
Memory Arbiter Mcp
io.github.billy12151由 GitHub 账号 billy12151 发布v0.18.4更新于 Nov 4, 2026
Local SQLite MCP memory: evidence-based recall, advisory conflict notices, authorized governance.
发布方自己的服务:Ahkam — Saudi court rulings
概览
本地 SQLite 记忆服务器,让多个编码助手共享一份带出处的事实库,支持基于证据的召回与冲突提示。
- 可以做什么
- 在共享记忆库中写入、查找、批量查找、按区间精确读取、更新与判定事实
- 只读查看记忆健康度、冲突分组与详情、历史、过期与审计、实体与工作区
- 执行经显式授权的治理操作,如退役、冲突方案应用与确认
- 修复证据索引、全库冲突扫描、清理历史与回放备份
- 每次调用返回结构化结果,含警告、降级标记与需关注事项
- 适用场景
- 适合让 Claude Code、Cursor、Codex 等多个编码助手共用一份持久记忆,而不是各记各的;也适合需要带原文偏移的召回、需要暴露相互矛盾事实,以及要求数据只留在本机、变更需显式授权的场景。
- 运行要求
- 以本地 Python 包运行(pip install memory-arbiter-mcp),用 mema 命令通过 stdio 启动,可选本机回环的 streamable-http 模式。需在 config.json 中设置 client 与 agent_id(为空则拒绝启动)、指定 SQLite 数据库路径;证据召回与写入时冲突仲裁还需本地嵌入 GGUF 模型和 mDeBERTa 判定模型。配置以配置文件为准,MEMORY_ARBITER_* 环境变量作为回退。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 Memory Arbiter Mcp,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。
其他 MCP 客户端
参照 仓库 中的启动说明。
README
Memory Arbiter MCP
[PyPI] [Website] [License] [Python]
English | 中文
Official site & docs: memarbiter.cn
Memory Arbiter (迷码) is a capability amplifier for your AI agents: plug it in over MCP and every agent you use — Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, ZCode — becomes one assistant with a running memory. Decisions made in Claude today are usable in Cursor tomorrow; every fact carries its provenance, collisions get surfaced before they bite, and what you've locked cannot be silently overwritten. One SQLite file on your machine holds every fact in full; every model — embeddings, conflict judge — runs locally.
Current release:
0.18.4· local-first · MCP-native · 4 tools · knowledge workbench in0.18.0
In one minute: what mema does for you
Every coding agent you use — Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, ZCode — keeps its own notes and knows nothing about the others. Facts get duplicated, contradicted, and silently go stale. mema replaces that with one trusted fact store all your agents share:
- Recall that actually works. Lexical and sentence-level evidence channels search in parallel and fuse by rank: 65/65 self-recall on the release exam. Sub-threshold candidates never reach a result page — what it returns is what you can cite — and every hit carries source offsets, so
read span=[start,end]slices the exact original text. - Conflicts get surfaced, not buried — and not spammed. When two facts disagree, a self-trained local mDeBERTa judge (one conflict probability, no prompt engineering, no winner-picking) calls it: only high-confidence conflicts interrupt you, hearsay-style narrative lines are dismissed by a code rule, and everything else lands in a small weekday triage queue your agent clears band by band — so a strict threshold never means a lost finding, and an open gate never means noise. On the release exam, 94.1% of the conflicts it interrupts you with are real.
- Facts stay yours — and stay safe. Full original text in one SQLite file on your machine, provenance on every write, version history on every edit, trust levels that lock what you confirmed. mema dials out nowhere on its own — the only optional call is a PyPI update check (the console workbench talks to the LLM endpoint you configure).
- A knowledge base, curated by you. The local browser console lets you pick which memories count as knowledge, browse them by workspace → tag with rendered markdown and relation graphs, and study them with a bring-your-own-LLM workbench (knowledge summary / key points / merge & tidy / self-quiz / plain-words explain / ask-me / timeline) whose outputs write back through the standard pipeline.
Benchmarks
Public: LoCoMo-Refined
Evaluated on LoCoMo-Refined (all 1,382 questions, official judge Qwen3-14B):
Context: Mem0's full pipeline scores 48.91% on the same text-only basis (re-scored by the benchmark authors) — bare mema with no LLM in the write path matches it; with a writer-agent, mema's text-only score trails only MemoraX on the leaderboard. Full methodology and reproduction: evals/locomo/RESULTS.md.
