Willitsend

io.github.abryfs由 GitHub 账号 abryfs 发布v0.1.0更新于 Oct 24, 2026

Deterministic pre-send lint for SMS/iMessage: silent carrier filtering and segment blowups.

已验证STDIO仅桌面开发者工具沟通与协作

概览

AI 生成的概览

一个本地运行的确定性发送前检查工具,用于短信和 iMessage 草稿,在发送前标出运营商静默过滤风险、分段膨胀和 iMessage 功能丢失问题。

可以做什么
检查短信或 iMessage 草稿正文,返回通过、警告、阻止或需要上下文四种判定之一,并附上问题说明、修复建议和引用来源,全程不发送任何消息。检查首条消息合规性,例如退订说明、品牌标识和订阅确认措辞,品牌名需由你提供。估算分段情况:编码方式、七位组与码元计数、逐段打包,包括非 GSM 字符导致的 Unicode 重编码膨胀。标记 iMessage 功能回退、无效发送样式、轮播数量越界和新联系人发送上限。筛查运营商过滤词、公共短链接和垃圾信息式写法,并输出包含目标分类和配额计算的发送追踪。
适用场景
适合助手批量撰写或发送短信、iMessage 时,在每次发送前做一次低成本、可重复的检查,尤其是给新联系人发首条消息、缺少退订或品牌说明可能被静默过滤的场景。也适合需要确定性判定而非提示词规则的 CI 流水线和智能体循环。
运行要求
通过 npx 作为本地 stdio 进程运行,需要 Node.js。无需账号或 API 密钥,检查器可完全离线工作。可选环境变量 AGENTPHONE_API_KEY 用于对手机号目标启用实时运营商与能力查询。
安装前请注意
它只检查草稿、不发送消息,但通过并不保证送达,订阅确认检查只验证措辞而非真实同意。检测目前仅支持英文,配额计算是静态示例而非你账户的实时状态。设置 AGENTPHONE_API_KEY 会向第三方查询服务发起网络请求;不设置则数据不离开本机。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Willitsend,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。

其他 MCP 客户端

参照 仓库 中的启动说明。

README

willitsend

[ci] [license: MIT]

Your AI agent sends texts. Carriers silently drop the non-compliant ones, and the API never tells you. willitsend is the missing check between the model and the carrier: a deterministic preflight for outbound SMS/iMessage that catches silent filtering, segment blowups, and dropped iMessage features before you spend the send.

Try it in the browser: runs client-side, nothing leaves the page.

npx -y -p github:abryfs/willitsend willitsend-cli "Hey! Your appointment is tomorrow at 2pm." --first-message
Verdict: BLOCKSegments: 1 (gsm7, 41 septets)Channel: unknown[BLOCK] first-message.opt-out: First message doesn't include opt-out instructions (e.g. "Reply STOPto unsubscribe"). Carriers may silently filter first messages that lack one, with no API error.  Fix: Append "Reply STOP to unsubscribe." to the message body.  Source: https://docs.agentphone.ai/documentation/reference/messaging-rate-limits#first-message-requirements[WARN] first-message.opt-in: No opt-in acknowledgment language found …[INFO] first-message.brand: No brand_name was provided …

The problem

Messaging APIs report "sent" when a message reaches the downstream carrier, not when it reaches a phone. AgentPhone's rate-limit docs spell out the consequence: first messages that skip brand identification, opt-in acknowledgment, or opt-out instructions "may be silently filtered by carriers. The API will not return an error."

AI agents now send texts autonomously, and nothing sits between the model and the carrier. An agent that drops the opt-out line gets no error and no delivery. An agent that adds one emoji turns a 160-character message into three billable segments and never notices.

willitsend is the missing check: a deterministic, stateless lint for a draft message. Text and context in, verdict and evidence out. It sends nothing and stores nothing.

mermaid
sequenceDiagram    participant A as AI agent    participant W as willitsend    participant API as Messaging API    participant C as Carrier    participant P as Phone
    rect rgba(255,69,58,0.08)    note over A,P: without preflight    A->>API: send_message (no opt-out language)    API-->>A: "sent" ✓    C--xP: silently filtered. no error, no delivery    end
    rect rgba(52,199,89,0.08)    note over A,P: with preflight    A->>W: preflight_message(draft, context)    W-->>A: BLOCK · missing opt-out · fix + citation    A->>W: preflight_message(fixed draft)    W-->>A: PASS    A->>API: send_message    API-->>A: "sent" ✓    C->>P: delivered    end

Why not just prompt the rules into your agent?

