Sdcgovernance

io.github.SemanticDataCharter由 GitHub 账号 SemanticDataCharter 发布v4.3.1更新于 Nov 2, 2026

Governance validation for Semantic Data Charter instances; returns OASIS XACML decisions.

概览

AI 生成的概览

面向 Semantic Data Charter 实例的治理咨询引擎,让助手校验工作流、认证、参与方/角色与溯源规则,并得到 PERMIT/DENY/INDETERMINATE 决策。

可以做什么
  • 检查 SDC 模型定义了哪些治理维度并报告启用情况
  • 校验工作流状态转换,判断拟议转换是否被允许
  • 对实例执行完整治理校验,返回错误与决策凭据
  • 以 W3C PROV-O 记录形式写入溯源事件
  • 按 table_id 与版本注册、列出并评估 DMN 决策表
  • 通过重算哈希校验 MTCP 证据包的完整性
适用场景
适用于助手处理带有治理内容的 Semantic Data Charter 数据模型与实例时,需要在智能体工作流中把关流程步骤、检查认证或参与方/角色要求,或生成可审计的决策凭据。
运行要求
以 Python 包 sdcgovernance 形式通过 uvx 在本地以 stdio 运行,需要 Python 运行时与 uv。未声明认证、环境变量或请求头。需提供 SDC 模型(XSD)与 XML 实例,依赖 rdflib 与 pyshacl。
安装前请注意
它只给出咨询性决策与凭据,决策后的路由、升级或中止由调用方自行实现。注册决策表会写入磁盘文件,且已注册版本不可更改。模型未定义治理组件时结果为 PERMIT,因此缺少治理不会被标记为失败。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Sdcgovernance,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。

其他 MCP 客户端

参照 仓库 中的启动说明。

README

sdcgovernance

W3C standards-based governance advisory engine for Semantic Data Charter instances.

A Python library that validates governance content in XML data instances against governance components defined in the SDC data model. If the model defines governance (workflow, attestation, party/role, provenance, audit), the instance must carry that content - and this library validates it.

Returns decisions using OASIS XACML semantics: PERMIT, DENY, or INDETERMINATE.

No framework dependency. No middleware. A function call.

How It Works

SDC data models (XSD) can optionally include governance components: Workflow state machines, Attestation authority requirements, Party/Role constraints, Provenance requirements, and Audit definitions. These are part of the data model, not a separate governance layer.

When governance components are defined, every XML data instance must carry the corresponding governance content. This library validates that content against the model:

python
from sdcgovernance import validate_governance
result = validate_governance("model.xsd", "instance.xml")
print(result.decision)      # PERMIT, DENY, or INDETERMINATEprint(result.has_governance) # True if model defines governance componentsprint(result.errors)         # list of governance validation errorsprint(result.receipt)        # tamper-evident decision receipt

If the model does not define governance components, the result is PERMIT - no governance to enforce.

Two Independent Libraries

sdcvalidator and sdcgovernance are separate, independent libraries. There is no hook, no chaining, no automatic invocation of one from the other.

sdcvalidator (structural validation)    Does the instance conform to the XSD schema?    Single-pass. Instance in, pass/fail out.
sdcgovernance (governance advisory)    Does the model define governance components?    If yes: does the instance carry valid governance content?    Conversational. Agents query multiple times during a workflow.

Both libraries read the schema from the instance. Agents call each one independently, at different points in a workflow, in whatever order the operational logic requires. A single workflow may involve multiple calls to both libraries.

What Gets Validated

ComponentWhat the model definesWhat the instance must carry
WorkflowCluster tree of valid paths (sub-clusters with XdOrdinal states)Current XdOrdinal state, proposed transition validated against ordinal adjacency in valid paths
AttestationAuthority requirements per actionAttestation with correct role, party reference, timestamp
Party/RoleRole constraints for governed actionsActing party identification with required role
Provenance/AuditProvenance requirements (PROV-O) + retention policy (DPV)PROV-formatted record(s) per retention policy: most recent + hash, last N, or full chain

Governance components are discovered by their position in the DMType root (fixed RM slots: workflow, attestation, party/role, audit, and related), not by CUID2 identity. Once a slot is found, its content is validated by vocabulary binding against the relevant standard (PROV-O, SCXML, VC, DPV). Any component occupying the right slot and bound to the right vocabulary is recognized - whether it comes from the Default project or was custom-built.

Enforcement Decisions (OASIS XACML)

DecisionMeaning
PERMITAll governance checks pass - action is authorized
DENYOne or more governance checks fail - action is refused
INDETERMINATEGovernance checks partially pass - requires review (configurable)

Every decision produces a W3C PROV record and a SHA-256 hash-chained receipt.

What happens after the decision is the agent's responsibility. sdcgovernance issues the decision and the receipt. The operational response - routing, escalation, notification, halting - is customer business logic that varies per implementation.

Two Interfaces, One Engine

Python API - for direct integration:

python
from sdcgovernance import validate_governance
result = validate_governance("model.xsd", "instance.xml")

MCP Server - for any agent framework:

bash
sdcgovernance            # what an MCP registry client runs (uvx sdcgovernance)sdcgovernance mcp        # the same, spelled like the other Semantic Data Charter serverssdcgovernance serve --mcp   # still works for existing client configurations

A client configuration needs only "command": "uvx", "args": ["sdcgovernance"].

The MCP server exposes governance as tools that agents call. The agent runs the loop. sdcgovernance advises.

