
Osnova
io.github.getdomovoi由 GitHub 账号 getdomovoi 发布v0.12.0更新于 Oct 24, 2026
Deterministic code map for AI coding agents: a tree-sitter call graph with exact file:line over MCP.
概览
Osnova 用 tree-sitter 把代码仓库索引成确定性的符号与调用图,并通过 MCP 提供查询,让助手获得精确到 file:line 的定义、调用方和测试信息。
- 可以做什么
- 按关键词检索定义,并按符号分组查找正则或字面文本匹配
- 列出单个文件的签名与行范围,并给出目录聚类、枢纽与热点
- 追踪直接或传递的调用方与被调用方,并附上把调用绑定到定义的证据
- 围绕问题收集任务上下文、某次改动的影响范围,以及引用某符号的测试文件
- 核对声称的调用点,并列出没有索引到调用方的定义
- 适用场景
- 适合助手在仓库中修改或重构代码时使用:需要回答谁调用了某个函数、一次改动会影响什么、哪些测试覆盖某个符号,而不是靠文本搜索猜测。对拥有深度适配器的七种语言(TypeScript、JavaScript、Python、Go、Rust、Java、C#)效果最好。
- 运行要求
- 需要 Node.js 22.13 或更高版本;以本地 stdio 进程运行,通常通过 npx 或全局安装启动。可选的 setup 命令会把 MCP 条目、钩子和技能写入 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor、OpenCode、Kilo 或 Pi。无需账号、API 密钥或网络访问;OSNOVA_CACHE_DIR 用于指定缓存目录。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 Osnova,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。
其他 MCP 客户端
参照 仓库 中的启动说明。
README
Osnova
[website getosnova.dev] [npm version] [license Apache-2.0] [ci] [node >=22.13] [M8ven Verified]
A deterministic code map for AI coding agents. Osnova indexes a repository into a symbol and call graph with tree-sitter, then serves it to any MCP client or from the command line. Same input, same output, byte for byte. No embeddings, no telemetry, and no network connection unless you type osnova update-check. Twenty languages, seven of them (TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Rust, Java, C#) with deep adapters.
Osnova is the Slavic word for base or foundation. That is the job: give an agent solid ground to stand on before it edits code.
[A coding agent asks osnova a question and gets back exact file and line, the resolution basis and an omission count; osnova reads a local cache that is built and refreshed from the repository by tree-sitter parsing.]Quick start
Node.js 22.13 or newer. Serve a repository to any MCP client:
After npm install -g @getdomovoi/osnova, one command per kind of agent: claude wires Claude Code (MCP entry, session, prompt and stop hooks, and the skill); agents wires every installed harness that reads AGENTS.md (Codex, OpenCode, Kilo, Pi, Cursor), each with its hooks, plugin or extension, plus one shared skill in ~/.agents/skills/. Each previews its changes; --apply writes them, backing up every file it changes.
Or add the MCP entry by hand; replace osnova with npx -y @getdomovoi/osnova when there is no global install.
What you get back
[A terminal recording: osnova warp lists the five resolved callers of click Context.invoke, each with its receiver hint; grep finds twelve .invoke( lines; osnova plumb checks those twelve and reports five confirmed, six name-only matches on other invoke methods and one line inside a docstring.]osnova warp src/api.ts#refreshWorkspace on this repository, cut to twelve lines (test/docs-readme-warp.test.ts fails when the first two no longer reproduce):
Each confirmed line names the caller, its lines and the evidence that tied the call to this definition: an import binding, a same-file definition, a re-export chain with its hop, or an identified receiver. Calls the index could not tie to a definition are listed apart as unresolved evidence, with the same-name candidates it found and the reason it stopped, so a name match is never mistaken for a caller. The reach line gives exact counts, not scores, and when the list outgrows its budget a capped: line and an omitted: footer count what was left out.
How much of the graph is exact
A call site counts as resolved when the index ties it to one definition through evidence it can name; everything else stays unresolved with a reason. These are the shares on the pinned checkouts under benchmarks/corpora/, recorded in benchmarks/results/resolution-coverage-2026-09-21b.json; the last column leaves out calls through packages outside the repository and calls to builtins, which can never resolve locally, and the reference defines every column.
Per-language rows are in the reference. osnova coverage reports the same numbers for your own repository, per language and per reason.
Resolved is not the same as right, so the call edges are also scored against each language's type checker or compiler. Every call site in six pinned checkouts was sent to the checker for the callee's declarations, and each osnova edge was marked true when the definition it names contains that declaration and false when it does not. Measured at 0.12.0:
Java and C# overloads share one symbol in the index, so a call edge names the overload it binds only when the written argument count fits exactly one declaration of the type, its partial parts and its declared base classes; when it fits several or none, the edge keeps the method and names no declaration, and the oracle leaves it out of both rates (2526 edges on gson, 602 on humanizer). 0.11.0 named the last overload declared for every call, recorded a call at the first line of its call expression, and lost the rest of a C# file after a primary constructor or a raw string; it measured gson 2045 false edges (24.75%), humanizer 617 (8.25%) and ripgrep 112 (2.06%). Of the 29 left on ripgrep, 11 are functions declared once per #[cfg] branch, 6 are a test module's function named like its parent's, and 5 are calls to a local closure or parameter named like a function elsewhere. A call whose target has one declaration that fits keeps it even when a base type is outside the index, where an unseen base overload could be the one the compiler binds; this limit is kept because withdrawing those edges cost 10 recall points on humanizer for one fewer false edge. Every false edge is classified by cause in benchmarks/results/type-checker-oracle-2026-09-30.json with the method and its limits. The scripts that produce these numbers are in benchmarks/oracle/.
