
cambium (remote)
io.github.jarmstrong158由 GitHub 账号 jarmstrong158 发布v0.2.0更新于 Oct 24, 2026
Cloudflare Worker for read-only recall of cambium knowledge. MCP 2026-07-28, dual-era.
概览
一个只读的 Cloudflare Worker,让助手从 cambium 的 git 知识文件中召回已晋升的团队与组织知识。
- 可以做什么
- 按查询检索团队与组织知识,可限定范围与结果数量,匹配度不足时明确弃答。查看该 Worker 被配置读取哪些内容,以及各范围下有效条目数量。知识通过 GitHub Contents API 从项目仓库 cambium 分支和专用组织知识仓库中的 knowledge.json 文件读取。个人未晋升的知识无法远程访问。
- 适用场景
- 当你希望 claude.ai(包括手机端)中的助手能用上已晋升的团队或组织知识,又不想运行桌面版 cambium 服务器时使用。若召回结果为空,先调用状态查询。
- 运行要求
- 需要已部署的 Cloudflare Worker 端点;连接器 URL 内含作为凭据的路径令牌。部署需设置 AUTH_TOKEN 密钥和具有元数据与内容读取权限的 GitHub 令牌(GH_PAT),并配置组织仓库与团队范围相关变量。
安装
在 SourceWeft 中
- 打开 控制台中的 cambium (remote),将其添加到工作区。
- 为需要使用其工具的对话启用该服务。
Web executable,通过 Streamable HTTP。 远程服务在工作区中配置后即可从网页运行时运行。
其他 MCP 客户端
参照 仓库 中的启动说明。
README
cambium-remote
Part of the xylem stack.
A Cloudflare Worker MCP server that makes cambium's promoted knowledge recallable from claude.ai (including mobile) — read-only.
Local cambium is a desktop stdio server; its team knowledge lives on a
cambium branch of each project repo and its org knowledge lives in a
dedicated knowledge repo — both plain knowledge.json files in git. This Worker
reads those files through the GitHub Contents API and serves recall() over
them, the same pattern agentsync-remote
uses for the coordination board.
Read-only by design. It exposes recall and status. It does not
distill, endorse, or promote (those are CAS writes / the generalization
gate — desktop-only), and recall here does not increment recall counts (so
it never feeds promotion). Local (personal, unpromoted) scope is desktop-only
and not reachable remotely — only the promoted team and org tiers are.
Tools
recall(query, scope?, limit?)— search team + org knowledge.scope:auto(default, team+org) |team|org. Abstains withno_confident_matchbelow the relevance floor, exactly like local cambium.status()— what the Worker is configured to read and how many active items each scope holds. Call it first if recall looks empty.
⚠️ Trust model — read this before pointing it at an org
Team "scope" is a read selector, not an authorization control. It answers "where do we look", not "who is allowed to tell us things". Nothing in this Worker checks provenance, signatures, or authorship of the knowledge it serves.
In the default TEAM_SCOPE_MODE = "discover" mode, the entire membership test
for team scope is:
does this repo, owned by
TEAM_OWNER, have a branch namedTEAM_BRANCH?
There is no allowlist and no denylist. So:
- Anyone who can push a
cambiumbranch to any repo underTEAM_OWNERcan inject into your org-wide recall — an outside contributor with write access to one small repo, a compromised CI token, a collaborator you forgot to remove. Theirknowledge.jsonis read as authoritative team knowledge. - It takes effect within the 5-minute discovery cache TTL. No redeploy, no review, no notification.
recall()output is exactly the kind of thing an agent treats as established fact and acts on. This is an injection path into agent behaviour, not merely a data-quality problem.
Discovery remains the default because it is genuinely safe in the
single-operator case this was built for, and because changing it silently would
empty team scope on existing deployments. It is safe only if you are the only
person who can push under TEAM_OWNER.
If anyone else can push under TEAM_OWNER, use strict mode
Team scope then becomes exactly those repos. No discovery scan is performed,
and TEAM_OWNER is ignored entirely — so leaving it set in wrangler.toml
cannot silently re-widen your scope later. Adding a repo becomes a deliberate
config change.
status() reports which model is in force, in plain language, in its own
output. If you are unsure what a deployment is doing, call it.
What status() deliberately does not tell you
By default status() returns the count of team repos, not their names. In
discover mode those names are the output of a scan over everything TEAM_OWNER
owns, so they enumerate private repositories — their existence and their
names — to anyone holding the path token, who has no GitHub identity and no repo
permissions of their own. The count answers the actual diagnostic question
("is team scope finding anything?"). Set STATUS_DISCLOSE_REPOS = "true" to opt
back in. In allowlist mode names are always shown: they are your own committed
config, not a discovery result.