Internal release exam (shipped configuration)
Every release must pass the internal exam suite — fixed fixtures: 42 recall queries across five query kinds (paraphrase / lookup / legal / far / keyword), 106 conflict pairs across four label classes (33 true conflicts), and four similarity-label groups (as of 0.18.0, shipped judge and thresholds; reproduce with eval/runner.py --suite all):
The exam is deliberately conservative and precision-favored: whatever the strict gate withholds is not lost — mid-band suspects land in the weekday triage queue instead. This is the quality bar that ships, re-measured on every release.
Install & quickstart
Install with your AI Agent
Paste this into Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or another coding agent with terminal access:
The agent treats this README as the source of truth, picks uvx/core/vec/semantic-local from your environment, and stops for user input when a safe choice cannot be inferred. A successful install is not complete until mema doctor has run and every warning has been reported. On a fresh install the agent may also offer a one-minute product demo — it first checks the mema-first-run-demo-status marker memory (offered at most once, globally; skipped silently if it exists).
Install manually
Or step by step:
Then wire your MCP client from examples/*.mcp.json and start the server with mema. Missing capabilities (models not downloaded) surface as a persistent degraded banner with remediation — an incomplete install cannot pass for a complete one.
Full documentation, the Team edition and the personal edition live at memarbiter.cn (docs: memarbiter.cn/docs).
Two things to know before first use:
- Identity is explicit. Set
clientandagent_idin config.json — no built-in defaults, the server refuses to start when either is blank. rememberrequiresworkspace. Callmemory_review(view="workspaces")first to list existing buckets, then pass one;'default'is the global pool.
The four tools
Every call returns {ok, mode, warnings, degraded, data}; things needing your attention arrive as notices or data.action_required. Point any agent at the packaged rule: memory(action="help", data={"topic":"agent_onboarding"}).
The daily loop is four calls — remember a reusable fact, find to recall, read for exact lookup, update when a newer source replaces an old fact (never a second active copy of one source of truth). find is an index page (metadata + content_chars + outline with source offsets); batch_find merges 8 queries into one round-trip; read span=[start,end] quotes exactly; an empty recall says so honestly instead of stuffing recent memories.
What's inside
Conflict arbitration, included. Candidate pairs surviving a deterministic funnel (sentence prefilter → memory screen → cosine band → rule evidence) are judged by the local mDeBERTa encoder — two bare row texts in, one calibrated conflict probability out. Only high-confidence conflicts notify; narrative hearsay is dismissed by a post-verdict code rule; mid-band suspects land in a bounded two-band ledger that a weekday triage task clears with row-level evidence — never in user-facing lists, never a full-library rescan. The judge never picks a winner and never edits memory: findings live in one auditable conflicts lifecycle (open → applying → resolved) your agent walks under explicit authorization (judge → apply_conflict_action → resolve_conflict, CAS-pinned revisions).
A knowledge workbench, included. memory-arbiter console opens a local browser console: curate your knowledge base (one-click kb_member add/remove — a dedicated column agents cannot drop by rewriting tags), browse by workspace → tag with markdown and one-hop relation graphs, and run seven one-click study actions on any memory (knowledge summary / key points / merge & tidy / self-quiz / plain-words explain / ask-me / timeline) with your own OpenAI-compatible API — outputs write back as memories, attributed to the console.
Trust, enforced. Provenance on every write, append-only version history, normal/protected/locked trust levels plus the user_confirmed label, and per-action authorized=true on every state-changing governance call. Workspace isolation comes in none/weak/strict — under strict, a new workspace stays pending until you confirm it, and the reserved default pool is invisible from project scopes. Workspaces listed in a recall_blacklist.jsonl file next to the database are excluded from unscoped recall; mema doctor reports the effective list.
Configuration
File-only, in ~/.config/memory-arbiter/config.json. The complete surface is 34 keys — full template at examples/memory-arbiter.config.example.json, per-key docs and migration tables in docs/INTEGRATION.md. The keys that matter on day one:
embedding.model_path— pointing at a local GGUF model is the sole intent to enable evidence recall.semantic_conflict.mdeberta_ckpt— pointing at the judge checkpoint (see below) enables write-time arbitration.mcp.transport—stdio(default) orstreamable-httpfor one shared local server.- Six launch-context environment variables exist (
MEMORY_ARBITER_CONFIG/DB_PATH/BACKUP_JSONL/MCP_TRANSPORT/CLIENT/AGENT_ID); config file wins, and any otherMEMORY_ARBITER_*export warns "no longer read".
