Dsa Coach Mcp

io.github.aaryagodbole由 GitHub 账号 aaryagodbole 发布v0.2.0更新于 Nov 3, 2026

面向LeetCode、Codeforces等的DSA教练:间隔重复复习与错题日志。

AI 翻译由 AI 模型根据下方的原文描述翻译,可能有误。

原文描述

DSA coach for LeetCode, Codeforces and more: spaced-repetition revision and a mistake journal.

已验证STDIO仅桌面

概览

Dsa Coach 的本地 MCP 服务;无需登录;STDIO。

暂无 AI 概览:以下信息来自注册中心条目和服务本身。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Dsa Coach Mcp,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。

其他 MCP 客户端

参照 仓库 中的启动说明。

README

dsa-coach-mcp

[CI] [PyPI] [Python 3.12+] [License: MIT]

An MCP server that turns your LeetCode and Codeforces history into a DSA coach inside Claude, Cursor or any MCP client: see where you stand across platforms, get problems to try next, and revise what you solved on a spaced-repetition schedule, with a mistake journal that remembers why you got things wrong and builds your next practice set around it.

[dsa-coach-mcp driven over stdio on live LeetCode and Codeforces data]

A real session, recorded by examples/demo.py: it starts the server over stdio and calls its tools on live data.

Why

Practice data is split across sites, and each grades difficulty its own way (LeetCode's Easy/Medium/Hard, Codeforces' 800-3500 ratings). Most trackers count problems; few tell you what you are forgetting. This server puts both platforms behind one interface and schedules revision with FSRS, so the model you already talk to can coach you.

FSRS predicts the chance you still remember each problem and brings it back just before that chance drops below 90%. In the open spaced-repetition benchmark over ~10k Anki collections, FSRS predicted recall better than SM-2 for the large majority of users. Once you have a review history, personalize_schedule fits its parameters to how fast you forget.

Counting solved problems hides the real signal: the same few mistakes, repeated. Every review can carry the mistakes behind it, and the model turns those patterns into practice sets and revision quizzes aimed at exactly what you keep missing.

Design

The server returns data, not decisions. It never hardcodes what counts as a weak topic or the next level up; the model reads your profile and the platform's own vocabulary and decides.

mermaid
flowchart LR    Client["MCP client<br/>(Claude, Cursor)"] -->|tools| Server["server.py<br/>validates against<br/>platform vocabulary"]    Server --> Registry["platforms/<br/>adapter registry"]    Registry --> LC["LeetCodeAdapter<br/>GraphQL"]    Registry --> CF["CodeforcesAdapter<br/>REST"]    Server --> SRS["scheduling.py<br/>FSRS"] --> Store[("SQLite<br/>cards, reviews,<br/>mistakes")]
  • Adapters translate one platform's API into shared models (Problem, Profile, PlatformInfo). Nothing outside an adapter names a platform.
  • Data comes from the platforms. Tags and levels are read from each platform's API, and a review takes the problem's title, link and tags from the platform rather than from the model, so nothing in your history is invented. Platforms' own tag lists are incomplete, so search_problems accepts a tag outside them and only reports it when nothing matched.
  • Profiles say what they can't see. Each profile carries limitations, e.g. LeetCode only exposes your 20 most recent accepted submissions publicly.

Tools

ToolWhat it does
list_platformsConnected platforms, with the tags and levels each accepts as filters
get_profileYour level, solved and unsolved counts per tag, and recent submissions
search_problemsProblems with every given tag at a given level, optionally skipping ones you solved
log_reviewRecords how you did (again / hard / good / easy), journals the mistakes behind it, and schedules the next revision with FSRS. Title, link and tags come from the platform
revisions_dueProblems due now, the one you are least likely to remember first, each with FSRS's recall estimate
schedule_infoThe FSRS parameters in use, whether they are personalised, and how many reviews are logged
personalize_scheduleFits FSRS to your own review history (needs dsa-coach-mcp[optimizer])
record_problemRecords a problem from any other platform (HackerRank, GeeksforGeeks, CodeChef, AtCoder, ...) as read from its page
progressPer platform: problems reviewed, reviews logged, and problems due now
show_dashboardProgress, revisions due by risk of forgetting, and a mistake heatmap, as an interactive view in hosts that support MCP Apps
mistake_kindsEvery mistake label used so far, so new mistakes reuse the same words
list_mistakesJournaled mistakes, filterable by label, tag, platform or recent days
mistake_patternsMistake counts per label, broken down by tag, platform and month

Prompts

PromptWhat it does
practice_planBuilds the next practice set from your recurring mistakes and progress
revision_quizQuizzes you on today's revisions using what you got wrong before

Dashboard

show_dashboard is an MCP App: hosts that support them (Claude, Claude Desktop, VS Code Copilot, Goose and others) render it inside the conversation; every other host gets the same data as the tool's result. The view is one self-contained HTML file with no external scripts, follows the host's light or dark theme, and talks to the host over the MCP Apps postMessage protocol.

