Github Repo Intelligence Mcp

io.github.digitalgremlin由 GitHub 账号 digitalgremlin 发布v0.1.0更新于 Oct 24, 2026

GitHub repo maintainability verdicts—maintained, slowing, at-risk, abandoned—via MCP.

已验证Streamable HTTP可网页运行开发者工具数据与分析

概览

AI 生成的概览

远程 MCP 服务器,让助手获得任意 GitHub 仓库的可维护性判定,并附带活动、议题、PR 与贡献者原始指标。

可以做什么
  • 获取仓库总体健康判定(活跃维护、放缓、有风险、疑似弃用),含各维度细分与理由说明
  • 查看提交节奏、发布频率与动能趋势
  • 查看议题响应速度、积压规模与陈旧议题比例
  • 查看 PR 合并率、合并耗时与最老未合并 PR 的时长
  • 查看贡献者广度与关键人物集中(bus factor)标记
  • 所有工具接受 owner/name 或 GitHub 链接,同一仓库共享一次缓存抓取
适用场景
适合在采用、推荐或基于某个开源依赖、库或厂商项目开发之前,让助手判断其是否仍在维护;也适合批量筛查和定期监控候选仓库。
运行要求
需要 Apify 平台上的远程 Streamable HTTP 端点,并使用 OAuth 认证。实际上必须提供 GitHub 令牌:主要 GraphQL 数据源拒绝未认证请求,共享出口 IP 也会很快耗尽匿名配额,无令牌时只会返回限流错误。令牌可通过 githubToken 输入或 Actor 上的 GITHUB_TOKEN 环境变量提供。可选设置:cacheTtlMinutes 与 analysisWindowDays。
安装前请注意
服务器需要 GitHub 令牌这一凭据;公开仓库用无 scope 的经典令牌即可,分析私有仓库则需具备相应读取权限的令牌,令牌以密钥形式保存。查询的仓库名会发送给 GitHub 以及 Apify 上托管的 Actor。Actor 在保持热备并处理请求期间按计算量计费,重复或定时使用会产生 Apify 费用。判定是基于固定阈值的启发式结论,并非保证。

安装

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 打开 控制台中的 Github Repo Intelligence Mcp,将其添加到工作区。
  2. 连接 所需的 凭据。它们会被私密存储,绝不会在公开页面上展示。
  3. 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。

Web executable,通过 Streamable HTTP。 远程服务在工作区中配置后即可从网页运行时运行。

交给智能体安装

把这段提示词粘贴到 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 等智能体,或 SourceWeft 对话中。智能体会读取该服务器的安装指南,先向你展示发布者、端点和登录方式,经你同意后再把它添加到你的客户端。密钥不会写进任何命令。

阅读 https://sourceweft.com/mcp/io.github.digitalgremlin%2Fgithub-repo-intelligence-mcp/install.md,并按其中说明把这个 MCP 服务器接入我的客户端。修改任何配置之前,先告诉我它的发布者、端点和登录方式,等我确认。不要把 API 密钥写进命令或我会提交的文件;问我密钥应从哪里获取。

查看智能体所依据的安装指南

其他 MCP 客户端

把它添加到你客户端的 mcpServers 配置中。 客户端会在首次连接时完成 OAuth 登录。

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "github-repo-intelligence": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://joeslade--github-repo-intelligence-mcp.apify.actor/mcp"
    }
  }
}

README

A maintainability verdict, not another dashboard.

GitHub Repo Health Check is an MCP server that answers the one question your dependency list can't: is this repo still maintained, or am I building on sand? Last-commit date lies. Star count lies. One signal isn't a verdict. So it returns a four-way read — Actively maintained, Slowing, At-risk, or Likely abandoned — synthesized across four dimensions (activity, issues, PRs, contributors), backed by the transparent, inspectable thresholds that produced it. Point it at any owner/name (or GitHub URL) and your agent gets a verdict it can act on, plus the raw numbers so it can see exactly why. Same repo state + config → the same verdict, every time.

It runs as a Standby Actor on the Apify platform — always warm, reachable over the Streamable HTTP transport at the /mcp path, with API access, scheduling, and monitoring included.

See it in action

Two repos, two very different verdicts — then a drill-down into the metrics behind them, all over MCP:

[GitHub Repo Health Check terminal demo]

Who is this for?

