Attest

io.github.dev-prathap由 GitHub 账号 dev-prathap 发布v0.1.0更新于 Nov 3, 2026

Decide by policy, gate behind a human, verify by read-back, record a hash-chained ledger.

概览

AI 生成的概览

Attest 是一个本地 MCP 校验服务器,让助手按策略决定代理操作是否放行、在关键操作前请求人工确认、从记录系统回读核验,并写入哈希链审计账本。

可以做什么
  • 策略与人工把关:按策略判定代理操作,必要时暂停等待人工确认,审批人可在批准前修改参数。
  • 回读核验:从 Gmail、Google Workspace、Microsoft Graph、HubSpot、Notion、Linear 或 Slack 回读,并比对字段是否与声称结果一致。
  • 记录证据:把每次操作写入哈希链 SQLite 账本,标注核验等级,并支持签名检查点与导出。
  • 查看记录:查询账本条目及其核验证据,包括哪些字段不一致。
  • 接入方式:可作为零代码 MCP 代理置于其他服务器之前,也支持 SDK 装饰器、HTTP 网关和框架适配器。
适用场景
适用于代理执行发邮件、更新 CRM、转账等有后果的外部操作,而你需要的是实际发生了什么的确凿证据,而不是工具返回的成功提示。也适合需要可审计、防篡改记录以满足合规或事后复盘的团队。
运行要求
以 stdio 本地运行,从 PyPI 安装 attestlayer 并用 uvx 启动。回读需要相应系统的 OAuth 或 API 令牌:GMAIL_TOKEN、GOOGLE_TOKEN、GRAPH_TOKEN、HUBSPOT_TOKEN、NOTION_TOKEN、LINEAR_API_KEY、SLACK_BOT_TOKEN。可选配置包括 ATTEST_POLICY、ATTEST_LEDGER、ATTEST_CONFIRM_TIMEOUT 和 ATTEST_AUTO_APPROVE。被拦截的操作还需要人工审批渠道(Slack、网页收件箱、webhook 或控制台)。
安装前请注意
它会保存代理操作的账本;若使用付费云版本,可能向 Attest Cloud 发送哈希和预览内容,仅用 SDK 时账本保存在本地。回读令牌是能访问邮件、CRM 和工作区数据的真实凭据,应尽量缩小权限范围。ATTEST_AUTO_APPROVE=1 会关闭人工把关,文档标明仅供开发使用。审批人可修改操作参数,且修改会被记录。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Attest,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。

其他 MCP 客户端

参照 仓库 中的启动说明。

README

Attest — prove what your AI agent actually did

[ci] [pypi] [npm] [docs] [license]

Decide → Gate → Verify → Attest. Your agent sends the email, updates the CRM, moves the money. Attest decides whether it may, gates it behind a human when it matters, reads back from the system of record to check it actually happened, and records tamper-evident evidence either way.

Attest never executes your action. Your tool does. That is why it works with any app and any framework on day one.

Your agent says it worked. Did it?

Two identical CRM writes, both reported success by the tool, both approved by a human:

console
$ attest ledger#2  2026-09-19 10:16:46  someweirdcrm.create → leads   ask  approved  unverified   a09e7641db12#1  2026-09-19 10:16:46  someweirdcrm.create → leads   ask  approved  verified     77a6d99a60f6

The second one read back clean. The first did not, and the ledger says which field disagreed:

json
{ "level": "unverified", "matched": false,  "evidence": { "compared": 4, "exists": true, "failed": ["stage"],    "fields": { "stage": { "want": "qualified", "got": "new", "ok": false } } } }

A trace would have shown two green steps. That gap is the entire product.

Install

bash
pip install attestlayer          # Pythonnpm  install attestlayer         # TypeScript — byte-identical ledger format
python
import attest
@attest.action(system="gmail", verb="send", target="to")def send_email(to, subject, body): ...
ts
import { Attest } from "attestlayer";
const at = new Attest({ agent: "followup-agent@v3", readers: { gmail: process.env.GMAIL_TOKEN! } });const sendEmail = at.wrap({ system: "gmail", verb: "send", target: "to" },                          async ({ to, subject, body }) => gmail.send({ to, subject, body }));

That is the whole change. The first external send now pauses for a human, and the ledger row says acknowledged, or verified once Attest can read back with the agent's own credentials (Attest(readers={"gmail": service})). Nothing else in your code moves.

