
AVCS
io.github.izagood由 GitHub 账号 izagood 发布v0.42.0更新于 Oct 24, 2026
AI-native version control where intent, operation, evidence and decision are first-class objects.
概览
AVCS 是一套 AI 原生的版本控制系统,通过 MCP 让助手提出操作、附加证据并一步落地改动,无需 git 式变基。
- 可以做什么
- 引导助手走完 AVCS 工作流,并基于意图构建上下文,包括来源、既往决策与实时风险。针对文件提出语义操作,而不是直接写入最终文件。运行校验并把签名证据附加到操作上。一次调用完成落地(推送、检查点、集成),返回裁决或冲突包。查看历史、归属、差异与冲突,并记录决策。
- 适用场景
- 当你希望 AI 助手在 AVCS 仓库中工作,把意图、操作、证据和决策作为一等对象追踪,并让并发编辑按确定性策略而非冲突标记解决时使用。它是研究原型,适合试验而非关键生产历史。
- 运行要求
- 以本地进程方式通过 npx 从 npm 包 @izagood/avcs 启动,需要 Node 22.6 或更高版本。目标仓库由环境变量 AVCS_REPO 指定,默认使用客户端工作目录。需在本机配置签名身份。未声明任何认证。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 AVCS,将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Desktop only,通过 STDIO。 STDIO 服务会启动本地进程,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面宿主。
其他 MCP 客户端
参照 仓库 中的启动说明。
README
AVCS — Agentic Version Control System
An AI-native version control system for humans and AI agents working concurrently.
[CI] [status] [node] [runtime deps] [license]
An agent should not spend its context on version control. That is the whole design goal, and it is measured rather than asserted — here is what the same work costs an agent:
[Agent tokens to land a change after another PR merged first: git costs 446, 5,249 and 18,922 tokens on 0.7 KB, 8 KB and 30 KB files, while AVCS stays flat at 279]git's recovery cost tracks the size of the file — a conflict is bytes inside it, so the agent reads the whole module and writes the whole module back to change one line. AVCS's tracks the size of the change: a conflict is an object naming the two contending operations, so it stays flat as the file grows. There is also no branch to rewrite and nothing to force-push, which is why the round trips differ — and that is one cycle, repeated for every PR that merges ahead of yours. Across the file sizes measured the saving is 37–99%.
None of this is a compression trick bolted on afterwards. It falls out of storing the operation graph instead of snapshots: there is no rebase to perform, so there is nothing to re-read. Method, caveats and the harness that produced the rebase numbers: avcs-demo → what it costs an agent in tokens. The schema figures are the advertised MCP surface itself — 35 KB of JSON against 14 KB, at the usual ≈4 bytes per token.
Git records when the code changed. AVCS records who changed it, with what intent, on what evidence, and through which conflict decisions the code reached its current state.
AVCS is a new, deliberately Git-incompatible version control system built for a world where humans and many AI agents edit the same codebase concurrently. It drops the commit / branch / merge / conflict-marker model and instead stores intent, session, operation, evidence, and decision as first-class objects. The code tree is not the source of truth — it is a projection computed by deterministically reducing the operation graph:
The same objects + the same policy + the same materializer produce the same tree on any replica. Merging is not text selection; it is a pure, deterministic reduction.
Status: research prototype. The implementation is real and test-covered, but every phase is built to a working-MVP depth (language-neutral text 3-way merge, ed25519 signing). Structure-aware merge, semantic-break detection, multi-signature trust, and hardened distributed sync are tracked on the roadmap.
Jump in: install · your first five minutes · work against a server · connect an agent over MCP · agent quickstart walkthrough
See it run first: izagood/avcs-demo — a runnable
demo of the question this design answers: what happens when two agents edit the same file at
the same time? One ./demo.sh walks a stale-head land that is absorbed instead of rejected,
a same-file auto-merge with no rebase, and a same-line collision that becomes a signed
decision rather than conflict markers.
