Mcp Scorecard

io.github.davidmosiah由 GitHub 账号 davidmosiah 发布v0.5.1更新于 Oct 24, 2026

Agent-readiness scorecard for any MCP server: 10 checks, 0-100 score, actionable findings.

发布方自己的服务:Scorecard

已验证STDIO仅桌面开发者工具安全与监控

概览

AI 生成的概览

审计任意 MCP 服务器的智能体就绪度,按 10 项检查给出 0-100 分、逐项结论与修复建议。

可以做什么
  • 审计目标 MCP 服务器(npm 包、GitHub 仓库、本地构建或托管 URL),得到 0-100 的智能体就绪度评分
  • 覆盖十项检查:schema 有效性、工具命名、隐私模式、写操作门控、agent manifest、冒烟测试、资源、描述、注解与可发现性
  • 查看逐项结论与建议修复,可输出 Markdown、JSON、HTML 或 README 徽章
  • 并排比较多个服务器、与保存的基线做回归对比,或只评某一维度(如安全、质量、智能体就绪)
  • 用最低分阈值或 GitHub Action 在 CI 中拦截
  • 把评分器本身作为 MCP 服务器运行,让助手在安装前先审计某个服务器
适用场景
适合在多个 MCP 服务器之间做选择、维护目录,或发布自己的服务器时,在发布前或 CI 中对其面向智能体的契约做可重复的检查。
运行要求
通过 npx 在本地以 stdio 运行(需要 Node.js)。未声明账号、API 密钥或环境变量。审计 npm、GitHub 目标及托管 URL 需要网络;可选的 HTTP 模式读取 MCP_SCORECARD_HOST、MCP_SCORECARD_PORT 和 MCP_SCORECARD_TRANSPORT。
安装前请注意
stdio 审计会以当前操作系统用户身份执行目标代码,既不沙箱也不只读;只审计可信目标,不可信代码请放在隔离环境中。探测会设置 MCP_PROBE=1 并只继承有限的环境白名单,但存放在文件或系统服务中的凭据仍可被访问。评分只衡量约定,不代表安全、隐私或正确性。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Mcp Scorecard,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。

其他 MCP 客户端

参照 仓库 中的启动说明。

README

mcp-scorecard

[CI] [npm version] [GitHub release] [npm downloads] [License MIT] [Built for MCP] [Verified release index]

Agent-readiness scorecard for any MCP server.
Probes a target over stdio, runs 10 checks, outputs a 0-100 score with itemized findings.


Quick start

bash
# Audit a published npm packagenpx -y mcp-scorecard whoop-mcp-unofficial
# Audit a GitHub repo (auto-resolves to the published npm package, or local dist)npx -y mcp-scorecard https://github.com/davidmosiah/whoop-mcp
# Audit a local build (entry file or package directory)npx -y mcp-scorecard /Users/you/Desktop/my-mcp/dist/index.jsnpx -y mcp-scorecard ./my-mcp          # resolves package.json bin/mainnpx -y mcp-scorecard ./dist/index.js   # relative paths work offline
# CI gate: fail the build if the score dropsnpx -y mcp-scorecard my-mcp --min-score 80
# Structured JSON for piping into your own toolingnpx -y mcp-scorecard my-mcp --json
# Run scorecard itself as an MCP server (stdio default)npx -y mcp-scorecard serve
# Same server on Streamable HTTP — v2 stateless, loopback onlynpx -y mcp-scorecard serve --http# GET  http://127.0.0.1:3000/health# POST http://127.0.0.1:3000/mcp   (sessionless)

Env for HTTP: MCP_SCORECARD_HOST, MCP_SCORECARD_PORT, MCP_SCORECARD_TRANSPORT=http.

Demo

Real captured run auditing the official MCP reference server @modelcontextprotocol/server-everything — nothing here is hand-edited, this is exactly what the CLI printed:

