
Uteke
io.github.codecoradev由 GitHub 账号 codecoradev 发布v0.23.0更新于 Nov 11, 2026
Long-term memory for AI agents: hybrid vector and full-text recall, rooms, time-travel.
概览
Uteke 为 AI 助手提供共享的长期记忆,支持向量与关键词混合检索、房间以及按时间点回溯。
- 可以做什么
- 存储、更新和遗忘记忆,可附带标签、实体、类型、作者与引用来源
- 按语义和精确关键词检索,并可回溯到过去某个时间点的记忆状态
- 通过房间让多个智能体共享记忆,并记录每条记忆的作者
- 用关系图连接记忆,并执行去重、孤立记忆清理等维护操作
- 在文档引擎中创建和读取文档,并支持批量导入与完整导出/导入
- 把原始对话轮次排队,之后再抽取为记忆
- 适用场景
- 适合希望助手跨会话、跨多个智能体(Claude Code、Cursor、Codex 等 MCP 客户端)保留上下文,而不是每次从零开始的场景;也适合需要同时按语义和关键词查找历史信息的场景。
- 运行要求
- 通过 OAuth 登录访问 uteke.app 的远程端点;README 说明托管的 Cloud 服务在公开测试期间免费。自托管方案是本地二进制或 Docker 镜像,无需 API 密钥,首次运行会下载约 200 MB 的嵌入模型。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 Uteke,将其添加到工作区。
- 连接 所需的 凭据。它们会被私密存储,绝不会在公开页面上展示。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Web executable,通过 Streamable HTTP。 远程服务在工作区中配置后即可从网页运行时运行。
交给智能体安装
把这段提示词粘贴到 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 等智能体,或 SourceWeft 对话中。智能体会读取该服务器的安装指南,先向你展示发布者、端点和登录方式,经你同意后再把它添加到你的客户端。密钥不会写进任何命令。
阅读 https://sourceweft.com/mcp/io.github.codecoradev%2Futeke/install.md,并按其中说明把这个 MCP 服务器接入我的客户端。修改任何配置之前,先告诉我它的发布者、端点和登录方式,等我确认。不要把 API 密钥写进命令或我会提交的文件;问我密钥应从哪里获取。其他 MCP 客户端
把它添加到你客户端的 mcpServers 配置中。 客户端会在首次连接时完成 OAuth 登录。
{
"mcpServers": {
"uteke": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://uteke.app/mcp"
}
}
}README
Uteke
Long-term memory for any AI agent.
One Rust binary, runs offline, no API key. Self-host it free, or let us host it on Uteke Cloud.
[CI] [Latest Release] [License: Apache 2.0] [GitHub Stars] [Docker Hub pulls] [GitHub release downloads] [LongMemEval-S recall@5: 98.2%]
Quick start · Benchmarks · Connect your agent · Docs · Uteke Cloud · Bahasa Indonesia
All 500 LongMemEval-S questions, no LLM call in retrieval. Raw outputs are committed: check them in a minute, or re-run everything for about $10.
Why Uteke
On Monday you tell your agent how you deploy. By Thursday it has no idea. Every session starts from zero, and every agent keeps its own half-memory.
Uteke gives all of them one long-term memory that runs on your own machine:
- Verifiable recall. 98.2% recall@5 on LongMemEval-S, with the stricter numbers shown next to it and the raw outputs in this repo.
- Fast and cheap to query. ~45 ms warm recall, 0 LLM tokens per query, CPU only.
- One binary. No Python, no Docker, no vector database, no API key. The embedding model (~200 MB) downloads once.
- One memory, every agent. Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Hermes and any MCP client share the same store. Rooms record which agent or person wrote what.
- Finds by meaning and by keyword. Local vectors and SQLite full-text search, fused into one ranking (how it works).
- Remembers over time. Point-in-time recall (
--at), a relationship graph, a document engine, and decay for stale memories. - Private by default. No telemetry. Secrets such as API keys are masked before a memory is stored.
- Open source. Apache-2.0, cosign-signed releases.
Quick start
No API keys, no Python, no cloud account. The first run downloads the embedding model (~200 MB, one time).
Give your agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Hermes) the same memory with one line:
New to Uteke, or you are an AI agent? Run uteke onboard. It detects your setup, asks which agent you use, and wires it up. 📖 Onboarding
Rather not run anything locally? Uteke Cloud runs the same engine for you: add one URL to Claude, sign in, done. Free during the open beta.
📦 More install options & Docker
Self-host or Cloud
Same engine, two ways to run it.
Choose self-host if your data must stay on your machine, or you want to run Uteke inside your own infrastructure. Choose Cloud if you want one memory across several devices and agents without running a server.
Benchmarks
LongMemEval-S (ICLR 2025) hides the facts an agent needs across ~115 chat sessions per question and checks whether retrieval finds them. 500 hand-curated questions, five memory abilities. Uteke runs the full suite with zero LLM calls in the retrieval path: local embeddings, one CPU, deterministic.
¹ Their published numbers on the same benchmark and 500-question split, on their own recall_any@5 basis (head-to-head notes); evaluation setups differ. ² Strict = every gold session in the top 5; 65% of questions have more than one. Max possible 99.4%. ³ agentmemory publishes MRR 88.2%, which is a different metric.