Why not a layer on top of git?
Every "AI + git" tool eventually stores the agent's context beside the history — commit trailers, PR comments, sidecar JSON. AVCS exists because these objects have to be load-bearing — consumed by the merge machinery itself — and bolted onto git they can't be:
- Evidence must gate merging. git happily merges a behavior change with no passing test. In AVCS that change is graded L3 — blocked by the reducer until trusted evidence lands, and an operation's own author vouching for it does not count.
- Decisions must outlive the merge.
git mergeresolves a conflict by emitting bytes; the choice and its rationale evaporate. An AVCSdecisionis a signed object — recallable later, and prior decisions bias future auto-resolution. - Concurrent edits must not degrade into conflict markers. Two agents editing one
file meet a deterministic policy reduction (L0–L4 below), not
<<<<<<<in the tree plus a human holding the pieces. - Intent must travel with the work. A trailer is inert text. An
intent(goal + constraints + allowed scope) is what sessions open against, what leases and contention checks are scoped by, and whatavcs.context.buildhands the next agent.
git stores snapshots and leaves the merge to text selection; AVCS stores the operation graph and makes the merge a computation over intent, evidence, and decisions. That is why it is deliberately git-incompatible — these objects are the engine, not metadata. (git interop still exists, as a bridge: docs/14, docs/20.)
Core principles
How it works
Every meaningful thing is a content-addressed, append-only object. Code is a projection over the operation DAG, never stored as commits.
…plus blob for raw content and the governance objects (lease, membership, protection, promotion, redaction, override, approval, line, integration) used by the multi-machine and security phases.
Conflict resolution levels
AVCS never falls back to last-write-wins for code. Contending operations are graded and resolved with a recorded rationale:
- L0 / L1 — different entities, or disjoint line regions in the same file → auto-merge
- L2 — concurrent edits that overlap the same line region → policy auto-decision (human-preferred, trust-weighted); the auto-decision is itself recorded in
autoDecisions - L3 — a behavior change with no trusted evidence → blocked
- L4 — a public-API break → requires a human decision, routed to the scope's owners
Evidence trust matters: an operation's own author cannot vouch for it. Evidence-gating and the passing-test bonus only count evidence produced by a non-authoring, trusted actor (CI bot / human).
What works today
The reducer and policy engine are the foundation; the higher phases build distributed collaboration, security, and observability on top.
Foundation (Phases 1–6)
- Storage core — append-only, content-addressed object store (
.avcs/objects) - Deterministic reducer + policy engine — the L0–L4 conflict grading above, with a priority ladder, bounded reliability nudges, and auditable auto-decisions
- Language-neutral text merge (Phase 2) — a deterministic N-way line-level 3-way merge (
src/merge/merge3.ts), so edits to disjoint regions of one file auto-merge regardless of language; overlapping edits become a policy-resolved conflict region. No language parsing in the core - Cryptographic trust (Phase 3) — ed25519-signed evidence/decision; forged signatures fail the trust gate. Real validation runner,
WorkLease,RepairContext - Decision memory (Phase 4) — recallable prior human decisions (
recallDecisions) and distilled "learned policies" that bias future auto-resolution - Policy depth (Phase 5) — code-owner routing and bounded reliability learning
- Release & provenance (Phase 6) — verified checkpoints + CycloneDX SBOM + signed artifacts
Collaboration, scale & security (Phases 7–12)
- Phase 7 — multi-machine: membership/roles (signed key federation),
pull(object gossip; two replicas converge to the sametreeHash), protection +finalizeCAS (non-fast-forward rejected, so a stale push can't overwrite fresh history) - Phase 8 — lineage: long-lived divergent lines (e.g. v1.x ∥ v2.x, same path, different content, zero conflict),
portOp(backport = cherry-pick) - Phase 9 — scale: entity index,
materializeAt(time travel), chunked large-blob storage with dedup - Phase 10 — observability:
blame(who/why),logP, deterministicbisect,diff - Phase 11 — external contributions: quarantine tier +