[dsa-coach dashboard, dark theme] [dsa-coach dashboard, light theme]

Rendered from sample data by examples/dashboard_host.py, which plays the host's side of the protocol.

Any platform

LeetCode and Codeforces have adapters that read from their APIs. Every other platform works through the page you are looking at: pair this server with a browser MCP server such as Playwright MCP in extension mode, which lets the model read the tab open in your own browser, logged in. The model reads the problem page and calls record_problem with its URL, title, tags and difficulty; from then on it is reviewed, scheduled and journaled like any other problem.

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "dsa-coach": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["dsa-coach-mcp"] },    "playwright": { "command": "npx", "args": ["@playwright/mcp@latest", "--extension"] }  }}

No platform is listed in the code: the platform is the problem URL's host, and its problem id is the URL's path. Problems recorded this way are marked "source": "reported", because they come from a page the model read rather than from the platform's API, and a host that has an adapter is always sent to its adapter.

Mistake journal

There is no fixed list of mistake types. The model labels each mistake in a few words and is shown every label used before, so it reuses yours instead of inventing new ones; your journal's vocabulary grows from your own reviews. The server only stores and counts them; spotting the pattern is the model's job.

text
You:    Redid Course Schedule. Forgot to detect the cycle again, and used DFS recursion        that would overflow on 10^5 nodes.Claude: (log_review rated "hard" with two mistakes, reusing your existing        "missed cycle detection" label)        That's the third time cycle detection has slipped on graph problems ...

Install

Requires uv.

Claude Desktop: add to claude_desktop_config.json:

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "dsa-coach": {      "command": "uvx",      "args": ["dsa-coach-mcp"]    }  }}

Claude Code:

bash
claude mcp add dsa-coach -- uvx dsa-coach-mcp

Cursor: same command and args as above in .cursor/mcp.json.

Agent skill

skills/dsa-coach/SKILL.md tells the agent when to reach for these tools and how to use them well: how to rate a review, to reuse existing mistake labels, and to record problems from other platforms only from a page it read. For Claude Code, copy it into your skills:

bash
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/dsa-coachcurl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aaryagodbole/dsa-coach-mcp/main/skills/dsa-coach/SKILL.md \  -o ~/.claude/skills/dsa-coach/SKILL.md

Configuration

VariableDefaultPurpose
DSA_COACH_DB~/.dsa-coach/coach.dbWhere cards, reviews and mistakes are stored

To personalise the schedule, install the optimizer extra (it pulls in PyTorch): uvx --from 'dsa-coach-mcp[optimizer]' dsa-coach-mcp.

Privacy

No login and no API keys. The server only calls the platforms' public APIs with the handles you give it, and revision cards stay in a local SQLite file.

Adding a platform

  1. Write src/dsa_coach_mcp/platforms/<name>.py with a class implementing PlatformAdapter: name, describe(), profile() and search().
  2. Add the class to ADAPTERS in platforms/__init__.py.
  3. Add tests with a mocked API, like tests/test_codeforces.py.

The server and tools need no changes.

Evals

Unit tests check the code; evals/ checks whether a model can actually coach with these tools. A model drives the real server over the MCP protocol, against a fixture world (one practice platform, a seeded history, a fixed clock), on tasks such as planning from a profile, logging a review with its mistakes, reusing an existing mistake label, recording a problem from another platform, and staying silent when no tool is needed.

Grading is deterministic, with no LLM judge: each task lists the tool calls it expects with predicates on their arguments, the tools it must not touch, and a call budget. A run reports pass rate, tool-selection accuracy, argument accuracy, tool error rate, calls per task and token usage.

The model is configuration, not code. Any API that speaks the chat completions format works, whether a hosted free tier, a paid API or a model served on your own machine:

bash
EVALS_BASE_URL=<api base url> EVALS_MODEL=<model> EVALS_API_KEY=<key, if needed> \  uv run python -m evals.run

The loop talks to models through a small AgentBackend interface (evals/backends/base.py); an API with a different wire format is one more backend module. Runs never start on their own: run it locally, or start the Agent evals workflow from the Actions tab after setting the EVALS_BASE_URL and EVALS_MODEL repository variables (and an EVALS_API_KEY secret if your API needs one). The graders, the fixture, the loop and the backend are unit-tested in CI without calling any model.

Development

bash
uv syncuv run pre-commit installuv run pytestuv run ruff check . && uv run ruff format --check .uv run mypy

Re-record the demo at the top of this page against live data:

bash
uv run python examples/demo.py --leetcode <username> --codeforces <handle>

Tests never hit the network: adapters are tested against mocked API responses. See CONTRIBUTING.md.

License

MIT

来源:README.md,提交 8a4bf99

工具

0
SourceWeft 曾在隔离沙箱中以无凭据方式启动该软件包一次,以列出其工具,但未能完成:软件包安装失败。

版本历史

1
  1. v0.2.0最新Nov 3, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 50%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通25 分

    请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。

  • 已声明认证方式10 分

    请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分