Stability across releases and results per question type
Stable across releases (full 500 questions, scored from committed raw, RESULTS.md):
Re-validated 2026-11-08 after the #1690 import fix: strict@5 identical (88.0%), strict@10 +1 question (95.4%), zero misses@50 — four questions shifted partial gold ordering, none lost all evidence.
By question type (recall_any@5, v0.20.0):
Every question's evidence lands in the top 50 (zero misses). What's left is ordering when a question needs several sessions at once: strict recall_all@5 is 88.0% against a 99.4% ceiling, and most misses lose exactly one session.
🎯 Don't trust our benchmark. Run it yourself. Public dataset, committed raw outputs for every validated release, scoring you can recompute in ~20 lines of Python. Verifying the committed results takes a minute and needs no embedder; re-running all 500 questions costs about $10. 👉 benchmarks/longmemeval/REPRODUCING.md · 🧾 Receipts for the headline number (v0.19.0 run)
LoCoMo. LoCoMo end-to-end QA measures answer accuracy, and the result depends on the LLM answerer and the LLM judge used. In an internal comparison, identical answers were scored up to 8 points apart when only the judge model was swapped. For that reason we do not publish a single LoCoMo number in this README. The full table, the per-judge figures and the receipts are in benchmarks/locomo/RESULTS.md. Retrieval recall, which needs no judge, remains the metric we rely on.
uteke bench --counts 100,1000,10000 measures latency and throughput on your own machine. 📖 Benchmark docs
Connect your agent
🏠 Rooms: several agents, one shared memory (example)
Author attribution on every memory; cross-agent recall without manual sync. 📖 Rooms
Features
All features with details
Core memory
Search & intelligence
Integrations
Performance & privacy
How it works
- Vector index finds by meaning ("deploy" matches "rollout").
- FTS5 finds by exact terms ("deploy" matches "deploy").
- Hybrid merges the two lists with Reciprocal Rank Fusion (k=60).
- Fusion merges the vector ranking (weight 1.7) with the hybrid ranking (weight 1), then adds small salience and recency boosts.
Everything runs in-process: no network, no server required. --strategy vector | fts5 | hybrid | graph picks a single stage instead.
🐳 Deployment modes
Local-first (default): single binary, zero infrastructure. Your data stays in ~/.codecora/uteke/.
Docker / server mode: for teams or remote agents.
Compared with other memory tools
How Uteke differs from Python, TypeScript and Go memory layers (table)
Tool labels (A–G) stand for common categories of AI memory layers as of August 2026, assessed from public documentation. Use this as a starting point for your own evaluation, not a ranking.
Documentation
FAQ
"Fully offline", but there's a Uteke Cloud?
The engine in this repo is complete and runs fully offline; nothing in it calls the Cloud. Uteke Cloud is a separate, optional hosted service that runs the same engine for people who don't want to run anything locally, and you can export your data from it any time. The open-source engine stays full-capability, and none of the benchmark results above depend on the Cloud.
Why not just keep notes in a Markdown file?
A file works until you need to find something by meaning: "ship the release" won't match "deploy v2.1" with grep. Uteke searches by meaning and by keyword at once, keeps who wrote each memory, and works the same for every agent you use, instead of one file per tool.
How is Uteke different from cloud-dependent memory tools?
Many memory layers need cloud API keys (OpenAI or another LLM) and extra infrastructure (Docker, Postgres, Qdrant), and your data is sent to an LLM provider. Uteke is a single binary with no API keys; embeddings run locally via ONNX. See the comparison.
How is Uteke different from other single-binary memory tools?
Most of them are full-text only (keyword matching). Uteke fuses vector search with full-text search, so you can search by meaning as well as exact words, and adds rooms, time-travel, a relationship graph, decay, a document engine and batch import.
Does it really work offline?
Yes. The embedding model (EmbeddingGemma Q4, 768d) downloads once (~200 MB) on first run. After that, memory operations make no network calls and there is no telemetry. The binaries check GitHub for a new release once a day; set UTEKE_NO_UPDATE_CHECK=1 to turn that off. If the local model fails, Uteke degrades to a no-op embedder; it never calls a cloud API.
How fast is recall?
~45 ms as a CLI (31 ms average at 10K memories on the published bench host; flat from 100 to 10K memories). No network round-trip, and an LRU cache skips re-embedding repeated queries.
Is it production-ready?
Uteke has 1,300+ tests, mutation testing before each release, CI on every pull request, cosign-signed releases and a benchmark harness. It's used in production by the CodeCora team and other early adopters. It is still 0.x (see the release badge), so expect rough edges, but the core is stable.
Contributing
Contributions welcome. Read CONTRIBUTING.md for the full guide, or say hi in Discussions.
License
Apache License 2.0. Use it, fork it, ship it.
If Uteke helps your agents remember, a ⭐ helps other people find it.
来源:README.md,提交 c98ff38
工具
0版本历史
1- v0.23.0最新Nov 11, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 85%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通必需25 分
- 已声明认证方式必需10 分
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分