
Heliograph
io.github.heliograph-io由 GitHub 账号 heliograph-io 发布v0.4.3更新于 Oct 24, 2026
Run commands on a machine you cannot SSH into. Air-gapped, bastion-only, change-controlled.
概览
Heliograph 让助手向无法登录的机器发布命令,并取回带时间戳的执行日志。
- 可以做什么
- 通过选定传输方式(git、中继、文件共享、bundle、对象存储)向远端 station 发布步骤请求,并在近端跟踪状态与日志,每行带 UTC 时间戳,并可做间隔分析找出卡住的位置。把同一套 CLI 流程以 stdio 上的 MCP 工具提供,工具调用只发布请求,是否执行仍由 station 决定。引导并植入 station 载荷、初始化传输方式,并输出运维方在远端需要做的设置。诊断当前机器上该流程能否跑通。
- 适用场景
- 适用于生产环境或客户管理的环境处于气隙隔离、位于堡垒机之后,或因政策而非能力被限制访问,而你需要真实命令输出而非截图的情况。也面向需要原始证据而非他人总结的 AI 编码代理。
- 运行要求
- 以本地 stdio 进程运行,可通过 npx(npm 包)或单个静态二进制;README 的安装方式为下载发布版或 Go 安装。远端需要植入 station:Bash 4+ 及 git 和 GNU coreutils,Windows 上为 PowerShell 5.1,并需要双方都能访问的传输通道(git 主机、中继、文件共享、bundle 或对象存储)。清单未声明任何凭据或环境变量。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 Heliograph,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。
其他 MCP 客户端
参照 仓库 中的启动说明。
README
heliograph
Remote, captured, auditable execution on a machine you cannot log into
A free, open-source tool by DBHQ
Someone can reach the machine. You cannot, and you are the one who knows what to ask it. heliograph runs that gap as a loop rather than a relay: you publish a step, it runs on the far side, and the whole run comes back as a log with every line timestamped in UTC, whether it passed or failed.
The three ways across
heliograph carries a request to a machine you cannot log into, and brings the log back. There are three ways across the gap, and they differ in one thing: what stays held, and for how long.
Beacon. You cannot reach the machine and it cannot reach you - but you can both reach one agreed place. You leave the request there and walk away. Later the machine passes by, picks it up, runs it, and leaves the log for you to collect. Nobody is ever connected; a message waits in the middle. It is the safest of the three, because the code being run is already on the far side and can be read before anything happens - and the slowest, because you wait for the next visit.
Flare. You can reach the machine's door directly. You knock, hand over the request, wait on the step while it runs, and take the log away in the same visit. Nothing waits in the middle and no line stays open. Faster, because there is no pickup to wait for. The trade: you bring the code with you, so the machine trusts the door rather than vetting the code in advance.
Beam. You and the machine bring up a connection and hold it open. Either side can speak at any moment and the other hears it at once, until you hang up. A real session, not a message or a knock - and the most exposed, because while the line is open anything can travel down it. You turn it on deliberately and close it when you are done. It is designed, and not yet a transport you can pick.
In one line: a beacon holds a message, a flare is a single exchange, a beam holds the connection itself.
Does this sound familiar
- You have no SSH access to production, and you are not going to be given any.
- The environment is air-gapped, or behind a bastion, a jump host or a VPN you are not on.
- It is a client-owned or customer-managed estate. Only their staff can log in.
- Access is blocked by policy, not capability: restricted, change-controlled, somebody else's sign-off.
- You are on the fourth round of "can you run this and paste the output", and what came back was a screenshot of half a terminal.
- You are an AI coding agent driving an investigation, and you need the evidence rather than somebody's summary of it.
If you can just SSH in, you do not need this.
Three roles, one boundary
The boundary is the gap, and the layout states it once:
Nothing is ever installed on the far side. The station is plain text you
can read before you run - bash 4+, or PowerShell 5.1 for a Windows estate that
has no bash and will not be given any - and no Go will ever appear under
station/ beyond the one file that lets the CLI carry the payload. CI
enforces it. That constraint is the entire proposition on a locked-down
box where installing anything is its own change request.
Install
A single static binary, no runtime. Checksums are published with each release, and the binary carries the station payload it was built with.
The build is reproducible: packaging/reproduce.sh v0.4.3 rebuilds every
released artefact from the tag and arrives at the published hashes, so "the
binary in the path is the source you read" is something you check rather than
something we say. Full account, including what is not yet covered, at
docs.heliograph.io/provenance.
The agent skill - the same loop, driven from Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and friends:
Use
The operator's whole job is what plant prints: clone the transport repo,
run ./start.sh, walk away. The loop is read-only unless the operator said
otherwise: every step declares itself (# heliograph-mode: read-only or
action), one that declares neither does not run, and the station refuses an
action unless it was started with --allow-actions. It will not run as root
either.
