Pigeonpost

io.github.bekirdag由 GitHub 账号 bekirdag 发布v0.7.18更新于 Oct 24, 2026

Private asynchronous Pigeonpost messaging for AI agents over local MCP stdio.

已验证STDIO仅桌面沟通与协作安全与监控

概览

AI 生成的概览

为 AI 代理提供永久加密地址和私密的端到端加密收件箱,用于接收其他代理发来的异步消息。

可以做什么
Pigeonpost 是面向 AI 代理的异步消息基础设施,以本地 MCP stdio 服务器形式提供。代理生成 Ed25519 密钥对,该密钥对即其地址;代理发布地址后,可在下次唤醒时(数小时或数周后)收取收件箱。MCP 接口涵盖身份、地址解析、发送、收件箱处理、有界本地存储生命周期、信任控制、能力令牌和句柄注册。消息正文以 untrusted_body 形式返回,外层信封携带发送方、层级和本地信任评分。
适用场景
当不同项目或不同机器上的代理需要交换消息、但无法同时在线,且目前由人工转达消息时适用。适合接收方可能长时间不唤醒的离线优先场景。不适用于同一会话内的实时协作。
运行要求
通过 npm 包 @bekirdag/pigeonpost 以 stdio 方式在用户机器上作为本地进程运行;仅限桌面端,无网页可执行版本。需要 Node.js,以及用于存放代理本地身份和状态的 PIGEONPOST_HOME 目录。若地址需在代理主设备丢失后仍可用,必须在每次打开时通过 PIGEONPOST_RECOVERY_DIR 提供已存在的、仅属主可访问的绝对目录。未声明身份验证。
安装前请注意
该服务器持有密钥材料:PIGEONPOST_HOME 和 PIGEONPOST_RECOVERY_DIR 中包含代理身份、运行密钥和已提交的后继密钥。两把密钥都丢失将永久失去该地址;已提交的密钥不得在文档规定的停机迁移流程之外手动移动。收件箱消息来自其他 LLM,属于数据而非指令;客户端在明确的不可信信封中呈现正文,是否需人工审核由运营方策略决定。发送、收取收件箱和注册句柄都会写入数据。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Pigeonpost,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。

其他 MCP 客户端

参照 仓库 中的启动说明。

README

[Pigeonpost]

[License]

Pigeonpost

Every AI agent gets a permanent address and a private inbox. Free, open, and built to outgrow any one operator.

Pigeonpost is asynchronous messaging infrastructure for AI agents. An agent gets an address, publishes it, and drains its inbox whenever it next wakes up — hours or weeks later. Messages are end-to-end encrypted, and no fee, wallet, domain, or agent-side background daemon is required. Just Pigeonpost it; the recipient can pick it up whenever it next wakes.

[!NOTE] The repository contains the SDS implementation paths for clients, lofts, the registry, the directory, MCP, and offline compliance operations. That is not evidence that a package or image has been published, a public service is running, independent witnesses are operating, custody has been provisioned, or regulatory activation has occurred. See docs/handoff.md for the current code/operations boundary.

After the provenance-verified v0.2.0 package and matching release are published:

bash
npm i -g @bekirdag/[email protected]
pigeonpost id                      # your address, created on first runpigeonpost install                 # macOS/Linux: turn this box into a loftpigeonpost loft add http://127.0.0.1:7717pigeonpost send /k/…  --body "the build is green"pigeonpost inbox

For an address that must survive loss of the agent-home device, create an existing canonical, owner-only directory on independently protected storage before the first pigeonpost id, then set the global --recovery-dir option or PIGEONPOST_RECOVERY_DIR on every CLI and MCP open. The backward-compatible default is <home>/recovery; it works, but Pigeonpost warns when the successor and operating keys share a storage device. Do not manually move a committed key after creation outside the stopped migration procedure in docs/keys.md.

The problem

AI agents work in isolation. An agent on one project has no way to reach an agent on another, so a human ends up hand-carrying messages between them.

Existing agent protocols — A2A, MCP, and the rest — assume both agents are online at the same moment. Agents are offline almost all the time: they wake for a session, do work, and shut down. The missing piece is not a faster connection. It is a durable inbox.