console
$ npx -y mcp-scorecard @modelcontextprotocol/server-everything
# mcp-scorecard - @modelcontextprotocol/server-everything @2026.1.26
**Agent-readiness score:** 44/100
- [PASS] Schema validity              (13/13 tools have valid input schema)- [FAIL] Tool naming convention       (12/13 tools violate snake_case)- [FAIL] Privacy modes documented     (only 1 tool(s) mention privacy modes)- [PASS] Mutation gating              (no write tools — n/a)- [FAIL] Agent manifest               (no agent_manifest tool)- [FAIL] Smoke test                   (no smoke script and no test script)- [PASS] Resources advertised         (7 resources registered)- [PASS] Tool descriptions            (avg 88 chars across 13 tools)- [FAIL] Annotations                  (0/13 read tools annotated)- [FAIL] Manifest discoverability     (no discovery tools)
## Details### Tool naming convention- Non-snake_case names: get-annotated-message, get-env, get-resource-links, get-resource-reference, get-structured-content, get-sum, get-tiny-image, gzip-file-as-resource, toggle-simulated-logging, toggle-subscriber-updates### Annotations- Missing readOnlyHint: echo, get-annotated-message, get-env, get-resource-links, get-resource-reference, get-structured-content, get-sum, get-tiny-image, gzip-file-as-resource, toggle-simulated-logging
## Suggested fixes- Rename tools to lowercase snake_case (a-z, 0-9, _).- Add a `privacy_mode` parameter (summary | structured | raw) on read tools so agents can request only what they need.- Expose a `<prefix>_agent_manifest` tool that returns { recommended_first_calls, standard_tools, ... } so agents can self-onboard.- Add `scripts/smoke-tools.mjs` that boots the server via StdioClientTransport and asserts the tool list.- Add `annotations: { readOnlyHint: true, openWorldHint: false }` to every read tool definition.- Expose discovery tools so agents can self-onboard: `*_agent_manifest`, `*_data_inventory`, `*_capabilities`, `*_connection_status`.

The reference server is a feature showcase, not a production integration — a 44 is expected and is exactly why the conventions checks exist. Agent-oriented servers that adopt snake_case naming, a manifest tool, and read-only annotations land in the 80s and 90s.

What it checks

Ten quality dimensions, each scored 0-10. Final score is the sum, capped at 100.

  1. Schema validity - boots the server, lists tools, and validates each tool's inputSchema with ajv. Missing or non-object schemas score zero per tool.
  2. Tool naming convention - rewards a shared prefix and snake_case (e.g. whoop_get_sleep). Mixed case, hyphens, and missing prefixes lose points.
  3. Privacy modes documented - looks for a privacy_mode parameter on any tool, or descriptions that mention summary | structured | raw.
  4. Mutation gating - any tool name matching (set|update|delete|create| pause|resume|enable|disable|cancel|publish|send) must document a gate in its description (Gated by ALLOW_MUTATIONS, requires explicit user intent, dry-run, confirm).
  5. Agent manifest - calls <prefix>_agent_manifest and checks the response object has recommended_first_calls (non-empty array) AND standard_tools (non-empty array). The probe NEVER persists the payload
    • only field names and lengths are recorded.
  6. Smoke test present - looks for scripts/smoke*.{mjs,js,ts} in the package, or a real test script in package.json (not the npm default echo-and-fail).
  7. Resources advertised - counts what listResources() returns. Zero scores zero; one or two scores 5; three or more scores 10.
  8. Tool descriptions - average description length across all tools. Below 30 chars scores 0; 30-60 scores 5; 60+ scores 10.
  9. Annotations - counts what fraction of read tools (any non-mutation tool) carry annotations.readOnlyHint = true. Score scales linearly.
  10. Manifest discoverability - has any of *_agent_manifest, *_data_inventory, *_capabilities, *_connection_status. Two or more scores 10; exactly one scores 7; none scores 0.

Output format

Markdown (default)

# mcp-scorecard - whoop-mcp-unofficial @0.4.3
**Agent-readiness score:** 88/100
- [PASS] Schema validity              (28/28 tools have valid input schema)- [PASS] Tool naming convention       (consistent `whoop_` prefix, snake_case)- [PASS] Privacy modes documented     (privacy_mode parameter on 6 tool(s))- [PASS] Mutation gating              (no write tools - n/a)- [PASS] Agent manifest               (recommended_first_calls present, 5 entries)- [PASS] Smoke test                   (scripts/smoke-tools.mjs found)- [PASS] Resources advertised         (8 resources registered)- [PASS] Tool descriptions            (avg 142 chars across 28 tools)- [WARN] Annotations                  (20/28 read tools annotated)- [PASS] Manifest discoverability     (4/4 discovery tools present (agent_manifest, data_inventory, capabilities, connection_status))
## Suggested fixes- Add `annotations: { readOnlyHint: true, openWorldHint: false }` to every read tool definition.
_Generated by mcp-scorecard v0.1.0 at 2026-05-23T15:42:11.000Z_