Standards

  • OASIS XACML - decision semantics (PERMIT/DENY/INDETERMINATE)
  • SDC native structure + W3C SCXML concepts - workflow sequencing via XdOrdinal components in sub-cluster paths, borrowing the concepts of state and transition from automata theory as specified in W3C SCXML
  • W3C PROV (PROV-O, PROV-DM) - provenance/audit records (one governance dimension)
  • W3C Data Privacy Vocabulary (DPV) - provenance retention policy (same vocabulary used for SDC access control)
  • W3C Activity Streams 2.0 - activity/event type vocabulary
  • W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model 2.0 - attestation authority pattern
  • W3C SHACL - cross-entity constraint validation
  • OMG DMN - decision tables for complex governance rules
  • SHA-256 - tamper-evident hash chains for decision receipts

Architecture

src/sdcgovernance/├── __init__.py          # Public API: validate_governance()├── engine.py            # GovernanceEngine - the decision engine agents query├── model_inspector.py   # Inspect SDC model for governance components├── workflow.py          # Validate workflow transitions in instance├── attestation.py       # Validate attestation content in instance├── party_role.py        # Validate party/role constraints in instance├── provenance.py        # Validate provenance/audit records + PROV generation + DPV retention policy├── decision.py          # DMN decision table evaluation + content hash├── tables.py            # Decision table registry: id, version, hash; files on disk├── receipts.py          # Decision receipt chain (hash-chained)├── shacl_runtime.py     # SHACL cross-entity constraint validation└── mcp_server.py        # MCP server exposing governance tools to any agent

Pure Python. No Django. No middleware. No web framework dependency.

Installation

bash
pip install sdcgovernance

Integration with SDC Ecosystem

  • sdcvalidator - independent structural validation library. Agents call it separately from sdcgovernance, at different points in a workflow.
  • SDCStudio - models governance components visually. The XSD output includes governance definitions that sdcgovernance validates against.
  • AppGen - generated applications can call validate_governance() at data entry boundaries.
  • SDC Agents - reference implementations showing how to wire governance MCP tools into agentic workflows using Default project governance models. Customer agents connect to the same MCP server and use the tools however they want.

Status

Production-ready. Available on PyPI under Apache 2.0.

Dependencies

  • rdflib - RDF/PROV record generation
  • pyshacl - SHACL constraint validation

License

Apache 2.0

来源:README.md,提交 abf62ec

工具

9

get_governance_status

Report which governance dimensions the model defines. Returns model_id, model_label, has_governance, and active dimensions.

输入参数schema_path必填

get_allowed_transitions

Get valid next states from the current workflow state. Returns list of valid transitions with target state info and path(s).

输入参数schema_path必填instance_path必填

evaluate_transition

Evaluate whether a specific workflow transition is permitted. Returns PERMIT/DENY/INDETERMINATE with receipt.

输入参数actorschema_path必填target_state必填instance_path必填

validate_governance

Full governance validation of an instance against its model. Returns decision, has_governance, errors, dimensions_validated.

输入参数schema_path必填instance_path

record_provenance

Record a provenance event as a W3C PROV-O record. Returns the PROV record content.

输入参数agent_refentity_idsystem_idagent_name必填descriptionactivity_type必填entity_hash_afterentity_hash_before

evaluate_decision

Evaluate a DMN decision table against instance context. Name the table by table_id (and table_version; the highest registered version when omitted) for a governed evaluation, or pass it inline as table_json for an ad-hoc one. Returns decision, matched_rules, reasoning, errors, the table's identity and content hash, and a tamper-evident Receipt whose receipt_hash covers table_id, table_version and table_hash as well as context_hash. instance_path is optional: when omitted, the decision is evaluated against extra_context alone, which is the path external context-only consumers (e.g. MTCP Evidence Packs) should use. Pass previous_hash to chain receipts; the caller is responsible for chain persistence.

输入参数table_idtable_jsoninstance_idcontext_hashextra_contextinstance_pathprevious_hashtable_versioninstance_version

register_decision_table

Register a decision table under a stable table_id and an immutable version, so evaluate_decision can name it and every Receipt it produces records which policy version applied. Returns table_id, version, table_hash (SHA-256 of the table's RFC 8785 canonical JSON), domain and policy. Registering the same content again under the same id and version is a no-op; different content under an existing id and version is refused: register it as a new version. Persists to the server's tables directory when one is configured.

输入参数domainpolicyversion必填table_id必填table_json必填

list_decision_tables

List the registered decision tables: table_id, version, table_hash, domain, policy and registered_at for each version, lowest version first. Filter by table_id or domain. With table_id the full table JSON of each version is included, which is how a receipt's table_id and table_version are resolved back to the rules that applied.

输入参数domaintable_id

verify_evidence_pack

Verify the integrity of an MTCP Evidence Pack by recomputing its evidence_pack_hash. Returns valid (bool), computed_hash, and expected_hash. Canonicalization follows RFC 8785: keys sorted, no whitespace, comma-colon separators, UTF-8.

输入参数evidence_pack必填

版本历史

6
  1. v4.3.1最新Oct 26, 2026
  2. v4.3.0Oct 18, 2026
  3. v4.2.4Sep 28, 2026
  4. v4.2.3Sep 17, 2026
  5. v4.2.1Sep 16, 2026
  6. v4.2.0Sep 16, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 90%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通25 分
  • 已声明认证方式10 分

    请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。

  • 已列出工具必需15 分
  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分