
redline
io.github.gowtham0992由 GitHub 账号 gowtham0992 发布v0.3.0更新于 Oct 24, 2026
Run local prompt regression checks from prompt-response logs in AI coding assistants.
概览
在本地运行提示词回归检查,把已有的提示词-响应日志转成评测套件,并在提示词变更上线前给出行为差异报告。
- 可以做什么
- redline 用你已有的提示词-响应日志生成确定性的回归套件,按行为签名分组并挑选代表性用例。它会重放改动后的提示词或对比候选输出,并指出具体哪里坏了:缺少 JSON 键、丢失 URL 或数字、表格和代码块消失、新增拒答、空回答,或显式要求未满足。报告可输出为 JSON、Markdown、HTML、JUnit 和 Slack 可用 JSON,本地审计日志带哈希链可供校验。MCP 接口提供读取、快速检查、用例查看、评测和报告工具,以及设置与评审类工作流提示。
- 适用场景
- 当你修改提示词、模型或运行器,想要一个快速、确定性的合并门禁来在用户看到之前拦住结构性回归时使用。适合已有提示词日志或可观测性导出、又不想手写评测或让核心信号依赖 LLM 评审的团队。
- 运行要求
- 需要本地 Python 环境;包从 PyPI 安装为 redline-ai,MCP 服务器以本地命令 redline-mcp 通过 stdio 运行。核心回归信号不需要云账号、API 密钥或 LLM 评审。若自行配置可选的评审命令和模型适配器,则需要相应的凭据。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 redline,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。
其他 MCP 客户端
参照 仓库 中的启动说明。
README
redline
Catch prompt regressions before they ship.
Automatic eval suites from the prompt logs you already have.
redline turns real prompt-response logs into local regression tests. It selects representative cases, replays your changed prompt, and shows the behavioral diff before a bad prompt reaches users.
Website · Docs · MCP · MCP Registry · Security · License
[CI] [GitHub Pages] [PyPI] [MCP Registry] [License: MIT] [Stars]
Start Here
Install from PyPI:
Run the guided local app with the public proof loaded:
This generates the public demo reports, opens the local product app, and shows the full import -> suite -> eval -> review workflow. The demo catches ten synthetic regressions without API keys, private logs, a cloud account, or an LLM judge.
Prefer terminal output first:
The demo writes JSON, Markdown, and self-contained HTML reports under
.redline/demo.
Ask redline what to do next:
status reads local config, suites, reports, history, and audit evidence, then
prints the next command instead of leaving you to infer the workflow.
Open the guided local product app on existing reports:
The app is a local, copy-command workflow: import logs, generate suites, run evals, review regressions, record history, and export CI/MCP setup without the browser executing shell commands.
On headless CI or remote shells, skip browser opening and use the printed HTML path:
First-run troubleshooting
redline: command not found: runpython -m pip install redline-ai, then confirmpython -m pip show redline-ai.- App did not open: use
--no-open --out .redline/app.htmland open or upload that file from your environment. - Suite not found: run
redline suite logs/baseline.jsonl --out redline-suite.json. - Validation failed: run
redline validate redline-suite.json --strictand fix the first reported error. - GitHub Action cannot find a suite: commit
redline-suite.jsonor point the actionsuiteinput at your prompt manifest.
Full guide: docs/troubleshooting.md.
Product Proof
redline has two proof paths: a fast first-run demo and a larger public-data dogfood run.
These screenshots are local artifacts from the 100-row internet dogfood run.
What Is redline?
redline is an open-source, local-first eval tool for AI teams. It uses logs you already have: prompts, outputs, support tickets, traces, model responses, and production JSONL exports.
Instead of asking you to hand-write evals first, redline generates the first suite from real behavior. You can then run that suite every time a prompt, model, or runner changes.
No cloud account is required. No manual test writing is required. No LLM judge is required for the core regression signal. The package has zero runtime dependencies, which keeps installs fast and the default supply-chain surface small.
How It Works
redline gives you three primitives that cover the prompt-regression loop:
For a first pass on two local logs, use one command:
It generates a temporary suite, writes JSON/Markdown/HTML reports plus a guided
local app under .redline/quick-check, opens the focused HTML report, and
prints the concrete behavioral diff. Use --open-app when you want the guided
review workflow to open instead of only the focused report.
1. Logs
Start with prompt-response data you already have. Import JSONL, convert exports from tools like Langfuse or Helicone, capture OpenAI/Anthropic SDK calls, or add bounded FastAPI/ASGI middleware.
Use --detect when you do not know the field names. Use --preview when the
export is new to you; it shows mapped, redacted sample rows without writing a
baseline file.
Suite generation prints a readiness score and improvement suggestions. That score measures suite health, not model quality or candidate safety.
2. Suite
redline groups behavior into deterministic signatures and selects representative cases first. You can add pinned edge cases and explicit requirements when a scenario must never be missed.
3. Eval
Replay a changed prompt or compare candidate outputs. redline names the behavior that broke: missing JSON keys, URLs, numbers, tables, code blocks, refusals, empty answers, or requirement failures.