promote+ untrusted-CI gate - Phase 12 — security:
redact(byte-eviction of leaked secrets, oid preserved), break-glassoverride, forward-only rollback - Local undo (docs/23) —
avcs undo [--last | <op-oid>…] [--purge] [--no-git]: drop local ops from the view, and with--purgeevict the bytes they uniquely reference. Refuses once the ops have been pushed, because that case belongs to admin-gatedredact. In a git-bridged repo--purgeclears the git copy too — but only where it can prove the rewrite is safe and local (nothing on a remote, the commits at the tip, no other work in them, a clean tree); anywhere else it still does the AVCS side and names precisely what is left and the one command that fits, up to and including "rotate the credential, it is already published" - The working tree is genuinely derived —
checkoutrecords what it projected (.avcs/projection.json, path → blob oid) and, on the next projection, removes the files the target view no longer contains. Files it never wrote — build output, ignored files, anything you just created — are untouched, and a projected file you have since edited is kept and named in a notice rather than silently overwritten. Switching views therefore yields that view, not the union of every view projected before it
Branches become views, commits become checkpoints, tags become releases. Agents drive AVCS through a first-class MCP server (39 tools, or 13 with --profile core); humans use the CLI. Since Phase 14 the server runs an integration queue (avcs submit, POST /integrate): a stale submission is never told "head moved — pull first" — the server re-reduces the frontier union on the submitter's behalf, and the outcome is always a verdict (advanced | conflict repair packet | needs_evidence — one validation run, never a redo | queued). Since Phase 15 replicas converge live (GET /events long-poll, avcs sync --watch, contention early-warning), and Phase 16 completed the MCP surface: avcs.sync.land lands work in one call, avcs.context.build assembles bounded working context with deterministic truncation, and subscribable resources notify a client when the head moves — see docs/17 and docs/18. The behavior is pinned by an 827-test contract suite (test/*.test.ts, all green) and tsc is clean.
Install
Requires Node ≥ 22.6 — AVCS runs TypeScript directly via type stripping, so there is no build step and zero runtime dependencies.
AVCS is published on npm as @izagood/avcs. Install it globally to get the avcs command on your PATH:
Or run it without installing, straight from the registry:
Your first five minutes (no server, no git required)
AVCS is local-first: a repo on your disk is a complete VCS — history, blame, undo, releases — with no server and no git anywhere. In an existing project directory:
Two things to notice: commit is not a git commit — it authors semantic operations,
the real history; and the working tree is a projection you re-materialize with
checkout, not the source of truth. avcs help lists every command.
Signing identity
An avcs identity belongs to you and this machine, not to one checkout — the same scope as
~/.ssh or ~/.gnupg. Provision it once and every repo on the box can sign with it:
The keystore is $AVCS_CONFIG_HOME, else $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/avcs, else ~/.avcs. A repo may
keep its own key in <store>/private/ to sign as a different actor (a CI checkout, a second
identity); that override is read first. See 12 — Local production.
Your id is your identity — trust, keys and governance key on it. For attribution and contact, set a display name and email the git way; they ride in every operation you author (so blame and history can show and reach you) but never gate anything:
These live in .avcs/config.json; AVCS_AUTHOR_NAME / AVCS_AUTHOR_EMAIL / AVCS_ACTOR
override per invocation.
Work against a server
A repo stays useful with no server at all. Once there is one — avcs serve,
avcs-server, or any conforming implementation — the
whole exchange is a handful of commands:
land is the one to reach for. A stale head is absorbed by the server's integration queue
rather than bounced back as "head moved — pull first", so the outcome is landed or a
conflict packet for a human to decide — never a redo. avcs remote add <name> <url>
registers additional servers; avcs sync <name> picks one.
