否被祖先元素隐藏
- 将页面渲染为 PDF,可选横向
- 适用场景
- 当助手需要真正“看到”页面而不是简单抓取时适用:确认部署或布局是否正确、读取对普通抓取只返回空壳的单页应用、诊断空白或异常页面、解释某元素为何不显示。主要面向无法在本地运行浏览器进程的客户端。
- 运行要求
- 通过 streamable HTTP 连接的远程 MCP 端点,无需安装、账号、API 密钥或配置。网址必须是包含 https:// 的绝对地址。页面需可公开访问,并在 20 秒导航时限内加载完成。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 Render Mcp,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Web executable,通过 Streamable HTTP。 远程服务在工作区中配置后即可从网页运行时运行。
交给智能体安装
把这段提示词粘贴到 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 等智能体,或 SourceWeft 对话中。智能体会读取该服务器的安装指南,先向你展示发布者、端点和登录方式,经你同意后再把它添加到你的客户端。密钥不会写进任何命令。
阅读 https://sourceweft.com/mcp/io.github.RodRomer%2Frender-mcp/install.md,并按其中说明把这个 MCP 服务器接入我的客户端。修改任何配置之前,先告诉我它的发布者、端点和登录方式,等我确认。不要把 API 密钥写进命令或我会提交的文件;问我密钥应从哪里获取。其他 MCP 客户端
把它添加到你客户端的 mcpServers 配置中。
{
"mcpServers": {
"render": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://render.makermargins.com/mcp"
}
}
}README
render-mcp
Gives an AI agent a real browser. Screenshots, PDFs, and the HTML a page produces after JavaScript has run.
No API key. No signup. No account. Point your client at a URL and it works.
Why this exists
An agent can fetch a URL. It cannot see one.
Ask an assistant to check whether a page looks right, or to read a site built with React, and it hits a wall: a plain HTTP fetch returns an empty shell and a loading spinner. The content is built by JavaScript that never runs.
The usual answer is a rendering API — but every one of them requires you to sign up, verify an email, and paste an API key. An agent working on its own can't do any of that. It has no inbox and no card. A free tier it cannot register for is worth nothing to it.
This server needs none of it. It runs on Cloudflare's network, launches a real headless browser, and hands back what the page actually looks like.
Install
Claude Code — as a plugin (one command, and updates arrive automatically)
Claude Code — directly
Claude Desktop, Cursor, and other clients — add to your MCP config:
That's the whole setup. Nothing to install, nothing to configure, no credentials.
Tools
screenshot_url
See a page as a person would. Returns a PNG.
Good for: confirming a deployment looks right, checking a layout, seeing what a user sees.
rendered_html
The DOM after JavaScript has executed. Returns HTML text.
Good for: single-page apps, anything where a plain fetch returns a shell.
page_diagnostics
Load a page and report what went wrong: JavaScript console errors, failed network requests, and any 4xx/5xx responses. Returns a readable summary.
Good for: a deployment that might have shipped a bug, a page that loads blank, a site that "looks broken" and you need to know why.
Stated honestly: this is not a rare capability. Microsoft's @playwright/mcp returns console
messages, and Google's chrome-devtools-mcp returns them with source-mapped stack traces across
29 tools. Both are excellent, both are better resourced than this, and between them they are
downloaded around 34 million times a month. If you can run a local process, use one of them.
The one thing neither can do is run where nothing can be installed. They need npx, Node, and
browser binaries, or a local Chrome. This needs a URL. That is the whole of the difference, and
it only matters if you are in that situation.
inspect_element
Answers "why isn't this element showing where I expect?" for a CSS selector.
Leads with a diagnosis, then the numbers: resolved box model, computed
display / visibility / opacity / position / z-index, colours, whether it's inside the
viewport, and whether another element is covering it.
The useful part is that it walks up the tree. The usual reason an element is missing is not the element — it's an ancestor, and the answer you want is which one:
It also catches the case no single property reveals. Content inside a closed <details> keeps a
normal box and reports display:block, visibility:visible, opacity:1 — everything looks fine,
and it still doesn't paint:
Good for: an element that "should be there", a click landing on the wrong thing, verifying a CSS change actually applied. Cascade resolution and layout cannot be derived from reading HTML and CSS — this is the one thing a browser is strictly required for.
url_to_pdf
Render a page to PDF as a browser would print it.
Good for: archiving a page, turning a rendered report into a document.
What it won't do
Stated plainly, so an agent doesn't waste calls discovering them:
- No private networks. Loopback, RFC1918 ranges,
169.254.x.x,.internaland.localhostnames are refused. This server runs inside Cloudflare's network and an unvalidated URL would be a server-side request forgery. - No logins. There's no session, so anything behind authentication renders as its login page.
- 20 second navigation limit. Very slow pages will time out.
- No JavaScript injection. It renders pages; it doesn't run your code on them.
Failures come back as readable text explaining what went wrong, not as protocol errors — so an agent can route around them rather than crashing.
Privacy
URLs and page content are never stored or logged. Each call launches a browser, does the work, hands back the result, and closes it. Nothing about what you asked for is retained.
One thing is counted, and it's worth stating precisely rather than hiding behind "anonymised":
That's three fields with no way to tie them to a request, a person or a site. The function that
writes them is never handed the URL in the first place, so it cannot record one by accident —
see count() in src/index.js.
It exists for one reason: this server is free, and the only way to decide whether it's worth keeping alive is knowing whether anything calls it.
The counts are public — no login, no dashboard:
Development
Two layers, both tested outside their host:
src/protocol.js— the MCP request/response surface as pure functions, with no Cloudflare or browser dependency. Every URL validation and SSRF rule is proven under plain Node before anything deploys.src/inspect-page.js— the half ofinspect_elementthat runs inside the page. It closes over nothing, so any real DOM can execute it. Its tests build fixture pages in headless Edge and assert on real computed styles and real geometry. A mocked DOM would prove nothing here: the entire premise of the tool is that these values only exist once a browser has resolved the cascade and run layout.
src/index.js is a thin shell — transport in, browser work out, prose formatting on the way back.
If Node isn't installed, npm run test:nonode runs the protocol suite in headless Edge instead.
It strips only the export/import keywords and executes the same source.
When testing against a live page, use a neutral URL
Use https://example.com — it is reserved by IANA for exactly this — or httpstat.us for error
paths. Do not point live tests at makermargins.com.
The reason is not politeness. That site has Cloudflare Web Analytics, whose beacon is injected into HTML responses for browser-like requests. This server drives a real headless browser, so every screenshot or audit of that site executes the beacon and registers as a visitor — inflating the traffic figures of the very asset the numbers are meant to measure. An instrument that counts its own operator measures nothing.
Status
Early and free. Built to find out whether MCP registry discovery actually works. If it gets used, it'll be maintained; if it doesn't, that's a useful answer too.
Issues and pull requests welcome.
How this was built
Written by Claude, directed by a human, and stated here rather than left to be inferred.
That is worth knowing when judging it, so the relevant facts are these: 318 tests cover the protocol surface, the routing table, the usage counter, the landing page and the plugin manifests, and the parts that need a real browser are tested against real fixture pages rather than a mock DOM. Every platform claim in this README was checked against a primary source, and several widely-repeated ones turned out to be wrong.
None of that makes it good on its own — but it is checkable, which is more useful than a promise.
Licence
MIT
来源:README.md,提交 4b71e66
工具
0版本历史
1- v0.7.4最新Sep 16, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 85%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通必需25 分
- 已声明认证方式必需10 分
- 已列出工具必需15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分