Product Promise
In under five minutes, on a real prompt log, redline should catch one regression you did not want to ship.
That promise is intentionally narrow. redline is not a hosted eval platform, a generic score, or a replacement for human judgment. It is the local safety loop between "I changed the prompt" and "this is safe enough to merge."
Real Workflow
Build a suite from baseline logs:
Evaluate a changed prompt file through your configured runner:
Or compare candidate outputs you already generated:
When redline finds a blocking change, it exits non-zero for CI and prints the reason:
What redline Catches
redline is deterministic and local-first by default. Optional judge commands are
available for ambiguous changed cases, but redline does not call a cloud model
unless you explicitly configure that command.
That is the point. redline is designed to be the fast merge-blocking gate for regressions that break production systems: invalid JSON, missing required fields, lost tables, empty answers, dropped URLs, changed refusal behavior, and explicit requirement failures. LLM judges are useful for semantic review, but they are slower, cost money, and can be flaky in CI. redline keeps the default gate deterministic, reproducible, and cheap, then lets you add judges only where the structural signal is not enough.
Methodology details live in docs/methodology.md.
Suite generation does not run statistical or embedding clustering by default. It groups logs by deterministic behavior signatures, such as prompt intent, response shape, length bucket, and JSON schema. It picks one representative per group first, then adds high-variance edges and evenly spread prompt-diverse samples from large groups when the case budget allows.
Trust Boundary
A green redline run means no configured high-signal structural blockers were found. It does not prove factual correctness, tone, hallucination safety, policy compliance, or subtle reasoning quality.
That boundary is visible in CLI output and reports because over-trusting eval
tools is dangerous. Each reported case includes a confidence and signal
(structural, shallow_semantic, requirement, judge, or human_judgment)
so reviewers can see why redline is making the call. Use requirements or an
optional judge for semantic risks that structural checks cannot prove.
Product Surface
redline is built around the full prompt-regression loop:
redline watch: collect prompt-response observations from logs, Python functions, OpenAI/Anthropic-compatible SDK calls, or ASGI apps, with best-effort common secrets and PII redacted before write by default.redline import: normalize exported team logs into redline JSONL, with the same best-effort redaction enabled by default. Use--no-redactonly for reviewed local-only logs.RedlineMiddleware: capture bounded JSON FastAPI or ASGI request/response pairs locally, with optional skip diagnostics.redline redact --check: scan logs for common secrets and PII, then write a scrubbed copy when needed. Redaction is best-effort pattern matching, not a privacy boundary; review sensitive logs before sharing.redline cluster: inspect deterministic behavior-signature groups before suite generation.redline suite: generate a representative eval suite from baseline logs.redline prompts: scan many prompt files and write or check a versionable prompt-to-suite manifest. Add--check-suitesin CI when every prompt should already have a built and valid suite.redline suite add: pin hand-picked edge cases the algorithm should never miss.redline budget/redline benchmark: estimate suite or prompt-manifest runtime without executing replay commands, write budget artifacts, and optionally fail on a CI time budget. Add--measure-localto time redline's deterministic local diff work on your suite baselines without calling a model.redline eval: replay each suite case through your local app or model runner.redline diff: compare candidate JSONL outputs against the suite baseline.redline markandredline accept: review intentional changes and promote the new baseline.redline require: add deterministic must-include or must-not-include rules.redline audit --verify: inspect the local audit trail and verify the hash chain. Add--expect-last-hashor--expect-entrieswhen you want to prove the local log tail still matches a checkpoint from CI or release evidence. Add--out-checkpoint .redline/audit-checkpoint.jsonto persist that evidence, then--checkpoint .redline/audit-checkpoint.jsonto verify against it later.redline sbom: write CycloneDX SBOM release evidence for security review.redline app: open the guided local product surface for importing logs, generating suites, reviewing regressions, recording history, and wiring CI/MCP.redline status: show project readiness and the next command from local evidence, including the guided app command, first review case, its reason, and why it matters.redline history,redline compare, andredline dashboard: track quality over time and inspect report artifacts locally. The dashboard surfaces feature-level rollups, prompt-level eval rows, benchmark evidence, and a latest-report review queue when reports come from a prompt manifest. It also warns when reports exist without benchmark evidence from the same project.redline summary: inspect suite readiness, or passredline-prompts.jsonto roll up multi-prompt suite coverage, owners, requirements, and missing suites.redline-mcp: let AI coding assistants run checks inside Claude, Codex, Cursor, Kiro, or any MCP client.
For repos with many prompt files, the manifest becomes the eval plan:
Manifest summaries show readiness across every mapped suite, manifest validation checks every mapped suite, manifest benchmarks aggregate runtime budget, and manifest evals print prompt-level rollups before case details. Large repos can see which prompt files or feature folders need attention first.