  • Agent developers whose agents need to decide whether to adopt, recommend, or monitor an open-source library or tool
  • Dependency due-diligence — vetting whether a package's upstream is alive before committing to it
  • OSS vendor evaluation — checking the health of a project before building on it
  • Repo triage at scale — ranking a list of candidates by health before a human reviews them
  • Automated monitoring — scheduling recurring checks and alerting when a dependency starts slowing

If you've ever asked "is this repo abandoned?" or run a GitHub repo health check by hand, this server does it programmatically at any scale.

Why use GitHub Repo Health Check?

Most GitHub tools hand an agent raw API access and leave the judgment to the model — inconsistent, hand-rolled heuristics on every call. This server does the synthesis for you.

The differentiator is judgment, not raw access: every verdict ships alongside the pinned thresholds and raw metrics that produced it, so the agent (and you) can audit the reasoning. Same repo state + same config always yields the same verdict.

One GitHub fetch per repository is cached and shared across all five tools. Drilling from the headline verdict into a specific dimension costs no extra upstream calls.

How to use GitHub Repo Health Check

  1. Deploy the Actor — run it in Standby mode on Apify. It boots with no input required.
  2. Connect your MCP client to the Standby endpoint (https://<your-standby-url>/mcp) using the Streamable HTTP transport.
  3. Call get_repo_health with a repo argument ("owner/name" or any https://github.com/owner/name URL) to get the headline verdict.
  4. Add a GitHub token — this is effectively required. The Actor's primary data source (GitHub's GraphQL API) rejects unauthenticated requests, and Apify's shared egress IPs exhaust GitHub's anonymous quota almost immediately. Without a token the Actor returns rate-limit errors, not verdicts. See Input for setup.
  5. Drill into dimensions — call get_activity_metrics, get_issue_health, get_pr_health, or get_contributor_insights when you need detail beyond the headline. All five tools read from the same cached payload.

The five tools

All tools take a single repo argument — either "owner/name" or any https://github.com/owner/name[/...] URL (case-insensitive).

get_repo_health — headline verdict

Returns the overall verdict, a per-dimension breakdown, and a rationale string explaining the worst dimension.

jsonc
{  "repo": "honojs/hono",  "overallVerdict": "Actively maintained",  "dimensions": {    "activity":     { "verdict": "Healthy", "lastCommitDaysAgo": 1, "commits90d": 412 },    "issues":       { "verdict": "Healthy", "medianFirstResponseDays": 2.4, "staleOpenRatio": 0.12 },    "pullRequests": { "verdict": "Healthy", "mergeRate": 0.88, "oldestOpenPrDaysAgo": 14 },    "contributors": { "verdict": "Healthy", "totalContributors": 312, "busFactorFlag": false }  },  "rationale": "Overall: activity is Healthy; weakest dimension is issues (Healthy).",  "stars": 21000,  "forks": 640,  "fetchedAt": "2026-06-01T00:00:00.000Z",  "authenticated": true}

get_activity_metrics — commit cadence and momentum

Commit volumes over trailing windows, release frequency, and a momentum trend.

jsonc
{  "repo": "honojs/hono",  "verdict": "Healthy",  "lastCommitDaysAgo": 1,  "commits30d": 140,  "commits90d": 412,  "commits365d": 1680,  "releaseCount365d": 48,  "lastReleaseDaysAgo": 3,  "momentumTrend": "steady",  "fetchedAt": "2026-06-01T00:00:00.000Z"}

momentumTrend is accelerating / steady / declining, derived from the 30-day commit rate vs the 90-day rate. Repos that tag rather than cutting GitHub Releases will show releaseCount365d: 0 and lastReleaseDaysAgo: null — this does not by itself degrade the verdict.

get_issue_health — responsiveness and backlog hygiene

How quickly maintainers respond to issues and how much of the backlog has gone stale.

jsonc
{  "repo": "honojs/hono",  "verdict": "Healthy",  "openIssues": 32,  "closedIssues": 1840,  "openClosedRatio": 0.017,  "medianFirstResponseDays": 2.4,  "medianTimeToCloseDays": 5.1,  "staleOpenIssues": 4,  "staleOpenRatio": 0.12,  "fetchedAt": "2026-06-01T00:00:00.000Z"}

An issue is stale if untouched for more than 90 days. Medians are null when no qualifying events exist in the analysis window — absence is not the same as zero.

get_pr_health — PR throughput and queue age

How effectively the project merges or closes contributions, and how old the oldest open PR is.