Reading from CI, without handing out a signing key. The default credential is an
AVCS-Sig signature over the canonical request, which covers the method and the body — a
captured read credential cannot be replayed as a write. That is the right default, and a
poor fit for an ephemeral reader. So a read also accepts a bearer token:
The token is read-only by construction: the write path takes no token parameter at all, so a leaked variable can clone but can never push, finalize, or rewrite policy. A held signing key always wins over the token, so a signed reader is never silently downgraded. The token's format, lifetime and scope belong to the server — see docs/26.
Connect agents (MCP)
Agents drive AVCS through its MCP server. Once avcs is installed, register it with the Claude Code CLI:
avcs mcp itself is the stdio server agents spawn (target repo = $AVCS_REPO, else the cwd). To register by hand — or for any other MCP client — point it at avcs mcp:
The MCP SDK ships as an optionalDependency, so a normal install includes it; no extra step needed.
Every tool answers compactly by default — pretty-printing is an opt-in verbose flag on the
call, because whitespace an agent never reads is still whitespace it pays for.
The loop an agent runs — five moves, and landing is one call:
sync.land is the point: a stale head is absorbed for you, so the outcome is either landed or a conflict packet for a human — never "pull and redo". Add --profile core to advertise only these 13 tools instead of all 39 — the schema an agent is handed drops from 35 KB to 14 KB, on every session:
To upgrade later, re-run npm install -g @izagood/avcs@latest; to remove it, npm uninstall -g @izagood/avcs (your repo data is left intact).
Install from source
Prefer to track the latest main, or hack on AVCS itself? The bundled install.sh clones the repo and wires up an avcs launcher that points back at the checkout, so updating is just git pull — no reinstall needed.
That one-liner clones the repo to ~/.local/share/avcs (override with --dir/AVCS_HOME) and installs an avcs launcher to ~/.local/bin. Re-running it updates the checkout in place. Already have a clone? Run the installer from inside it instead:
The launcher lands in ~/.local/bin (override with --bin-dir <dir> or AVCS_BIN_DIR). If ~/.local/bin isn't on your PATH yet, the installer prints the line to add.
Other install-from-source options:
If node isn't on your PATH at runtime, point the launcher at one with AVCS_NODE=/path/to/node.
Use as a library (@izagood/avcs)
A hosting server (e.g. avcshub) can depend on the AVCS core as a versioned package. Development and tests run the raw .ts via type stripping, but npm publish ships a tsc-compiled dist/ (JS + type declarations via tsconfig.build.json), so consumers import it with no build tooling of their own.
Entry points: . (root barrel) · ./hub · ./hub/client · ./store · ./identity · ./types.
Releasing: bump package.json's version in a PR and merge it to main — .github/workflows/release.yml detects the new version, runs npm publish (with provenance), tags the commit vX.Y.Z, and cuts a GitHub Release. The publish steps are guarded by a registry check, so package.json edits that don't change the version are no-ops. Every PR also runs a release dry run (npm run build + npm pack --dry-run) in CI to catch packaging regressions before merge. Requires an NPM_TOKEN repository secret with publish rights to the @izagood scope.
Build your own server
AVCS is a protocol, not a service. A conforming server needs three endpoints:
Everything else is optional. The client reads capability flags from GET /version, and when a
flag is absent — or an endpoint answers 404/405/501 — it falls back on its own. A
read-only mirror serving only the first two is a legitimate server; so is one without the
integration queue, without batching, without long-poll.
That is deliberate: avcs is a public client against deployments it does not control.
Two documents are the contract:
- 26 — Server protocol — every endpoint's request/response shape, status codes, capability negotiation, the SSH-style request signature, and a table of the mistakes server authors actually make.
- 24 — Canonical interop — how an oid is computed. Read this first if you are not writing JavaScript: an object's identity is the sha256 of its canonical JSON, and three parts of that canonicalization are easy to get subtly wrong. Diverge and you do not get an error — you get two honest implementations that never converge.
