
Builderforce Memory
io.github.SeanHogg由 GitHub 账号 SeanHogg 发布v2026.10.80更新于 Nov 11, 2026
Token-saving persistent memory for AI agents: recall durable facts instead of re-reading files.
发布方自己的服务:Memory.fit
概览
为 AI 智能体提供持久记忆:保存长期事实并按需召回少量排序结果,让助手不必反复读取文件来记住信息。
- 可以做什么
- 召回、按精确键获取并按标签检索已存事实,结果经过排序和截断以控制上下文占用
- 写入新记忆和遗忘已有记忆,也可用只读模式仅开放召回
- 把已被吸收的事实压缩成一行指针存根,并保留归档与原文恢复途径
- 可选启用经验功能:保存和列出演示、编译与调度技能、记录运行及其审计轨迹
- 把服务器安装到 Claude Code、Claude Desktop、Cursor、Windsurf、VS Code、Cline、Gemini CLI 或 Codex CLI,共用同一存储
- 适用场景
- 当助手反复读取文件或重复推导相同事实,而你希望偏好、纠正和项目知识在决策时被召回时使用。适合编码智能体,以及多个工具需要共享同一记忆存储的多主机环境。
- 运行要求
- 通过 npx 以 stdio 在本地运行,需要 Node.js。可选的 BUILDERFORCE_API_KEY 用于启用成本工具;BUILDERFORCE_MEMORY_FILE 指定 JSON 快照路径(默认位于用户主目录下的共享文件);BUILDERFORCE_MEMORY_READONLY=1 仅开放召回。语义排序需要配置 Evermind 模型和分词器,否则使用词法排序。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 Builderforce Memory,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。
其他 MCP 客户端
参照 仓库 中的启动说明。
README
@seanhogg/builderforce-memory-mcp
Expose @seanhogg/builderforce-memory to any MCP client. One token-saving
tool core over a pluggable MemoryBackend, three transports:
Technical report & peer review. This transport is reviewed in the Evermind technical report's adversarial
PEER-REVIEW.md. Note before exposing the HTTP handler publicly: theauthTokencheck is a non-constant-time string compare (timing channel) and the handler shares onebackendwith no per-tenant isolation — a single token reads every tenant's facts. Despite the "multi-tenant" note above, real isolation (token→namespace mapping, constant-time compare, rate limiting) is not yet implemented. Tracked asEVM-3in the Builderforce.ai Consolidated Gap Register. Resolved in v2026.6.34: the HTTP handler now uses a constant-time token compare and per-tenant namespace isolation (see the resolution addendum inPEER-REVIEW.md).
Why this saves tokens
The point of an external memory store is fetch-on-demand instead of pinning
your whole memory file into every prompt. That only pays off if recall is
selective, so the caps are enforced server-side in tools.ts:
memory_recallreturns a ranked top-K (default 5, hard-capped), never the store.- Each entry's content is truncated (default 500 chars) before it hits context.
- There is no "return everything" tool — a dump-all is more expensive than inlining.
memory_compactshrinks a fact the local Evermind has already ABSORBED down to a one-line pointer stub, so it stops filling context. It is lossless: a recall probe must pass first, and the original is archived (recall still returns it) — see below. It writes through the live store, which keeps memory and the on-disk snapshot in agreement.- Recall ranks by hybrid fusion (BM25 ⊕ optional CPU SSM embedding, RRF, MMR) and then
weights by importance (×(0.5+importance)) and a 90-day half-life recency decay —
createLocalMemoryStoreBackend({ ranking: false })turns the signals off.
Tool descriptions are prescriptive ("call this before answering when…") because recent Claude models reach for tools more conservatively; the trigger condition in the description is what drives should-call rate. Pair this with prompt caching (keep the tool set identical across tenants so the cached prefix survives) and context editing (prune stale recalled facts) for the full win.
The seam
Everything is written against MemoryBackend:
Ship the local MemoryStoreBackend (IndexedDB via @seanhogg/builderforce-memory) today;
drop in a networked builderforce.ai adapter later with zero changes to tools
or transports.