Grep versus the graph
The reason to keep a call graph instead of running a text search is not speed. It is that the first regex a person types is wrong more often than it looks, and nobody notices. Nine call-site sets in six languages were verified line by line; each cell shows sites found (precision / recall), and the method lists what each side got wrong.
The graph never returned a site that was not a call of the target. The record is benchmarks/results/grep-vs-graph-2026-09-21.json.
The ten tools
The names play on the foundation image. The CLI uses the same names without the prefix: osnova ground and osnova_ground are the same query.
Every MCP response opens with its index generation, says when the index is partial, and counts what its budget left out; the budgets, and which CLI subcommands carry the generation, are in the reference.
Hooks and clients
One global install serves every repository and every client: one entry in each client's global config, nothing per project, nothing written inside your repository. osnova setup claude and osnova setup agents show the diff and write nothing until --apply; agents skips a harness whose config folder is missing, --only codex,pi narrows it, and a skill or plugin file you edited is kept and reported. --uninstall reverses either family the same way, previewing first. The table lists the per-client form, for one piece at a time. What each hook prints, when it stays quiet, and what the trials measured are in the reference.
The search gate is opt-in: add --gate to osnova setup claude or osnova setup agents, or to the per-client form. It denies a grep, rg, find or search-tool call that reaches code osnova indexes until an osnova tool, or the osnova CLI, has run in the current turn; the deny names the tools to use instead. A search of data, prose or configuration files, of a path outside the repository, or of a command's output after | always runs. Codex and Pi may not report an osnova call to the gate, so there it denies once per turn until it has seen one, then holds as on the other clients. OSNOVA_GATE=off switches it off for a session.
In CI
The action runs osnova settle --base-ref against the pull request base and lists every indexed dependent of the symbols the pull request changed; the report is indexed structural evidence only, so a missing dependent is not proof that nothing depends on the change.
Inputs and the local form are in the reference.
What osnova does not do
- No type inference and no dynamic dispatch. Edges come from syntax: direct calls, imports, name references, declared heritage (a written superclass or interface name) and framework routes (a registration whose receiver binds to a listed framework import, with the verb and the literal path written at the site), with lexical binding and receiver hints for TypeScript, JavaScript and Python. Resolution is heuristic and says so.
- No route table. A
routesedge is one registration site tied to one handler; prefixes from mounts, blueprints and controllers are recorded on their own edges and never composed into a full path, a computed path records no path, and an inline closure or a wrapped handler records the route with no target. Express, NestJS, Flask and FastAPI are read; gin, axum, Django, Spring, ASP.NET, Rails and file-based routers are not. - That boundary has a measured price. Scored against a type checker on two pinned corpora, the calls osnova does not resolve are mostly calls whose receiver type is never written down: 2945 of 6359 missed sites on zod and 164 of 307 on click are a plain name carrying no annotation, and another 1478 on zod are a call result or a property chain. Only 349 missed sites on zod and 10 on click have a type written at the receiver's declaration, and 248 of those 349 are a single library idiom. Resolving every one of them would move recall from 76.9% to 78.2% on zod and from 90.4% to 90.7% on click, so the boundary costs roughly one recall point rather than ten. The full census is in
benchmarks/results/receiver-boundary-census-2026-09-21.json. - No semantic search.
osnova_groundis fielded lexical ranking over definitions. It is fast, deterministic and explainable, and it will not match a paraphrase. - No proof of safety. An empty caller list means the index found no caller, not that none exists.
- No cost claims. Agent trials so far show correctness parity with and without the graph on small tasks. A benchmark that separates the two is in progress.
How it stays honest
- Every query refreshes the index from the working tree first, uncommitted edits included, and reports its generation.
- Every clipped output says how much was clipped. Every ranked list says how many candidates it dropped. Partial indexes say so on every response.
- Every hit carries a
file:linespan, a source hash and an index generation, so you can check what the agent cites. - Every benchmark result in
benchmarks/results/is frozen with its corpus fingerprint, and rejected experiments stay on record next to accepted ones. - The cache verifies a SHA-256 over the structural core before parsing it and hash-checks each source text on read. Nothing is written outside it.
CLI
Every tool is a subcommand: osnova build <root>, osnova warp <symbol>, osnova settle --base-ref <ref>, plus coverage, check, doctor, setup and mcp. The full list is in the reference.
Library
import { buildIndex, ask, callersDetailed, renderMapCard } from "@getdomovoi/osnova". The structured APIs return complete results with omission counts; the text budgets apply to CLI and MCP presentation only. Every export is in the reference.
Contributing
Bug reports, language adapters, benchmark corpora and agent trials are all welcome. Read CONTRIBUTING.md for the gates a change must pass: lint, typecheck, tests, build, perf budgets and package smoke.
Determinism is the core invariant. A change that makes incremental refresh differ from a full rebuild by one byte is a bug.
License
Apache-2.0
Privacy: PRIVACY.md. Security policy and reporting: SECURITY.md.
来源:README.md,提交 dff046f
工具
0版本历史
2- v0.12.0最新Oct 2, 2026
- v0.11.0Oct 1, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 50%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通25 分
请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。
- 已声明认证方式10 分
请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分