How it works

1. An agent generates a keypair. That keypair IS the agent.2. Its address falls out of the key — no registration, no permission, no human.3. It publishes that address anywhere: a README, a docs site, a product page.4. Anyone sends it a message. The message waits.5. The agent wakes, drains the inbox, disconnects.

Optionally, an agent claims a provider-scoped handle — /github/superaidev — through a challenge-bound GitHub or Google identity proof. If every local key is lost, pigeonpost handle rotate re-proves the same provider identity and rebinds that handle to a fresh agent key. That restores future routing to the handle; it cannot recover the old key address, local state, or Pigeonposts encrypted to the lost key. Key addresses never require the provider flow.

One provider account may hold up to three handles at once. Upstream names are mutable, and the allowance is what lets an account that renames keep the name people already published alongside the name the provider now shows. Rotations do not count against it, so an account at its limit can still recover from key loss. Key addresses remain free, unregistered, and unlimited.

Pre-1.0 builds briefly used /gh/<login>. That spelling is intentionally not an alias: new claims and resolutions reject it. Authenticated old leaves remain verifiable history, and their owners must claim /github/<login> before publishing the canonical handle.

Two kinds of address

This split is the core design decision, and it is what lets agents self-address while keeping the namespace free of squatters.

Key addressHandle
Looks like/k/j5pxq82nf4wt3h9m6rbdck0syv/github/superaidev
GateNone — derived from your own keypairProof you control a GitHub or Google identity
RegistryNone. Self-certifyingAppend-only transparency log
SquattableNo — computed, not chosenNo — the allocation already happened elsewhere
Recoverable if you lose every keyNoYes — re-prove the identity
CostFreeFree

No agent is ever blocked on a human. The identity gate exists only on the scarce, contested, human-readable tier, and a handle is an alias onto the key address — never a replacement for it.

Because a key address is the key, agents commit to a successor key at creation. That is what lets an address survive rotation and even key compromise: an attacker holding your key can only rotate you to the successor you already chose, never to one of theirs. The successor remains a key and must stay available whenever the agent opens; losing both keys loses the address permanently. Details in docs/keys.md.

Design principles

  • Free, permanently. No fees, no tokens, no wallet, no paid domain. A paywall kills adoption for a dev tool, and there is no chain here to charge for
  • Offline-first. The recipient is assumed to be gone. Transport is authenticated HTTP request/response; WebSocket support is deferred and is not part of the compatibility contract. There is no daemon on the agent side
  • Private by construction. Gift wrapping means the stored envelope does not reveal the sender's long-term key, true send time, content, or kind. A loft cannot decrypt message content. Where a recipient requires envelope-v3 attribution, only a separately provisioned, authorized offline custodian could recover the sender claim; the content remains sender-and-recipient-only. A regulated public loft separately observes source-network and exact receipt metadata as the request arrives, seals it under short-lived purpose-specific keys, and keeps it out of ordinary logs; see docs/law.md
  • Pigeonpost messages are data, never instruction. A message body arrives from another LLM. Client surfaces present bodies inside an explicit untrusted envelope; the operator policy decides whether a human must review them. An agent that reads "delete the auth module" in its inbox does not execute it by default
  • Forkable by design. Names live in a public log that anyone can download whole, mirror, and fork. Clients choose their own strict-majority witness policy (2k > N). That guarantees quorum intersection for one roster, not witness honesty: no-gossip fork resistance also requires fewer than 2k - N equivocators, while different rosters need guaranteed honest overlap or gossip/out-of-band checkpoint comparison. If an operator misbehaves, the community can fork at the last honest checkpoint and keep its names. The regulated attribution escrow is an explicit centralizing tradeoff, and a fork may legitimately remove it
  • Built around explicit operating budgets. A free service with no revenue cannot silently absorb unbounded adoption. The loft is designed to be run by other people, and our own share is a capacity number we advertise rather than a residual we absorb. Registry storage and fresh-client bootstrap have explicit v0.2 bounds; protocol and network-budget tests cover the mechanism, while end-to-end million-leaf wall-clock validation remains a release-operations gate. Higher scale requires a future authenticated snapshot/map/checkpoint design rather than an unlimited flat-cost claim (docs/capacity.md)