Quick start — in-process with the Claude Agent SDK
The snapshot is shared — the server watches it
With persistFile set, the store lives in memory and the JSON snapshot is the source of
truth across process lifetimes. Other processes edit that file too (the BuilderForce VS
Code extension rewrites absorbed entries to stubs in place), so before every operation the
backend stats the file and re-hydrates from disk when it changed underneath — otherwise
this server, still holding the pre-edit bodies, would re-snapshot over that work on its next
write. Its own writes are stamped (mtime + size + content hash) the moment they land, so the
steady-state cost is one stat and there is no write-loop.
SSM-embedding recall — including on a headless host (no GPU)
With no model configured the local backend ranks recall lexically (BM25). Point it
at an Evermind checkpoint and the ordering becomes the SSM embedding's cosine ranking
fused with the lexical one (Reciprocal Rank Fusion — dense ⊕ sparse, so exact
tokens like identifiers and error codes are still caught). Every memory_recall
result names the ranker it used, so a degrade to lexical is never silent:
The stdio/HTTP servers do not need a GPU for this. EvermindLM is a pure-CPU
model and EvermindLM.embed() mean-pools + L2-normalises the same hidden state the
GPU HybridMambaModel.embed() does, to the same contract. Configure it with:
Vectors are cached across process lifetimes (stamped with the model's fingerprint, so an adapted checkpoint invalidates them), because a per-session subprocess that re-embedded the whole store on its first recall would cost more than the lexical ranking it replaces.
In-process hosts pass an embedder directly — reuse an already-loaded GPU Evermind runtime rather than standing up a second model:
Either way, recall quality improves automatically as that model is adapted/distilled.
Experience — what Evermind has done (opt-in)
Facts are one kind of learned item; experience is another. An episode is a
recorded demonstration (a program and the UI steps a person took in it), a skill is
what Train Once compiles from one (typed values become parameters, secrets never stored,
irreversible clicks gated for approval), and a run is one execution with its audit
trail. The domain lives in @seanhogg/builderforce-memory-engine; this server keeps it
durable and exposes it.
Set BUILDERFORCE_MEMORY_EXPERIENCE=1 to register the tools (Synapse does). Off by
default, so ordinary coding-agent installs never carry them in their tool list.
Stored beside the memory snapshot as experience.json (shared across processes exactly
like memory.json) plus episodes/. Never served to a token-selected tenant of the
HTTP handler.
One-shot install into any MCP host (not just Claude)
Writes the stdio server entry into each host's own config, idempotently and with
.bak backups. Supported hosts: Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf,
VS Code, Cline, Gemini CLI, Codex CLI. Every agent points at one shared store
(resolveMemoryFile(): ~/.builderforce-memory/memory.json, or the legacy
~/.claude/builderforce-memory/memory.json when that is where the live store is; override
with --memory-file / BUILDERFORCE_MEMORY_FILE; the hook script resolves the same way),
so a fact remembered in one agent is recalled in another. --readonly drops the
write tools; --local=<dist/bin/stdio.js> runs a checkout for development.
The same launch spec is exported for programmatic use:
buildServerSpec() / installMemoryServer() (see src/install/).
Claude Code: the self-driving "memory combo"
Registering the server gives Claude Code the memory tools. For Claude Code the
installer ALSO wires hooks so memory is self-driving instead of advisory (skip
with --no-hooks):
All four point at one generated, dependency-free hook script
(~/.claude/builderforce-memory/bfmem-hook.mjs, four modes) plus a companion
skill. Idempotent + .bak-safe. Source of truth: src/install/claude-hooks.ts
(installClaudeCombo / bfmemHookSource).
Quick start — stdio (any process / language)
Env: BUILDERFORCE_MEMORY_DB (db name), BUILDERFORCE_MEMORY_READONLY=1 (drop write tools).
Quick start — HTTP (multi-tenant)
Or mount createMemoryHttpHandler(backend, { authToken }) on your own Node/Express
server against any backend (including a future remote one).
Custom / remote backend
Implement MemoryBackend and hand it to any transport:
Compaction rules (@seanhogg/builderforce-memory-mcp/compaction)
The stub format that memory_compact writes ([absorbed→Evermind vN] <first line>) is published as a dependency-free subpath. An external compactor imports its rules from it, so its stubs are byte-identical to the server's and neither re-stubs the other.