Verification is layered, and it never overstates

Every row states exactly how much was checked. A check that could not run is never dressed up as a pass.

levelwhat it means
verifiedread back from the system of record, and the fields matched
verified-customyour own check ran and passed
acknowledgedthe action was accepted, but no read-back could run here
attested-onlyrecorded with no verifier available for this action
unverifieda check ran and contradicted the claim

Only a contradiction earns unverified. Missing credentials, a read-only scope or an unsupported verb degrade to acknowledged, because "we could not check" and "it did not happen" are different facts.

Where it plugs in

surfacehow
Decorator / wrapper@attest.action(...) · at.wrap(...)
LangGraphtool node wrapper, gate as a graph interrupt
OpenAI Agents · Claude Agent SDK · CrewAI · DeerFlowadapters in attest/
MCPzero-code proxy in front of any server, plus a verify server
HTTP gatewaypoint outbound traffic at it, no SDK at all
API onlyPOST the descriptor yourself

Human confirmation lands where the team already works: Slack, the web inbox, a webhook, a LangGraph interrupt, or the console. Approvers can edit the parameters before approving, and the edit is recorded.

The record itself

Hash-chained ledger, SQLite locally and Postgres per organisation in the cloud. Signed checkpoints let you prune old rows and still verify the chain. Optional Ed25519 signing, and external anchoring to a file, a git repo or an HTTP endpoint. Exports: JSON, CSV, the IETF draft-sharif-agent-audit-trail JSONL format, and an EU AI Act event-log pack.

Overhead is roughly a sixth of a millisecond per action, measured in benchmarks/ (published numbers).

Try it locally

bash
python examples/unknown_app.py                         # an app Attest has never seen, L1 → L3ATTEST_AUTO_APPROVE=1 python examples/langgraph_agent.pycd deploy && cp .env.example .env && docker compose up  # cloud API :8400 + dashboard :3400

Attest Cloud

The SDK is MIT and works standalone with a local ledger. Attest Cloud adds the shared ledger, the confirm inbox, versioned org policy, agent keys and compliance exports. Your vendor tokens never reach it: read-back happens in your process with your own credentials, and only hashes and previews are sent. Self-host it from deploy/, or read DEPLOY.md.

Install channels

wherehow
PyPIpip install attestlayer → attest, attest-mcp, attest-mcp-server, attest-gateway
npmnpm install attestlayer
MCP Registryio.github.dev-prathap/attest (verify server) · io.github.dev-prathap/attest-proxy (zero-code proxy)
Smitheryattestlayer/attest
Claude Desktopattest-<version>.mcpb on the latest release
Dockerghcr.io/dev-prathap/attest-api · ghcr.io/dev-prathap/attest-dashboard

Documentation

Full docs at dev-prathap.github.io/ATTEST — quickstart · verification levels · policy · read-back recipes · ledger & exports · hardening

Repository

pathwhat
attest/Python SDK — descriptor, policy, ledger, verification ladder, gates, adapters, MCP proxy, CLI
packages/attest-ts/TypeScript SDK — same canonical hashes, fixture-tested against Python
cloud/Attest Cloud — FastAPI + Postgres: orgs, keys, policy versions, ledger, confirm inbox, exports
dashboard/Next.js dashboard — ledger drill-down, confirm inbox, policy and keys
examples/unknown app, LangGraph, OpenAI Agents, MCP config, API-only, cloud
deploy/Dockerfiles and compose
benchmarks/what the layer costs per action
docs/documentation site source, plus design notes
bash
pytest -q && (cd cloud && pytest -q)     # 355 + 37 offline testspytest tests/live                        # 8 live suites; need real credentials, skipped without them

Contributing

Read-back recipes are the easiest place to start: each one teaches Attest how to confirm a write in one more app, and needs nothing but that app's read API. See CONTRIBUTING.md, and SECURITY.md for reporting a vulnerability.

Principles

  • We never execute your action. Your tool executes; we decide, gate, verify and record.
  • Coverage is universal. Verification depth is layered and stated honestly on every row.
  • Open-source SDK under MIT. Paid cloud for the shared ledger, inbox, policy and exports.

Design notes

The thinking behind the product, kept in the open: vision · product · universal adapter · architecture · market · build plan · decisions · phase plan

Lineage

Attest's core mechanisms are extracted from two working codebases: DO (policy engine, read-back verification pairs, evidence ledger) and DeerFlow (tool receipts, verification patterns, MCP and chat-channel adapters), which run against real Gmail, Slack, HubSpot, Notion, Linear and Google Workspace. Attest ships its own live suites for those systems in tests/live/; they need real credentials and are skipped without them.

来源:README.md,提交 a694329

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中启动过该软件包,因此其工具未知。

版本历史

1
  1. v0.1.0最新Sep 19, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 50%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通25 分

    请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。

  • 已声明认证方式10 分

    请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分