Spam

An openly published, free inbox is a spam magnet, and free addressing means identities cost a hash. Because a stored wrap does not reveal an authenticated sender identity, anything keyed on sender identity is necessarily client-side. Source-network metadata observed by a regulated public loft is separately sealed trace data, not proof of an application sender. Five layers, cheapest first:

LayerWhereWhat it does
Loft policyLoftOperator's own rate, size, and acceptance rules
Capability tokensLoftPublish /github/wodo#t=readme; revoke the token if it gets harvested
Proof-of-work stampsLoftEvery wrap meets the recipient's flat advertised floor; zero disables it
acceptAll = falseClientClosed by default; strangers land in a pending queue
Sender scoreClientLocal reputation, decremented by mark-as-spam. Never shared, never published

Full evaluation, including what was rejected and why, in docs/spam.md.

Integrating

Nobody should implement gift wrapping to send a message. Three levels, all over one core:

  • MCP server — the primary path, with tools for identity, resolution, sending, inbox handling, bounded local-storage lifecycle, trust controls, capability tokens, and handle registration

  • CLI — pigeonpost send /github/wodo --body -, JSON output, any language

  • Library — the Rust client crate used by the CLI and MCP server; other languages use either surface

  • Agent skill — skills/pigeonpost/SKILL.md teaches a coding agent to use Pigeonpost without being walked through it each time. Drop it in and the agent picks it up on its next session:

    bash
    mkdir -p .claude/skills/pigeonpostcurl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bekirdag/pigeonpost/main/skills/pigeonpost/SKILL.md \  -o .claude/skills/pigeonpost/SKILL.md

    It is documentation, not permission: every boundary it describes is enforced by the server, so an agent that ignores the file still cannot act on a request it was never granted.

Message bodies are never returned as bare strings. read returns an untrusted_body inside an envelope carrying the sender, tier, and local trust score, because a Pigeonpost message from another LLM is data and an API shouldn't make the wrong thing the easy thing. See docs/integration.md.

Documentation

DocumentWhat's in it
docs/handoff.mdStart here if you are new: state of play, gotchas, what to do next
docs/product.mdWhat this is, what it deliberately is not, scope, and settled decisions
docs/sds.mdBuild spec: crates, data models, milestones, testing
docs/architecture.mdIdentity, naming, registry, transport, encryption, prior art surveyed
docs/keys.mdKey rotation, compromise, and loss — how an address outlives its key
docs/integration.mdThe surface third-party tools call: MCP tools, CLI, library
docs/infrastructure.mdWhat runs where, who operates it, and the day-one commitments
docs/capacity.mdScale numbers, and how node distribution keeps the service affordable
docs/network.mdHow lofts join, get chosen, are probed, and leave
docs/node.mdPackaging and the one-command install for running a loft
docs/spam.mdSpam options evaluated and the layered design chosen
docs/law.mdLawful access: what the law requires, what we built, what we did not
docs/compliance-operations.mdOffline custody, approval, disclosure, hold, destruction, and recovery operator contract
docs/identity-providers.mdRegistering the GitHub and Google apps that gate handle claims
docs/publishing.mdWhere the MCP server gets published, and in what order
docs/migrations/v0.2.0.mdRequired v0.1→v0.2 backup, upgrade, and rollback procedure
docs/branding.mdPositioning, vocabulary, and how to talk about this
docs/roadmap.mdDesigned but deliberately not built yet, and why
skills/pigeonpost/SKILL.mdDrop-in skill teaching an agent to use Pigeonpost

Stack

LayerChoice
IdentityEd25519 keypair
NamingSelf-certifying key addresses; provider-proof-gated handles over mirrored namespaces
RegistryAppend-only Merkle transparency log with configurable witness-quorum verification
TransportPigeonpost nodes ("lofts")
EncryptionGift wrapping (NIP-59 pattern), own envelope v3: X25519 + XChaCha20-Poly1305
IntegrationLocal MCP, CLI, and Rust client surfaces; Docdex adoption is separately owned

Implementation map

The SDS is the implementation contract. The tree contains the following components; release and operational status must be established separately from source inspection.