JSON (--json)

json
{  "target": {    "displayName": "whoop-mcp-unofficial",    "version": "0.4.3",    "serverName": "whoop-mcp",    "serverVersion": "0.4.3"  },  "totalScore": 88,  "checks": [    {      "id": "schema_validity",      "label": "Schema validity",      "score": 10,      "status": "pass",      "summary": "28/28 tools have valid input schema",      "details": [],      "fixes": []    }  ],  "generatedAt": "2026-05-23T15:42:11.000Z",  "scorecardVersion": "0.1.0"}

How it probes

The scorecard launches the target MCP server over stdio with MCP_PROBE=1 set on the child's env. Only the MCP SDK's platform-specific runtime environment allowlist (such as PATH and HOME on Unix) is inherited; shell API keys, auth sockets, proxy settings, and code-loading settings such as NODE_OPTIONS are not forwarded. Author hook: if your MCP needs OAuth or other credentials to even list tools, detect this env var and return your tool/resource/prompt manifests anyway. The scorecard expects to be able to read your contract without making any auth-requiring API calls.

Stdio auditing executes the target's code as the current OS user and may call an *_agent_manifest tool. It is not a read-only or idempotent operation and does not sandbox filesystem access, network access, or the target's effects. Audit trusted targets; use a separate isolated environment for untrusted code. MCP_PROBE=1 asks the target to cooperate and cannot enforce these limits.

Privacy model

  • The probe response is never persisted. Only counts and field names are recorded into the in-memory snapshot used by checks.
  • Any string going into the report is run through a redaction pass that replaces values for customer_id, email, phone, access_token, refresh_token, client_secret, developer_token, and api_key with [REDACTED].
  • The scorecard sends no telemetry. Resolving npm/GitHub targets may use the network, hosted URL audits make HTTP requests, and executed stdio targets can make their own network calls. The probe's environment allowlist does not prevent access to credentials stored in files or OS services.

Use cases

  • CI gate - block a PR if the score drops below a threshold: npx -y mcp-scorecard my-mcp --min-score 85.
  • Registry curation - run the audit across a list of MCPs to pick the best-documented and most agent-friendly options for a directory or catalog.
  • Pre-publish self-check - add it to prepublishOnly so you never ship a regressed contract by accident.
  • Comparative review - score two MCPs that ostensibly cover the same API and see which is friendlier to agents.

Limitations

  • Cannot probe MCPs that REQUIRE auth before listTools() returns. If your server is one of these, support the MCP_PROBE env hook so the scorecard can still read your contract.
  • Cannot grade logic correctness - the scorecard only inspects shape, metadata, and discoverability. A server can score 100/100 and still return wrong data.
  • Mutation detection is name-based - if you call a write tool prepare_thing instead of set_thing, the check will miss it. This is intentional: we reward clear naming.

Roadmap

  • v0.2 - rule pack for agent-rules-of-thumb (output shape stability, pagination patterns, error envelope consistency), a perf benchmark (median listTools() latency), and an OAuth probe with a mock token.

Support

Disclaimer

This is a quality audit tool. It does not certify security, privacy, or correctness; it only measures whether a server follows agent-friendly conventions. Always do your own review before plugging an MCP into a production agent.

License

MIT - see LICENSE. Code of Conduct.


New in v0.3.0 — differentiators

  • Run it AS an MCP server so agents can call it mid-task:
    json
    { "mcpServers": { "mcp-scorecard": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "mcp-scorecard", "serve"] } } }
    Then your agent can audit("some-mcp-server") before installing it. An MCP that scores MCPs.
  • Audit hosted/remote servers by URL (12 security + agent-readiness checks): npx -y mcp-scorecard https://your-server
  • Badge for your README: npx -y mcp-scorecard my-mcp --badge → a shields.io markdown badge.
  • GitHub Action:
    yaml
    - uses: davidmosiah/[email protected]  with:    target: dist/index.js    min-score: 80

v0.4.0

  • mcp-scorecard compare a b c — side-by-side ranking.
  • --profile security|quality|agent-ready — score one category. --baseline old.json — regression diff. --html — shareable scorecard.
  • Checks explainer: https://mcp-scorecard.vercel.app/checks.html

来源:README.md,提交 c924cba

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中启动过该软件包,因此其工具未知。

版本历史

1
  1. v0.5.1最新Sep 16, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 50%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通25 分

    请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。

  • 已声明认证方式10 分

    请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分

其他 Scorecard 集成