Lossless contract (what every compactor must do, in order):
planLosslessCompaction(candidates, { probe, version })— the structural rules (planCompaction: skip stubs, never grow an entry) plus a recall probe:probeQuestionFor(key, content)blanks the fact's most identifying token and the local Evermind must supply it (probePasses). No probe, or a wrong answer, leaves the fact uncompacted (no_probe/probe_failed).- Archive every write's
archiverow (mergeArchiveintodefaultArchiveFile(memoryFile)→memory.archive.json) — durably, before any stub is written. The archive sits outside the snapshot, is only merged into and never pruned, so it survives snapshot rewrites,forget, and the 10,000-entry cap. - Write the stubs.
Reads resolve a stub to its archived original (RecallHit.content = full text, RecallHit.stub = the stored stub). A stub with no archive is contentLost: tools and the Claude Code hooks label it CONTENT_LOST_LABEL — "(content lost — re-verify before relying on it)" — and the hooks importance-demote it. memory_restore (file on the stdio bin, inline json everywhere) brings the text back from [{key, content}] or the Evermind coordinator's [{id, text}] mem: dump: matched by key (an id loses its mem: prefix), else uniquely by first line against the stub's pointer; the text is archived beside the stub, so the token saving stays.
Every overwrite of a shared store file (SharedJsonFile: the snapshot, the archive, experience.json) first rotates the previous version into <file>.bak.1 … .bak.3.
Dependencies
@modelcontextprotocol/sdk + zod are hard deps. @anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk
(SDK transport), @seanhogg/builderforce-memory + fake-indexeddb (local backend) are
optional peers, imported indirectly — install only what your transport/backend
needs.
来源:packages/memory-mcp/README.md,提交 bec4fb1
工具
0版本历史
22- v2026.10.80最新Nov 11, 2026
- v2026.10.60Nov 8, 2026
- v2026.10.56Nov 8, 2026
- v2026.10.55Nov 8, 2026
- v2026.10.48Nov 7, 2026
- v2026.10.45Nov 7, 2026
- v2026.10.40Nov 5, 2026
- v2026.10.39Nov 4, 2026
- v2026.10.38Nov 3, 2026
- v2026.10.37Nov 1, 2026
- v2026.10.36Oct 31, 2026
- v2026.10.35Oct 29, 2026
- v2026.10.26Oct 25, 2026
- v2026.10.24Oct 25, 2026
- v2026.10.23Oct 23, 2026
- v2026.10.3Oct 21, 2026
- v2026.9.34Oct 17, 2026
- v2026.9.33Sep 30, 2026
- v2026.9.32Sep 29, 2026
- v2026.9.31Sep 29, 2026
- v2026.9.30Sep 28, 2026
- v2026.9.29Sep 27, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 40%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通25 分
请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。
- 已声明认证方式10 分
请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分
请在仓库或注册中心条目中声明许可证。
其他 Memory 集成

Memory.fit
fit.memory官方发布者
托管式 Memory.fit 服务器,让 AI 读取你的训练、睡眠、恢复与饮食数据,并写回每周计划、每日目标和饮食计划。
pg.ddx.io: the PostgreSQL community's memory
io.ddx.pg官方发布者
pg.ddx.io: the PostgreSQL community's memory 的托管 MCP 服务,由 pg.ddx.io 发布;无需登录;Streamable HTTP;29 个工具。
var.gg Naming Memory
gg.var官方发布者
远程 MCP 服务器,可根据领域概念推荐并检索韩、日、中、越、英多语言的代码标识符名称,并提供 ERD 结构查询。

Memoria — Deterministic AI Memory & Code Intelligence MCP
由 GitHub 账号 kolivritech 发布
远程 MCP 服务器,为 AI 编程助手提供确定性的长期记忆和代码智能工具,召回过程不消耗 LLM token。

thron-memory
由 GitHub 账号 jacobbarglof 发布
为所有支持 MCP 的 AI 应用提供一份共享的私有记忆,以纯文本笔记页形式供助手搜索、读取和更新。