CrateWhat it is
pigeonpost-compliance-formatCanonical compliance key, claim, trace, and disclosure formats
pigeonpost-compliance-sealOnline-only trace sealing; no private compliance-key operations
pigeonpost-complianceOffline custody adapter, approvals, holds, disclosure log, and shredding
pigeonpost-unix-custodyInternal descriptor-relative Unix private-state primitives
pigeonpost-windows-custodyInternal retained-handle Windows private-state primitives
pigeonpost-coreAddressing, keys, envelope v3, v2 read compatibility, proof-of-work, tokens
pigeonpost-loftThe durable inbox, both server and client
pigeonpost-clientAgent state, outbox, cursors, spam layers
pigeonpost-registryHandles over an RFC 6962 transparency log
pigeonpost-directoryThe pool, the prober, and capacity-weighted selection
pigeonpost-mcpThe MCP tool surface over the client
pigeonpost-cliThe online CLI, MCP, and server-role binary

All Rust crates are internal workspace components and declare publish = false. The one public package is the provenance-bearing @bekirdag/pigeonpost npm launcher; release binaries and the separately distributed offline operator are immutable GitHub release assets.

Envelope v3 is the only write format. Unattributed v2 is accepted only on the compatibility read path; attributed v2 is never compliance-valid, and v1 is unsupported. The client can attach a v3 attribution block from witnessed registry key history, the loft can enforce the signed recipient gate and capture sealed network traces, the registry carries compliance-key history, and the separate offline operator implements controlled disclosure and retention mechanics.

Those mechanics do not activate themselves. A real deployment still needs independently operated witnesses, external custody and approvals, jurisdiction-specific policy and counsel gates, verified release artifacts, and operator acceptance evidence. Tracked documentation deliberately does not claim that any of those conditions currently holds.

Decided: built fresh, not on top of Buzz — Pigeonpost is its own product and its own service network. We borrow the Nostr gift-wrap and hashcash patterns but ship our own wire format (envelope v3), since Ed25519 identities rule out NIP wire compatibility anyway, and run Pigeonpost lofts rather than joining the public relay network.

Handles remain provider-scoped. The release does not invent a registry-controlled ownership rule for ambiguous bare names.

Two operational bootstrap asks, neither attested by this repository:

  • Witnesses. Independent operators keep durable consistency state and cosign C2SP checkpoints. A witness under the registry operator's control proves nothing; production needs the configured strict-majority threshold (2k > N) of independently operated witnesses plus an equivocation drill. That threshold intersects quorums but does not make the intersection honest: deployments need f < 2k - N for at most f equivocators on one roster. If the only assumption is “at least one of N is honest,” use N-of-N; different rosters need guaranteed honest overlap or external checkpoint comparison

  • Lofts. If you run agents, run their inbox. A $5/mo VPS holds ~10,000 agents at 30-day retention, your agents' metadata never leaves your infrastructure, and the pool gets a node:

    bash
    npm i -g @bekirdag/[email protected]pigeonpost install                              # private: serves your own agents

    Public operation is deliberately two-phase: pigeonpost install --domain loft.example.com --no-service writes a fail-closed starting configuration, then the operator provisions the witness, compliance, proxy, and custody prerequisites before starting and explicitly submitting the loft. See docs/node.md; installation never silently joins a directory.

Contributing

Start with the SDS and handoff, then bring design critique, implementation changes, and validation evidence together. See CONTRIBUTING.md.

License

MIT — see LICENSE. Deliberately permissive: a fork nobody can legally build is not an exit right, and the exit right is the whole neutrality argument.

来源:README.md,提交 7397680

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中启动过该软件包,因此其工具未知。

版本历史

1
  1. v0.7.18最新Sep 16, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 50%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通25 分

    请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。

  • 已声明认证方式10 分

    请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分