jsonc
{  "repo": "honojs/hono",  "verdict": "Healthy",  "openPrs": 6,  "mergedPrs": 220,  "closedUnmergedPrs": 30,  "mergeRate": 0.88,  "medianTimeToMergeDays": 1.2,  "oldestOpenPrDaysAgo": 14,  "fetchedAt": "2026-06-01T00:00:00.000Z"}

mergeRate excludes still-open PRs from the denominator. It is null when no PRs have been decided in the analysis window.

get_contributor_insights — concentration and bus-factor risk

How many contributors the project has and whether commit activity is dangerously concentrated.

jsonc
{  "repo": "honojs/hono",  "verdict": "Healthy",  "totalContributors": 312,  "topContributorShare": 0.28,  "topTwoContributorShare": 0.41,  "busFactorFlag": false,  "fetchedAt": "2026-06-01T00:00:00.000Z"}

busFactorFlag is true when the top contributor owns more than 50% of commits, or the top two together own more than 80%. totalContributors is the repository's all-time contributor count (sourced from GitHub's stable /contributors list endpoint) — it is not a 90-day-active count.

Verdict thresholds

Verdicts come from pinned, transparent thresholds — same repo state plus same config always yields the same verdict.

DimensionHealthyModerateAt-RiskNotes
Activitylast commit ≤ 30d30–180d180–365dLikely abandoned if > 365d
Issuesmedian first response ≤ 7d and staleOpenRatio ≤ 0.40≤ 30d and ≤ 0.60otherwisenull median → judged on staleOpenRatio alone
Pull requestsmergeRate ≥ 0.60 and oldestOpenPr ≤ 30dmergeRate ≥ 0.30 or oldestOpenPr ≤ 90dotherwisenull mergeRate → judged on oldestOpenPr alone
ContributorstotalContributors ≥ 3 and not bus-factor1–2 contributors, or ≥ 3 with bus-factor0 contributorssolo active maintainer → at most Moderate

Overall verdict is activity-dominant, evaluated top-down (first match wins):

  1. Likely abandoned — activity is Likely abandoned (no commits in > 365 days).
  2. At-risk — activity is At-Risk, or any two of {issues, PRs, contributors} are At-Risk.
  3. Actively maintained — activity is Healthy and no dimension is At-Risk.
  4. Slowing — everything else (e.g. activity Moderate, or Healthy activity with one At-Risk dimension).

Input

The server boots with no input required (a Standby constraint — all fields are optional in the schema so the container never crash-loops on startup). In practice, you must provide a GitHub token for the Actor to return verdicts rather than rate-limit errors.

FieldTypeDefaultDescription
githubTokenstring (secret)—Effectively required. GitHub's GraphQL API (this Actor's primary data source) rejects unauthenticated requests, and on Apify's shared IPs the anonymous REST quota (~60 req/hour per IP) is typically already exhausted by other traffic. A token gives 5,000 req/hour and enables private-repo analysis.
cacheTtlMinutesinteger20How long a repo's fetched payload is reused before refetching. Lower = fresher data; higher = fewer GitHub API calls.
analysisWindowDaysinteger90Trailing window (30–365 days) over which issue and PR activity is measured.

GitHub token setup. A classic token with no scopes is sufficient for public repositories. A fine-grained token scoped to specific repos works for private-repo analysis. For Standby deployments the recommended approach is to set a GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable on the Actor (stored as a secret) rather than pasting the token into the input field — it persists across restarts. Both paths work; both are stored as secrets and never exposed in logs.

Output

Each tool returns a single structured JSON object (shown above in each tool's section). Responses are deterministic — same repo state plus same config always produces the same verdict. Each response includes a fetchedAt timestamp reflecting when the underlying GitHub payload was pulled. A cached read returns the same timestamp as the original fetch for that TTL window.