GH_PAT is the broadest credential in the xylem stack
Discovery requires Metadata: Read + Contents: Read across every repo under
TEAM_OWNER, including private ones. That makes this Worker's PAT
substantially more powerful than agentsync-remote's (scoped to one
coordination repo). Two consequences worth acting on:
- Prefer
allowlistmode, which lets you scope the PAT to only the listed repos instead of the whole account. - Treat a leak of
AUTH_TOKENhere as more serious than for the siblings: the Worker will read any in-scope repo on the caller's behalf.
Configure (wrangler.toml vars)
In discover mode team scope is a growing set: a newly team-promoted repo
shows up on mobile within minutes with no redeploy. One GraphQL scan per few
minutes (cached in-isolate) lists the repos; a repo without the branch is
skipped.
Deploy
Then add https://cambium-remote.<subdomain>.workers.dev/mcp/<AUTH_TOKEN> as a
custom connector in claude.ai → Settings → Connectors. The whole URL is the
credential — treat it like a password.
🔒 Auth — the connector URL is a credential
Path-token: POST /mcp/<token>, compared against the AUTH_TOKEN secret in
time independent of both content and length; anything else returns a bare
404. Same scheme, and now literally the same code
(src/shared/mcp-core.ts), as the sibling Workers.
Why the token is in the URL path, and what that costs you
This is a deliberate design choice, not an oversight. claude.ai custom
connectors do not reliably send custom headers, so an Authorization: header —
the obvious alternative — cannot be depended on. Putting the credential in the
path is what makes the connector work at all.
Be clear about the price, because it is not the same as a header:
- URLs get recorded in places request bodies never do. Browser history, shell history, proxy and CDN access logs, crash reports, bug reports, screenshots, "copy link" buttons, and agent session transcripts. During the audit that produced this section, the connector URLs for these Workers were found in ~54 occurrences across 13 local session transcripts on a single machine — none pasted deliberately; they were simply part of the tool configuration an agent echoed back.
- The Worker itself does not log it. Every log line records the route as
/mcp/***. The leak surface is everything around the Worker, which is exactly what you cannot audit. - A leak here is the worst of the three, because this Worker's
GH_PATspans every repo underTEAM_OWNER(see Trust model).
Practical guidance:
- Rotate on a schedule, not just on suspicion — assume the URL has been
recorded somewhere you don't control. Rotation is cheap: change
AUTH_TOKEN, update the connector. - Rotate immediately if you've shared a terminal recording, a transcript, a screen capture, or a bug report from a machine where the connector is configured.
- Use a long random token (32+ bytes, e.g.
openssl rand -hex 32). - Scope
GH_PATas narrowly as yourTEAM_SCOPE_MODEallows. - If you ever get the chance to use a header or OAuth instead, take it. This tradeoff is forced by the client, not preferred.
Development
CI (.github/workflows/ci.yml) runs typecheck + tests on every push and PR,
including in forks. .github/workflows/deploy.yml deploys the canonical repo on
green main only, and is guarded by if: github.repository == … so a fork
never attempts a deploy it has no secrets for.
License
MIT — see LICENSE, matching the sibling
agentsync-remote and
context-keeper-remote
Workers.
Note for the maintainer: this README previously stated PolyForm Noncommercial 1.0.0 while the repo shipped no LICENSE file at all. An MIT
LICENSEhas been added here to match both siblings. If PolyForm was the intended licence for this Worker, replaceLICENSEand this section before merging — the discrepancy was pre-existing and is flagged rather than assumed.
来源:README.md,提交 e3393bb
工具
0版本历史
1- v0.2.0最新Sep 16, 2026
评分
已满足适用检查项的 50%
该评分衡量此收录条目的完整程度,依据注册中心条目、端点与公开来源计算得出。它不是对服务器本身的评价,也不表示服务器安全或当前可用:可连通性是带日期的检查结果,评分也不包含安装量或用户评价。
- 近 30 天内可连通必需25 分
请保持端点能够响应 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探测一次。
- 已声明认证方式必需10 分
请在注册中心条目中声明凭据请求头,或保持端点能够响应探测,以便判定其认证方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
请让服务器在无凭据时响应 tools/list,或发布可在沙箱中无凭据启动的软件包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 图标10 分
- 文档15 分
- 许可证10 分