Validate your canonicalizer against spec/canonical-vectors.json
(10 accepted, 4 rejected, each with the expected canonical bytes and oid) before anything else.
Then point the conformance suite at your server:
It reports which levels apply — core (the three endpoints, and a clone that reproduces the
source treeHash), then sync, governance, queue as your capability flags allow. A level
you do not advertise is skipped, not failed: a partial server is a legitimate one.
What core checks is object replication and clone-ability, not server-side projection.
The treeHash comparison runs between two clients — one that pushed, one that cloned — so it
establishes that your server returned faithfully what it was given, not that your server can
itself derive a tree from those objects. A server that stores and serves objects correctly but
never materializes anything passes core, and that is intended: projection is a client
concern, and a server that does it too is doing more than the level asks.
Three implementations to start from:
-
examples/server.py— a complete conforming core-level server in one stdlib-only Python file. No JS, no avcs library: its only dependencies are docs/24 and the golden vectors, which is the point — runpython3 examples/server.py --selftestto see the vectors check its canonicalizer, then point the conformance suite at it. -
avcs-server — a standalone, self-hostable, multi-repo server built on this library. Conformance-verified at
core; run it, read it, or fork it as the starting point for your own deployment. -
startHubin this repository — the reference: single-repo, no multi-tenancy, but it serves the whole protocol. Read it as the spec's executable form, or run it withavcs serve.
Running from a checkout
Hacking on AVCS itself? Every command runs straight from the checkout with node:
Type checking (
tsc --noEmit) needsnpm install; the runtime itself has no dependencies.
Code map
Design docs
- 00 — Overview & principles
- 01 — Architecture
- 02 — Object model
- 03 — Reducer & conflict levels
- 04 — Policy engine
- 05 — Views · Checkpoints · Releases
- 06 — MCP / Skill interface
- 07 — Roadmap
- 08 — Governance & consensus (avcshub)
- 09 — Git/GitHub use-case coverage & design evolution
- 10 — Production design plan
- 11 — Incremental reduce
- 12 — Local production
- 13 — Hub production
- 14 — Git bridge (real-world compatibility)
- 15 — Language-neutral core
- 16 — Workspace scope
- 17 — Sync convergence: integration queue & live sync (design)
- 18 — MCP as the first-class connection
- 19 — Entity identity: rename × edit commutativity
- 20 — Workspace-first git bridge
- 21 — shared-paths: build environments shared across workspaces
- 22 — Region policy arbitration (design)
- 23 — Local undo: the pre-share escape hatch
- 24 — Canonical interop: the language-neutral canonicalization subset
- 25 — Agent quickstart: driving AVCS from Claude Code (MCP)
- 26 — Server protocol: what a conforming server must serve
Contributing
This is an early-stage research prototype and the design is still moving. Issues and discussion are welcome — if you're proposing a change, the design docs above are the best starting point for the rationale behind the current model. Please run npm test and npm run typecheck before opening a pull request.
Filing an issue
Hit something you'd like changed while using AVCS? Please open an issue rather than sending free-form feedback — structured reports are far easier to act on. Two templates are provided under .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE:
- 🔧 Change request — propose a change to existing behavior, the CLI/MCP interface, defaults, or docs.
- 🐞 Bug report — something behaves incorrectly, crashes, or produces a non-deterministic result.
🌐 Any language is welcome. File your issue in whatever language you're most comfortable with — English, 한국어, 日本語, etc. Maintainers will translate as needed; don't let language be a barrier to reporting.
Every push and pull request to main runs CI (.github/workflows/ci.yml): npm ci → npm run typecheck → npm test on Node 22.x and 24.x. PRs are merged only when CI is green.
License
Licensed under the Apache License 2.0. Copyright © 2026 jaebin lee. See NOTICE for attribution.
来源:README.md,提交 37d0221
工具
0版本历史
1- v0.42.0最新Sep 16, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 50%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通25 分
请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。
- 已声明认证方式10 分
请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分