Data fields reference

FieldWhat it tells you
overallVerdictThe headline: Actively maintained / Slowing / At-risk / Likely abandoned
lastCommitDaysAgoDays since the most recent commit; null if no commits found
commits30d / commits90d / commits365dCommit counts over trailing 30, 90, and 365-day windows
momentumTrendWhether commit rate is accelerating, steady, or declining (30d vs 90d rate)
medianFirstResponseDaysMedian time (days) until a maintainer first responds to a new issue
staleOpenRatioFraction of open issues that have had no activity in 90+ days
mergeRateMerged PRs ÷ (merged + closed-unmerged) — excludes still-open PRs
oldestOpenPrDaysAgoAge of the oldest PR that is still open
totalContributorsAll-time contributor count (not a 90-day-active figure — see FAQ)
busFactorFlagtrue when commit activity is dangerously concentrated on 1–2 people

Pricing

This Actor runs in Standby mode and is billed for the compute used while warm and serving requests. Health reads are lightweight — each repo's GitHub data is fetched once, cached (default 20 minutes), and shared across all five tools. Drilling into multiple dimensions for the same repo costs a single upstream fetch.

A GitHub token is required in practice (see Input) and adds no extra Apify cost.

Tips

  • Start with get_repo_health for the headline verdict, then call a dimension tool only when you need detail — they all share the same cached payload.
  • Raise cacheTtlMinutes when triaging a long list of repos in a batch to minimize GitHub API calls. Lower it when you need fresh reads.
  • Set GITHUB_TOKEN as an environment variable on the Actor rather than in the input field — it persists across Standby restarts without re-supplying input.
  • Adjust analysisWindowDays (30–365) to match how recent you need issue and PR signals to be. A shorter window surfaces recent trajectory; a longer window averages over a steadier baseline.

How it works

  1. An MCP client sends a tool call (e.g. get_repo_health) with a repo argument.
  2. The server checks an in-memory LRU cache. On a miss, it fires a single GraphQL query to GitHub's API (plus a REST call for contributor data) and caches the raw payload.
  3. Pure metric-computation functions derive counts, medians, and ratios from the payload — no further network calls.
  4. Verdict functions compare each metric against the pinned thresholds in config.ts and return a dimension verdict.
  5. The overall verdict is composed from the four dimension verdicts using the activity-dominant rule above.
  6. The full result — verdict, per-dimension breakdown, raw metrics, and fetchedAt — is returned to the MCP client.

All five tools share step 2's cached payload. The verdict logic is deterministic and clock-injected (testable without network).

Works well with

Part of a small slate of agent-focused Apify Actors:

  • SERP Topic Gap Monitor — finds topic gaps in search-result coverage and produces scored gap reports.
  • Changelog Triage Agent — monitors product changelogs across services, classifies each new entry as BREAKING / WARNING / INFO, and delivers a de-duplicated triage report so teams catch deprecations before they bite.
  • Docs MCP Server — an MCP server giving AI assistants queryable access to framework documentation (Next.js, React, Tailwind, TypeScript, Prisma).

FAQ and support

Does it work on private repositories? Yes — provide a githubToken with read access to the repo.

Is the verdict subjective or configurable? No. Every verdict comes from the pinned thresholds documented above. Same repo state always yields the same verdict. The raw metrics are returned alongside it so you can audit every call.

Why is totalContributors not a 90-day-active count? GitHub's per-period contributor stats endpoint (/stats/contributors) is unreliable on a cold cache — it returns 202 and rarely warms within a request cycle. Contributors are sourced from the stable all-time /contributors list instead. The field reflects repository-lifetime contributor breadth, not recent activity.

What does the rationale field contain? It names the activity verdict and the weakest non-activity dimension, e.g. "Overall: activity is Healthy; weakest dimension is issues (Moderate)." It's designed for agent logs and human audit trails, not user-facing copy.

The Actor returned a rate-limit error — what do I do? Add a GitHub token. See Input. A classic token with no scopes is free and takes under a minute to create at github.com/settings/tokens.

Found a bug or want a feature? Open an issue on the Actor's Issues tab. Custom variations are available on request.

License

Copyright © 2026 Joe Slade.

Licensed under the GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 (AGPL-3.0). You're free to use, study, modify, and self-host this software; if you run a modified version as a network service, the AGPL requires you to offer your modified source to its users under the same license. For a commercial license not subject to the AGPL's network-copyleft, contact the author.

来源:README.md,提交 a82a60b

工具

0
该服务器需要 API 密钥等凭据,因此 SourceWeft 无法在没有凭据的情况下读取其工具,也未收录。

版本历史

1
  1. v0.1.0最新Sep 16, 2026

评分

已满足适用检查项的 85%

该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。

  • 近 30 天内可连通必需25 分
  • 已声明认证方式必需10 分
  • 已列出工具15 分

    请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 图标10 分
  • 文档15 分
  • 许可证10 分