HTTP mode: sharing one local server
stdio (default) needs no background process. To share one server across several clients: set mcp.transport to "streamable-http", keep the process alive (launchd template in examples/ — mema has no built-in daemon), and point clients at http://127.0.0.1:8000/mcp with the fixed X-Mema-Client/X-Mema-Agent-Id headers from examples/streamable-http.mcp.json. Loopback only; headers are provenance, not authentication. Claude Desktop / Claude Code connect through a one-entry mcp-remote bridge — copy it from the same example file.
Conflict judge model (mDeBERTa, optional)
One-time manual install (the ~556MB fp16 checkpoint does not ship on PyPI):
pip install memory-arbiter-mcp[mdeberta];- download
mdeberta-v78_ep5_fp16.pt(+ themdeberta-basetokenizer directory) from the mini-clash release artifacts (already included in the offline install bundle frommemarbiter.cn— skip this step there); - point
semantic_conflict.mdeberta_ckptat it — auto-enables and preloads at startup;mema doctorverifies the digest and label contract.
Unconfigured = write-time arbitration disabled; the weekday triage queue stays empty until you enable it.
Degradation
- No sqlite-vec / embedding model: lexical recall and governance continue, evidence indexing is unavailable.
- No judge: write-time arbitration pauses; nothing lands in the triage queue.
- SQLite unavailable: writes fall back to the append-only JSONL envelope; workspace decision state requires the database.
Upgrading from an older database
Databases older than schema generation workspace_state_v1 are refused at startup — run the side-by-side mema upgrade (preview with --dry-run, the source database is never deleted). The full operational guide — WAL-safe backup, what gets carried over and what is intentionally dropped, the post-upgrade scan epoch — lives in docs/UPGRADE.md (中文版 docs/UPGRADE.zh-CN.md).
Development
During development, package/docs may describe an unreleased dev version while server.json (the MCP Registry manifest) stays at the last released version; scripts/sync_version.py advances it at release time and --check prevents drift.
中文摘要
Memory Arbiter(迷码)是面向 AI Agent 的本地可信事实层:每条事实只存一份完整原文,向量与索引皆可重建;写入带出处、编辑带版本、信任级别防静默改写。冲突仲裁与知识库工作台开箱即得——mDeBERTa 二分类判定走宽严双门(宽门保召回、严门保安静),conflicts 表走 open → applying → resolved 可审计生命周期;浏览器控制台提供知识库策展(kb_member 独立治理位)与自带 LLM 的学习工作台。公开评测 LoCoMo-Refined 文本类口径写入代理 65.62%、零抽取打平 Mem0;内部发版考试自召回 65/65。完整中文文档见 README.zh-CN.md;另见 INTRO.md、docs/INTEGRATION.zh-CN.md 与 docs/UPGRADE.zh-CN.md。
License
Apache-2.0 — see LICENSE.
来源:README.md,提交 9e7194d
工具
0版本历史
6- v0.18.4最新Nov 4, 2026
- v0.17.1Oct 5, 2026
- v0.16.12Sep 22, 2026
- v0.16.8Sep 17, 2026
- v0.16.7Sep 16, 2026
- v0.16.5Sep 16, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 50%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通25 分
请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。
- 已声明认证方式10 分
请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分
其他 Arbiter 集成
Ahkam — Saudi court rulings
sa.arbiter官方发布者
检索已公布的沙特法院判决,并获得仅基于所检索判决的分析。AI 翻译

Saudi Law Portal · البوابة الميسرة للأنظمة
sa.arbiter官方发布者
沙特法律法规:搜索、阅读全文、分析脱敏事实(阿拉伯语/英语)。AI 翻译

NullClear Arbiter
由 GitHub 账号 mithgalalfayez 发布
NullClear Arbiter 让助手发现 x402 API、审计 Base 代币与钱包,并通过托管式 HTTP 402 支付完成调用并取得凭证。

Arbiter
由 GitHub 账号 godwin105 发布
本地 MCP 服务器,让助手按次以 USDC 付费购买 Arbiter 的判断:交易风险裁决、对手方核验与人工审核。