A fair question: AgentPhone's docs are agent-readable, so you could feed them into every generation call and ask the model to comply. Two things break, and one gets expensive:

  1. Generation is probabilistic; verification is deterministic. A model with the rules in context complies usually. This checker returns the same verdict every time, and its failure mode is a visible finding rather than a silently filtered message. Compose-time guidance and pre-send verification are complements — this repo ships both (the agent skill is the compose-time half).
  2. Models can't do segment math. Septet counting, GSM-7 extension characters, encoding flips from one smart quote, placement-aware packing — token-based models are structurally bad at exactly this arithmetic. No amount of prompting fixes it; a 300-line deterministic function does.
  3. The token math, measured (char-count/4 heuristic on the actual pages, July 2026):
ApproachTokens per message10,000 msgs/day at $3/M input
Feed both AgentPhone doc pages into each generation call~7,700$231/day ($23/day with 90% prompt caching)
preflight_message call result (default)~250 (+ ~1,450 once per session for the tool definition)~$7.50/day
preflight_message with response_format: "concise"~4 on pass, ~44 on block (measured)~$0.35/day at a 90% pass rate

Roughly 30× fewer tokens per message in default mode — several hundred× in concise mode — and the checker's own compute rounds to zero (~4µs locally, no API). If you compress the rules into your system prompt instead — our skill file does, at ~950 tokens — you keep the compose-time benefit but still have no verifier and no segment math. Bulk senders feel this most: the tool exists precisely for AI agents sending texts at volume.

Quickstart

As an MCP tool (Claude Code):

claude mcp add willitsend -- npx -y -p github:abryfs/willitsend willitsend-mcp

or in any MCP client config:

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "willitsend": {      "command": "npx",      "args": ["-y", "-p", "github:abryfs/willitsend", "willitsend-mcp"]    }  }}

For AI agents — paste this block into your agent (or point it at this README):

text
Install the willitsend MCP server (pre-send SMS/iMessage lint, no API key needed):- Claude Code: run `claude mcp add willitsend -- npx -y -p github:abryfs/willitsend willitsend-mcp`- Any other MCP client: add {"command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "-p", "github:abryfs/willitsend", "willitsend-mcp"]} to its MCP server config.Then, before every send_message (or equivalent) call, call preflight_message with thedraft body, is_first_message_to_contact (true/false when known), and brand_name.Treat verdict "block" as do-not-send: apply the returned fix strings and re-run untilpass. Treat "needs_context" as a signal to determine whether this is a first message(check conversation history), never as permission to send. For high-volume loops passresponse_format: "concise" (~4 tokens on pass).

No API key required. Set AGENTPHONE_API_KEY if you want a live iMessage/SMS capabilities lookup for phone-number destinations; without it the tool runs offline. The config above installs straight from this repo (a prepare script builds on install) — nothing to sign up for. willitsend also publishes to npm and the MCP Registry under the server name io.github.abryfs/willitsend; once a release is cut, registry-aware clients can add it by name and npx -y willitsend starts the server directly. See docs/publishing.md for the release runbook.

As a library (npm install github:abryfs/willitsend):

ts
import { preflight } from "willitsend";
const report = preflight({  body: "Acme: thanks for signing up. Your order shipped. Reply STOP to unsubscribe.",  is_first_message_to_contact: true,  brand_name: "Acme",});
report.verdict; // "pass" | "warn" | "block" | "needs_context"report.findings; // each with severity, fix, and a citation URLreport.trace.segments; // { encoding, units, segments, perSegment, ... }

As a CLI: npx -y -p github:abryfs/willitsend willitsend-cli --help (or npx -y -p willitsend willitsend-cli once installed from npm). Exit codes: 0 pass/warn, 1 block, 2 needs context, 3 usage error. It drops into CI or a shell pipeline as-is.

What it checks

RuleSeveritySource
first-message.opt-out: first message to a contact must carry opt-out instructionsblockAgentPhone docs
first-message.brand: first message must identify the brand (checked only against a brand_name you provide, never guessed)blockAgentPhone docs
first-message.opt-in: first message should acknowledge how the contact opted inwarnAgentPhone docs
first-message.media-only: compliance text can't ride in an imagewarnAgentPhone docs
segments.unicode-blowup: one non-GSM character re-encodes the whole message as UCS-2warnAgentPhone docs
imessage.feature-fallback: send_style, threaded replies, and carousels drop without a trace on SMS fallbackwarnAgentPhone docs
imessage.invalid-send-style, imessage.carousel-count: invalid effect names, carousels outside the documented 2-20 rangeblockAgentPhone docs
imessage.new-contact-cap: iMessage caps new-contact sends at 50/day per lineinfoAgentPhone docs
destination.invalid, destination.voip: malformed destinations; known-VoIP lines (line type is never guessed from the number)block / warnsend API / AgentPhone docs
content.shaft: sex/alcohol/firearms/tobacco terms carriers filter (hate speech has no keyword rule: word lists can't detect it and we don't pretend)warnTwilio guidelines
content.url-shortener: shared public shorteners (bit.ly, tinyurl, …) conflict with CTIA dedicated-shortener guidancewarnCTIA MP&BP (PDF)
content.spam-patterns: ALL-CAPS runs, $$$, !!!infoheuristic

Rules come in two labeled tiers. Rules sourced from AgentPhone's own documentation can block. Industry-sourced rules warn at most, because a keyword heuristic has no business vetoing your send.