When mapped suites are valid, the check prints ready commands such as:
Connect Your App
Any command that reads a prompt from stdin and prints a response to stdout can be a redline runner:
Built-in adapters cover provider-neutral stdio, OpenAI, Anthropic, LiteLLM, HTTP APIs, Python chains, JSONL log imports, and OpenAI/Anthropic SDK capture:
Runner details live in docs/runners.md. Log import and SDK
capture adapters are for building suites from real observations, not for
redline eval replay. The JSONL log adapter includes Langfuse, Helicone,
LangSmith, and Braintrust presets for exported observability logs.
AI Assistant Native
redline ships a local Model Context Protocol server:
Use docs/mcp.md to wire redline into an MCP client. The MCP
surface exposes safe capture-readiness, privacy, audit, scale, read,
quick-check, case-inspection, eval, and report tools plus workflow prompts like
setup_redline_project, check_prompt_change, build_suite_from_logs, and
review_candidate_outputs.
It can also list or copy runner adapters and optional judge templates during setup.
The only mutating MCP tool is guarded: redline_mark requires allow_write: true
and a note before it records an intentional case judgment. Baseline promotion
stays CLI-only.
CI And GitHub
Create config plus a GitHub Actions workflow:
Use redline as a composite GitHub Action from another repo:
For multi-prompt repos, point suite at redline-prompts.json. The action
checks every mapped suite with redline prompts --check --check-suites, runs a
manifest-wide benchmark, then runs the manifest eval.
The action writes JSON, full Markdown, concise PR-comment Markdown, HTML, JUnit,
Slack-ready JSON, history, dashboard, and audit checkpoint artifacts under
.redline/, appends benchmark, concise eval, and trend summaries to the GitHub
step summary, and exits with the eval gate status. Set benchmark-max-seconds
when a suite should fail CI if its worst-case runtime budget grows too far.
Reports
Every diff and eval run can write:
- JSON for machines and dashboards
- full Markdown for detailed summaries, including prompt-manifest rollups
- concise PR-comment Markdown for merge-review surfaces
- self-contained HTML for side-by-side inspection, including feature and prompt eval tables
- JUnit XML for CI test reporting
- Slack Block Kit JSON for CI bots or webhook integrations you control
- GitHub annotations for changed or blocking cases
Example:
Optional Judges
Use judges only where structural checks are not enough. redline sends only
ambiguous changed cases to the configured command as JSON on stdin:
Repo examples and installable templates:
- examples/judge_changed.py
- examples/openai_judge.sh
- examples/anthropic_judge.sh
- examples/litellm_judge.sh
- examples/judges/support_rubric.md
- examples/judges/extraction_rubric.md
- examples/judges/safety_rubric.md
Calibration guidance lives in docs/judges.md.
Config
redline init writes redline.json with a $schema reference for editor
autocomplete. Important keys:
Check setup before relying on a suite:
doctor shows whether the suite has explicit requirements or recorded
judgments before you rely on structural checks in CI.
summary reports a suite readiness score, behavior-group/case coverage, owner
coverage, accepted baseline history, approver coverage, and explicit guard
coverage for cases with requirements or recorded judgments so teams can review
suite readiness before CI.
dashboard also shows audit checkpoint evidence when .redline/audit-checkpoint.json
is present.
Dogfood Assets
The public fixture is synthetic, shaped after public instruction/chat dataset patterns, and documented in examples/public_dogfood_sources.md.
For AI-assistant session dogfood, use
docs/ai-session-dogfood-prompts.jsonl
and normalize raw exports with scripts/normalize_ai_session_logs.py.
Reproducible dogfood case studies live in
docs/case-studies.md.
Public dataset candidates for internet dogfood are ranked in
docs/internet-dogfood-sources.md.
From a repo checkout, record the public demo:
Development
Before cutting a release or asking someone else to try a branch:
Project Docs
- docs/release.md: package, tag, PyPI, and MCP Registry release flow
- docs/launch.md: public alpha launch plan
- docs/troubleshooting.md: first-run and CI failure recovery
- docs/import-guides.md: Langfuse, Helicone, OpenAI chat, Datadog, and custom log import recipes
- docs/methodology.md: behavior grouping, case selection, scoring, and trust boundaries
- docs/calibration.md: tiny fixture showing regressions, changed cases, and neutral cases
- docs/commands.md: compact CLI command reference
- docs/real-log-dogfood.md: redaction-first real-log test protocol
- docs/dogfood.md: first-user dogfood protocol
- docs/case-studies.md: reproducible dogfood case studies
- docs/internet-dogfood-sources.md: public prompt-response datasets for dogfood sourcing
- docs/runners.md: runner and log adapter setup
- docs/mcp.md: MCP server setup
- docs/benchmarks.md: performance contract and CI benchmark artifacts
- docs/repository.md: GitHub repository controls
- scripts/README.md: maintainer script index
- CONTRIBUTING.md: contributor validation
- SECURITY.md: privacy and vulnerability reporting
- LICENSE: MIT open source license
Website source for GitHub Pages lives in site/ and deploys from the
committed static assets on main.
来源:README.md,提交 012d697
工具
0版本历史
1- v0.3.0最新Sep 16, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 50%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通25 分
请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。
- 已声明认证方式10 分
请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分