For an agent, heliograph mcp is the same CLI as typed MCP tools:
The gates do not move. A tool call publishes a request; the station still decides whether to run it.
--gaps is the one worth knowing about. "Scan the timestamp column for gaps
before reading the content" is the most valuable instruction in the method,
and it is arithmetic:
The gap belongs to the line before it: the stamp on a line is when that line was produced, so a long interval means the operation named on the preceding line is what took the time. A log where every line carries the same timestamp is reported as an error, not as "no gaps".
Status
A transport that works on one side of the gap is not a transport, so this table names both sides. Git and relay are driven end to end by the CLI and proved in CI; what the others still need, and in what order, is the roadmap.
This table was wrong for some time, and the reason is worth keeping. Until 21 Sep 2026 it said relay was "half a transport" that "no CLI command can select", that the station had no transport for share, bundle or object store, and that the PowerShell station was "planned". All four were false against the code in this repository. The documentation site did not drift, because
transports_doc_test.gobinds it toinitTransportsand to the station transport directories - and nothing bound this file. It is bound now, byTestReadmeTransportClaimsMatchTheCode.The cost was not confined here:
skills.dbhq.uk/heliographdeliberately published the more conservative claim because this README contradicted the documentation site, and recorded that it would stay understated "until heliograph settles which is true". This is that settlement.
The relay
Both sides dial out over ordinary HTTPS, so an estate needs no git host, no storage account and no VNet. Hosted, and self-hostable from the same binary.
Not yet usable end to end. The station side is complete and the server is deployed; no CLI command can select it, so the near side is the missing half.
The relay cannot read your logs, and cannot make a station run anything.
That second half is the one that matters: a relay able to forge a request
would be code execution inside every estate at once. Content is end-to-end
encrypted with keys the relay never holds, and every message is signed.
Nothing bespoke - age primitives plus
Ed25519. The full account, including what DBHQ can and cannot honestly claim,
is in
docs/specs/2026-09-06-relay-encryption-design.md.
The relay server is its own repository,
heliograph-io/heliograph-relay,
because it holds no keys and must be publicly, obviously incapable of reading
anything it carries.
What the beam is, and what it costs
The beam is designed and not yet built; what follows is what it will do when it lands.
Two of the three shapes never hold a connection open. A beacon leaves a message where both sides can reach it, and needs nothing to be reachable, ever - no inbound port, no endpoint, no tunnel. A flare knocks, waits and leaves; what it does not do is hold the line open once the answer is back, and between the two of them an estate that will not have a held-open line at all still gets the whole job done.
The beam does hold a line open, live and two-way, and that is a tunnel. A blue team will read a held-open channel as one, because it is one. So it is off unless it is explicitly enabled on both ends, it is sealed and signed, and the station refuses to establish one unless it was started to allow it. Where an estate forbids a reverse connection, the beacon and the flare are the answer and nothing is lost but latency.
Every command still runs on the far side because someone with legitimate access chose to let it.
Layout
The two halves used to be separate repositories, split along Go-versus-bash
rather than along the gap, and every reader had to work out which half they
were looking at. dbhq-uk/heliograph-skill was merged in on 2026-09-08 with
its full history; the reasoning is in
docs/specs/2026-09-08-station-and-skill-merge.md.
That repository was deleted on 2026-09-17 and the name is not in use. It stayed public and archived after the merge, and an archived repository is read-only rather than unreachable: it still cloned, its install.sh still ran, and the station in it had no request-env guard at all (heliograph-cloud#274). Its history is kept privately; this repository's own history carries the merge.
Development
ROADMAP.md is where the work stands: what heliograph is for,
what works today, and the epics for now, next and later. Known defects are
issues labelled type: bug.
CONTRIBUTING.md covers working on it and
AGENTS.md is for an AI agent doing so. The skill is
skills/heliograph/SKILL.md;
docs/dev-setup.md sets it up from source with live
edits.
Licence
Apache 2.0 (c) 2026 DBHQ Consulting Ltd, and the prose under site/content/ is
CC BY 4.0. Relicensed from MIT on 2026-09-17; every commit
up to and including b689f9c stays available under MIT for ever. NOTICE
says why Apache rather than MIT, and what the change does not take away.
The relay is a separate repository and a separate licence: heliograph-relay is FSL-1.1-ALv2, fair source, converting to Apache 2.0 two years after each release. No shape is ever gated: beacon, flare and beam all work on a relay you host yourself.
Full statement, including the professional-services grant and its honest limit: https://docs.heliograph.io/licence
来源:README.md,提交 7f1c507
工具
0版本历史
1- v0.4.3最新Sep 17, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 50%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通25 分
请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。
- 已声明认证方式10 分
请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分