The verdict model

A finding that depends on context you didn't supply doesn't pretend to be certain. If you never say whether this is the first message to a contact, the opt-out rule reports conditionally and the verdict is needs_context. You get no fake pass and no fake block.

mermaid
flowchart LR    F[findings] --> B{any block finding<br/>with known context?}    B -- yes --> BLOCK    B -- no --> C{any block finding<br/>waiting on context?}    C -- yes --> NC[NEEDS_CONTEXT]    C -- no --> W{any warning?}    W -- yes --> WARN    W -- no --> PASS

Every report also carries a send trace: destination classification, assumed channel (iMessage/SMS/MMS), full segment math (encoding, septet and code-unit counts, placement-aware per-segment packing), and, given a 10DLC campaign tier, what this message costs against published daily segment caps.

Benchmarks

Reproduce every number here from the repo; none of them require an account.

  • Segment-math parity: agrees with Twilio's reference segment calculator on encoding and segment count across a frozen 126-vector corpus: GSM-7/UCS-2 boundaries, extension characters, emoji, ZWJ sequences, and a deterministic fuzz sweep. The corpus and suite live in test/parity.test.ts; run npm test.
  • Latency: median ~4µs per message, ~100,000 messages/second on one thread (Node 22, Apple Silicon laptop; single-pass code-point tables, zero per-character allocation). Run npm run bench on yours. Preflighting every outbound message is cheaper than logging it.
  • Worked cost example, from published caps: a sole-proprietor 10DLC campaign gets 1,000 T-Mobile segments/day (≈3,000 total US, per AgentPhone's published estimate). One stray emoji that flips a 2-segment GSM-7 message to 4 UCS-2 segments halves the number of messages that quota buys. Same text, same recipients, half the reach.

You will find no delivery-rate improvement claims here. That claim needs send data we don't have.

What this can't do

Carriers filter with systems whose rules they don't publish. The policy layer is public (conduct codes, content categories, volume caps); the runtime filtering decisions are deliberately opaque, and only part of the outcome is observable (some blocks return explicit filter errors, some messages are accepted and silently never delivered). This tool covers the deterministic, documented layer, and nothing else:

  • A pass is not a delivery guarantee. It means nothing documented will kill the message.
  • The opt-in check verifies language presence, not that consent exists. Consent lives in your records, not in message text.
  • Detection is English-only in v1 (findings carry a locale field).
  • Quota math is a static illustration from published caps, not your account's live state.
  • The tool never infers line type (VoIP/mobile) from a phone number. Pass destination_line_type from a lookup service if you have one; libphonenumber-js gives a free approximation, with known limits for US numbers.

Prior art

  • TwilioDevEd/message-segment-calculator is the reference for segment math. This library is tested for parity against it rather than competing with it.
  • sms_policy_checker covers similar compliance ground for Ruby/Rails with an LLM layer; willitsend is the deterministic, zero-network counterpart.
  • Web checkers (10dlccheck.com, Calilio) cover overlapping rules as human-facing forms. willitsend makes those checks embeddable: a library an agent can call a hundred thousand times a second, with citations.
  • As far as we can tell, this is the first MCP tool for pre-send SMS content compliance. Corrections welcome.

Privacy

No telemetry. No network calls, except the optional capabilities lookup you enable with an API key. The tool never logs, stores, or echoes message bodies in its output. The playground runs in your browser and sends nothing anywhere.

Future

  • The engine's natural home is server-side: a dry_run parameter on the send endpoint itself. The library is written to drop in, as a pure function with no state and a dependency-free core.
  • Close the loop: correlate preflight verdicts with delivery-status webhooks, so rule precision is measured against real outcomes instead of assumed. Filtering is partially observable (explicit filter errors on some blocks, silence on others), which is exactly enough signal to grade a deterministic ruleset honestly. Learning the opaque layer itself takes aggregate send data across many senders; that belongs to platforms, not to a stateless client tool.
  • A rendered deliverability report card via the MCP Apps extension.
  • Locale packs beyond English.

Developing

git clone https://github.com/abryfs/willitsend && cd willitsendnpm install   # builds via preparenpm test      # 191 tests: unit, Twilio parity, held-out acceptancenpm run bench

License

MIT

来源:README.md,提交 67dfbaa

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中启动过该软件包,因此其工具未知。

版本历史

1
  1. v0.1.0最新Sep 16, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 50%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通25 分

    请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。

  • 已声明认证方式10 分

    请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分